Tag: visa petition

Categories
Updates

Revisiting the “Parole in Place” Policy for Children of WWII Veterans

Share this:

When U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officials visited the Philippine Consulate in San Francisco in July 2015 for a briefing on the Filipino World War II Veteran Policy, the issue that was of serious concern is about the eligibility of those who are in the United States in unlawful status. It was emphasized that the the FWVP parole is only for those outside the United States. Those who are in the United States must leave the country to get the parole but risk being barred for 3-10 years.

Those who are in the United States in unlawful status may still consider applying for a parole in place under the November 15, 2013 USCIS policy memorandum. However, parole in place has limited applicability.

Parole in Place

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services released a Policy Memorandum titled “Parole of Spouses, Children and Parents of Active Duty Members of the U.S.Armed Forces, the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve, and Former Members of the U.S. Armed Forces or Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve and the Effect of Parole on Inadmissibility under Immigration and Nationality Act§ 212(a)(6)(A)(i)”. Pursuant to this Memorandum the children, parents and spouses of active duty members of the US Armed Forces as well as the veterans of the US Armed Forces are entitled to a “parole” status.

Parole status means that those eligible will be considered granted temporary relief from removal and that they will be provided with employment authorization document. The new policy also shall allow immediate relative who are eligible for this parole in place status to adjust their status if they have an approved petition visa petition from their US citizen immediate relative. Parole status does not erase any period of prior unlawful presence.

Usually “parole” status is granted to those who are entering the United States but have no valid visas. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has the authority to grant parole based on humanitarian or emergency circumstances of the applicant for parole. In this new policy memorandum, the grant of parole status is extended to those who are already in the United States in unlawful status but who have entered the United States without inspection or admission. Those who have entered with a valid visa and later on had the visa expired are not eligible for the parole in place.

Considering that the “parole in place” relief has limited applicability to spouses, children and parents of members and veterans of the military service, only children of war veterans who entered without inspection are entitled to parole. Most Filipinos who enter the United States have in their possession valid nonimmigrant visas. At the time of their entry, they are inspected and admitted. Since they were inspected, even if there are those who failed to maintain lawful status, they still will not be eligible for the parole in place.

The case will be different for children of veterans who crossed the Canadian or the Mexican border. When someone crosses the border without the appropriate visa, these are considered to have entered without admission or inspection (known as “EWIs”). If such is the case, then the “parole in place” may be applied with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

Yet. those who are not eligible for parole in place may explore the option of adjustment of status under Section 245(i) since most of the veterans petition for their children were filed in before 2001.

(Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq is a partner at the Tancinco Law Offices, a Professional Law Corp. Her principal office is located at One Hallidie Plaza, Ste 818, San Francisco CA 94102 and may be reached at 1 888 930 0808 or email at law@tancinco.com or go to their website at tancinco.weareph.com/old or at www.facebook.com/tancincolaw.)

Categories
Updates

DHS Proposing new employment based immigration regulations

Share this:

The Department of Homeland Security [DHS] is offering rule that would modernize and improve certain aspects of employment based immigration visa programs. People with temporary work visas waiting for a green card are the one who is going to get more benefits because of these projected changes. The DHS says that the projected changes are ‘envisioned to better expedite US employers to recruit and maintain extremely accompanied workers who have profited from employment-based immigration visa petitions, while growing the skill of such workers to progress their careers by accepting raises, changing positions with present employers, changing employers, and trailing other employment opportunities.

Many of the projected changes will actually have no practical effect of any kind, according to the National Law Review – an online news source published by a group of in-house attorneys. The National Law Review states that even the most noteworthy change of them all, relating to work authorization for certain individuals with approved I-140s, will have very little effect basically.

Highlights:

 

  1. The extension of an H-1B visa can be obtained beyond the maximum six-year stay.
  2. When an H-1B non-immigrant can shift jobs or employers without it affecting his or her permitted immigrant visa petition.
  3. How to calculate H-1B recapture time [days outside the US that do not count towards the maximum six-year stay].
  4. Those businesses that qualify as H-1B ‘cap-exempt’ employers. This is important as in recent years the H-1B visa quota is immensely oversubscribed within a few days of the quota becoming available at the opening of April each year.
  5. Offering a one-time 60-day grace period, during an authorized validity period, for individuals in E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, L-1, or TN status, where employment ends due to voluntary or involuntary termination or lay off. These individuals are not authorized to work during the grace period.
  6. An addition of the 10-day grace period allowed prior to and after H-1B status to also include persons in E-1, E-2, E-3 or L-1 status. During the 10-day grace period, you will not be permitted to work. On a one time basis, you also benefit from 60 day grace period, if you are on this employment related visas.
  7. Permitting issuance of one-year Employment Authorization Documents (EAD) for individuals in E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1 or O-1 status with an approved I-140 and no available visa numbers if the individual can show compelling circumstances. It is not certain what is meant by convincing circumstances; DHS includes examples, such as serious ailment and disabilities. If you work with an EAD in these circumstances then it will be considered to be the case that you are no longer on a non-immigrant work visa and when visa numbers are available will need to apply for an immigrant visa from outside the US. If you have an EAD your spouse and children may also be able to apply for an EAD. Renewals are allowed in certain circumstances.
  8. Removing the 90-day processing time required by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for Employment Authorization Documents (EADs), spontaneously extending most EADs 180 days beyond the expiration if the extension was timely filed.

It is worthwhile to note that the DHS proposal does include other regulatory amendments. However, these additional changes largely conform to current policy guidance, and so the primary purpose of the regulations in these additional areas is to formalize the existing guidance.