Categories
Updates

How Recent COVID-19 Operational Changes in U.S. Immigration Agencies Impact Your U.S. Immigration Petitions/Status

Share this:

As most U.S. government agencies resume operation, Tancinco Law, P.C. compiles a summary of what you need to know about your immigration petitions pending with different offices. In addition, we also have described travel restrictions imposed in the Philippines and the United States as it relates to a Filipino/American citizen traveler.

U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE (USCIS)

Emergency Services

On June 4, 2020, the local U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced that their local offices have re-opened for non-emergency in person services. As of this writing, USCIS is only scheduling local InfoMod appointments. These are cases where the individual has an emergent need such as ADIT stamp or proof of lawful residence and issuances of advance parole.  Physical interview schedules or rescheduled on immigrant benefit applications are yet to be mailed. Slowly USCIS will safely resume in person services. Those who need emergency document services may make an appointment www.uscis.gov/contactcenter or call 1 800-375-5283.  There will be no entry for those with no appointments. No walk in visits at the USCIS.

Naturalization: Oath Taking Ceremonies 

Notices of rescheduled oath taking ceremonies will be mailed out. So those who passed their citizenship tests and are waiting to take their oath will soon receive notices. As USCIS safely resumes in-person services, some naturalization ceremonies may be conducted differently than in the past. You may receive supplemental information from USCIS that provides detailed instructions for your ceremony. 

Biometrics

USCIS announced that in certain cases, it will issue notifications of biometrics reuse to eligible individuals instead of coming to the Application Support Center for biometrics. For those not eligible for the reuse of biometrics, notices of new schedule will soon be mailed on their cancelled biometrics appointments. If you do not receive notification of biometrics or appointments within 90 days of USCIS opening, you may call 1-800-375-5283.

DEPARTMENT OF STATES: CONSULAR PROCESSING

NATIONAL VISA CENTER (NVC)

Applications and submissions of documents with the National Visa Center’s online platform ,CEAC, is fully operational.

As of June 1, 2020, the National Visa Center will no longer accept or respond to inquiries through mail. Inquiries including urgent medical or humanitarian situations are to be submitted through a Public Inquiry Form at https://nvc.state.gov/inquiry. As of June 1, 2020, NVC is responding to inquiries received on May 23, 2020.

Documents will only be mailed if there are explicit instructions from the National Visa Center to do so and those instructions were received through email, telephone call or letter from the National Visa Center.

Beneficiaries of visa petitions are reminded of the “one year contact” requirement that they should apply for the immigrant visa within one year of notice of visa availability or risk termination of the registration  or revocation of the visa petition.

U.S. EMBASSY IN MANILA

The Department of State announced that each post will reopen on their own timeline based on the situation in the respective country. 

On Visa Applications and Interviews:

As per June 8, 2020 communication with the U.S. Embassy in Manila the following response was provided:

The U.S. Embassy in the Philippines has canceled all immigrant and nonimmigrant visa interviews scheduled through July 3 due to the Philippines’ community quarantine measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19.

We will resume routine visa services as soon as possible but are unable to provide a specific date at this time. We appreciate your patience and understanding.

After the community quarantine is lifted in Metro Manila, all affected applicants should reschedule their visa interviews through the Embassy call center by phone at +63 (2) 7792-8988 or +63 (2) 8548-8223, or through the online appointment system at ustraveldocs.com/ph.

There is no fee to change an appointment and visa application fees are valid for one year in the country where the fee was paid.

With no specific date and time to reopen, all visa applicants who wish to reschedule their interview may call the phone numbers provided or go online and access the U.S. Embassy’s online appointment system.

On Expired Visa and Inability to Travel Because of COVID-19

If a visa has been issued but the applicant cannot travel, the U.S. Embassy in Manila when it opens may be able to reprint a visa foil if the underlying documents have not expired. Where the documents expire while waiting to be able to travel to the U.S. the applicant will be required to obtain new documents. 

IMMIGRATION COURTS

The immigration judges continue to hear cases of individuals who are in detention. 

On Monday, June 15, 2020, Honolulu Immigration Court will resume hearings for non detained cases.

For individuals within the jurisdiction of Boston, Buffalo, Dallas, Hartford, Las Vegas, Memphis and New Orleans, immigration court hearings for non-detained cases will resume on Monday June 29, 2020. In all other immigration courts outside of those mentioned, hearings are postponed through and including Friday June 26, 2020. Those with hearing notices scheduled on or before June 26, 2020 will receive new Notices of Hearing. It is more important to check with your legal counsel about the status of your hearing with the immigration court so as not to miss your hearing dates.

IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE)

ICE Arrests

ICE maintains that in light of the ongoing COVID-19, the agency adjusted its enforcement posture beginning March 18, 2020 and limited arrest to those cases that are with highest priorities to promote life saving and public safety activities. Note that this does not mean that they are suspending arresting individuals with criminal history or those subject to mandatory detention.

ICE emphasized that it shall abide by its sensitive locations policy during the COVID-19 crisis and will not carry out enforcement operations at or near health care facilities, such as hospitals, doctors offices, accredited health clinics & emergent or urgent care facilities. Note though that ICE agents are present during protests despite the fact that these are considered sensitive locations. Unauthorized immigrants including DACA recipients joining the rallies/protests must be aware of their rights should they be taken into custody.

ICE Check Ins

Individuals required to report regularly to ICE for in person check-ins have been allowed to do so through alternative means. As of April 17, 2020, the in-person reporting has been temporarily suspended. However, individuals who are subject to the reporting requirement in lieu of detention/removal are still mandated to report either by calling or telephone check ins. For stays of removal applications, ICE-ERO will accept I-246 by mail.

 

TRAVEL TO THE PHILIPPINES AND UNITED STATES

Travel to the Philippines

Under existing guidelines, arriving U.S. citizens or non Filipinos are still not allowed to enter the Philippines even after 31 May 2020. Only OFWs, Foreign nationals married to Philippine citizens including their dependent children and foreign diplomats are allowed to enter the country.

All non-Filipinos who intend to depart the country can leave anytime. Filipinos are not allowed to leave unless they are OFWs, permanent residents, or holders of student visas in their countries of destination.However, they may have challenges in booking a flight as most of the international flights remain suspended.

Passengers Not Subject to the Restrictions and Who Are Arriving in the Philippines Subject to Mandatory Quarantine

All travelers to Manila will undergo the usual thermal scan upon arrival. If a passenger is showing symptoms of the COVID-19, s/he will undergo a real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. Travelers whose test results are positive will be transferred to a designated hospital for further medical management.

Those who do not have symptoms will undergo a mandatory quarantine where a baseline rapid test will be conducted. While waiting for the results, passengers must stay in either a government designated quarantine facility or in a Bureau of Quarantine approved quarantine hotel for 14 days.

After quarantine is completed, individuals may go about their travel plans subject to quarantine protocols of the local government of their destination.

Filipinos who are not OFWs and Non-Filipinos will shoulder their own payment for the accommodation.

Traveling to the United States

Philippine citizens are not banned from entering the United States as long as they have valid U.S. temporary or permanent resident visas. Those who traveled internationally in the past 14 days and return to the United States, they are required to self quarantine, stay home and monitor their health. 

Unless the traveler is a U.S. citizen or a permanent lawful resident (green card holder), s/he will be banned from entering the U.S. if s/he traveled from the following countries: China, Hong Kong and Macau, Iran, the UK and Ireland Schengen area which encompasses the following 26 European Countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.

U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents of the United States, certain family members, and other individuals who meet specified exceptions who have been in one of the countries listed above in the past 14 days will be allowed to enter the United States through on of these airports: 

  • Boston-Logan International Airport (BOS), Massachusetts
  • Chicago O’Hare International Airport (ORD), Illinois
  • Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW), Texas
  • Detroit Metropolitan Airport (DTW), Michigan
  • Daniel K. Inouye International Airport (HNL), Hawaii
  • Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport (FLL), Florida
  • George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH), Texas
  • Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL), Georgia
  • John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK), New York
  • Los Angeles International Airport, (LAX), California
  • Miami International Airport (MIA), Florida
  • Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR), New Jersey
  • San Francisco International Airport (SFO), California
  • Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA), Washington
  • Washington-Dulles International Airport (IAD), Virginia 

After arriving in the United States from one of these countries, CDC recommends that travelers stay home and monitor their health for 14 days. 

(Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq is a partner at the Tancinco Law P.C. Her office is located at One Hallidie Plaza, Ste 818, San Francisco CA 94102 and may be reached at 1-888-930-0808; email at law@tancinco.com, www.facebook.com/tancincolaw or check their website at tancinco.weareph.com/old.) 

Categories
Updates

Updates of Agency Closures: USCIS, Immigration Courts, Embassy

Share this:

USCIS : CLOSED UNTIL MAY 3

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) offices have extended their temporary closure from April 1 to May 3 and will reopen on May 4.

As a result of this closure, there will be no face to face interviews, no oath taking ceremonies for new U.S. citizens. Interviews including biometrics scheduled during this period that the USCIS is closed will be rescheduled. USCIS will send new Notices of Interview. Please note that U.S. postal services are still open and if you need to file for applications for extensions or changes of status you can still do so either by mail and when permitted through on-line filing.

IMMIGRATION COURTS (EOIR): NON-DETAINED HEARINGS ARE POSTPONED UNTIL MAY 1
Those who have pending hearings before Immigration Courts and they are not detained, their hearings scheduled between now until May 1 will be rescheduled. Hearings for detained clients/respondents are still ongoing unless the Court grants continuances.

U.S. EMBASSY IN MANILA: VISA PROCESSING AND ISSUANCES ARE PUT ON HOLD
The U.S. Embassy in Manila has suspended temporarily its immigrant and nonimmigrant visa services. However, emergency services are still provided especially for U.S. citizens. Please check the U.S. Embassy website for more information.

Categories
Updates

USCIS Extends for 60 days Deadlines to File Responses to RFEs

Share this:

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced this week that it is adopting measures to minimize the immigration consequences associated with responding to requests for evidence (RFEs) and notices of intent to deny (NOIDs) dated between March 1 and May 1, 2020. This rule also applies to notice of intent to revoke (NOIR), notice of intent to terminate (NOIT) or appealable decisions within AAO jurisdiction where the issuance date listed on the request, notice or decision is between March 1, 2020 and May 1, 2020.

As a result, applicants and petitioners who receive an RFEs or NOIDs dated between March 1 and May 1, 2020, any responses submitted within 60 calendar days after the response deadline set forth in the RFE or NOID will be considered by USCIS before any action is taken.

Categories
Updates

USCIS/ICE/Immigration Courts in the SF Bay Area Updates

Share this:

Do You Have a Scheduled Hearing or Interview at the USCIS or Immigration Court in San Francisco?

See updated information below:

USCIS- San Francisco & San Jose
Interviews scheduled for March 17 through April 6 are cancelled. Officers are attempting to contact all scheduled interviewees to inform them of rescheduling. Most likely new interview dates will be for late May to June. Naturalization applicants with approved N400 and those scheduled for Oath taking on March 18 and March 25 will have their oath taking ceremony rescheduled to a later date.

USCIS- Fresno
Interviews are cancelled beginning March 18 at this USCIS office. All interviewees will receive rescheduled dates for their interviews.

You can also contact the USCIS through your online account or by calling the USCIS customer service number: Dial 800-375-5283 (for people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability: TTY 800-767-1833) to access automated information through an interactive menu 24 hours a day, seven days a week. If you are outside the United States or a U.S. territory, you can call 212-620-3418.

Biometrics ASCs:
Application Support Centers: Starting tomorrow, all six Bay Area ASCs are closed: San Jose, San Francisco, Fresno, Santa Rosa, Oakland and Salinas.

Immigration Courts:
If you have a master hearing (not individual hearing) please note that Master Calendar Hearings with schedule from March 16 through April 10 are postponed. Usual operations remain open specifically for filings except for Seattle.

ICE :
If you are required to do regular reporting before the ERO-ICE, note that the San Francisco ICE located at 630 Sansome Street remains open. But if anyone has a question about reporting, they should utilize the inquiry mailbox SFR-ERO-INQUIRIES@ICE.DHS.GOV to reschedule.

For questions about immigration matters or if you need legal representation or assistance, please contact our office at 1 888 930 0808 or email us at law@tancinco.com, or visit our website at tancinco.weareph.com/old.

Categories
Updates

Overcoming “Break in Continuity of Residence” for Citizenship Purposes

Share this:

Arnel, a Filipino national, is a lawful permanent resident. He arrived in the United States in 2003 and resided with his U.S. citizen spouse. Arnel has substantial business ties in the Philippines and travels to Manila at least 3 times in a year but only for 2 months in duration. In 2018, he stayed for 9 months in Manila to attend to his business that was encountering some financial issues. Last year, Arnel decided to file for his naturalization to become a U.S. citizen. He was recently called for the interview last month February 2020. The USCIS officer informed Arnel that he was not eligible to become a U.S. citizen. He was told that he spent more than 6 months in the Philippines and so he broke the continuity of his residence for purposes of citizenship. Was the finding of ineligibility accurate?

The Physical Presence Rule

Applicants for naturalization must demonstrate that they have been physically present in the United States for more than half of the required time (three years for those married to and residing with a U.S. citizen and five years for all others). In addition, pursuant to Section 316(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, applicants must demonstrate that they have continuously resided in the United States, or put another way, have not abandoned their residence (since such a finding is often the outcome of a naturalization case denied for such reasons).

Breaks in Continuous Residence

There are 2 ways outlined in which the continuity of residence is broken. First is absence for more than 6 months but less than 1 years. The second one is absence for more than 1 year or more.

To be able to continue counting the residence for purposes of naturalization, the applicant must show continuity. Oftentimes, green card holders are not aware and are under the false belief that if they stay for more than 6 months outside the U.S. they may still consider this as continued residence.

On February 26, 2020, USCIS released a policy clarification on this issue, the highlights of which states that (1) an applicant absent from the United States during the statutory period for more than 6 months but less than 1 year, must overcome the presumption that the continuity of residence has been broken in order to remain eligible for naturalization and (2) clarifies that an applicant who USCIS determines to have broken the continuity of residence must establish a new period of continuous residence; the requisite duration of that period depends on the basis upon which the applicant seeks to naturalize.

Overcoming the Presumption For Continued Eligibility

An applicant may overcome the presumption of a break in the continuity of residence by providing evidence to establish that the applicant did not disrupt the continuity of his or her residence. Such evidence may include, but is not limited to, documentation that during the absence: (1) The applicant did not terminate his or her employment in the United States or obtain employment while abroad; or (2) The applicant’s immediate family members remained in the United States; and/or (3) The applicant retained full access to or continued to own or lease a home in the United States.

In the case of Arnel, the USCIS officer was correct in stating that he broke the continuity of his residence unless contrary evidence is submitted by Arnel. Evidence such as his regular and continued employment in the U.S., ownership of his home and residence of his immediate family in the United States will be helpful in overcoming the presumption. If the USCIS officer accepts his evidence and is convinced that there is continuity of evidence, then Arnel may be approved for his U.S. citizenship.

(Atty. Lourdes S. Tancinco is an immigrant advocate and legal counsel based in San Francisco CA. She is the principal and co-founder of Tancinco Law Offices and may be reached at law@tancinco.com, tancinco.weareph.com/old, facebook/tancincolaw, or at 1-888-930-0808)

Categories
Updates

Are You At Risk of Being Stripped of Your U.S. Citizenship?

Share this:

Creation of Stand Alone Denaturalization Section Under the DOJ May Trigger More Revocation of U.S. Citizenship

On February 26,2020, the Department of Justice announced the creation of its Denaturalization Section dedicated to investigating and litigating revocation of naturalization. The newly created stand alone section will join the existing sections within the Civil Division’s Office of Immigration Litigation—the District Court Section and the Appellate Section. This move underscores the Department’s commitment to bring justice to terrorists, war criminals, sex offenders, and other fraudsters who illegally obtained naturalization.

This move follows the creation of Denaturalization Task Force within the U.S.Citizenship and Immigration Services in 2018 indicating the policy trend of the administration running not only after the undocumented immigrants but also after American citizens.

As may be read from the DOJ’s press release, Assistant Attorney General Jody Hunt emphasized the main reason for the creation of the denaturalization section: “When a terrorist or sex offender becomes a U.S. citizen under false pretenses, it is an affront to our system—and it is especially offensive to those who fall victim to these criminals. The Denaturalization Section will further the Department’s efforts to pursue those who unlawfully obtained citizenship status and ensure that they are held accountable for their fraudulent conduct.”

Denaturalization may be found in Section 340 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. There are only certain legal basis to denaturalize an individual and this is initiated by the government through the federal district courts. In the past it was seldom utilized except in extreme cases like in denaturalization of former Nazis who lied about their past who illegally procured naturalization.

Those who are most likely to be affected by the administration’s effort to strip U.S. citizenship from naturalized citizens may be divided mainly into 3 categories. These are immigrants who procured their citizenship illegally because of the presence of:

  1. Prior criminal conviction that was concealed: Those who concealed their criminal convictions on their naturalization applications and their criminal cases are grounds for removal may have their cases referred for naturalization. Note that criminal charges or convictions must have occured before and during the naturalization process.
  2. Prior removal cases and assumed identities: Ten (10) years ago, the U.S. government discovered hundreds of individuals who had prior deportation orders and who used different names in their green card and naturalization applications. These cases are now being investigated and may be re-opened for denaturalization.
  3. Material fraud and misrepresentation. This refers to those who lied in obtaining their green cards through fraud and misrepresentation. The lie must have a relation to the eligibility for green card or naturalization to be a basis for denaturalization.

Once an immigrant is identified for investigation by USCIS for purposes of denaturalization, the matter will be referred to the Department of Justice’s Denaturalization Section under the Office of Immigration Litigation and the Assistant U.S. Attorney. Thereafter, the case will be filed with the federal district court having jurisdiction over the residence of the immigrant being stripped of citizenship. When the case is filed with the court the naturalized U.S. citizen may present evidence to avoid denaturalization. Note that this is a judicial process and only a federal judge may strip one of U.S. citizenship. There is a due process involved and a right to a hearing. If a citizen is denaturalized, most probably this individual will be put in removal proceedings. Whether or not he will be deported depends on available relief or waivers.

Naturalized U.S. citizens must now realize that they no longer have a sense of permanence when it comes to their immigration status. If you believe that you fall into any of the category of those who might be affected by this denaturalization effort of USCIS, it will be best to revisit and re-examine your naturalization application, and have your case assessed by competent legal counsel. And, if there is a possibility of denaturalization, prepare yourself to defend yourself in the federal court and, in the worse case scenario, explore applicable waivers or defenses to avoid removal.

(Atty. Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq. is a San Francisco based immigration attorney and an immigrant rights advocate. She may be reached at 1 888 930 0808, law@tancinco.com, facebook.com/tancincolaw, or through her website tancinco.weareph.com/old)

Categories
Updates

2020 U.S. Immigration Outlook for Filipino Immigrants

Share this:

2020 is a Presidential election year. Whether the United States will have a new or a re-elected President, immigrants and their families will be facing major changes in immigration policies. Let’s examine and determine the prospects of 8 major immigration policy changes that may affect our Filipino immigrants.

The Filipino World War II Veterans Parole Program (FWVP)

The FWVP program was created in June 2016 in recognition of the extraordinary contributions and sacrifices of Filipino veterans during WWII. This program allowed their family members to join the veterans or their widows in the U.S. while their visa petition is waiting for visa availability. After 3 years, several hundreds of family members were allowed in on parole under the FWVP program. As part of the administration policy to eliminate parole programs, the USCIS announced in August 2019 that it will terminate the FWVP. Advocacy groups like the Asian American Advancing Justice, FilVetRep, and the Bayanihan Equity Center, among others, have been working hard to preserve the program. This 2020, unless the administration changes its mind about terminating the program, FWVP program will end after USCIS issuance of its final rules.

Increased USCIS Fees

In November 2019, USCIS announced that it will increase fees on petitions and applications. Among the many applications that are going to be affected are (1) Adjustment of Status application, an increase from $1,225 to $2,195; (2) DACA fees will increase from $495 to $765, an overall increase of 55 percent; (3) Naturalization application will increase by 83 percent, raising the fee from $640 to $1,170. Aside from the increase in fees, USCIS is eliminating fee waivers for naturalization, adjustment of status, green card replacements and renewal and employment authorization. The increase will take effect this 2020 and only after USCIS releases its final regulations.

Backlog in Family Petitions

As of November 2019, there are 291,392 approved visa petitions on behalf of Filipino nationals filed by their US citizens or green card holder relatives, awaiting visa availability with the National Visa Center. The backlog is still severe and there is still lengthy wait for visa availability in certain preference petitions. For Filipinos with petitions under the F3 and F4 visa category, the waiting period is more or less 21 years and for those whose petitions are F1 or F2B the waiting period is approximately 11 years. There are bills (RELIEF Act, S.2603 and H.R. 5327) pending before the 116th Congress which if passed will increase visa numbers and eliminate backlogs. Until these bills are passed into law, expect decades of waiting for certain petitions on behalf of Filipino nationals.

H1B Visa

On January 9, 2020, USCIS released its regulations on the registration system for H1B visa petitions. Instead of filing a full petition for a foreign national employee, the U.S. employer must complete a registration process that requires basic information about the H1B employer and the employee being petitioned. USCIS will open registration period from March 1 through March 20, 2020. Only those selected by USCIS lottery system will be able to file H1B petitions to meet the 65,000 cap.

Public Charge

Under the law, a visa applicant will not be allowed to enter the United States if the government believes that they are likely to become public charge or reliant on government assistance. In 2019, the USCIS issued a new definition of public charge rule to include those who receive either cash or non-cash benefits like housing or health care, from the government for more than 12 months during the 3 year period. The implementation of this public charge rule is suspended because of court litigation filed by several States and advocacy groups challenging the legality of the rule. The Supreme Court is expected to rule on this case this 2020. If the public charge rule takes effect, the legal impact will be on low income legal immigrants petitioning their relatives.

Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals (DACA)

Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals or DACA program was created in 2012 to grant young immigrants deferred status and employment authorization. In 2017, Trump announced that it was ending DACA. This resulted in several lawsuits filed against the administration challenging the decision to terminate DACA. The case was heard by the Supreme Court in November 2019 and a decision is expected anytime before June 2020. In the meantime, DACA recipients are allowed to renew their DACA status and employment authorization.

REAL ID

Beginning October 1,2020, federal agencies including Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) will only accept state issued driver’s licenses that are REAL ID compliant. This means that the state licensing agency must issue REAL IDs to those with valid identification and legal status. Those who are still in unauthorized status may not be issued READ ID compliant driver’s licenses and identification that will allow them to access federal offices or travel domestically through commercial airlines.

H2B Visa

In January 2019, nationals from the Philippines were banned from receiving H2B temporary working visas for one year. As of this writing, there is no update yet from the USCIS if in 2020, the Philippines will be allowed to become beneficiaries of new H2B visas.

These 8 immigration policies are just among the many policies that are anticipated to affect our Filipino immigrant community. The enforcement of immigration law has consistently been the highest priority of the Trump administration resulting in hundreds of thousands of ICE arrest since he took oath as U.S. president. After a decade, we still have not seen a major overhaul and change in immigration law. Hopefully, this 2020 decade, our leaders will finally pass a more humane and sensible immigration reform law; a more compassionate, relevant and rational one that will replace the dysfunctional immigration system we have right now.

(Atty. Lourdes Santos Tancinco, is an immigrant advocate, founder and a principal partner at the Tancinco Law Offices, San Francisco CA based law firm. She may be reached at 1 888 930 0808, law@tancinco.com, facebook.com/tancincolaw, or through tancinco.weareph.com/old)

Categories
Updates

Visas for Spouses & Minor Children of Green Card Holders Available for December 2019

Share this:

Normally, one has to be a U.S. citizen to be eligible to file a simultaneous I-130 petition and I-485 application for adjustment of status. Petitions by U.S. citizens on behalf of spouses, parents and minor children are considered as immediate relatives and visas are immediately available. In the last couple of months, the Visa Bulletin under the F2A visa category which covers petitions by green card holders for their minor children and spouses is reflecting a “current” visa availability. Filipinos who are green card holder petitioner’s in certain circumstances may also file simultaneous I-130 petition and I-485 adjustment of status under the F2A visa category.

Claire was petitioned by her mother under the F1B visa category. Her mother is a U.S. citizen who waited for more than 10 years before Claire was able to immigrate to the U.S. under the F1B visa petition. Claire has a minor child, Jason, but was not married to Nico, the father of her child.

When Claire immigrated in 2018 to the United States, she was able to take her minor child Jason with her. But Nico was left behind in Manila. Recently, Nico arrived in the United States on a student visa (F1), he is taking up Masteral Degree related to his career. Claire and Nico recently got married and Claire filed a petition for Nico under the F2A visa category (spouse of a green card holder) on December 1, 2019.

Nico regularly follows and reads the Visa Bulletin issued by the Department of State (DOS) to determine when his visa may become available. He noticed that for the months of F2A, the Final Chart on the Visa Bulletin shows that the F2A has the letter “C” on it. But the Filing Chart shows a 2009 priority date. What does the “C” status on the F2A category mean for Nico? Can Claire now file for his petition and simultaneously adjust his status?

Understanding the Two Charts on the Visa Bulletin

The monthly Department of State Visa Bulletin has two different charts. The DOS will post two charts per visa preference category. The charts are: (1) Application Final Action Dates (dates when visas may finally be issued); and (2) Dates for Filing Applications (earliest dates when applicants may be able to apply).

According to the recently released November 26, 2019 policy guidance, when USCIS determines there are immigrant visas available for the filing of additional adjustment of status applications, generally, the Dates for Filing Applications chart will be used to determine when to file an adjustment of status application with USCIS. Otherwise, if the priority is current as indicated on the Application Final Action Dates chart, then the final action date chart must be used to determine when to file an adjustment of status application with USCIS.

This means that despite a cut-off date on Filing Chart (second chart), if the Final Action chart (first chart) shows a “C” or a current priority date for a visa category, the application for adjustment of status may be filed immediately for that specific month.

Going back to the case of Nico, who is the beneficiary of an F2A petition, since the Final Action chart indicates a C (or a current priority date), he may now file for an adjustment of status. This is because the C indicates that a visa is available for the month of December 2019. However, unlike immediate relative petitions of U.S. citizens, unless there is 245(i) eligibility, beneficiaries of F2A petitions must be in lawful status to be able to file for adjustment of status.

(Atty. Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq. is an immigrant advocate and a principal partner at the Tancinco Law Offices, a San Francisco CA based law firm. She may be reached at 1 888 930 0808, law@tancinco.com , facebook.com/tancincolaw, or through this website tancinco.weareph.com/old)

Categories
Updates

USCIS Proposes to Adjust Fees to Meet Operational Needs

Share this:

WASHINGTON – The Department of Homeland Security will publish a notice of proposed rule-making in the Federal Register to adjust the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Immigration Examinations Fee Account fee schedule.

Fees collected and deposited into the IEFA fund nearly 96% of USCIS’ budget. Unlike most government agencies, USCIS is fee-funded. Federal law requires USCIS to conduct biennial fee reviews and recommend necessary fee adjustments to ensure recovery of the full cost of administering the nation’s immigration laws, adjudicating applications and petitions, and providing the necessary infrastructure to support those activities.

“USCIS is required to examine incoming and outgoing expenditures, just like a business, and make adjustments based on that analysis. This proposed adjustment in fees would ensure more applicants cover the true cost of their applications and minimizes subsidies from an already over-extended system,” said Ken Cuccinelli, acting director of USCIS. “Furthermore, the adjudication of immigration applications and petitions requires in-depth screening, incurring costs that must be covered by the agency, and this proposal accounts for our operational needs and better aligns our fee schedule with the costs of processing each request.”

The rule proposes adjusting USCIS IEFA fee schedules by a weighted average increase of 21% to ensure full cost recovery. Current fees would leave the agency underfunded by approximately $1.3 billion per year.

The proposed fee rule accounts for increased costs to adjudicate immigration benefit requests, detect and deter immigration fraud, and thoroughly vet applicants, petitioners, and beneficiaries.
USCIS last updated its fee structure in FY 2017, by a weighted average increase of 21%.

For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow on Twitter (@uscis), Instagram (/uscis), YouTube (/uscis), Facebook (/uscis), and LinkedIn (/uscis).

[Release Date: Nov. 8, 2019]