Tag: AILA

Categories
Updates

Texas, 15 States challenge Keeping Families Together Program

Texas, 15 states challenge Keeping Families Together Program
Share this:

Just four days after the implementation of the Parole in Place program for spouses of U.S. citizens, a lawsuit was filed seeking to suspend it. As of August 23, 2024, the plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, and Stay of Agency Action, challenging the Biden administration’s Keeping Families Together program, also known as Parole in Place. The lawsuit was brought by Texas and Idaho, along with 14 other state attorneys general from Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, North Dakota, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wyoming.

In their 67-page court filing, the plaintiffs assert that the program is illegal, arguing that it exceeds the executive branch’s authority to set immigration policy. They claim that the program constitutes a misuse of parole authority, stating, “The Biden-Harris Administration — dissatisfied with the system Congress created, and for blatant political purposes — has yet again attempted to create its own immigration system.”

Kelli Stump, President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), responded to the lawsuit, saying:

“This is another example of states attempting to stop the federal government from using its well-established legal authority to promote family unity. In its place, these states and Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s anti-immigrant policies, hope to re-institute a xenophobic, anti-family, anti-American agenda. We are talking about the family members of U.S. citizens who have been stuck in long-term legal limbo and, through Keeping Families Together, can now apply for legal status rather than endure an arduous and unworkable bureaucratic process. These are individuals who have been living in the United States for at least a decade and are contributing to American communities. It is reprehensible and nonsensical that these states want to undermine the core American value of strengthening families when cutting the red tape will also ensure a more secure and fairer immigration system. From a purely legal standpoint, the states are advancing weak, baseless arguments to justify their standing to sue that in no way merit the program being enjoined. While the program remains in effect, AILA members will continue to help their clients apply for this life-changing protection.”

At present, USCIS continues to accept applications, although this could change if the plaintiffs’ motion is granted.

(Atty. Lourdes S. Tancinco is an immigration attorney and immigrant rights advocate based in the San Francisco Bay area and a partner at the Tancinco Law P.C. for 32 years. She may be reached at law@tancinco.com, www.tancinco.com, facebook/tancincolaw, or at 1-888-930-0808)

Categories
Updates

Why Is It Taking Too Long for USCIS to Adjudicate a Visa Petition/Application?

Share this:

The delay in the processing of visa benefits applications with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has reached a critical level that’s affecting U.S citizen families and employers filing visas on behalf of their relatives and employees, respectively. Last month, U.S. Congressional Representatives led by Rep. Jesus G. “Chuy” Garcia (D-IL) sent a letter to the USCIS Director Lee Francis Cissna demanding accountability on the current delays in the adjudication of visa petitions and other applications. What is causing the delay and what actions can we take to help address this issue?

Many years back, specifically in 2004, an applicant for naturalization will have to wait for 14 months before s/he is called for an interview. To address the increasing delay in the processing of applications, the USCIS created the “Backlog Elimination Program” with the purpose of working smarter and eliminating redundancies in the adjudications of visa petitions and applications. At that time the number of backlog of cases was approximately 1.7 million. After 2 years of implementing the Backlog Elimination Program, the processing time for naturalization applications was reduced from 14 months to 5 months. In fact, in an election year, such as in the year 2016, the naturalization applications were adjudicated in three months.

In 2017, there were changes in USCIS policies that resulted in processing delays. According to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, there is now a net backlog exceeding 2.3 million in delayed cases. The study of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) indicates that number amounts to more than 100% increase over the span of one year. If an applicant for naturalization would notice now, there is an average of 10-19.5 months before the application is adjudicated. Other than naturalization applications, the other visa applications that are suffering from processing delays are the petitions for immediate relatives (I-130); applications for employment authorization (I-765) and applications for adjustment of status(I-485).

A spouse of a U.S. citizen applying for lawful permanent resident must now wait at least 17.5 months before the spouse is called for the interview on the I-130 and 485 application. An employment authorization document application is taking now at least 4 to 6 months if it is based on adjustment application. Other basis for applications for employment authorization now take anywhere from 6.5 to 8.5 months before being adjudicated and released.

While historically, staffing levels and volume of cases received at the USCIS are contributory to the delay, shift in policies being implemented by USCIS now have the same effect. DHS stated in its report to Congress in 2018 that “policy shifts” are factors influencing its diminished per hour case completion rate. One of the changes in policies are the elimination of the long standing deference policy which gives deference to prior determinations involving the same employer and same position. Now the USCIS is assessing and re-examining prior approved cases. Other policy changes are the (1)requirement for a domestic interview for employment-based petition; (2) adopting extreme vetting security protocols (even if existing screening measures are adequate) and (3) adding enforcement duties to USCIS officers under the new NTA policy where an adjudicating officer is required to issue Notices to Appear to individuals with denied petitions. Undeniably, diversion of resources from adjudication to enforcement could slow down case processing.

These delays had adversely affected applicants, their families and their employers – resulting in job losses, inability to travel internationally for important family and business events or simply the inability to obtain social security numbers and driver’s licenses.

USCIS is an agency created by Congress, hence, it is just appropriate that it remains accountable for the delays in adjudication. Affected U.S. citizen businesses and families and immigrant advocates must contact their congressional representatives and urge them to direct USCIS to focus on its service oriented purpose as an agency, create a backlog elimination program and remove enforcement functions to resolve this critical issue of adjudication delays.

(Atty. Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq. is a San Francisco based immigration attorney and an immigrant rights advocate. She may be reached at 1 888 930 0808, law@tancinco.com or facebook.com/tancincolaw, or through this website tancinco.weareph.com/old)

Categories
Global Pinoy

Know Your Rights in Case of ICE Arrest

Share this:

At the recently concluded American Immigration Lawyers Association conference held at New Orleans, representatives from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement indicated the lack of detention centers and beds. It was mentioned several times, that Trump’s policy on interior enforcement is being executed and they expect increase in apprehension.

If a non-U.S. citizen who is without legal status is arrested by ICE agent, what steps may be taken? What rights if any do they have at the time of arrest?

Below are the “Know Your Rights” information being disseminated by Immigration Legal Resource Center and certain non-profit organizations, which may be asserted if the inescapable ICE visit or arrest takes place.

You have the right to remain silent.

You can assert your fifth amendment right. You can refuse to speak to an ICE agent. Do not answer any questions, especially about your birth place, immigration status or how you entered the United States. Say that you want to remain silent until you speak with a lawyer.

You have the right to demand a warrant before letting anyone into your home.

The ICE agent may not enter your home without a warrant. You do not have to give permission for him to enter. It is okay not to open your door unless the agent shows you the warrant. If the warrant is presented to you, ask the agent to slip it under the door or through the window. Make sure it is signed by a judge with your correct name, address and date of birth.

You have the right to speak to a lawyer and the right to make a phone call.

It is important to have your attorney’s phone number handy. You will be entitled to make a phone call. If you do not know your attorney’s number, call a trusted friend or relative to coordinate with your attorney.

You have the right to refuse to sign anything before you talk to a lawyer.

There will be some documents that will be presented to you for signing after you are apprehended and taken into custody. Do not sign anything. If you sign without understanding the nature of the document, it is possible that you are signing a waiver of your rights to a lawyer or to a hearing. And if you waive these rights, it may result in your immediate removal without a hearing.

You have the right to refuse to show any documents before speaking with a lawyer.

When you are visited by an ICE agent, you do not have to give permission to search any of your belongings unless there is a warrant. You can ask to speak with a lawyer before you submit any documentation. Each case of an unauthorized individual is distinct and all non-U.S. citizens must be vigilant about their rights. During these challenging times, a legal advice from a professional immigration attorney becomes indispensable to figure out what legal options may still be available.

(Atty. Lourdes S. Tancinco is a San Francisco CA based immigration attorney at Tancinco Law Offices and may be reached at law@tancinco.com, facebook.com/tancincolaw, or at 1 888 930 0808 or at 1 415 397 0808.)

Categories
Updates

AILA, NILC, and CAP Report on the “Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act”

Share this:

AILA, along with the Center for American Progress and the National Immigration Law Center, released a report highlighting state-by-state data on the millions of dollars of critical community and public works funding that are at risk under S. 3100, the “Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act.”

The bill would force local police to become immigration enforcement agents by threatening to withhold millions of dollars in federal grants to so-called “sanctuary cities.”

View and download the document here.