Categories
Updates

Press Release: Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver

Share this:

WHO CAN BENEFIT FROM THIS NEWLY MINTED REGULATION

What a blessing to have received two pieces of good news related to
immigration within a span of one year.  Since August 15, 2012, when DACA
– Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals – took effect, thousands of
hopeful youngsters have received their employment authorization
documents and social security numbers. They are now gainfully employed,
contributing ot he family coffers or saving up for college.  By March 4,
2013, the new provisional unlawful presence waiver, alternatively
referred to as 601A waiver, will take effect. On the state level, there
is also good news because immigrants without status will eventually
become eligible to apply for driver’s licenses under the temporary
visitor driver’s license (TVDL) program.  The program will take effect
ten months after Governor Quinn signs the approved bill into law. 

Who can avail of the 601A Unlawful Presence Provisional Waiver?

A
limited set of individuals will benefit from this recent announcement. 
Only individuals who are immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, who are
physically present in the U.S. but cannot adjust status here, despite
being married to U.S. citizens, with U.S. citizen children and having
lived here for a long time, may avail of this unlawful presence
provisional waiver. 

“Immediate Relative” is defined as the (i)
spouse of a U.S. citizen; (ii) parent of a U.S. citizen who is at least
21 years of age; (iii) child below 21 of a U.S. citizen parent. 
Examples of those may benefit from this waiver include: spouses, parents
and children of U.S. citizens who crossed the border or jumped ship or
entered without inspection by an immigration officer.   

How does the 601A waiver work?

This
new process applies only to immediate relatives of U.S. citizens who
have no violation other than being unlawfully present in the U.S.  This
new process will not apply if there are other issues such as entering
with a false passport or name, previous removal/deportation, criminal
conviction, engaging in any form of fraud or misrepresentation, or
unauthorized claim of U.S. citizenship.

A very important
requirement for a successful waiver application is a showing of extreme
hardship on the part of a qualifying relative – a U.S. citizen spouse or
parent.  There is no clear definition of extreme hardship and it can
only be inferred from successful case law.  This emphasizes the
importance of seeking legal counsel who can thoroughly assess a specific
situation and help the applicant evaluate whether it is wise to apply
for this waiver.   

By March 4, 2013, and only after the approval
of an immediate relative immigrant petition or a self-petition,
applicants may file the 601A waiver at a designated lockbox within the
United States.  This new procedure alleviates the anxiety among family
members because they can continue to be together during the waiver
application process.  In order to perfect the waiver process, the
applicant must still leave the U.S. and have the immigrant visa
interview at a U.S. consulate abroad.  Approval of the unlawful presence
waiver does not a guarantee issuance of the immigrant visa but as long
as there is no issue other than unlawful presence, the applicant can
expect to rejoin his or her family in the U.S. immediately after visa
issuance.  If, at the interview process, other undisclosed or not
immediately discoverable issues surface, the applicant will be required
to go through the regular 601 waiver process described below.     

The
existing 601 waiver procedure still applies to those who cannot avail
of the 601A waiver. This existing process requires the applicant to go
for the immigrant visa interview first before being allowed to file the
601 waiver, consequently causing months, if not more than a year, of
waiting for the outcome of the waiver application.  In an effort to
streamline the waiver process, all waiver applications – the new 601A or
the existing 601 process – are now filed in designated locations. 
Hopefully, this will make the adjudication process consistent compared
to the past when waiver applications were adjudicated at the various
consulates around the world.           

Applicants scheduled by the NVC ON or AFTER January 3, 2013 for an upcoming interview are eligible to apply for a 601A waiver.

Who qualifies for a 601A Unlawful Presence Provisional Waiver?

An individual qualifies for this waiver if ALL of the six requirements below can be met:

  1. The applicant is at least 17 years of age;
  2. The applicant is physically present in the United States;
  3. The applicant has accrued unlawful presence in the U.S. for a
    period greater than 180 days or the applicant entered the U.S. without
    inspction  
  4. An immediate relative immigrant petition on behalf of the applicant has been approved;
  5.    The immigrant visa processing fee has been paid;  
  6.    Extreme hardship will be caused upon qualifying relatives
    (U.S. citizen spouse or parent) if the waiver is not granted an
    immigrant visa

Who are ineligible to apply for a 601A Waiver?

  1. Anyone who does meet any one of the qualifying factors above will be ineligible to apply for a 601A waiver.
  2. The applicant has a pending application for adjustment of status.
  3. Applicants with notices of visa interview prior to January 3, 2013

Example 1 – Spouses and Children of U.S. Citizens who Entered Without inspection (EWI)

In 2005, Alex traveled to Canada.  Although Alex did not have a U.S.
visa, he was able to enter by land.  He fell in love with Cathy and got
married three years later.  They have two U.S. citizen children.  Cathy
filed an immigrant petition for Alex as soon as they got married but
because he was not inspected by an immigration officer when he entered
the U.S., he could not proceed with his immigrant visa process within
the U.S.  He needed to leave and process his immigrant visa abroad. 
However, the length of his unauthorized stay in the U.S. would have
prevented him from returning for at least 10 years.  For Alex and Cathy,
leaving to pursue the visa application abroad was an impossible
solution in light of the fact that Cathy needed to work and no one would
be available to take care of their two young U.S. citizen children. 
Alex’s lengthy absence would subject Cathy to extreme hardship.

Pursuant
to a 601A waiver application, Alex can file an application for
provisional waiver in the U.S. after Cathy’s immigrant petition has been
approved and the requisite visa fee paid. The waiver application must
prove that Cathy (Alex’ qualifying relative) will suffer extreme
hardship if the waiver is not granted. He can wait for the outcome of
the application in the U.S., thus, enabling him to spend more time with
his family.  Once the waiver is approved, he can travel to a consulate
abroad to continue the immigrant visa process and reenter the U.S. as a
lawful permanent resident once he receives an immigrant visa.     
          

Example 2 – Crewmembers (C1 and D1 Visa Holders) who Married a U.S. Citizens

Cesar,
a widower, had a low-paying job in a cruise ship. While the ship was
docked in Florida in 2002, he learned about opportunities for a higher
income in the U.S.  This was very enticing to him because he wanted his
children to go to school and eventually earn their professional
degrees.  One of the children, Dan, was focused on becoming a licensed
physical therapist in the U.S.  Dan succeeded in becoming a green card
holder through employment-based immigration.  Dan, who is now a U.S.
citizen, could have easily petitioned for his father Cesar but having
“jumped ship”, he was unable to apply for adjustment of status in the
U.S. His situation is similar to someone who entered without inspection.

Cesar eventually met Liza, a U.S. citizen widow and a strong
cancer survivor.  Cesar and Liza gave each other hope, treasured being
together and decided to get married.  They longed to travel to places
around the world but Cesar had to work out his immigration status. 
Cesar would need to apply for a waiver and the new provisional waiver
would allow him to await its approval in the U.S.  This would enable
Cesar and Liza to spend more time together, before Cesar proceeds abroad
to continue his application for the issuance of his immigrant visa.

Example 3 – Children Who Crossed the Border at a Tender Age

There
are thousands of infants and unsuspecting children who were brought to
the U.S. through the borders by their relatives.  Many of these children
cannot proceed to college because they cannot avail of student loans
for lack of social security numbers.

Miguel, an agricultural
worker, gained residency through employment.  This process took so
long.  He finally received his green card and was reunited with his
childhood sweetheart, Celina. They got married and were blessed with a
child, Mario.  As a green card holder, Miguel was capable of filing a
petition for his family but, back then, it would have taken at least 5
years for his wife and child to immigrate. The family could not bear
being separated much longer. Celina and Mario were denied visitor’s
visas many times so Miguel’s wife, Celina, and their 3-year old son
risked it and crossed the border. 

Life got in the way and it
took some time for Miguel to become a U.S. citizen.  He can now file an
immigrant petition on behalf of Celina and Mario (who is now 18) but
because they entered without inspection, they would need to exit in
order to apply for their immigrant visas at the U.S. Consulate back
home. The recently announced provisional waiver enables them to file
their applications for provisional waiver in the U.S. prior to attending
the visa interview at the U.S. consulate abroad.  Once the visas are
issued, they can return as permanent residents.       

No Appeal, Motion to Reconsider or Motion to Reopen

The
waiver application process is complex.  While it may sound
self-serving, I strongly advise seeking legal counsel before filing an
application for provisional waiver.  It is also important to note that
grating of a waiver is discretionary and there is no appeal or motion to
reconsider or motion to reopen if the application is denied.

Categories
Updates

Iowa Department of Transportation to Issue Drivers Licenses and Nonoperator IDs to People Granted DACA Status

Share this:

The Iowa Department of Transportation has changed its perspective and
will now issue driver’s licenses or nonoperator ID cards to people who
have been approved for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
status after a change in guidance by USCIS and the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).

On Friday, January 18, 2013, USCIS changed the definition of persons
granted DACA status to being “authorized granted Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrival status are “authorized by the Department of Homeland
Security to be present in the United States and considered to be
lawfully present during their deferred action [time period].”

Under Iowa legislation, driver’s licenses and nonoperator IDs can only
be issued to foreign nationals authorized to be present in the U.S.
Because of this change in definition by USCIS, Iowa’s Department of
Transportation can now legally issue these IDs to people granted DACA
status.

Categories
Immigration Round Table

Taking Steps to Realize a Mothers Dying Wish

Share this:

Dear Atty. Lou,
 
My 98-year-old mother has not seen my sister, who resides in the Philippines, for a total of 38 years. Now my mother is very ill and has been in out of the hospital. Many times, she was on the verge of dying but survived after treatment. She has multiple medical problems including dementia. Most recently during the holidays, she suffered a mild stroke. She told me that her only wish is for her to see my sister before she dies. 

In our Filipino culture, I believe, there is a saying that when someone is suffering a serious ailment and is on the verged of death, this person may be waiting for wish to become a reality. Probably the reason why my mother is still alive despite her serious medical conditions is that she is still waiting to see my sister. My question Atty. Lou is how can my sister apply for a visitor’s visa?  For sure, she does not have proof of employment neither does she own properties. However, I can shoulder all her costs for travel including her round trip ticket and her expenses during her temporary stay here. I am willing to execute an Affidavit of Support. Please guide us on what we can do. I want our mother’s wish to come true before the inevitable happens. May this be considered a humanitarian request for a visa? Please help us.

Maria

Dear Maria,

I totally understand how you feel about your mom and her ardent desire to see your only sibling left in the Philippines. You did not mention whether your mother petitioned your sister. If your mother and your sister have not seen each other for 38 years, I would assume that no relative petition was filed on her behalf.

There are two ways for your sister to obtain a visa to enter the United States for a visit. The first one is through a B2 visitors visa. This type of visa is the most appropriate for your sister. A visitors visa is granted to those who wish to enter the United States temporarily for pleasure. It is expected that the visa applicant must show proof that she will only stay in the United States for a short period of time or holds a non-immigrant intent. This means she should be able to convince the consular officer that she will not stay permanently in the United States. Under Section 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, a legal presumption exists that every applicant for a visitors visa is an intending immigrant until he or she establishes to the satisfaction of the consul that he or she is eligible for a nonimmigrant status as a visitors visa holder. Once the presumption is overcome, the applicant will be able to obtain a nonimmigrant visa and subsequent admission to the United States. In overcoming this presumption, the applicant must show sufficient ties to the Philippines and that her ties will not be abandoned during her temporary stay in the United States.

It is a challenge that your sister has no properties or sufficient income. But her ties to the Philippines may be established by other means like the residence of her own family and long time employment. The health condition and advance age of your mother may be strong reasons to prove the urgency of the visit and the temporary nature of your sister’s stay in the United States.

If after exerting all efforts to apply for a visitors visa and your sister is still denied one, she may try to apply for the humanitarian parole visa, which is the visa of last resort for those who urgently need to travel for humanitarian reasons with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

I hope this information is helpful. Good luck.

Atty. Lou

(Lourdes Santos Tancinco Esq .is a partner at the Tancinco Law Offices, a Professional Law Corp. Her principal office is located at One Hallidie Plaza, Suite 818, San Francisco CA 94102 and may be reached at 1 888 930 0808, email at law@tancinco.com. The content provided in this column is solely for informational purposes only and do not create a lawyer-client relationship. It should not be relied as legal advice. This column does not disclose any confidential or classified information acquired in her capacity as legal counsel. Consult with an attorney before deciding on a course of action. You may submit questions to law@tancinco.com)
 

Categories
Global Pinoy

Finding Courage to Prosecute Traffickers

Share this:

Pablo arrived in the United States using an H2B visa. Having paid his recruiter a substantial amount of money, he was told that he will work for a hotel in Nevada. Upon his arrival, he found out that there was no employment for him in a hotel. Instead, he was forced against his will to work in various households as a housekeeper for a minimal pay. His recruiter kept his passport with the visa that eventually expired. After one year without legal status, he left his housekeeping job without his recruiter’s knowledge. He finally found a job as a live-in caregiver and worked 24/7 without leave. This time he was paid a reasonable salary for his services.

Since he is undocumented, Pablo would like to legalize his stay by applying for a working visa. He found out that obtaining a visa as a caregiver could take several years. He also learned that being in unlawful status will make it legally impossible for him to change status to a nonimmigrant working visa. Pablo heard about the case of a Filipina getting a “T” visa as a victim of human trafficking. He wants to apply for the same visa. Pablo was told that he fits the profile of a trafficking victim. But when he was informed that part of the requirement is that he assists law enforcement agencies in prosecuting his recruiter and employer, he had second thoughts about his decision to file the T visa. According to Pablo, he could not in conscience assist in persecuting the person who helped him in coming to the United States. He said that despite paying the recruiter money, he still feels that he owes this person a debt of gratitude.

The story of Pablo is a story of many of our “kababayans” who are victims of human trafficking but are afraid to pursue their cases against their recruiters. Very few find the strength to fight for their rights and liberate themselves from the traffickers with law enforcement authorities’ support.  In an effort to reach out and assist victims of human trafficking, the Obama administration proclaimed the month of January as the National Slavery and Human Trafficking Prevention Month.

Human Trafficking

Human trafficking is a serious offense. It is a form of modern-day slavery in which traffickers lure individuals with false promises of employment and a better life. Traffickers often take advantage of the vulnerable population, the poor, unemployed individuals, the undocumented who lack access to social safety nets.

Not all failed recruitment or labor contracts may be classified as trafficking. To consider a case as ‘trafficking’ depends on the type of work, the use of force, fraud, or coercion to obtain or maintain work.

A trafficking survivor may avail of the protection of the law anytime he can show that he was a victim of a “severe form of trafficking in persons”. The severity may be proven by showing that the victim was brought to the US either for: (1) the purpose of a commercial sex act by force, fraud or coercion, or was under age 18, or (2) labor or services induced by force, fraud or coercion and for the purpose of subjecting the victim to slavery, debt bondage or involuntary service

The “T” Visa

In October 2000, Congress created the “T” nonimmigrant status by passing the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act (VTVPA). The legislation strengthens the ability of law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute human trafficking, and most importantly, offers protection to victims.

For those who are trafficking victims and are undocumented, the “T” visa may be availed of. The T Visa allows victims to remain in the United States and obtain permanent immigrant visa status.

Prosecuting the Trafficker

The T visa has a dual purpose. It primarily assist the victims of trafficking and secondarily  assist law enforcement authorities in the investigation or prosecution of human trafficking cases. Under the secondary purpose, the applicant for the T visa is expected to comply with reasonable request by authorities to assist in the investigation and prosecution of trafficking. If the victim is not willing to cooperate, the T visa will not be approved. This part of the application process is where some victims are afraid to pursue their applications for T visas. To help the victims gather courage to assist in prosecution, the family and community must be supportive of the efforts undertaken by the trafficking victim. The prevention of human trafficking requires a team effort not just from the government but also from public.

Filipino Trafficking Victims in the U.S.

There is no exact number on how many Filipinos are victims of human trafficking in the United States. In the media and even in the blog of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, many Filipinos relate how they became victim of unscrupulous individuals who forced them into labor and debt bondage. While we often hear of domestic workers as victims, recently, teachers on H1B visas are also claiming to be victims of trafficking. In the recent federal case of Nunag Tanedo v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board there were 350 Filipino teachers who scored a victory when after trial the jury awarded them $4.5 million in damages. These cases and the other human trafficking cases where the employers were investigated, charged and convicted manifest the increasing awareness of individual against human trafficking. We each play a role in curbing extreme exploitation and abuses of workers and innocent kababayans.

(To report trafficking in persons call the following U.S numbers: 1-888-428-7581 or 1-888-3737-888.  Author Atty.Lourdes Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 887 7177 or 721 1963)

Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes 2013 H-2A and H-2B Eligibility List

Share this:

Federal regulations state that USCIS may only approve petitions for H-2A
and H-2B nonimmigrant status from nationals of countries that have been
designated for such status, as published in the Federal Register. The
notice of countries must be renewed each year. This year’s notice has
just been published and identifies 59 countries whose nationals are
eligible to participate in the H-2A and H-2B nonimmigrant programs in
the coming year. The list is the same as the previous year, but includes
one new country: Grenada. The notice takes effect January 18, 2013.

Eligible countries include:

  • Argentina
  • Australia,
  • Barbados,
  • Belize,
  • Brazil,
  • Bulgaria,
  • Canada,
  • Chile,
  • Costa Rica,
  • Croatia,
  • Dominican
    Republic,
  • Ecuador,
  • El Salvador,
  • Estonia,
  • Ethiopia,
  • Fiji,
  • Grenada,
  • Guatemala,
  • Haiti,
  • Honduras,
  • Hungary,
  • Iceland, Ireland,
  • Israel,
  • Jamaica,
  • Japan,
  • Kiribati,
  • Latvia,
  • Lithuania,
  • Macedonia,
  • Mexico,
  • Moldova,
  • Montenegro,
  • Nauru,
  • The Netherlands,
  • Nicaragua,
  • New
    Zealand,
  • Norway,
  • Papua New Guinea,
  • Peru,
  • The Philippines,
  • Poland,
  • Romania,
  • Samoa,
  • Serbia,
  • Slovakia,
  • Slovenia,
  • Solomon Islands,
  • South Africa,
  • South Korea,
  • Spain,
  • Switzerland,
  • Tonga,
  • Turkey,
  • Tuvalu,
  • Ukraine,
  • United Kingdom,
  • Uruguay,
  • Vanuatu.
Categories
Updates

USCIS Provides DACA Updates and Revises FAQs

Share this:

This week, USCIS updated the amount of Deferred Action for Childhood
Arrivals (DACA) cases it has received and accepted for processing.
According to USCIS, since August 2012, a total of nearly 400,000
requests have been accepted, 13,366 have been rejected and 407,899
received. The majority of requests have been submitted for people
originating from Mexico (290,019) and currently residing in California
(110,230).

USCIS also recently published an update
of its FAQ on consideration of DACA on its website. This FAQ covers
background information on DACA, guidelines for requesting consideration,
eligibility criteria and other details about the DACA process.

Categories
Global Pinoy

New Stateside Waivers and its Limited Impact on Family Petitions

Share this:

Joel entered the United States n 2007 with a crewmembers’ (C1/D) visa.  He had a contract to work for a cruise ship. He was employed for one year but during one of their trips in Florida, he decided to jump ship and illegally stay in the United States. Joel met Rowena and they got married after a few months. Rowena became a naturalized U.S. citizen and filed a petition for Joel.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services denied Joel’s application for immigrant visa on the ground that individuals with crewmembers’ visas are not allowed to receive their green card through adjustment of status. He was told that he had to get his visa outside the Untied States or specifically at the U.S. Embassy in Manila.

Joel was hesitant to depart for the Philippines for fear that he will not be issued a U.S. visa since he overstayed and incurred unlawful presence in the United States for more than five years. He has been a “TNT” or undocumented for one year and was told that if he departs, the 3-10 year bars will apply to him. This means that he will not be able to return until after ten years even if his spouse petitions him. As a result of this bar, Joel opted to stay undocumented and risk deportation/removal. He now has two U.S. citizen children and is working without authorization as a parking attendant. Rowena, on the other hand, has been unemployed for quite some time due to disability. Joel heard about the “stateside” waiver and is wondering if he may now finally legalize his stay. Is he eligible for the provisional waiver of unlawful presence? How will he go about applying for this waiver?

Beginning March 4, 2013 immediate relatives of United States citizens who overstayed their authorized stay in the US may be allowed to legalize their status. After the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service first announced its “stateside” waiver policy in April 2012, it took ten months before a final rule was released on January 3, 2013.

INDIVIDUALS WHO WILL BENEFIT FROM THE STATESIDE WAIVER

The immigration policy on Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver, which is most often referred to as the “stateside” waiver, was announced last year to benefit undocumented immigrants who are immediate relatives of U.S. citizens and who are in the United States in unlawful status. It is to be emphasized that not all undocumented relatives of United States citizens will benefit from this new policy. It is limited only to parents, spouses and minor children of U.S. citizens. Lawful permanent residents or green card holders may not confer benefits of this law to their spouses, minor children or parents.

THE TRADITIONAL WAIVER

Prior to the released of this provisional waiver policy, undocumented relatives of U.S. citizens who are not eligible to get their green cards in the United States must leave the US to get their visas through consular processing with a U.S. Embassy abroad. The consular officer will then require a traditional waiver of the unlawful presence only after the interview.

If the relative leaves the US to get the visa, he will be denied because of his accumulated unlawful presence in the United States. The basis for the denial is the 3-10 year bar imposed by legislation in 1997. This situation created a catch 22. Within the United States, this individual is denied the adjustment of status and outside the United States, he will be denied the immigrant visa through consular processing because of the 3-10 year bars. If the individual decides to get the visa outside the United States, he will have to take the chance of applying for the waiver of his unlawful presence while outside the United States and wait until it is approved which may take several months or years. In the meantime, the individual and his family members are separated while the application is pending.

To remedy this situation, the individual who incurs unlawful presence will be permitted to file a provisional waiver of the “unlawful presence” while the individual is still in the United States.

THE PROVISIONAL WAIVER

The release of the final rules on provisional waiver was anticipated for almost a year. The length of time it took for the rules to become final meanT that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security took serious steps to consider how limited or extensive its impact will be on those who are affected by this new policy.  An examination of the rules reveal that this provisional waiver has very limited applicability. Aside from having to prove “extreme hardship”, among the limits set are as follows:(1) it waives only unlawful presence and not other grounds of inadmissibility such as fraud or misrepresentation; (2) applies only to spouse, parents and minor children of immediate relatives; (3) does not apply to those who were previously interviewed for immigrant visas at the U.S. Embassy; (4) does not give provisional immigration benefit such as employment authorization or advance parole and (5) no appeal from a denial of the waiver.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service clearly is taking an incremental approach to providing relief to undocumented immigrants. This provisional waiver policy is for a recognizable group of “immediate” relatives. It is going to be implemented in the spirit of family unity but with its limited applicability, we cannot raise our hopes too high. A comprehensive fix to the broken immigration system is still the only solution to curb illegal immigration.

(Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or a 887 7177 or 721 1963)

Categories
Updates

USCIS Customer Service Center Now Accessible on Saturdays

Share this:

Starting January 12, USCIS’ National Customer Service Center will expand
its live, toll-free telephone assistance service to include Saturday
hours. Customer service representatives from the National Customer
Service Center will be available for calls from 8 am to 8 pm, Monday
through Friday, and from 9 am to 5 pm, Saturdays.

USCIS customers can call a toll-free number on Saturdays to get access
to nationwide assistance for immigration services and benefits. Customer
service representatives can answer routine questions on topics such as
ordering forms, processing times, and information on local USCIS
offices. People seeking answers to more complex questions should call
the Service Center Monday through Friday. The toll-free customer service
line is 1-800-375-5283.

Categories
Updates

U.S. and Canada Sign New Information Sharing Agreement

Share this:

A new agreement to share information about visas and immigration was
signed on December 13 between the U.S. and Canada. The new agreement
will enable the two countries to share information from third country
nationals who apply for a visa or permit to travel to the U.S. or
Canada. This new agreement will help protect the security and safety of
citizens of both countries and will, ideally, identify risks and
applicant identities at the earliest possible opportunity.

The agreement, which was signed by U.S. ambassador, David Jacobson, and
Canada’s Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism,
Jason Kenney, authorizes the development of arrangements under which one
country can send automated requests for data to the other. These
requests would contain limited information (e.g., name, date of birth,
anonymous fingerprint). If the identity matches a previous application,
immigration information may be shared between the two countries. This
information could include whether the person has been refused a visa in
the past. Information will not be shared regarding U.S. or Canadian
citizens or permanent residents.