Categories
Updates

The Latest Court Ruling on DACA: The Good and the Bad

Share this:

There’s good news and bad news about the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

The United States 5th Circuit Court affirmed the 2021 ruling of a Texas judge that DACA was illegal. 

But here’s the catch – it did not order the government to stop it.

It still ordered the government to stop approving the first-time DACA applicants but it did not order for the end of the program.

How did this happen? The Circuit Court ruled that the Texas judged who decided DACA to be illegal, Judge Andrew Hanen, should review the legality of regulations that the Biden administration set.

These regulations refer to the Biden administration’s effort to codify DACA through legislative regulation instead of law, which leaders have so far failed to do.

These regulations are scheduled to take effect on October 31, and were crafted after DACA was still in limbo – the period of time after the government appealed the decision of the Texas judge declaring DACA illegal.

Essentially, the Circuit Court wants Hanen to reevaluate the decision based on the new factor at play – the new rules set by the Biden administration.

We earlier wrote about this in this newsletter and as we expected, it did have an effect on the future of DACA even if it was not as potent as a Congress-passed law.

This means DACA recipients will continue to be protected from deportation and will still keep their jobs. 

On the flip side, DACA recipients still have no pathway to citizenship.

To protect the future of Dreamers, American leaders still need to pass a law to give them pathways to citizenship. Until then, they Dreamers can only continue to dream of a way forward.

To make sense of DACA and how to navigate this limbo, consult your trusted immigration lawyer.

Categories
Updates

What the Biden admin has prepared and is doing for Dreamers

Share this:

With the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program still in limbo, the Biden administration has been on the move to prepare for the worst.

By worst, it means the halting of DACA. 

So far it has been declared illegal by at least two courts, but it will be reevaluated by a Texas judge to take into account the Biden administration’s new rules codifying the program.

Now what will happen if it still gets struck down all the way to the Supreme Court? Here’s the Biden government’s plan.

A big order is that if DACA recipients are to be deported, they will be deprioritized, especially if they are not deemed as threats to public safety and national security.

The problem with this order is that if Biden is replaced, he a new president can just simply undo this policy and reprioritize deporting DACA recipients who no longer have protection from deportation.

More upfront, the Biden administration has been urging lawmakers to pass a law that will provide DACA recipients a path to citizenship. As these recipients are called Dreamers, Congress has been called to pass a DREAM Act.

The problem with passing laws, however, is that it needs a broad enough support for it to materialize – which it currently does not have.

This has forced lawmakers to be creative with their proposals for Dreamers.

For example, Representative Ruben Gallego from Arizona has introduced a bill that would allow for Dreamers to gain citizenship through military service. This is widely seen to not pass.

With Dreamers continuously in limbo, the power still rests in the courts whether DACA will continue. This is unless the Biden administration takes more active measures to protect Dreamers.

Unsure about how this affects you or a Dreamer you know? Consult your trusted immigration lawyer.

Categories
Updates

The new DACA regulation and what it means for Dreamers

Share this:

In August, the Biden administration released the new regulation concerning the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.

What does this mean for Dreamers?

The good news: Before the regulation, DACA’s only basis was executive action. With the regulation, it is further formalized with guidelines, making it also stronger to legal scrutiny.

Some of the notable clarifications that the guideline gives is that immigration offenses such as juvenile delinquency, felonies, and misdemeanors, do not make someone automatically barred from the program.

It also clarifies that Dreamers can only be barred from working if their DACA status has been terminated and not when their deportation trial starts.

Currently there are over 600,000 immigrants who are enrolled in the DACA program.

The bad news: The regulation does not go far enough to give a pathway for Dreamers for citizenship. It also only deals with DACA renewals and does not provide for new DACA applications, which has been on hold for years.

The new rules are set to take effect on October 31, 2022.

To recall, DACA is currently under deliberation in a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, where advocates believe the program will be ruled as illegal.

With the codifying of DACA, the Biden administration can further argue for its legality. Even if the administration loses in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, it can continue arguing before the Supreme Court, where it will most likely appeal to if it loses in the lower court.

Still, the best way United States leaders can continue DACA is through legislation: A law needs to be passed and signed by the president that will give a pathway to citizenship for Dreamers and to also allow more applications to come in.

For more information on DACA, consult with your trusted lawyer.

Categories
Updates

The court ruling that could end DACA

Share this:

The Biden administration released a final version of a rule to strengthen the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) to protect Dreamers, but the program is still endangered as a court reviews whether to strike the program down.

The legality of DACA is currently being reviewed by a three-judge panel from the Fifth Circuit Court. They heard arguments in July 2022, but are currently deliberating on its ruling.

Many believe the court will take down the program, which means the loss of opportunity for tens of thousands of aspiring Dreamers – the loss of work, education, and the chance to stay in the United States.

According to advocates, around 22,000 jobs will be lost per month with the termination of DACA. 

To protect Dreamers, Congress needs to pass legislation to create a way for them to get citizenship. 

If the DACA does get terminated through the Fifth Circuit Court’s ruling, however, it does not mean that it is the end for Dreamers.

The government can still appeal to the Supreme Court, where the legal battle can continue for longer, meanwhile leaving Dreamers longer in limbo about their status. 

Unsure about how this will affect you? Consult your trusted lawyer.

Categories
Updates

Public charge immigrant? Biden admin rolls back Trump-era rule

Share this:

The Biden administration is moving towards loosening requirements for permanent residency which took effect under former president Donald Trump.

A new Department of Homeland Security regulation will make it easier for some immigrants to evade being disqualified from obtaining residency through the “public charge” principle.

Immigrants are labeled “public charge” if they are seen to be more of an economic burden than a contributor to the United States. 

Under president Trump, the government expanded the definition of benefits so that these could be used against immigrants seeking permanent residency.

With the new regulation – which is coming this December 23, 2022 – the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will only consider immigrants as “public charge” if “they are likely at any time to become primarily dependent on the government for subsistence.”

While it is months away, the Biden administration has stopped enforcing the public charge rules since the beginning of its term. With the upcoming regulation, the fear of many immigrants who could be labeled as public charge will be abated.

On one hand, the Trump administration then argued that their policy would push immigrants to work harder, but advocates have condemned the policy as too harsh for the vulnerable immigrant population.

There are hundreds of thousands of immigrants who seek green cards per year in the United States. There are also those who get residency through being refugees or getting asylum, which are categories where public charge rules do not apply.

For more information about the new regulation, consult with your trusted lawyer.

Categories
Updates

10 years since DACA: Is there hope for Dreamers?

Share this:

It has been 10 years since President Barack Obama enacted DACA or the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals through an executive order.

The policy survived a Republican Administration and has been defended by the Supreme Court.

But in July 2021, a Texas court ruled the policy to be illegal. It is now under appeal while the government has been instructed to stop granting initial requests for DACA.

DACA was originally intended to only be a “stopgap measure”, but 10 years on, DACA is still not backed by any law that would allow its recipients – the Dreamers – for a path to citizenship, leaving hundreds of thousands of immigrants in limbo.

Without DACA, immigrant children who entered the United States who are now adults find it almost impossible to find work and education opportunities. They also face the threat of deportation.

President Biden should fully reinstate the DACA program and make it fairer and more accessible by modifying criteria based on age, residency, education, and past criminal activity.

What happened to legislation?

Different variations of a DREAM act have been introduced at the House and the Senate, but none have ever reached the President’s table.

Based on a 2020 Pew Research Center survey, 74% of U.S. adults say they favor a pathway to citizenship for young people brought to the U.S. illegally as children. The vast majority, 91%, of Democrats or those who are Democratic-leaning, support permanent residency for Dreamers, while 54% of Republicans or those who are Republican-leaning say the same.

But translating public support to legislation has been tricky.

President Biden himself pushed for the US Citizenship Act, which promised a path to citizenship for 11 million undocumented immigrants and their families. However, it remains stuck in Congress, and analysts say it only has a slim chance of passage unless Biden offers a compromise.

President Biden’s deadline could well be the 2024 midterm elections, which has so far been predicted to deliver an upset to his party, further trimming down the chances for his immigration policy.

What now for DREAMERS?

For young immigrant Filipino Dreamers, there is always hope that this DACA program would become legislation and would provide a pathway to citizenship. So in the meantime, for those who were able to apply prior to the District Court injunction, you can continue to renew your employment authorization documents and work legally. For students, continue to pursue your studies to completion as the government will always prioritize highly skilled or professional workers for immigrant resident visas. There are States that do not ask about legal status for students to attend post secondary education, so it is advisable to pursue their studies if they can and explore opportunities when the right time comes.

Unfortunately, those who are no longer allowed to apply for DACA because of its limited eligibility, let us continue to lobby and advocate for the passage of legislation that will either extend the coverage of DACA to benefit more DREAMERS or a legislation that will make DACA a legislation with opportunity to become U.S. citizens.

Each case is different, however. For tailored legal advice, always seek professional help from a legal counsel.

To push for legislation, call your respective lawmakers and urge them to support a Dream Act that will provide resident permanent status and citizenship to all undocumented young immigrants.

Categories
Updates

Trump’s “No Insurance, No Green Card” Rule Now Revoked by Biden

Share this:

Under the Trump Proclamation 9945 announced in October 2019, immigrant visa applicants had to prove they were covered by approved insurance, such as employer-sponsored plans, unsubsidized plans or family members’ plans, or “possess[ed] the financial resources” to pay for any reasonably foreseeable medical costs before they may granted their immigrant visas or green cards. Trump’s belief was that the cost of immigrant health care would be pushed onto American taxpayers and drive hospitals into insolvency.

The American Immigration Lawyers Association filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Department of State and other federal agencies on behalf of a proposed class of affected individuals and the nonprofit Latino Network, claiming that Trump’s rule was unconstitutional and that the administration sidestepped a notice-and-comment period required under administrative law.

On May 14, 2021, President Biden issued a proclamation lifting former President Donald Trump’s Proclamation 9945 and said his administration can expand access to quality affordable health care without barring the entry of non-citizens who seek to immigrate lawfully but lack the means to pay for health plans. Biden revoked the rule saying that Trump’s policy was at odds with an executive order of his own from February aimed at “restoring faith” in the immigration system.

Categories
Updates

Updates on Biden’s U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021

Share this:

The U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021 (H.R. 1177 and S.348) introduced in Congress by the Democrats on February 18 and 22, 2021 is currently referred to various committees including  the Judiciary Committee for hearing and consideration. No significant action has been taken on this Biden bill since its introduction.

There are two stand-alone bills that were approved by the U.S. House of Representatives in the month of March 2021. These are the American Dream and Promise Act and the Farm Workforce Modernization Act. Both of the provisions of these bills are also included in the broader U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021.

(This update is current as of June 7, 2021. Previous updates on the U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021 may be viewed here.)

Categories
Updates

7 Immigration Policy Changes Important to Filipinos

Share this:

On his first day in office, President Joe Biden will introduce hundreds of pages of immigration executive orders that will cover most of the policies he pledged to change. With several provisions that are proposed, the more than 4 million Filipinos residing in the United States and their relatives still waiting to migrate are looking forward to major change in policies. Below are 7 immigration related agenda that may have the most impact for Filipinos.

1. The DACA Program

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients are immigrants who arrived in the United States at a very young age. After several attempts to pass legislation to confer legal status to this category of immigrants and the failure of Congress to pass law, former President Obama issued an Executive Order giving these young immigrants protection from deportation and issuing them employment authorization. When President Trump came into office in 2017, one of his first executive actions was to rescind the DACA program. More than 800,000 DACA recipients were affected by Trump’s rescission of the program. Court litigation ensued and the Supreme Court affirmed the legality of the DACA program. While the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services started implementing the DACA protections to initial applicants, it did so only a few months ago leaving thousands of DACA recipients still in limbo about their status.

During this pandemic crisis, more than 200,000 DACA recipients are considered essential workers. Thus, in the Biden proposal, green cards or permanent immigrant visas will be granted to DACA recipients with a pathway to U.S. citizenship in three (3) years.

2. FWVP Program

More than 200,000 Filipinos were conscripted to join the U.S. Armed Forces during World War II (WWII)when the Philippines was still a territory of the United States. Under the War Powers Act, those who fought under the American flag may be entitled to apply for U.S. citizenship. All 66 allied countries nationals who fought side by side with the Americans during WWII were able to obtain U.S. citizenship but not the Filipino Veterans. A 1946 Rescission Act was enacted declassifying their services during WWII as not considered services for purposes of the veteran benefits. Hundreds of thousands of veterans lost their opportunities to apply for U.S. citizenship until 1990, when the Immigration and Nationality Act was enacted allowing belatedly the then 70 and 80 year old veterans to apply for U.S. citizenship.

As soon as they became U.S. citizens, they started filing petitions for their children. As the system in place takes more than 20 years to be current due to the severe backlog, most of the veterans who came in 1990s have already passed away. In the last 5 years, approximately 8,000 veterans are still alive but they have been slowly reducing in numbers. The Obama Administration proposed a Parole program specifically for the families of the veterans to enter the United States and be reunited with their veteran parents who are now of advanced age and sickly. This parole program is the Filipino World War II Veterans Parole Program. This Program only has a 5 year validity until 2021. Last December 2020, the Trump administration issued a notice to rescind the FWVP after 60 days of comment period. President Biden should consider supporting legislation that will give immediate green card status to families of the veterans; or, if not, extend the FWVP program.

3. Family Reunification

Family unity is very important to immigrants, and this applies most specially to Filipino immigrants. Petitioning immediate relatives by U.S. citizens is faster than petitioning adult children and siblings. For those being Petitioned from the Philippines the waiting period for visas to become available for adult married children and siblings of U.S. citizens takes approximately 20 years. And for those who are unmarried adult children, the waiting period is approximately 10 years.

With the pandemic crisis, even those whose visas are available who waited more than 20 years are not being processed at the U.S. Embassy because of the Trump Presidential Orders banning certain immigrants from entering the United States. Visa applications of parents and fiances of U.S. citizens are also put on hold at the U.S. Embassy. President Biden should reform the immigration system by adding more visas to the Family based category to reduce the backlog and make it faster for U.S. citizens or green card holders to petition their family members. Trump’s Presidential Proclamations 10014 and 10052 banning the entry of immigrants and processing of their visas at the U.S. Embassy must be revisited and rescinded.

4. Pathway to Citizenship for Undocumented Immigrants

About 2% of the 11 million undocumented immigrants are unauthorized Filipino immigrants. These are mostly those who fell into the cracks because of the broken immigration system leaving them no option to legalize their status. These unauthorized immigrants are with their family members in the U.S., are hardworking and regularly pay taxes. It is just an opportune time to provide them a pathway to U.S. citizenship.

The Biden administration is introducing the immigration reform bill that will allow unauthorized immigrants an 8 years pathway to citizenship by granting them green cards after 5 five years and allowing them to obtain U.S. citizenship in 3 years. This proposal is the centerfold of the immigration bill introduced by Biden and needs to be passed by Congress to become effective.

5. Public Charge Rule

One of the salient feature of the Trump legacy on immigration is not just curbing illegal immigration but also legal immigration. Deeply disguised as promoting national interest, the public charge rule also known as the wealth test prohibits the grant of immigrant visa if the petitioner or the beneficiary does not have enough financial resources to show that the beneficiary will not rely on public assistance for their subsistence. Restrictive rules were issued making it difficult for US citizens with meager income to be reunited with their families. There is also the 2019 Trump “uninsured ban” rule where those coming to the United States must be able to show proof within 30 days of arrival that they have health care insurance coverage. All these restrictive rules have become barriers to lawful immigration and it is cloaked in a way that benefits the U.S. when in fact it is based on the Trump administration’s assumption that immigrants are a drain to the nation’s resources. This has to change. Most of Filipino immigrant families are educated and bring their skills and knowledge to flourish and succeed in this country. President Biden should rescind the restrictive changes made by the Trump administration related to the public charge rule.

6. Healthcare Workers

During this global pandemic, the Filipino immigrants who are admired most as heroes are our health care workers. We have many Filipino caregivers, physical therapists, medical practitioners and nurses. These essential workers have proven their worth especially during this time of crisis. Current immigration law makes it difficult for most healthcare workers to obtain their immigrant visas. Even when the priority dates for employment-based third preference became current for Philippine nationals, it is usually still subject to long delays of months or years for the healthcare professionals to migrate to the United States. The increasing need for the essential healthcare workers had never been critical and President Biden should consider re-establishing a temporary visa category for nurses like before such as the H1C and H1A visas. This category will make it faster for healthcare workers to enter the United States.

7. Other Employment Based Visas

Philippines was included again in the list of those countries eligible to participate in a temporary working visa program or the H2B. Realizing how it will be in the best interest of the U.S. to make sure that the Filipinos are added to the workforce in the construction of military bases in Guam. This is a positive development. But also, there are Filipinos who are holders of H1B, J and L visas that have been affected by the Presidential Proclamation banning them from entering except those covered by litigation. President Biden should rescind this proclamation and reverse the H1B regulatory changes that Trump released prior to his departure from the White House.

All 7 immigration issues are just a few of the immigration priorities of the Biden Administration. As we maintain our faith in the new administration, we also hope that the Democratic led Congress will find it a priority to pass the Biden’s immigration reform bill for all these provisions to have a meaningful impact on our Filipino immigrants and their families.

(Atty. Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq. is a San Francisco based immigration attorney and an immigrant rights advocate. She may be reached at 1 888 930 0808, law@tancinco.com, or facebook.com/tancincolaw, or through her firm’s website at www.tancinco.com)