Categories
Updates

USCIS to Consolidate Online Filing of Form I-539

Share this:

On February 28, 2013, USCIS will disable its alternative legacy online
filing method for Form I-539, the Application to Extend/Change
Nonimmigrant Status. Petitioners will, on that date, be given the option
to either file online with USCIS ELIS or file a paper application by
mail.

After the launch of USCIS ELIS, its paperless electronic immigration
system, the federal agency began offering petitioners three ways to file
Form I-539. Since the launch of USCIS ELIS, USCIS has improved its
systems. The improved USCIS ELIS allows for a range of online options,
including creating an account online, filing and paying electronically,
uploading support documents directly into the system and tracking
applications online.

Categories
Updates

Action Alert! Jump into the immigration debate happening on Capital Hill…

Share this:

Action Alert!  Jump into the immigration
debate happening on Capital Hill, cable news, local newspapers and at
kitchen tables across the country.

Don’t let your Members of
Congress run for election without hearing from you! Tell them that you
believe immigration is a national priority and that now is the time for
immigration reform! Congress needs to get serious about CIR when they
come back from the elections! Learn more and how to take action at http://capwiz.com/aila2/home/


Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes New Edition of Form N-470

Share this:

USCIS published a revised Form N-470, the Application to Preserve
Residence for Naturalization Purposes, on February 11, 2013. The edition
date of this version is 1/03/2013. USCIS comments that it will accept
older editions for a total of 60 days. Starting April 12, 2013, the
federal agency will online accept the 1/03/2013 edition of Form N-470.

The new edition of Form N-470 includes a single filing address. All
individuals filing this form must mail it to the Dallas Lockbox
facility. This new, centralized filing location will, according to
USCIS, “streamline intake functions, enhancing customer service and
improving operational efficiency.”

Categories
Updates

House and Senate to Vote to Reauthorize Violence Against Women Act

Share this:

On February 7, 2013, a series of amendments to the Violence Against
Women Act (VAWA) introduced by Senator Grassley were defeated on a vote
of 65 to 34. These amendments would have made a third DUI conviction an
aggravated felony and cause for immigration removal, and would have
expanded aggravated felonies to include all domestic violence
convictions. The Senate will now reconvene on Monday, February 11 to
continue debate, propose amendments to the bill and vote on the final
bill, which does not include the proposed Grassley amendments.

The
Senate had voted on February 4 to move forward with a vote on the highly
bipartisan VAWA, which, if passed, will strengthen protections for
victims of sexual and domestic violence, with a special focus on Native
Americans, immigrants and LGBT persons. Three bills to reauthorize the
VAWA of 1994 were introduced in the House on January 22.

Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes Improved Forms, Launches Form Improvements Initiative Web Resource

Share this:

USCIS announces the publication of a series of improved forms with
easier-to-use formats and new data collection technology. Updates forms
include the following:

Form N-600, the Application for Certificate of Citizenship
Form N-336, the Request for a Hearing on a Decision in Naturalization Proceedings

Form I-601, the Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility

Form I-90, the Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card

USCIS has also launched a new USCIS Forms Improvement Initiative web page
to explain the types of improvements in this new improvement
initiative. This page introduces new and recently improved forms, and
provides links to each form’s landing page.

Categories
Updates

New Immigration Reform Act Introduced in U.S. Senate

Share this:

A new act supporting high-skilled immigration professionals was recently
introduced in the U.S. Senate by Senators Hatch (R-UT), Klobuchar
(D-MN), Rubio (R-FL) and Coons (D-DE). The Immigration Innovation Act of
2013, also known as the “I-Squared” Act proposes to make critical
changes in the area of high-skilled immigration.

The act would affect multiple issues faced by businesses that need
highly skilled workers and foreign students graduating from U.S.
universities in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM). The
Act also would allow for additional employment-based green cards by
using green cards from other immigration categories. Finally, the Act
would create a fund through fees paid by businesses seeking
highly-skilled workers to improve STEM education programs in states
throughout the U.S.

Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes Updated H-2B Visa Numbers Jan. 25, 2013

Share this:

On January 25, 2013, USCIS provided an update of the amount of
cap-subject H-2B visas received and approved by the federal agency for
the first and second halves of Fiscal Year 2013. According to USCIS, a
total of 29,227 beneficiaries have been approved for the first half of
Fiscal Year 2013, with an additional 3,047 petitions pending. A total of
2,264 beneficiaries have been approved for the second half of Fiscal
Year 2013, with an additional 2,395 petitions pending.

Congressionally-based legislation limits the amount of H-2B visas
provided per fiscal year to a total of 66,000, with 33,000 allocated for
employment for the first half of the fiscal year and 33,000 allocated
for employment for the second half of the fiscal year. Unused numbers
from the first half of the fiscal year are made available for use by
employers seeking H-2B workers during the second half of the year. These
numbers do not, however, carry over from one fiscal year to another.

Categories
Global Pinoy

The Consequences of Lying

Share this:

Last week, world-renowned cyclist, Lance Armstrong admitted in his interview with Oprah that he used banned drugs to score victories on his Tour de France competitions. According to Armstrong, he feels “disgraced, humbled and ashamed by his actions”.  Telling the truth may have liberated him from living a lie for seventeen years, but this revelation comes with consequences.

In an immigration context, lying to an immigration examiner or on the immigration application also comes with serious consequences. There are lies that may be forgiven through waivers and lies that result not only in a denial of one’s current application but in permanent bars to receiving future visas.

Isabel entered the United States using the passport with a U.S. visa under the name of “Maricel”. She did not have to appear before the consular officer in 2000 to get the visa. A phony travel agent claimed that she looked like the picture on the passport and that she would be allowed to use the visa. Since Isabel always wanted to travel to the United States, she paid a significant amount of money to the agency and was able to enter the United States. After more than five years in the U.S., she met her partner in life. A petition was filed on her behalf but the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service denied the petition and her waiver application. Isabel was brought to the immigration court for removal/deportation.

In court, she renewed her application for her green card and her request for waiver. She admitted before the immigration judge that she used an “assumed name” when she entered the United States. The immigration judge was observing Isabel while she was testifying and noticed that there was lack of remorse on her part in admitting to the fraud. It was at that point that the judge asked her a moral question: “do you know what is right from wrong?”. Isabel answered ‘yes’ to the question. The Judge then continued to question her in this fashion until Isabel broke down in tears and admitted the reasons why she actually lied to the immigration officer about her identity.  Still in tears, Isabel asked for forgiveness and pled for compassion from the judge to allow her to stay in the United States so she continue to live with her ailing U.S. citizen husband. She said she regretted getting herself in this mess, she regretted being part of such a scheme assuming someone else’s identity.  She said she was never at peace during the years that she was using someone else’s identity but that she had hoped to be given a second chance so she could stay and take care of her ailing husband. The immigration judge granted her waiver and she was spared from deportation. She was granted a chance to right the wrong she committed.

Not all who engaged in fraud in immigration petitions are successful in obtaining waivers. The circumstances of each case are taken into account in determining whether an individual merits a grant of waiver. Those who are not granted waivers will not be issued visas and risk being deported or removed from the United States.

When Lying is Fraud

Not all lies will constitute fraud for purposes of denial of visa applications. Lies turn to fraud when it is a serious and material lie or misrepresentation. The most common types of serious “lies” in immigration are those involving (1) actual marital status; (2) good faith marriages; (3) traveling with different or assumed name and (4) political asylum applications.

There are those who are able to get away with the fraud and travel, like in the case of Isabel.  But once the fraud is discovered, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will take steps to make sure that the individual who engaged in fraud is either prosecuted or put in deportation proceedings. Those found to have engaged in fraud in obtaining visas are specifically excluded from receiving benefits from recent immigration pronouncements such as prosecutorial discretion, deferred action, or provisional waivers. This indicates that fraud is as high a priority in the denial of visas as those who have been convicted of crimes or deemed to be national security threats.

Waivers of Fraud

Since ‘fraud’ in visa applications is specifically mentioned as a ground for denial of visas, it has been difficult to obtain waivers of fraud.

Prior to 1997, filing a waiver for the inadmissibility ground of fraud simply requires the filing of an accomplished I-601 form and filing fee. But after the enactment of the Illegal Immigration Reform Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRAIRA), the law requires proof of extreme hardship to U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident spouses or parents. Extreme hardship must be supported by strong evidence. Again, each case is different and the immigration examiner has discretion to adjudicate the waiver applications.

The Courage Not To Lie

It is not easy to admit a lie. Watching Armstrong admit his biggest lie is like watching an individual admitting his mistakes and lies before an immigration judge. Armstrong is a public figure, a legendary sports hero. His admission resulted not only in great loss to him monetarily but forever damaged his iconic place in the world of sports and philanthropy. While a person in removal proceedings is not under the same level of scrutiny, he certainly faces the same predicament. Like Armstrong, a person enjoying immigration benefits acquired through lying may get away with the lie, even for a long time, but it does not mean that the wrong is somehow righted, or that at some point, the lie would not be revealed. And if the reckoning comes, one has to deal with the lie, admit to it, and accept its consequences. This is difficult and it is disgraceful. So instead of going through the ordeal, one should deliberate seriously on the possible consequences before choosing to engage in fraud or lie in immigration applications. The courage is not in one’s ability to admit to a lie, greater courage is required not to commit one.

(Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 887 71 77 or visit her website at tancinco.weareph.com/old)

Categories
Updates

Press Release: Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver

Share this:

WHO CAN BENEFIT FROM THIS NEWLY MINTED REGULATION

What a blessing to have received two pieces of good news related to
immigration within a span of one year.  Since August 15, 2012, when DACA
– Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals – took effect, thousands of
hopeful youngsters have received their employment authorization
documents and social security numbers. They are now gainfully employed,
contributing ot he family coffers or saving up for college.  By March 4,
2013, the new provisional unlawful presence waiver, alternatively
referred to as 601A waiver, will take effect. On the state level, there
is also good news because immigrants without status will eventually
become eligible to apply for driver’s licenses under the temporary
visitor driver’s license (TVDL) program.  The program will take effect
ten months after Governor Quinn signs the approved bill into law. 

Who can avail of the 601A Unlawful Presence Provisional Waiver?

A
limited set of individuals will benefit from this recent announcement. 
Only individuals who are immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, who are
physically present in the U.S. but cannot adjust status here, despite
being married to U.S. citizens, with U.S. citizen children and having
lived here for a long time, may avail of this unlawful presence
provisional waiver. 

“Immediate Relative” is defined as the (i)
spouse of a U.S. citizen; (ii) parent of a U.S. citizen who is at least
21 years of age; (iii) child below 21 of a U.S. citizen parent. 
Examples of those may benefit from this waiver include: spouses, parents
and children of U.S. citizens who crossed the border or jumped ship or
entered without inspection by an immigration officer.   

How does the 601A waiver work?

This
new process applies only to immediate relatives of U.S. citizens who
have no violation other than being unlawfully present in the U.S.  This
new process will not apply if there are other issues such as entering
with a false passport or name, previous removal/deportation, criminal
conviction, engaging in any form of fraud or misrepresentation, or
unauthorized claim of U.S. citizenship.

A very important
requirement for a successful waiver application is a showing of extreme
hardship on the part of a qualifying relative – a U.S. citizen spouse or
parent.  There is no clear definition of extreme hardship and it can
only be inferred from successful case law.  This emphasizes the
importance of seeking legal counsel who can thoroughly assess a specific
situation and help the applicant evaluate whether it is wise to apply
for this waiver.   

By March 4, 2013, and only after the approval
of an immediate relative immigrant petition or a self-petition,
applicants may file the 601A waiver at a designated lockbox within the
United States.  This new procedure alleviates the anxiety among family
members because they can continue to be together during the waiver
application process.  In order to perfect the waiver process, the
applicant must still leave the U.S. and have the immigrant visa
interview at a U.S. consulate abroad.  Approval of the unlawful presence
waiver does not a guarantee issuance of the immigrant visa but as long
as there is no issue other than unlawful presence, the applicant can
expect to rejoin his or her family in the U.S. immediately after visa
issuance.  If, at the interview process, other undisclosed or not
immediately discoverable issues surface, the applicant will be required
to go through the regular 601 waiver process described below.     

The
existing 601 waiver procedure still applies to those who cannot avail
of the 601A waiver. This existing process requires the applicant to go
for the immigrant visa interview first before being allowed to file the
601 waiver, consequently causing months, if not more than a year, of
waiting for the outcome of the waiver application.  In an effort to
streamline the waiver process, all waiver applications – the new 601A or
the existing 601 process – are now filed in designated locations. 
Hopefully, this will make the adjudication process consistent compared
to the past when waiver applications were adjudicated at the various
consulates around the world.           

Applicants scheduled by the NVC ON or AFTER January 3, 2013 for an upcoming interview are eligible to apply for a 601A waiver.

Who qualifies for a 601A Unlawful Presence Provisional Waiver?

An individual qualifies for this waiver if ALL of the six requirements below can be met:

  1. The applicant is at least 17 years of age;
  2. The applicant is physically present in the United States;
  3. The applicant has accrued unlawful presence in the U.S. for a
    period greater than 180 days or the applicant entered the U.S. without
    inspction  
  4. An immediate relative immigrant petition on behalf of the applicant has been approved;
  5.    The immigrant visa processing fee has been paid;  
  6.    Extreme hardship will be caused upon qualifying relatives
    (U.S. citizen spouse or parent) if the waiver is not granted an
    immigrant visa

Who are ineligible to apply for a 601A Waiver?

  1. Anyone who does meet any one of the qualifying factors above will be ineligible to apply for a 601A waiver.
  2. The applicant has a pending application for adjustment of status.
  3. Applicants with notices of visa interview prior to January 3, 2013

Example 1 – Spouses and Children of U.S. Citizens who Entered Without inspection (EWI)

In 2005, Alex traveled to Canada.  Although Alex did not have a U.S.
visa, he was able to enter by land.  He fell in love with Cathy and got
married three years later.  They have two U.S. citizen children.  Cathy
filed an immigrant petition for Alex as soon as they got married but
because he was not inspected by an immigration officer when he entered
the U.S., he could not proceed with his immigrant visa process within
the U.S.  He needed to leave and process his immigrant visa abroad. 
However, the length of his unauthorized stay in the U.S. would have
prevented him from returning for at least 10 years.  For Alex and Cathy,
leaving to pursue the visa application abroad was an impossible
solution in light of the fact that Cathy needed to work and no one would
be available to take care of their two young U.S. citizen children. 
Alex’s lengthy absence would subject Cathy to extreme hardship.

Pursuant
to a 601A waiver application, Alex can file an application for
provisional waiver in the U.S. after Cathy’s immigrant petition has been
approved and the requisite visa fee paid. The waiver application must
prove that Cathy (Alex’ qualifying relative) will suffer extreme
hardship if the waiver is not granted. He can wait for the outcome of
the application in the U.S., thus, enabling him to spend more time with
his family.  Once the waiver is approved, he can travel to a consulate
abroad to continue the immigrant visa process and reenter the U.S. as a
lawful permanent resident once he receives an immigrant visa.     
          

Example 2 – Crewmembers (C1 and D1 Visa Holders) who Married a U.S. Citizens

Cesar,
a widower, had a low-paying job in a cruise ship. While the ship was
docked in Florida in 2002, he learned about opportunities for a higher
income in the U.S.  This was very enticing to him because he wanted his
children to go to school and eventually earn their professional
degrees.  One of the children, Dan, was focused on becoming a licensed
physical therapist in the U.S.  Dan succeeded in becoming a green card
holder through employment-based immigration.  Dan, who is now a U.S.
citizen, could have easily petitioned for his father Cesar but having
“jumped ship”, he was unable to apply for adjustment of status in the
U.S. His situation is similar to someone who entered without inspection.

Cesar eventually met Liza, a U.S. citizen widow and a strong
cancer survivor.  Cesar and Liza gave each other hope, treasured being
together and decided to get married.  They longed to travel to places
around the world but Cesar had to work out his immigration status. 
Cesar would need to apply for a waiver and the new provisional waiver
would allow him to await its approval in the U.S.  This would enable
Cesar and Liza to spend more time together, before Cesar proceeds abroad
to continue his application for the issuance of his immigrant visa.

Example 3 – Children Who Crossed the Border at a Tender Age

There
are thousands of infants and unsuspecting children who were brought to
the U.S. through the borders by their relatives.  Many of these children
cannot proceed to college because they cannot avail of student loans
for lack of social security numbers.

Miguel, an agricultural
worker, gained residency through employment.  This process took so
long.  He finally received his green card and was reunited with his
childhood sweetheart, Celina. They got married and were blessed with a
child, Mario.  As a green card holder, Miguel was capable of filing a
petition for his family but, back then, it would have taken at least 5
years for his wife and child to immigrate. The family could not bear
being separated much longer. Celina and Mario were denied visitor’s
visas many times so Miguel’s wife, Celina, and their 3-year old son
risked it and crossed the border. 

Life got in the way and it
took some time for Miguel to become a U.S. citizen.  He can now file an
immigrant petition on behalf of Celina and Mario (who is now 18) but
because they entered without inspection, they would need to exit in
order to apply for their immigrant visas at the U.S. Consulate back
home. The recently announced provisional waiver enables them to file
their applications for provisional waiver in the U.S. prior to attending
the visa interview at the U.S. consulate abroad.  Once the visas are
issued, they can return as permanent residents.       

No Appeal, Motion to Reconsider or Motion to Reopen

The
waiver application process is complex.  While it may sound
self-serving, I strongly advise seeking legal counsel before filing an
application for provisional waiver.  It is also important to note that
grating of a waiver is discretionary and there is no appeal or motion to
reconsider or motion to reopen if the application is denied.