Categories
Featured

Are you a Green Card holder and at risk of being detained at a U.S. airport?

Share this:

Nowadays, a non-U.S. citizen returning from travel outside the United States is not necessarily guaranteed a smooth entry, even with a validly issued visa or lawful permanent resident (LPR) status. Many immigrants—including not just undocumented individuals but also green card holders—are increasingly fearful of their status. This atmosphere of fear has been fueled by the current administration’s heightened enforcement of immigration laws, along with stricter scrutiny of individuals’ past immigration and criminal histories upon entry into the U.S.

With recent news reports of numerous LPRs being detained at airports, this article aims to provide guidance on whether you might be at risk of possible detention or arrest upon arrival.

Why Are Lawful Permanent Residents Being Detained at Ports of Entry/Airports After Traveling Abroad?

A non-U.S. citizen is granted lawful permanent resident status by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to allow them to permanently reside and work in the United States. Green cards may be issued through family-based or employment-based petitions, as well as humanitarian visas.

However, holding a green card does not mean that your status is truly “permanent” or that you are automatically guaranteed re-entry into the U.S. Like temporary visas, lawful permanent resident status is a privilege granted by the U.S. government—not an absolute right. If you fail to meet the residency requirements or engage in conduct that violates immigration laws, your green card may be revoked.

Traveling and Returning to the United States

General Rule

As a green card holder, you generally should not fear returning to the U.S. after traveling abroad. However, if you have a case or past actions that fall under grounds for revocation of your green card, you could face detention and secondary inspection by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers at the port of entry.

Returning Resident vs. Arriving Alien

In immigration law, understanding certain key terms is essential. When entering the U.S. with a valid visa—whether a green card or a temporary visa—you are expected to be admitted after inspection of your travel documents. If no legal grounds exist to deny your entry, CBP must allow you in. However, if there are deficiencies in your visa or circumstances rendering you inadmissible, you may be classified as an “arriving alien” rather than a “returning resident.”

Generally, green card holders are not considered arriving aliens. However, there are exceptions where an LPR may be classified as an arriving alien, which could put them at risk of inadmissibility and denial of entry.

For example, an LPR may be deemed an arriving alien if CBP suspects that they abandoned their resident status or if they fall under a category subject to removal from the United States. If this occurs, the CBP officer may place the individual in secondary inspection, detain them at the airport, or refer them to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), depending on the nature of their case.

Categories of Green Card Holders Who May Be Detained or Considered Arriving Aliens

Even before the current administration’s restrictive enforcement of immigration laws, legal provisions already existed for classifying certain green card holders as arriving aliens under Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 101(a)(13)(C). A green card holder may be deemed an arriving alien if they:

  • Have abandoned or relinquished their resident status
  • Have been absent from the U.S. for a continuous period exceeding 180 days
  • Have engaged in illegal activity after departing the U.S.
  • Departed the U.S. while under legal proceedings for removal
  • Have committed an offense that falls under INA Section 1182(a)(2) unless granted relief under INA 1182(h) or 1229b(a)

Criminal grounds of inadmissibility referred to in number 5 category refer to:

  1. Crime involving moral turpitude;
  2. Multiple criminal convictions;
  3. Controlled substance traffickers;
  4. Prostitution and commercialized vice;
  5. Human Trafficker;
  6. Money Laundering

To complicate matters for arriving aliens, there are certain crimes that require the law enforcers to detain non-U.S. citizens because of the Laken Riley Act which was enacted immediately after President Trump took office. Added to the crimes defined under existing law above, the following crimes may render the returning resident into stricter scrutiny:

  1. Burglary;
  2. Theft;
  3. Larceny;
  4. Shoplifting;
  5. Assault of law enforcement officer;
  6. Crime resulting in death or serious bodily injury to another person.

If an LPR falls into any of these categories—including those with prior criminal convictions—CBP may classify them as an arriving alien and detain them at the port of entry. However, similar to other immigrants detained after enforcement actions, LPRs detained at ports of entry still have rights they can exercise.

Before Traveling Abroad or Returning to the United States

The mere passage of time since receiving your green card or the fact that you have previously traveled in and out of the U.S. without incident does not guarantee future entry. Given the stricter enforcement environment, it is crucial to exercise due diligence before traveling.

What You Should Do:

  1. Consult an immigration attorney before traveling if:
    • You have a prior arrest or criminal record (convictions or pending charges)
    • You have a pending case with immigration court or USCIS
    • There is anything in your immigration history that was not disclosed during your green card application and could raise questions upon re-entry
  2. Be mindful of extended absences from the U.S.
    • Staying outside the U.S. for more than six months may have serious consequences. While this alone may not revoke your green card, CBP may view it as evidence of abandonment.
    • If pressured to sign an abandonment of residence form at the airport, know that you are not required to sign it against your will.
  3. Know your rights as a lawful permanent resident.
    • Understanding the legal framework surrounding LPR status will help you navigate interactions with CBP officials and avoid unnecessary complications upon return.

Final Thoughts

Not all green card holders are at risk of being detained at the airport upon re-entry. However, those classified as “arriving aliens” may face heightened scrutiny and potential enforcement actions by CBP. If you are an LPR, remember: “Use it, or lose it.”

(Author Atty. Lourdes Santos “Atty. Lou” Tancinco is an immigration attorney and immigrant rights advocate based in the San Francisco Bay area and a partner at the Tancinco Law P.C., law firm established since 1992.  She is also a producer/host of Pusong Pinoy sa Amerika, an immigration law informational show aired on GMA Pinoy TV. She may be reached at law@tancinco.com, www.tancinco.com, facebook/tancincolaw, or at 1-888-930-0808)

Categories
Updates

Restoring Faith: Noticeable Increase in Naturalized Citizens in the Biden Administration

Share this:

In 2021, President Biden issued an executive order aimed at restoring faith in the legal immigration process. A key part of this effort was to significantly reduce naturalization processing times, with the goal of strengthening the integration of new Americans.

Several changes under this administration appear to be benefiting new U.S. citizens. Notably, the backlog of naturalization cases has decreased. By 2023, the backlog stood at 416,034 citizenship applications—a 44% drop from the high of 942,669 in 2020 and the lowest backlog since 2015.

Although the filing fee for naturalization increased from $640 to $710, USCIS has made it easier for low-income applicants to qualify for reduced fees. The naturalization application itself has also been streamlined, shrinking from 20 pages to 14 pages.

A study by Boundless found that by May 2024, the average processing time for citizenship applications had dropped to just five months—a 15% reduction from the previous year and a more than 50% decrease from 2022. This expedited processing is evident in the USCIS San Francisco District Office, where applicants often receive interview notices within 3-4 months of filing. Oath ceremonies are commonly held the same day or the next day after the interview. This marks a stark contrast to the previous administration, when naturalization processing often took up to 12 months, and some cases were even reopened after naturalization had been granted.

Nationally, around nine million green card holders are eligible for naturalization but have yet to apply. In 2023, more than 25% of lawful permanent residents from Mexico were eligible to apply, and the Philippines is among the top five countries with the most eligible non-U.S. citizens.

One of the most significant rights of U.S. citizenship is the right to vote. With the 2024 Presidential election just months away, 81.4% of newly naturalized citizens are expected to cast their ballots, according to a survey by the U.S. Immigration Policy Center.

With these positive developments in naturalization processing, there’s no better time to apply for U.S. citizenship than now. If you have any questions, contact Tancinco Law P.C. at 415 397 0808 or visit our website at www.tancinco.com.

Categories
Updates

Making sense of the big immigration backlog problem

Share this:

The immigration backlog of the United States continues to rise at dizzying rates, resulting in migrants having to wait for years before getting any resolution for their cases. 

There are even stories of migrants dying before their visas, work permits, green cards, and naturalization petitions reached a resolution.

According to data tracked by the Syracuse University, unresolved cases are about to hit 2 million.  Common sense as confirmed by reporting indicates that the backlogs spiked because of the pandemic, but with the US relaxing COVID measures, the backlog continues to grow.

A factor to emphasize is that in the entirety of the US, there are only 600 immigration judges to rule on these cases. Many of these judges handle up to 4,000 cases each.

If the country had unlimited resources and law professionals, an easy solution would be to hire more judges – but that is not the case. This is why experts have been calling for prioritization: that the cases that need to be resolved more urgently.

Of the almost 2 million people waiting in the backlog, some 750,000 are asylum-seekers. These migrants are placed in a tight spot because the US only allows for 180-day work permits after the filing of an asylum petition, forcing many to work illegally.

While the government has enacted policies to help in reducing the backlog, such as making it easier for migrants with advanced STEM degrees, these have so far been insufficient.

The US needs to respond to this urgent problem as more migrants enter the country, the situation exacerbated by conflict in the Middle East and more recently in Ukraine.

To make sense of the backlog and find alternate paths to citizenship, reach out to a trusted immigration lawyer.

Categories
Global Pinoy

Petitioning private caregivers not a good option for senior immigrants

Share this:

Jane became a naturalized US citizen in 2012 and immediately petitioned her elderly parents to live in the States.

In 2013, Jane’s parents arrived in the US and resided with her. The first year of their residence in the US with Jane was pleasant as the family traveled together to various places in California.

However, in 2014, Jane’s mother suffered a stroke and needed full-time care. She was not able to get medical insurance for her mother so she paid all the medical expenses.

Jane has a full-time job and has minor children. Since she barely had the time to attend to her mother, her father took care of her ailing mother.

Jane’s father began to noticeably lose weight and was not getting enough sleep from taking care of her mother. To relieve her father’s stress, Jane moved her mother into a senior health-care facility to have a full-time caretaker. Two weeks after her mother moved to the facility, her father suffered a heart attack and passed away.

Jane wants her mother moved back into her home. Instead of having a nonrelative take care of her mother, Jane prefers to have a relative be her mother’s caregiver.

Petitioning for caregivers

Jane wants to petition her relative in the Philippines who graduated from a nursing school. How long will this take?

Under the present US immigration system, caregivers fall under the third preference employment-based category “other workers.”

As of December 2015, only petitions filed on or before Aug. 1, 2007 in this category are being processed. Thus, if a petition for a caregiver is filed in 2015, there will be an approximate wait of seven to eight years before the caregiver will be processed for a visa.

By that time, the elderly immigrant may no longer be around to benefit from the presence of a caregiver. This lengthy process is a result of the severe backlog in the employment based petitions for nonprofessional workers.

This situation is analogous to family-based petitions where an elderly parent who is a green-card holder files a petition for an adult child. The petition falls under the second preference family-based category, and to date, only petitions that were filed in December 2004 are being processed. For a recently filed petition, the wait could be nine to 10 years for it to be current. As in most cases, the elderly petitioner passes away before the visa is available.

Filipino immigrant families usually prefer to care for their elderly in their homes. Also, most seniors would prefer to have their child or a relative take care of them. Unfortunately, the reality is that the US immigration system is broken and the matter of giving priority to caregivers of senior citizens is yet to be addressed. Until then, elderly immigrants will need to rely on alternative system of care such as social services groups or nonprofit organizations among others.

Categories
Global Pinoy

5 reasons Filipino immigrants apply for U.S. citizenship

Share this:

Immigrants who have resided in the United States for an extended period of time aspire to become US citizens for different reasons.

For the more than 4 million Filipinos who decided to live and make the US their adopted land, the following are some of their motivations for seeking naturalization.

1. Family unity
Green card holders or non-US citizens who are permanent residents may petition their unmarried children as well as their spouses. However, unlike US citizens, they are not allowed to petition their parents, their married children and their siblings.

Being a US citizen provides them the ability to petition more family members including their future spouses or fiancées. Also, US citizens may petition their minor children and spouses faster (about 12 months) as compared to green card holder petitioners.

Filipino immigrants who are family-oriented would prefer to be naturalized as US citizens rather than wait to be reunited with their family members.

2. Avoiding separation
Once a green card holder migrates, the permanent resident status is not really “permanent” in the sense that it may be revoked for cause by the US Department of Homeland Security.

This happens when an immigrant is convicted of a removable/deportable offense even if family members are all US citizens.

This happened to a longtime Filipino immigrant who was arrested for a traffic violation but was later found to have a criminal history. The criminal convictions he had were deportable offenses and resulted in his deportation from the United States and consequently was separated from his US citizen spouse and children. This situation could have been avoided if the immigrant was a naturalized US citizen at the time of conviction.

To prevent any unintended immigration consequence, it would be best to apply for US citizenship as soon as the immigrant meets the eligibility for naturalization.

3. Civic engagement
Filipinos are the second highest growing minority group and integration to the adopted land becomes critical. Naturalized US citizens are given access to voting, political rights and can seek equal protection of the law.

A naturalized US citizen may hold elected positions that will not only protect the interests of their constituents but also their community.

4. Federal employment
A naturalized US citizen may be afforded opportunities for federal employment with better benefits.

Many Filipinos have joined the US military and become US citizens giving them the ability to petition family members and enjoy military benefits.

5. Ease of travel
This is probably the least important in terms of the reasons for becoming a US citizen but interestingly, some Filipinos carry pride in holding US passport in traveling to other countries.

Certainly, there are more than these five reasons to apply for US citizenship. The motivation may be toward immigration integration but it does not take out the “Filipino” in the immigrant. In the United States, a Filipino who is a US citizen is still perceived as part of the Filipino minority group.

In success or failure, the Filipino naturalized US citizen will still be perceived as a Filipino in his adopted land.

(The author may be reached at law@tancinco.com, facebook.com/tancincolaw, tancinco.weareph.com/old or [02] 721-1963)

Categories
Global Pinoy

Donald Trump’s hostility to U.S. citizen children of undocumented immigrants

Share this:

IN AN EFFORT to curb illegal immigration, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump announced his plan, if he is elected, to eliminate this birthright citizenship to children of the undocumented immigrants.

Is this plan an effective solution to resolving the broken US immigration system? Why is it that other Republican candidates do not support Trump’s proposal?

Karen entered the United States on a fiancé visa. Her US citizen fiancé George knew that Karen was a victim of a sexual offense and became pregnant prior to entering the US as a fiancée.

Six months after her arrival in the United States, Karen gave birth to Mariel. Meanwhile, Karen and George had a falling out and never got married.

Mariel is a US citizen by birth while her mother has an expired fiancée visa and is now an undocumented immigrant. Having heard of the proposed elimination of the birthright citizenship, Mariel, who is now in high school is wondering if she will be “deported” and divested of her US citizenship should Trump succeed in getting elected President. What is the likelihood that the birthright citizenship will be eliminated?

Birthright citizenship
Unlike in the Philippines where citizenship is determined by the citizenship of the parents, the United States follow the jus soli principle of citizenship. This means that any individual born in American soil is a US citizen at birth irrespective of the nationality of the parents. This birthright citizenship is not a legal principle but a constitutional right enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution.

This birthright was historically intended by the framers of the Constitution to place citizenship status above prejudices based on the fundamental belief that each person is born equal regardless of color, creed or social status.

Proposal
The 14th Amendment withstood many challenges in judicial courts and in Congress. Now that it is being mentioned again, it is not clear how this elimination of birthright citizenship is going to take place. In fact, Trump has not specifically stated in detail which proposal he is going to make.

One of the proposals being floated is that both parents must be citizens or legal residents at the time of each child’s birth. The other extremely cruel proposal is that all US citizen children of immigrants should retroactively prove that they were entitled to their citizenship by proving the legal status of their parents.

Mariel’s fear of being divested of her US citizenship will, in all probability, not be a reality. It is election season and it is not unusual that this birthright citizenship is an issue that is being brought up but there are high legal hurdles that will need to be accomplished before that even happens.

A constitutional amendment, for example, requires the vote of two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of all the states. With the views on immigration as polarized as it is, getting the two-thirds majority in Congress will be an impossible task. Much less will it be any easier to get three-fourths of the states to approve a constitutional amendment.

(The author may be reached at law@tancinco.com, facebook.com/tancincolaw, tancinco.weareph.com/old or [02] 721-1963.)