Tag: president biden

Categories
Updates

U.S. District Court Judge Orders Injunction on Biden’s Priority for ICE Enforcement & Prosecutorial Discretion Memos

U.S. District Court Judge Orders Injunction on Biden's Priority for ICE Enforcement & Prosecutorial Discretion Memos
Share this:

If ICE were to immediately do an en masse arrest, detention and removal of millions of unauthorized immigrants from the United States, it will not only be an inhumane undertaking but there will also be an adverse socio-economic impact and a tremendous drain on government resources.

With a policy for a more compassionate immigration policy, President Biden issued policy directives through the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency early this year.

The Biden-Harris Administration came out with “priorities for enforcement” through ICE memoranda and directives:

(1) Pekoske Memo Dated January 20, 2021: Review of and Interim Revision to Civil Immigration Enforcement and Removal Policies and Priorities;

(2) Johnson Memo Dated February 18, 2021: Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement and Removal Priorities

(3) Maher Memo Dated May 27, 2021: Implementing Interim Civil Immigration Enforcement Policies and Priorities;

(4) Trasvina Memo Dated May 21, 2021: Interim Guidance to OPLA Attorneys Regarding Civil Immigration Enforcement and Removal Policies and Priorities

The Pekoske and Johnson Memos set interim guidelines for immigration enforcement, including providing guidance to ICE ERO officers on prioritizing enforcement actions, custody decisions, the execution of final orders of removal, and other actions. Priorities for enforcement listed those individuals who are threats to national security, border security public safety and those with convictions for aggravated felonies.

The Maher and Trasvina Memo, on the other hand, provided guidance on ICE exercise of prosecutorial discretion (PD) at all stages of ICE enforcement including, but not limited to, issuance of Notice to Appear, Cancellation of the NTA, Stipulation to Relief, Administrative Closure, Termination and Continuances of Removal.

Notwithstanding the compassionate and practical nature of the priorities for enforcement and the reasonable guidance provided on prosecutorial discretion as contained in the Memos, the States of Texas and Louisiana filed a lawsuit against the Biden Administration questioning the legality of the abovementioned Memoranda (State of Texas v. United States, 6:21-cv-16 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 19, 2021). As a result of the lawsuit, Judge Drew Tipton issued a preliminary injunction against ICE restraining them from enforcing the ICE Memos. The injunction was temporarily suspended on August 23, 2021 until August 30, 2021.

Before the issuance of the injunction order, several immigrants who are in removal proceedings applied for Prosecutorial Discretion based on the relevant ICE Memo resulting in closure and sometimes termination of removal proceedings. With the injunction, the ICE priorities for enforcement and the prosecutorial discretion based on the subject Memos may not be enforced in the interim pending litigation. But this does not necessarily mean that the immigrant in removal proceedings may not avail of the request for prosecutorial discretion and other applicable reliefs based on ICE long standing policy. It will be best to seek legal advice from professional legal counsel for existing remedies that may still be available pending the final decision on the lawsuit.

Categories
Updates

Updates on Biden’s U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021

Share this:

SUMMARY: The U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021 (H.R. 1177 and S.348) introduced in Congress establishes a path to citizenship for certain undocumented individuals. The bill also replaces the term alien with noncitizen in the immigration statutes and addresses other related issues.

Specifically, the bill establishes a new status of lawful prospective immigrant. This status shall be available to an applying noncitizen who meets certain requirements, including being continually present in the United States from January 1, 2021, and passing background checks. After at least five years with this status, an eligible noncitizen may apply for and receive permanent resident status.

The bill also provides permanent resident status to certain applying noncitizens, specifically for eligible noncitizens who (1) entered the United States as a minor, (2) were eligible for temporary protected status or deferred enforced departure on January 1, 2017, or (3) worked a certain amount of agricultural labor in the five years prior to applying.

STATUS:  The U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021 (H.R. 1177 and S.348) is still pending and is currently referred to various committees including  the Judiciary Committee for hearing and consideration. No significant action has been taken on this Biden bill since its introduction.

There are two stand-alone bills that were approved by the U.S. House of Representatives in the month of March 2021. These are the American Dream and Promise Act and the Farm Workforce Modernization Act. Both of the provisions of these bills are also included in the broader U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021.

(This update is current as of July 19, 2021. Previous updates on the U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021 may be viewed here.)

Categories
Updates

Latest Court Ruling Affects First Time DACA Applicants

Share this:

On July 16, 2021, a federal court Judge Andrew Hanen ordered the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to stop the processing and approval of new DACA applications. What is the impact of this decision on DACA recipients and those with pending DACA applications?

Jose turned 18 years old in January 2021.  When Jose was 5 years old, he was brought to the United States by his Aunt and his immigration status was never legalized. He practically grew up in the United States and completed his high school education and dreams, one day, of becoming a physician.

When President Biden was elected, Jose filed for protection under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. This is the first time that he applied for DACA.  The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services acknowledged receiving his application but no action has been taken so far.  On Friday, July 16, 2021, Jose learned that the Federal Court Judge ruled against new DACA applicants. What are the chances that he will be granted employment authorization and protection under DACA?

The DACA Program

In 2012 President Obama created a policy called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), calling for deferred action for certain undocumented young people who came to the U.S. as children. Applications under the program began on August 15, 2012. More than 800,000 DACA eligible individuals filed for protection and employment authorization under this DACA program.

Legal Challenges

DACA has always been the subject of legal challenges where certain States question the legality of the DACA program. When former President Trump took office, he immediately issued an order rescinding DACA. Several lawsuits were filed questioning the rescission of the DACA program.

On June 18, 2020, in Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of University of California,the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Trump administration’s termination of the DACA program and ruled that the termination of DACA was “arbitrary and capricious” under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). While it ruled against its termination, the Court did not rule on whether or not DACA itself is lawful, but merely held that the Trump administration did not follow the law when it tried to terminate the program. In Casa de Maryland v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security,  a federal judge in the U.S. District Court of Maryland ordered the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to reinstate the DACA program to its 2017, pre-termination status and to start accepting new applications.

On July 16, 2021, Judge Andrew Hanen, a federal judge in the State of Texas, issued a ruling declaring DACA as unlawful since, according to his decision, the Department of Homeland Security has no authority to create DACA and to prevent immigration officials from enforcing the removal provisions of the law.

Impact of the Decision: First Time DACA Applicants Adversely Affected

Jose’s application as illustrated above will be put on hold as a result of the recent decision.

Those who have received prior DACA protections and employment authorizations are not affected by the decision. Unfortunately, first time DACA applications will be placed on hold by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services which means that no new DACA applications will be approved at this time. The federal Court decision blocked USCIS from approving any new DACA cases. Hence, all individuals who have submitted DACA initial applications (those that never had DACA and are applying for the first time) and have not received an approval from USCIS will have their application held. This applies to all initial cases that were not approved prior to July 16, 2021.

What about individuals who already had prior DACA for the first time and are renewing? If an applicant was recently granted DACA for the first time, his/her DACA will remain valid and may be renewed.

Future of DACA

President Biden vowed to appeal the federal court decision. But while this is on appeal, the new DACA applicant’s fate will be put on hold. The more permanent solution is for Congress to pass the American Dream and Promise Act which bill is waiting to be passed.

President Obama emphasized the importance of passing legislation to protect our DREAMers.  On his Twitter posting, he said that “For more than nine years, DREAMers have watched courts and politicians debate whether they’ll be allowed to stay in the only country many of them have ever known, it’s long past time for Congress to act and give them the protection and certainty they deserve.”

Let us continue to strongly support our DREAMers, by calling and urging our representatives in Congress to pass the American Dream and Promise Act. Undeniably, our young DREAMers deserve better.

(Atty. Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq. is an immigration attorney with the Tancinco Law Offices, a San Francisco CA based law firm. She may be reached at 1 888 930 0808, law@tancinco.com , facebook.com/tancincolaw, or through her website www.tancinco.com)

Categories
Updates

What Changes in Immigration Policies are Expected under a new Biden Administration?

Share this:

As President Joe Biden takes his oath of office on January 20, 2020, the immigrant community is looking forward to a new vision of the United States as a more welcoming country. After 4 years of cruel and inhumane immigration policies specifically relating to asylum restrictions, interior enforcement and separation of children at the border, a more compassionate administration is taking over. President Biden plans to rescind asylum restrictive policies, reform the parole programs and improve the immigration system, among others.

Below are some of the main focal points of the proposed immigration changes.

Pathway to Citizenship for the 11 Million Unauthorized Immigrants

On his first day of office, President Biden will roll out a comprehensive immigration bill that will provide a pathway to U.S. citizenship for long time residents and those who have been present in the United States without legal status. The bill will cover those immigrants who have been in the United States as of January 1, 2021. The proposed legislation will have an eight (8) year pathway where qualifying immigrants will have temporary status for five(5) years and then they will be granted green cards after meeting certain qualifications which is payment of taxes and background checks among others. After being granted green cards, these immigrants will be able to apply for citizenship three (3) years thereafter.

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients and those in temporary protected status (TPS) program have a faster route to citizenship. They can apply for a green card immediately. DACA recipients are the children who arrived in the U.S. at a young age and have had no lawful status. With the DACA program, they are protected from being deported. TPS, on the other hand, refers to those immigrants from strife torn countries many of whom are from El Salvador.

100 Days Moratorium on Deportation

President Biden promised a moratorium on deportation during his first 100 days in office. Unlike the prior Trump administration where there was intense interior enforcement that caused fear in the immigration community, a moratorium on deportation will mean a more compassionate approach to dealing with unauthorized immigrants and most especially for those who have strong family ties in the United States and who do not have criminal case histories.

Reversing Trump’s Proclamations

President Biden pledged to move quickly to reverse several Trump proclamations. A memorandum is expected to be issued on his first day that will delay for 60 days the implementation of last minute regulations promulgated in the last days of the Trump presidency.

Three Presidential Proclamations must be reversed immediately. First, the two Presidential Proclamations (10014 and 10052) signed in April 2020 and June 2020 suspended entry of certain immigrants and non-immigrants to the United States following the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Outbreak. With certain exceptions, the latter Proclamation 10052 curtails the ability of H1B visa, H2B visa and L1 visa and certain categories of the J visa from entering the United States. These two proclamations while they were issued during the pandemic to avoid risk to the U.S. labor market are more a restriction on the entry of lawful immigrants especially for parents and adult children of U.S. citizens. Trump extended these two proclamations to be effective until March 31, 2021.

Aside from these Presidential Proclamations, there is also the October 2019 Proclamation referred to as the Uninsured Ban. This proclamation bars entry of immigrants without “approved” health insurance. Obviously, this was meant to curb legal immigration by making it harder for low income immigrants from reuniting with their immediate family members in the US.

The U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the legality of these bans. President Biden must act to immediately reverse this Proclamation. However, despite a firm intent to invalidate Trump’s proclamations, it may not be a smooth process for the Biden administration given prior Court rulings. Reversing proclamations require the government to address the scope of authority and rationale behind the policies.

Bill Must Be Passed in Congress

The Biden Administration has a considerable number of priorities in his first 100 days. With the number of COVID-19 related casualties rising each day, President Biden will surely prioritize the Covid-19 issue and take clear measures to deal with the pandemic crisis. While the proposals and plans to change immigration policies are positive developments contrary to the prior anti-immigration agenda, it may not be easy to implement them without legislation passed in Congress. The hope is that the Democratic controlled Congress led by Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Schumer must take active roles in prioritizing the passage of the Biden immigration reform bill.

(Atty. Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq. is a San Francisco-based immigration attorney and an immigrant rights advocate. She may be reached at 1 888 930 0808, law@tancinco.com, facebook.com/tancincolaw, or through her firm’s website.)