Tag: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Categories
Updates

DACA Dreamers win support from US solons, mayors

Share this:

SAN FRANCISCO — More than 750,000 DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) applicants have acquired approved employment authorization documents and are temporarily protected from removal.

But as of June 30, 2016, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services reports that 7,941 approved DACA applications are from Filipino nationals who are now at risk of being deported if the Trump administration takes immediate action to revoke the DACA program.

“Jose” entered the United States when he was five years old. He does not remember the details of his family’s entry to the United States. He was not even aware that he was unlawfully in the U.S. until he applied for his driver’s license when he was 16 years old. He is now 25 years old and availed of the DACA program. When he applied for a job as a computer engineer in Silicon Valley, he was hired right away and has now been working for three years.

Realizing that President-elect Trump may take action on DACA after inauguration, he asked me about the risk of losing his employment authorization document and his state identification card. He was very emotional as he expressed his fear: “I do not want to be back to a situation where I have no legal document at all. Please tell me that they are not taking away my employment permit and IDs.”

At the present time, there is no definite response to Jose’s question. Although President-elect Trump seems to have softened his stance on young undocumented immigrants in one of his public interviews, there are no indications that he will continue the DACA program of his predecessor.

On the other hand, the DACA population’s supporters are increasing nationwide. Before the end of the Congressional sessions this month, a bipartisan bill called “Bar Removal of Immigrants who Dream and Grow the Economy” or BRIDGE Act was introduced by Senators Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and Dick Durbin (D-Illinois).

This bill would allow eligible individuals the chance to apply for “provisional protected present,” which is a temporary protection from deportation similar to that provided by DACA. As part of the temporary protection, employment authorization will be issued to the applicants. The policy behind BRIDGE Act is to protect the investment that American communities have made in educating these young undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States at a young age and who are currently eligible for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).

Aside from proposed bipartisan BRIDGE Act, 14 mayors joined Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel last week in a letter to President-elect Trump seeking support for the DACA program. Included as signatories to the letter are mayors of cities who believe that DACA helps foster economic growth and enhances public safety and national security.

According to the Emanuel letter, “ Eighty seven percent of DACA recipients are employed with American businesses. Six percent of DACA recipients started their own businesses, higher than the American public (3.1 percent). All of these things translate into higher wages and better economic outcomes.”

Jose is one of the 87 percent of DACA recipients working for a U.S. enterprise and contributing to the US economy. Unfortunately, his fear of reverting back to his former status as an individual in unlawful presence without a valid identification is real; and, until there is certainty on the future of the DACA program, this population remains in limbo.

With a lot of support for the DACA population, the hope is that the incoming Trump administration would reconsider its anti-immigrant rhetoric during his run to the election and that the US Congress would immediately pass the BRIDGE Act.

(Atty. Lourdes S. Tancinco is a partner at Tancinco Law Offices, a San Francisco based law firm and may be reached at law@tancinco.com, facebook.com/tancincolaw, tancinco.weareph.com/old or 1 888 930 0808.)

Categories
Updates

USCIS Announces Final Rule Adjusting Immigration Benefit Application and Petition Fees

Share this:

WASHINGTON – U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services today announced a final rule published in the Federal Register today adjusting the fees required for most immigration applications and petitions. The new fees will be effective Dec. 23.

USCIS is almost entirely funded by the fees paid by applicants and petitioners for immigration benefits. The law requires USCIS to conduct fee reviews every two years to determine the funding levels necessary to administer the nation’s immigration laws, process benefit requests and provide the infrastructure needed to support those activities.

Fees will increase for the first time in six years, by a weighted average of 21 percent for most applications and petitions. This increase is necessary to recover the full cost of services provided by USCIS. These include the costs associated with fraud detection and national security, customer service and case processing, and providing services without charge to refugee and asylum applicants and to other customers eligible for fee waivers or exemptions.

The final rule contains a table summarizing current and new fees. The new fees will also be listed on the Our Fees page on our website. Form G-1055 will not reflect the new fees until the effective date. Applications and petitions postmarked or filed on or after Dec. 23 must include the new fees or USCIS will not be able to accept them.

“This is our first fee increase since November 2010, and we sincerely appreciate the valuable public input we received as we prepared this final rule,” said USCIS Director León Rodríguez. “We are mindful of the effect fee increases have on many of the customers we serve. That’s why we decided against raising fees as recommended after the fiscal year 2012 and 2014 fee reviews. However, as an agency dependent upon users’ fees to operate, these changes are now necessary to ensure we can continue to serve our customers effectively. We will also offer a reduced filing fee for certain naturalization applicants with limited means.”

Read more about the new fee schedule on the Our Fees page. Highlights follow:

  • A modest fee increase of $45, or 8 percent, from $595 to $640 for Form N-400, Application for Naturalization.
    • USCIS will offer a reduced filing fee of $320 for naturalization applicants with family incomes greater than 150 percent and not more than 200 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines. For 2016, this means, for example, that a household of four with an income between $36,000 and $48,600 per year could pay the reduced fee. Those eligible may apply for this option using the new Form I-942, Request for Reduced Fee.
  • The fee for Form N-600, Application for Certificate of Citizenship, and N-600K, Application for Citizenship and Issuance of Certificate Under Section 322, will increase from $550 or 600 to $1,170.
  • A new fee of $3,035 is required for Form I-924A, Annual Certification of Regional Center.
    In preparing the final rule, USCIS considered all 436 comments received during the 60-day public comment period for the proposed rule published May 4.
Categories
Updates

USCIS proposes parole status for foreign entrepreneurs

Share this:

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released a proposed rule that will allow the individuals referred to as “international entrepreneurs” to enter the United States temporarily on parole.  The parole status is similar to the status given to children of Filipino war veterans in a recent policy implemented a couple of months ago but in a different context. This recent international entrepreneur rule is considered to be a significant public benefit parole program to promote entrepreneurship and job creation.

There is a gap in the current immigration law  that will permit start up entrepreneurs  who receive significant capital investment from U.S. investors to stay and operate their businesses in the United States. Foreign students who are potential entrepreneurs and founders of start-ups have limited ways  to stay on a temporary visa after they graduate. Young immigrants who are researchers, innovators specifically in new technologies are not afforded sufficient avenues to develop their own start up businesses within the United States. The proposed  policy allows USCIS to use its discretionary parole authority to fill this gap and grant parole to founders of start-up entities whose entry would provide “significant public benefit” and whose start-ups have potential to facilitate research and development , create jobs for U.S. workers or otherwise benefit the U.S. economy through increased business activity, innovation and dynamism.

The proposed rule will grant parole status to an applicant who is an “entrepreneur”  of a start-up who has an active role in the operations and growth of the business. This entrepreneur must have recently formed a new start-up entity within three years before the date of filing the initial parole application.

Unlike an investors visa where the entrepreneur must show infusion of capital to the business that is formed from his own resources, an international entrepreneur seeking parole must show that the start-up business has potential for a “rapid growth and job creation.”

There are 3 alternative ways to prove this: first, that the business has significant U.S. capital investment of $345,000 or from established U.S. investors such as venture capital firms, angel investors and the like who have a history of substantial investment in successful start-up entities; second, the business received government funding of grants totaling $100,000 or more; and, third, any reliable and compelling evidence that will prove significant public benefit to the United States.

It is expected that this proposed rule will be implemented before end of this year; and, as soon as the rules are final, the USCIS will start accepting applications on new USCIS Form 941. The filing fee for this application is $1200. Once the application is approved, the entrepreneur, his/her spouse and minor children will be paroled into the United States and will receive employment authorization documents. Parole will be granted for up to 2 years and may be renewed for up to 3 years.

Recently it is noticeable that the current administration has been releasing new immigration policies. Even with a few months left before President Obama leaves office, he has somehow made good his promise to use his Executive power to fill in the gaps that have been left open by the failure of a divided Congress to pass any form of immigration legislation that is responsive to the competitive new global economy.

(For inquiries, you may reach Atty. Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq., at 1 888 930 0808 or email law@tancinco.com. This article also appears in the Philippine Daily Inquirer.)

Categories
Updates

Revisiting the “Parole in Place” Policy for Children of WWII Veterans

Share this:

When U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officials visited the Philippine Consulate in San Francisco in July 2015 for a briefing on the Filipino World War II Veteran Policy, the issue that was of serious concern is about the eligibility of those who are in the United States in unlawful status. It was emphasized that the the FWVP parole is only for those outside the United States. Those who are in the United States must leave the country to get the parole but risk being barred for 3-10 years.

Those who are in the United States in unlawful status may still consider applying for a parole in place under the November 15, 2013 USCIS policy memorandum. However, parole in place has limited applicability.

Parole in Place

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services released a Policy Memorandum titled “Parole of Spouses, Children and Parents of Active Duty Members of the U.S.Armed Forces, the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve, and Former Members of the U.S. Armed Forces or Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve and the Effect of Parole on Inadmissibility under Immigration and Nationality Act§ 212(a)(6)(A)(i)”. Pursuant to this Memorandum the children, parents and spouses of active duty members of the US Armed Forces as well as the veterans of the US Armed Forces are entitled to a “parole” status.

Parole status means that those eligible will be considered granted temporary relief from removal and that they will be provided with employment authorization document. The new policy also shall allow immediate relative who are eligible for this parole in place status to adjust their status if they have an approved petition visa petition from their US citizen immediate relative. Parole status does not erase any period of prior unlawful presence.

Usually “parole” status is granted to those who are entering the United States but have no valid visas. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has the authority to grant parole based on humanitarian or emergency circumstances of the applicant for parole. In this new policy memorandum, the grant of parole status is extended to those who are already in the United States in unlawful status but who have entered the United States without inspection or admission. Those who have entered with a valid visa and later on had the visa expired are not eligible for the parole in place.

Considering that the “parole in place” relief has limited applicability to spouses, children and parents of members and veterans of the military service, only children of war veterans who entered without inspection are entitled to parole. Most Filipinos who enter the United States have in their possession valid nonimmigrant visas. At the time of their entry, they are inspected and admitted. Since they were inspected, even if there are those who failed to maintain lawful status, they still will not be eligible for the parole in place.

The case will be different for children of veterans who crossed the Canadian or the Mexican border. When someone crosses the border without the appropriate visa, these are considered to have entered without admission or inspection (known as “EWIs”). If such is the case, then the “parole in place” may be applied with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

Yet. those who are not eligible for parole in place may explore the option of adjustment of status under Section 245(i) since most of the veterans petition for their children were filed in before 2001.

(Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq is a partner at the Tancinco Law Offices, a Professional Law Corp. Her principal office is located at One Hallidie Plaza, Ste 818, San Francisco CA 94102 and may be reached at 1 888 930 0808 or email at law@tancinco.com or go to their website at tancinco.weareph.com/old or at www.facebook.com/tancincolaw.)

Categories
Updates

Provisional Waiver New Rules to Benefit More Unauthorized Immigrants

Share this:

A significant number of unauthorized immigrants who have been petitioned by U.S. citizen or residents’ relatives or employers still find themselves, after many years, still without legal status. Those who are not eligible, among others, include those who entered without inspection, fiancé visa holders with new partners, as well as those who entered with crewman visas. Generally, for those petitioned in family and employment-based preference categories they may adjust status only if they are in lawful status.

In 2013, the provisional waiver rules was released by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) giving immediate relatives of U.S. citizens who are ineligible to adjust an opportunity to obtain a provisional waiver, leave the U.S. and get their immigrant visa at a U.S. Embassy or consulate abroad. Upon their return, they are considered legal residents after having cured their only ground of inadmissibility which is “unlawful presence” through approval of their provisional waiver. Unfortunately, this 2013 provisional waiver is very limited.

On July 29, 2016 USCIS announced that it is expanding the provisional waiver program. There are five changes to the provisional waiver rules.

First, more unauthorized immigrants may now apply for the provisional waiver and will have the opportunity to legalize their stay in the United States. In 2013, only those with immediate relative petitions were eligible for provisional waiver. Now, in 2016, individuals petitioned in any of the family or employment based preference categories may now apply for provisional waiver. The priority dates of these visa petitions must be current which means that there is an available visa and that the beneficiary does not have any other ground of inadmissibility other than being “out of status”. The Second change in the rule is consideration of additional relatives who may be qualifying relatives. For purposes of the extreme hardship requirement to qualifying relatives, the new rule now permits LPRs or green card holder parents and spouses to be considered for purposes of showing extreme hardship.

Thirdly, besides expanding the scope of petitions covered by the provisional waiver, the new rules also allow those in removal proceedings or those with removal orders to apply for provisional waiver.

Fourth, the new rules now clearly states that USCIS may no longer use the “reason to believe” that there are other grounds of inadmissibility to deny the provisional waiver. In the 2013 rules, despite an apparent eligibility for provisional waiver USCIS nevertheless denied waiver applications based on “reason to believe”. This is now eliminated in the 2016 rules.

Lastly, the Department of State “interview schedule” bar has been eliminated. USCIS may now allow applicants to apply for provisional waiver despite having been scheduled for a visa interview prior to 2013. In eliminating this bar, there will be more applicants who may qualify for the provisional waiver.

Those who may eligible may now prepare to file their applications for provisional waivers in time for the effectivity date of the new rule which is August 29, 2016.

(Atty. Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq. is an immigration attorney with the Tancinco Law Offices, a San Francisco CA based law firm. She may be reached at 1 888 930 0808, law@tancinco.com, facebook.com/tancincolaw, or through tancinco.weareph.com/old)

Categories
Updates

USCIS officials, Fil-Am leaders explain Filvets parole program

Share this:

SAN FRANCISCO — Just as the euphoria over the recently implemented Filipino World War II Veterans Parole (FWVP) program is beginning to rise, a very timely warning was aired by the panelists at a “Talakayan” hosted by the Philippine American Press Club (PAPC) and the Philippine Consulate General in San Francisco: Scammers are lurking in the shadows, waiting for victims.

The complexities that may await veterans of advanced age, who may not have heard of the news about the program could provide scam artists opportunities to strike.

No less than the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) San Francisco District Director John Kramar delivered the alert, especially to the elderly whose first language is not English.

“So we have a double vulnerable population here. It is very important for all of us, the civil servants, those working for the community, it is also the responsibilities of the media, to put the word out to be very careful about who you go to,” cautioned Kramar.

“USCIS.gov is the website for U.S. citizenship immigration service. No other site is the official site showing what the forms are, what the fees are, what the process is. Just make sure that you look at the correct USCIS website and nothing else,” he added.

Kramer also explained that there are licensed attorneys with the U.S. Bar Associations and accredited representatives of the Department of Justice that can be relied on.

“That list is available is available in our website and through the Department of Justice website for everyone to check. There are well-meaning advocates in the community. Go to the right persons and if you are not certain, check it out,” Kramer advised.

Accurate information available

Veterans Equity Center Board President and immigration lawyer Atty. Lou Tancinco stated that accurate information must be disseminated by reputable organizations, encouraging them to rely only on USCIS published information.

“Opportunism arises when unscrupulous individuals demand money from family members who are not even qualified for the FWVP,” Tancinco warned.

“When someone promises to deliver a service that seems to be too good to be true, that is a red flag and the veterans’ family should be wary of the existence of these scammers,” Tancinco further cautioned. “Hence, as attorneys we need to be working together with the USCIS and the Philippine Consulate to outreach to the stakeholders.”

Talakayan venue host Consul General Henry Bensurto Jr. admitted that not too many people are well informed yet on the FWVP even if the information had been available for more than a month.

“Please read the regulations, talk and consult with the right people who know the regulations well. We want you to get the right information by consulting the right people,” exhorted Bensurto who also plans to use the consulate website.

The FWVP program was borne out of an initial policy announced in July 2015 by the Obama administration. The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) worked on the policy which is now in effect.

Kramar hailed it as a measure that honors the thousands of Filipinos who bravely enlisted to fight for the United States during World War II. “It is extremely important for the USCIS service and to me as director of the San Francisco district to be here to recognize the extraordinary contributions and the sacrifices of Filipino veterans who fought for the United States during World War II. So it is my pleasure and an honor to be here and talk about this program.”

He added: “This policy will allow certain Filipino American family members that have been waiting so long for American visas to come to the U.S. to be with their loved ones. For many it will also allow them to lend support, care and companionship to their elders in honor of all their services, including the survivors’ spouses.”

‘75 years in the making’

In an exclusive interview during the Kalayaan 2016 in Union Square in San Francisco, Maj. Gen. Taguba (Ret.), an veterans’ advocate seeking the Congressional Gold Medal for the veterans, strongly believes that the parole program had been 75 years in the making.

“People had to wait for 75 years for that parole program, the first 50 years for U.S. citizenship of the veterans themselves and another 25 years for the children to be able to apply. The children have become adults and the 75 years have become more than a lifetime. And those veterans are in poor health, some of them need medical care and given care of by their children,” Taguba rued, citing veteran Art Caleda in Hawaii who is 96 years old and will finally get his wish that two of his sons can come to Hawaii to live with him.

Veterans Equity Center (VEC) Executive Director Luisa Antonio, reported that about 30,000 World War II Filipino veterans came to the U.S. after the 1990 Immigration and Nationality Act. “In the Bay Area there are now fewer than a thousand veterans who have lived on supplemental security income. A lot of them do not have family members to take care of them. And this makes the parole program more important.”

The federal register presently estimates that between of 2,000 to 6,000 Fil-Am veterans are U.S. citizens in the U.S.

Concerns over reentry

Kramar and Tancinco also expressed concern for family members from the U.S. who may have problems on reentry should they be required to apply for the benefit outside of the U.S. because they had overstayed in the U.S.

“Parole is not a visa but a window of relief for those who cannot in any way come here immediately in a legal way. It is a travel document, a temporary permission to come here and not a substitute for an immigrant visa or a non-immigrant visa. The short five-year parole program is not an immigrant visa and is good only for three years,” Tancinco stressed.

Tancinco also strongly bats for extension of the program beyond five years because some visa petitions may not yet be current in five years and the family members may need to be in the US on parole to wait longer.

Also, Tancinco stated that the biggest challenge is a change in administration in the U.S. since the program is only a policy and not a piece of legislation. It would be good to have a new president who is an ally of the previous administration since there would be a bigger chance the policy would continue.

Here is a presentation prepared Atty Lou Tancinco on the Filipino World War II Veterans Parole Program (FWVP).

Filipino World War II Veterans Parole Program (FWVP) from tancincolaw
Categories
Updates

USCIS, magsasakatuparan ng Programang Parole para sa mga Beteranong Pilipino ng Ikalawang Digmaang Pandaigdig

Share this:

WASHINGTON — Simula Hunyo 8, 2016, ang U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) ay papayagan ang ilang benepisyaryo ng aprobadong family-based immigrant visa petitions na magkaroon ng pagkakataong mapagkalooban ng parole base sa kani-kanilang kaso upang sa gayon ay makarating sa Amerika habang hinihintay ang kanilang immigrant visa na magagamit sa tamang panahon.

Ang mga detalyeng patakaran sa nasabing parole ay matatagpuan sa ulat ng White House, na nailathala nuong Hulyo 2015. Mayroong tinatayang bilang na 2,000 hanggang 6,000 na beteranong Filipino-American na nakipaglaban sa Ikalawang Digmaang Pandaigdig ang kasalukuyang naninirahan sa Amerika ngayon. Bukod pa sa mga ilang bagay, ang patakarang ito ay maaari din magbigay sa karapat-dapat na indibidwal na sumuporta at kumalinga sa mga nakatatandang beteranong U.S. citizens o permanenteng residente na miyembro ng kanilang pamilya.

“Ang Programang Parole para sa mga Beteranong Pilipino ng Ikalawang Digmaang Pandaigdig ay nagbigay dangal sa mga libo-libong Pilipino na buong loob at tapang na nakipaglaban para sa bansang Amerika sa panahon ng ikalawang digmaang pandaigdig,” ayon kay USCIS Direktor Leon Rodriguez. “Bilang pagkilala sa mga kontribusyon at sakripisyong ginawa ng mga kinikilalang beterano, ang patakarang ito ay nagbibigay daan sa mga miyembro ng pamilya ng naturang Filipino-American na naghihintay sa kanilang immigrant visa upang makapunta sa Amerika at muling makapiling ang bawat isa. Sa mga nakararami, ito ay magbibigay daan rin upang makapagbigay ng suporta at pangangalaga sa mga nakatatandang beterano o nang kanilang nabubuhay na asawa.

Maliban sa mga immediate relatives ng mga U.S. citizens, ang numero ng ibang family-based immigrant visa na magagamit ayon sa bansang pinagmulan sa anumang naibigay na taon ay limitado ayon sa batas. Ang mga resulta ng limitasyong ito ay magbibigay ng mahabang panahong paghihintay sa mga miyembro ng pamilya na makapiling ang mga nagpitisyong U.S. citizens o permanenteng residenteng kapamilya na nasa Amerika at upang maging ganap na permanenteng residente rin sila. Sa mga Filipino-American, ang paghahantay ay maaaring umabot hanggang sa 20 taon.

Sa ilalim ng patakaran, ang ilang miyembro ng pamilya ng beteranong Pilipino ng Ikalawang Digmaang Pandaigdig ay maaaring mapagkalooban ng parole upang makapunta sa Amerika bago maging available o magamit ang kanilang visa.Sa mga limitadong kaso, ang mga kuwalipikadong kamag-anak ay maaring makahanap ng parole para sa kanilang mga sarili kapag ang kanilang kamag-anak na beteranong Pilipino ng Ikalawang Digmaang Pandaigdig at ang kanyang asawa ay pareho nang namatay.

Sa ilalim ng Programang Parole sa mga Beteranong Pilipino ng Ikalawang Digmaang Pandaigdig, ang USCIS ay susuriin ang bawat kaso upang malaman kung ang pagpapahintulot ng parole ay sadyang angkop.Ang bawat indibidwal na dumating sa U.S. Port of Entry ay susuriin ng U.S. Custom and Border Protection para malaman kung pwedeng mabigyan ng parole ang nasabing indibidwal.

Ang legal na kapangyarihan sa patakaran ng parole ay nanggaling sa Immigration and Nationality Act, na nagpapahintulot sa Sekretarya ng Homeland Security na bigyan ng parole sa Amerika ang mga kwalipikadong indibidwal base sa kani-kanilang kaso, para sa madaliang makataong dahilan, o kaya naman ay sa makabuluhang pampublikong benepisyo.

Ang karagdagang inpormasyon tungkol sa Programang Parole sa mga Beteranong Pilipino ng Ikalawang Digmaang Pandaigdig at ang mga pamamatnubay para sa mga naayong gawin, proseso ng aplikasyon at kung saan maaring isumite ang aplikasyon ay matatagpuan sa binagong Form I-131 instructions at ng Federal Register notice na nailathala kahapon. Hindi po kami tatanggap ng aplikasyon sa ilalim ng patakaran bago mag Hunyo 8, 2016. Ang USCIS ay matinding hinihikayat ang mga kwalipikado at interesadong indibidwal sa paghiling ng parole sa ilalim ng FWVP Program na isakatuparan sa loob ng 5 taon mula Hunyo 8, 2016.

Categories
Updates

USCIS to Implement Filipino World War II Veterans Parole Program

Share this:

WASHINGTON—Beginning June 8, 2016, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services will allow certain Filipino World War II veteran family members who are beneficiaries of approved family-based immigrant visa petitions an opportunity to receive a discretionary grant of parole on a case-by-case basis, so that they may come to the United States as they wait for their immigrant visa to become available.

This parole policy was announced in the White House report, Modernizing and Streamlining Our Legal Immigration System for the 21st Century, issued in July 2015. An estimated 2,000 to 6,000 Filipino-American World War II veterans are living in the United States today. Among other things, this policy will enable many eligible individuals to provide support and care to their aging veteran family members who are U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents.

“The Filipino World War II Veterans Parole Program honors the thousands of Filipinos who bravely enlisted to fight for the United States during World War II,” USCIS Director León Rodríguez said. “This policy will allow certain Filipino-American family members awaiting immigrant-visa issuance to come to the United States and be with their loved ones. For many, it will also allow them to provide support and care for elderly veterans or their surviving spouses.”

With the exception of immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, the number of family-sponsored immigrant visas available by country of origin in any given year is limited by statute. These limits result in long waiting periods before family members may join petitioning U.S. citizens or permanent residents in the United States and become permanent residents themselves. For some Filipino-American families, this wait can exceed 20 years.

Under the policy, certain family members of Filipino World War II veterans may be eligible to receive a discretionary grant of parole to come to the United States before their visa becomes available. In limited cases, certain eligible relatives will be able to seek parole on their own behalf when their Filipino World War II veteran and his or her spouse are both deceased.

Under the Filipino World War II Veterans Parole Program, USCIS will review each case individually to determine whether authorizing parole is appropriate. When each individual arrives at a U.S. port of entry, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will also review each case to determine whether to parole the individual.

Legal authority for this parole policy comes from the Immigration and Nationality Act, which authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security to parole into the United States certain individuals, on a case-by-case basis, for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.

Additional information about the Filipino World War II Veterans Parole Program—including guidance on eligibility, the application process and where to file—is available in the revised Form I-131 instructions and the Federal Register notice published today. We will not accept applications under this policy until June 8, 2016. USCIS strongly encourages eligible individuals interested in requesting parole under the FWVP Program do so within 5 years from June 8, 2016.

Categories
Global Pinoy

Challenges in applying for Filvets US parole visa

Share this:

Henry was petitioned by his father who was a Filipino World War II veteran. Sometime in 2000, his father suffered a heart attack in the U.S., and Henry traveled on a visitor visa to take care of him. He extended his stay as a visitor for another six months until his father passed away.

Henry stayed beyond his authorized stay in the U.S. and incurred unlawful presence. He heard about the parole program for children of Filipino World War II veterans and is excited to apply for parole. Will Henry be eligible to apply for parole?

Henry meets most of the requirements of the Filipino World War II Veterans Parole Policy or FWVP as released by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services on May 9, 2016. Henry is already in the United States; will he still be allowed to apply for the parole and eventually be eligible for employment authorization?

Those presently in the U.S. must depart and process for the parole abroad (U.S. Embassy in Manila). But if Henry departs from the United States, he will face the 3 to 10-year bar to inadmissibility.

This means that since he has been out of status for more than one year, he will not be able to return to the U.S. for 10 years, defeating the purpose of the parole. Henry may just want to take at the legal option of a humanitarian reinstatement of the revoked petition and subsequently apply for adjustment of status.

There are several benefits of FWVP as thousands of family members may take advantage of this program in the next five years. But there are also anticipated challenges. One is the requirement that veterans or their surviving spouse must be the petitioners for parole if they are still alive. With their advanced age and declining health, they will need assistance to locating and putting together the supporting documents needed to file parole for their children.

Another major challenge is a situation where both parents are deceased and the children are allowed to self-petition for parole. In this case, they have to request for the humanitarian reinstatement of the petition before they may be granted the parole. This request for humanitarian reinstatement is very discretionary and usually the standards are very high unless special consideration are given to children of Filipino veterans.

As mentioned by the USCIS in its May 9, 2016 announcement of this parole program, the FWVP is a discretionary determination that will be made on a case by case basis. While it is understandably a discretionary matter, in delineating the parameters and in the implementation of this parole program USCIS should be liberal in the exercise of their discretion. They should take into account not just the policy behind the parole program, but also its humanitarian nature, recognizing the extraordinary contributions and sacrifices of these Filipino veterans during World War II.

(Atty. Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq. is an immigration attorney with the Tancinco Law Offices, a San Francisco CA based law firm. She may be reached at 1 888 930 0808, law@tancinco.com , facebook.com/tancincolaw, or through her website tancinco.weareph.com/old)