Categories
Updates

USCIS Issues Final Rule to Adjust Certain Immigration and Naturalization Fees

Share this:

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a final rule to adjust certain immigration and naturalization benefit request fees for the first time since 2016. The final rule will allow USCIS to recover a greater share of its operating costs and support more timely processing of new applications.

The final rule is the result of a comprehensive fee review, as required by law, and follows the January 2023 publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking. The review concluded that the current fee schedule falls far short in recovering the full cost of agency operations, including the necessary expansion of humanitarian programs, federally mandated pay raises, additional staffing requirements, and other essential investments.

“For the first time in over seven years, USCIS is updating our fees to better meet the needs of our agency, enabling us to provide more timely decisions to those we serve,” said USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou. “Despite years of inadequate funding, the USCIS workforce has made great strides in customer service, backlog reduction, implementing new processes and programs, and upholding fairness, integrity, and respect for all we serve.”

USCIS received over 5,400 unique public comments in response to its January 2023 notice of proposed rulemaking. USCIS took into consideration comments and feedback received during the proposed rulemaking process. Acknowledging this feedback from stakeholders, the final fee rule includes several important updates since the initial rulemaking. The final rule:

  • Lowers the agency’s required annual cost recovery by $727 million, in part by considering the budget effects of improved efficiency measures;
  • Expands fee exemptions for Special Immigrant Juveniles and victims of human trafficking, crime, and domestic violence; U.S. military service members and our Afghan allies; and families pursuing international adoption;
  • Provides special fee discounts for nonprofit organizations and small business employers;
  • Allows for half-price Employment Authorization Document applications for applicants for adjustment of status and a reduced fee for adjustment of status applicants under the age of 14 in certain situations;
  • Expands eligibility for a 50% fee reduction for naturalization applications, available to individuals who can demonstrate household income between 150% and 400% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines; and
  • Implements a standard $50 discount for online filers.

Every fee in the final rule is the same or lower than in the proposed rule. For most individual filers, the final rule limits how much newly established fees may increase. Under the final rule, the new fees will not increase by more than 26%, which is equivalent to the increase in the Consumer Price Index since the last fee rule was issued in 2016.

With the new revenues the rule will generate, USCIS will continue using innovative solutions to improve customer experience and stem backlog growth. Although the fee increases announced today will allow USCIS to better offset overall costs, congressional funding continues to be necessary to sustainably and fully address the increased volume of caseloads associated with recent border crossers, including by hiring additional USCIS personnel to help right-size a system that was not built to manage the numbers of cases USCIS receives.

The new fees under the final rule will go into effect on April 1, 2024.

USCIS encourages stakeholders to visit the Frequently Asked Questions page on its website to view a full list of the revised forms that will go into effect on April 1, 2024, along with the new fees. USCIS will accept prior editions of most forms during a grace period from April 1, 2024, through June 3, 2024. During this grace period, USCIS will accept both previous and new editions of certain forms, filed with the correct fee.

There will be no grace period for the following new forms, however, because they must be revised with a new fee calculation. Filers should click the links below to access a preview version of each new form edition before the April 1, 2024, effective date:

USCIS will use the postmark date of a filing to determine which form version and fees are correct but will use the receipt date for purposes of any regulatory or statutory filing deadlines.

USCIS ANNOUNCES WINDOW FOR  H1B CAP REGISTRATION

The fiscal year 2025 (March 2024) H-1B cap registration period will open at noon eastern on March 6, 2024 and run through noon eastern on March 22, 2024. For fiscal year 2025 H-1B cap filings, employers will also have the option of filing Form I-129 electronically on the USCIS website.

On January 30, 2024, USCIS announced a final rule to reduce the potential for fraud in the H-1B registration process. The new rule selects H-1B cap entries by each unique employee, instead of by each registration. This gives each employee the same chance of selection, regardless of how many registrations were submitted on that employee’s behalf.

With this update to the registration process, the employee is required to include valid passport or travel document information, and a employee cannot register under more than one passport or travel document.

USCIS has also provided clarification that for H-1B cap petitions, a start date after October 1 of the relevant fiscal year is allowed.

(Source: USCIS Website-Release Date: 01/30/2024)

Categories
Updates

Marry, Divorce & Remarry: Effect on the Conditional Green Card Holder Spouse

Share this:

Entering into a good faith marital relationship is always with the intention to stay married forever.  But what if there is no “forever”? What will happen when there is separation or divorce?  What are the effects of these circumstances to the petitioned spouse who is a green card holder with only a conditional resident status? 

Let’s take the case of Joseph (not his real name).  In 2015, Joseph entered the United States based on the petition of his U.S. citizen spouse Rita.  They were childhood sweethearts and have known each other since high school.  So when Rita attended their high school reunion, both Joseph and Rita rekindled the old flame and got married in a simple wedding ceremony.  Upon returning to the United States, Rita petitioned Joseph.  After a year of petitioning, Joseph was able to travel to the United States and was issued a 2-year conditional green card with an expiration date of  12/30/2018.  

After being together for only 6 months, Rita and Joseph began to experience marital problems until they decided to go their separate ways. Rita obtained a divorce decree ending their short lived relationship.  

With Joseph’s green card’s validity expiring, he was at a loss on whether he will return to the Philippines (to avoid falling out of status) or file for a waiver.  He decided to return to the Philippines but a few months before his departure, he met Cecilia who is also a U.S. citizen.  Cecilia and Joseph started dating regularly until Cecilia offered to marry and petition Joseph.  Now Joseph is presented with a situation where he has to choose to return to the Philippines or have Cecilia petition him.  Can he be petitioned even if he still has 6 months validity on his original conditional resident card?  Will the USCIS allow him to adjust his status in the U.S. once Cecilia petitions him?

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 245(d), conditional residents are barred from adjusting unless they take the necessary steps to remove the two year conditions on their status.  This means that a person could not obtain conditional resident status based on marriage to a U.S. citizen, divorce that petitioner spouse, remarry a second U.S. citizen and re-adjust during that 2 year period.  

When a person with conditional resident status fails to file for the Petition to Remove Condition (I-751) prior to expiration of the validity of the two year conditional status, the USCIS usually issues a decision terminating the status of the green card holder.  The next process then is that the petitioned spouse will be facing the Immigration Judge in a court proceeding to have a filed I-751 be reviewed to prove validity of the first marriage. 

This rule had applied for many years until the interpretation of this rule was changed in 2019 by the USCIS based on the case of Matter of Stockwell, 20 I&N Dec 309 (BIA 1991), where a person with condition resident status may adjust based on second marriage without having to go to immigration court.

Therefore, in the case of Joseph, once he gets the USCIS Notice Terminating his resident status, he will be allowed to adjust based on the second marriage.  USCIS interpretation is that conditional status is now terminated as a matter of law on the second anniversary of the noncitizen’s lawful admission for resident status. 

Categories
Updates

Doctor “lost” his U.S. Citizenship after Renewing his Passport

Share this:

A 62 year old doctor, born in the United States tried to renew his U.S. passport but instead lost his U.S. citizenship. This story originally was published by the Washington Post in November 2023.

Dr. Siavash Sobhani who has been practicing medicine for 30 years and is nearing retirement has always been a holder of a U.S. passport.  He also has proof through his birth certificate that he was born in the United States.  

The U.S. Department of State confirmed his U.S. citizenship by the issuance and past renewals of his U.S. passport.  His last renewal came as a surprise when he was denied issuance of a U.S. passport and was informed that he was in fact not a U.S. citizen. 

Jus Soli Not an Absolute Rule

The United States follows the jus soli principle of citizenship  where a person who is born in the United States is considered to be a U.S. citizen.  But this general rule is not absolute.  There are also classes of individuals that are exempt from the application of this citizenship rule.

Under pertinent regulations, children of high level credited foreign diplomats on the Department of State’s Blue List who are born in the United States are not United States citizens.

The rule states that a “person born in the U.S. to a foreign diplomatic officer accredited to the United States,as a matter of international law, is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.  That person is not a United States citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.”

Who are the Foreign Diplomatic Officers?

Foreign diplomatic officers are those listed in the State Department Diplomatic List known as the “Blue List.”  These include ambassadors, ministers, charges the ‘affaires, counselors, secretaries and attaches of embassies and legations as well as members of the Delegation of the Commission of the European Communities..

Who are NOT Foreign Diplomatic Officers?

Employees of foreign diplomatic missions whose names appear in the State Department list entitled “Employees of Diplomatic Missions Not Printed in the Diplomatic List” also known as the “White List”. Also included are (1)employees of foreign diplomatic missions accredited to the United Nations Organization of American States or foreign diplomats accredited to other foreign states; (2) foreign government employees with limited or no diplomatic immunity such as consular officials named on the State Department list entitled “Foreign Consular Officers in the United States” and their staffs.

In the case of Dr. Sobhani, he was born in the United States to a parent who is foreign diplomatic officer from Iran.  When the Department of State realized this through his last submission of his application for renewal, he was denied issuance of his passport.

Rectifying the Mistake

What this means is that the U.S. government can make a mistake decades back and there is no statutory period to rectify this.  Hence, Dr. Sobhani was taken aback when the Department of State refused renewal of his passport.  In fact, he did not lose his U.S. citizenship, he actually did not have U.S. citizenship to begin with since his father was a foreign diplomatic officer not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

For those who were born in the United States of foreign diplomatic officer parents, you may want to examine your citizenship status.  If you are not a U.S. citizen at the time of birth and your parents were diplomatic officers as defined above, you are still entitled to reside in the United States as lawful permanent residents.  After residing in the United States as permanent residents for 5 years, you may then apply for naturalization as U.S. citizens.  This is what happened to Dr. Sobhani, he had to start applying for his lawful permanent residence and apply for citizenship after 5 years.

Categories
Updates

Bipartisan Effort to Enhance Healthcare Workforce

Share this:

In a significant move to address the shortage of registered nurses in U.S. hospitals, Democratic Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois introduced in the 118th Congress the Healthcare Workforce Resilience Act, garnering widespread bipartisan support. Eight Republicans, six Democrats, and one Independent joined forces to cosponsor this promising proposal.

The Healthcare Workforce Resilience Act targets the shortage by reclaiming unused employment-based visas and earmarking them exclusively for healthcare professionals. Notably, this includes 25,000 visas allocated for professional nurses and 15,000 for physicians. A crucial aspect of this initiative is that the visas granted will not be bound by country caps, offering U.S. employers the flexibility to recruit skilled international nurses from any part of the world.

To streamline the process, the proposed act mandates the Department of State (DOS) to expedite visa processing and shipping without additional charges for speedier service. This presents a significant advantage for both healthcare facilities and aspiring foreign nurses looking to contribute to the U.S. healthcare system.

Despite the promising bipartisan support, the future of the bill remains uncertain. While the bill’s strong backing is noteworthy, past legislative sessions saw earlier versions of the Healthcare Workforce Resilience Act faltering. Introduced in May 2020 and again in March 2021, both bills unfortunately met their demise in the Senate without a vote.

Stay tuned for updates on this pivotal legislation as we collectively work towards addressing the pressing healthcare workforce challenges in the United States.

Categories
Updates

Unlocking Opportunities: Biden’s AI Executive Order and Employment-Based Immigration

Share this:

Greetings!

We’re excited to share insights into President Biden’s recent executive order on artificial intelligence and its potential to transform employment-based immigration in the United States. This executive order is not just about technology but also focuses on modernizing the Schedule A list, a pivotal move aimed at addressing labor shortages in high-demand sectors and enticing global talent to contribute to vital areas of the country.

Understanding the Impact of Biden’s AI Executive Order on Employment-Based Immigration

President Biden’s AI executive order (Executive Order on the Safe, Secure and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence) signifies a groundbreaking step in reshaping employment-based immigration laws. A key aspect is the directive for the Department of Labor (DOL) to issue a request for information (RFI) by December 13, inviting public and expert input on “identifying AI and other STEM-related occupations.” This process marks the first significant update to the Schedule A list since 1991, promoting transparency and engagement. At the moment, included in the list are registered nurses and physical therapists.

With this Executive Order the DOL will gather public input to identify specific AI and emerging technologies-related occupation, and other sectors, lacking sufficient U.S. workers. President Biden’s order positions the nation to adapt to economic and skill demands, ensuring relevance in the evolving job landscape.

To ensure accuracy in reflecting current labor shortages and adaptability to future market changes, the DOL is encouraged to employ comprehensive labor market analytics. This data-driven approach involves analyzing unemployment rates, employment growth, wage patterns, and job vacancy rates, fostering a responsive and dynamic Schedule A list.

Beyond Filling Gaps: A Strategy for Economic Growth and Innovation

Modernizing the Schedule A list extends beyond addressing job vacancies; it’s a strategic move to drive progress and innovation in critical sectors like STEM and healthcare. Attracting international talent to these areas solidifies the US as a hub for innovation, complementing domestic contributions and fostering economic growth.

Conclusion:

President Biden’s AI executive order marks a crucial step in reshaping the employment-based immigration landscape, offering predictability and flexibility aligned with current economic conditions. However, a comprehensive approach to modernizing employment-based immigrant visa categories is essential to prevent prolonged wait times for foreign workers. This holistic strategy ensures the United States remains a competitive destination for global talent, propelling economic growth and innovation.

Best regards,
Tancinco Law