Categories
Updates

Homeland Security Extends Temporary Protected Status for Haiti

Share this:

The Department of Homeland Security has extended the designation of
Haiti for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for 18 additional months.
This extension is granted for the periods from July 23, 2014 through
January 22, 2016. This extension will allow current TPS beneficiaries to
keep their status through January 22, 2016 as long as they otherwise
continue to meet the requirements for TOPS status.

This extension was granted because the conditions in Haiti that
originally prompted the designation of TPS continue to be met.
Substantial (yet temporary) conditions in Haiti continue to prevent
nationals of that country from safely returning home.

Categories
Global Pinoy

Discovery of a Parent’s Fake Name on One’s Birth Certificate

Share this:

Proving a parent-child relationship is key to approval of most family-based petitions. Proof of filiation is typically shown through the birth certificate of the child. This document not only establishes fact of birth but also identifies parentage. It is therefore generally accepted as sufficient proof of parental relationship. What happens in a situation where the child who is ready to petition her parent discovers that her parent has been using a “fake” name?  How will this complicate the petitioning process?

The Fake Parent’s Name

Agnes was born in the United States. Her mother, Annie has been living as an undocumented immigrant in the U.S. for many years when she gave birth to Agnes almost 21 years ago. Since Agnes was born in the United States, she is a U.S. Citizen by birth.Agnes was advised that when she turns 21 years old, she would be able to help Annie obtain lawful residence status and get her a green card.

Agnes will be turning 21 years old this June. She began to gather all pertinent documents she figured she would need in order to file a petition for her mother. Agnes found her birth certificate listing her birth mother, “Annie”. She asked her mother to produce her own birth certificate for submission and to Agnes’ great consternation, her mother’s birth certificate listed her as “Teresita”, not “Annie”. All her years growing up, she has only known her mother to be “Annie” and by no other name. When she asked her mother for a birth certificate showing her mother’s name as “Annie”, her mother could not produce one.

Her mother then revealed to Agnes that the name “Annie” is not her real name but a fictitious name she assumed and used to enter the United States. Her mother’s real name is Teresita and she also has a different birthday from that indicated in Agnes’ birth certificate.

After being told about the real name of her mother, Agnes raised more questions. Why will her mother list a different name in her own daughter’s birth certificate? Is it not illegal to use a fictitious name and list it on a recorded instrument like a birth certificate? Is there a real person with the name Annie? Did her mother steal Annie’s identity? More questions came to Agnes’ mind as she delved deeper into the reasons behind the fake name.

Teresita, a.k.a. Annie, related the whole story to Agnes. Many years back, before Agnes was even born, Teresita had a chance to go to the United States. She over-stayed and was eventually deported back to the Philippines. Her brief stay in America made her dream of going back and try to make a life for herself here in the U.S. She was advised by a consultant, erroneously, that the only way she could re-enter the United States is by adopting a different identity. Teresita foolishly followed this advice. She admitted that she paid an agency in Manila to obtain a Philippine passport with a different name and birth certificate. She paid a substantial amount of money to the agent to get a different identity. Teresita, now passing herself off as Annie, was granted a nonimmigrant visitor visa. She used this identity to enter the United States more than 21 years ago. Agnes is her daughter out of wedlock and her husband, the father of Agnes, abandoned them when Agnes was just 5 years old.

Agnes cannot live without her mother. As it stands, she is fearful that her mother might be deported if she even tries to file a petition for her. She is seriously contemplating whether or not it would be wise to assist her mother in getting her an immigrant visa. Does Agnes have a chance of obtaining a valid visa for her mother?

Use of False Documents

Unsuccessful visa applicants are oftentimes tempted to obtain visas through illegal means. The use of false documents to obtain a visa can have serious, sometimes irreversible consequences for the applicant. It is one of the many grounds used for the denial of many future immigration benefits. If the person is in the United States in unlawful status, it is also a ground for deportation.

Quite often, the use of falsified documents is intentional. There are times, however, when visa applicants who use falsified documents are themselves victims of unscrupulous travel consultants who prey on the innocence and vulnerability of the eager and the foolhardy. But whether intentional or not, the adverse consequences attach equally. All risk denials of future applications for visas.

The use of a false identity is nothing less than material misrepresentation. As such, Agnes’ mother will find it difficult to obtain a visa without an approved “waiver” of the misrepresentation. But unlike other grounds for denial, consequences for use of false documents may be waived by filing an application with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.  If this waiver application is approved, a visa may be issued to Agnes’ mother.

There are remedial measures that the mother has to do before Agnes may even file a petition for her.  The first step to take is to “correct” the false identity and have her mother’s real identity established by obtaining a validly issued identification or travel document. She can go to the nearest Philippine consulate and apply for a valid passport. Thereafter, legal steps must be taken to have Agnes’ birth certificate amended with the civil registry to reflect the mother’s real name and identity.  

No Valid Excuse

Cases of using false documents vary in many respects. Waiver applications, because they depend in large measure on the facts and circumstances of each individual situation, may or may not be granted. If the waiver is denied, the ensuing result could be dire to the visa applicant.   

Reasons vary as to why individuals opt to take such a risky route in order to obtain a visa. It is important to remember, nevertheless, that any reason or explanation given to why an individual misrepresents or uses falsified documents, while providing a possible basis for forgiveness, is never an excuse or justification for wrongdoing.

(Atty. Lourdes Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at (02)721 1963 or visit her website at tancinco.weareph.com/old)

Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes Updated H-2B Visa Numbers February 28, 2014

Share this:

On February 28, 2014, USCIS provided an update of the amount of
cap-subject H-2B visas received and approved by the federal agency for
the first and second halves of fiscal year 2014. According to USCIS, a
total of 35,145 beneficiaries have been approved for the first half of
fiscal year 2014, with an additional 2,763 petitions pending. 6,609
beneficiaries have yet been approved for the second half of fiscal year
2014; 7,288 petitions are pending.

Congressionally-based legislation limits the amount of H-2B visas
provided per fiscal year to a total of 66,000, with 33,000 allocated for
employment for the first half of the fiscal year and 33,000 allocated
for employment for the second half of the fiscal year. Unused numbers
from the first half of the fiscal year are made available for use by
employers seeking H-2B workers during the second half of the year.

Categories
Immigration Round Table

Obtaining Drivers License May Delude a Non-Citizen to Vote Illegally

Share this:

A Filipina national married to a U.S. citizen is facing removal proceedings for voting illegally in a U.S. election in 2006.  Although she is married to a U.S. citizen and has U.S. citizen children, she is being charged with inadmissibility because she violated 18 U.S.C. Section 611, which penalizes an individual for illegal voting and for false claim to citizenship. What happened in her case and why should new immigrants be aware of what could occur when they obtaining State driver’s license?

Elizabeth was petitioned by her U.S. citizen spouse and entered the U.S. in 2003 with a K3 visa. Upon her arrival in Illinois, she took steps to obtain her social security card, State identification card and drivers license. These are the steps that a new immigrant usually takes upon arrival in the United States.

According to the facts of the case as related in her case before the Seventh District U.S. Court of Appeals (Keathley v. Holder 11-1594), the State official at the Department of Motor Vehicles asked Elizabeth whether she wants to be an organ donor. She answered affirmatively. According to her, she also was asked whether she wants to register to vote. Again, she answered yes.

A few days after her trip to the DMV, Elizabeth received her driver’s license and a voter registration card. She innocently claims that with the issuance of a voter registration card, she assumed that she was entitled to vote. Hence, in the 2006 election she voted in the U.S. election.

When Elizabeth applied for her U.S. citizenship with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the examiner discovered the “illegal voting”. Elizabeth was put in removal proceedings.  She is at risk of being deported for what seemed to be her ignorance of her inability to vote. At present, she is awaiting for the hearing on her case after the Court of Appeals remanded the case back to the Immigration Court.

The Motor Voter Act

The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) also known as The Motor Voter Act was signed into law on May 20, 1993. This legislation required state governments to allow for registration when a qualifying voter applied for or renewed their driver’s license or applied for social services.

In compliance with this law, every state developed their respective unique election registration forms.  Most states also afford election registration training to bureau of motor vehicle officials.  But despite the election registration training of state officials at the Department of Motor Vehicles, there are non-citizens who find themselves in a situation where they register for voters’ identification cards. The worse case scenario is that the noncitizen is misled to believing that she is qualified to vote upon receipt of the voter’s identification card from the DMV. Thus, rendering her inadmissible and removable for making a false claim to U.S. citizenship.

Will the DMV official be held responsible for registering a non-U.S. citizen after he was presented with the Philippine passport and the appropriate visa?  Does the new immigrant have the right to rely on the “official” action of the DMV State official in issuing the voter registration identification card? These are just some of the issues that will be threshed out in a hearing to be held soon for Elizabeth. Hopefully, she will prevail.

The case of Elizabeth is not a common case but may happen to new immigrants. One may claim ignorance of the consequences of an unlawful act. And, unfortunately, the adverse implications may result in possible family separation. It is important to know what the basic rights and limitations of a new immigrant. But it is also equally important for them to be able to rely on the authority of government officials task with registering voters.

(Atty. Lourdes Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at  1888 930 0808 or at 1 800 999 9096 or visit her website at tancinco.weareph.com/old)

Categories
Updates

Chile Receives Designation As Visa Waiver Program Participant

Share this:

The Department of Homeland Security has designated Chile as a
participant in the Visa Waiver Program (VWP). Beginning May 1, 2014,
eligible Chilean nationals with an approved Electronic System for Travel
Authorization (ESTA) and e-passport will be able to enter the United
States without a nonimmigrant visitor visa.

“This announcement furthers our important partnership with Chile and
will benefit the security and the economies of both our nations,” said
Secretary of Homeland Security, Jeh Johnson. “The addition of Chile to
the Visa Waiver Program will enable us to work together to maintain the
highest standards of security, while also facilitating travel for
Chileans visiting the United States.”

Categories
Global Pinoy

Widow’s Remarriage: a Penalty to Obtaining Status?

Share this:

When it comes to immigration benefits from the federal government based on petitions by deceased spouses, widows are often confronted with the impact of a remarriage. If they were petitioned by a deceased spouse, but before adjustment of their status to lawful permanent residents unexpectedly fell in love with another, would they even consider re-tying the knot? What happens to a widow seeking immigrant status who decides to remarry after the U.S. citizen spouse’s death? Will she still qualify as a self-petitioning widow?

The Remarried Widow

Lucy met Henry, a U.S. citizen, while Henry was a student in Nevada.  After three years together, Lucy and Henry got married in 2004 in a simple civil ceremony in Las Vegas.  Since Lucy’s student visa was expiring, Henry filed a petition for Lucy with an application for adjustment of status to that of an immigrant.

A few months after filing the petition, Henry was hospitalized after collapsing in the gym. He suffered from aneurysm. Lucy was a widow at the age of 30. She stayed in the United States and waited for the result of Henry’s petition. Since her petitioner died, Lucy’s petition also was automatically revoked. At that time in 2005, Lucy could not file for a Self Petition as a widow because she was married to Henry for less than two years. The regulations then require her to be married for at least two years to file a widow self petition. She filed for reconsideration but the petition was nevertheless denied.

In 2011, Lucy’s friends introduced her to John, also a U.S. citizen. The latter would court Lucy and take her out on dates. A few months after being acquainted to each other, Lucy and John got married. Since Lucy had incurred unlawful presence, John immediately filed a petition for her so Lucy would be able to get her green card.  Unfortunately, Lucy and John found themselves arguing most of the time and their marriage ended in divorce only after being married for five months. Lucy decided that it would be best if she just depart for the Philippines where her family resides. To make sure that she does not encounter legal problems upon her departure, she consulted with a lawyer about her rights as a widow and as a divorced spouse. It was during this consultation that she discovered that she still has an opportunity to legalize her stay and obtain a green card through the petition of her first spouse, Henry. She thought that by re-marrying John, she lost her chance to obtain an immigrant visa through Henry. What can she do?

Self Petitions for Widows

One of the exceptions to the rule that “petition dies with the petitioner” is the widow of a U.S. citizen petition. Hence, even if the U.S. citizen spouse dies, the surviving spouse may still avail of the immigration benefits of obtaining the green card by filing a self-petition.

Prior to 2009, there exists what was referred to as the “widow’s penalty”. This was applied as a bar to widows who have not been married for two years at the time of death of their U.S. citizen spouses.  Widows who were married for less than two years were then prevented from applying for their green cards.

In 2009, the U.S. Congress has abolished the “widow’s penalty” for all applications pending on or after Oct. 28, 2009 and a widow(er) of a USC can now obtain residency if he or she was married at the time of the principal’s death and he or she petition’s for his or her green card within two years. There was also a transition period until Oct. 28, 2011 that allowed widow(ers) to file by that date if the citizen spouse died before Oct. 28, 2009, they were married for less than 2 years, and the widow(er) has not remarried.

The widow(er) petition is submitted on Form I-360. If the petition was filed as an I-130 and the petitioner dies, it is automatically converted into an I-360 petition if the widow(er) otherwise qualifies for an I-360. If the I-130 was denied based on the widow’s penalty, the petition may be re-opened and USCIS may re-adjudicate the petition.

Effect of  Remarriage

The USCIS takes the position that the regulations defining what constitutes a “widow” contains a caveat that the widow must not have re-married as a condition for the widow to avail of the immigration benefits under the 2009 law. But in the recent case filed in federal court, Williams v. DHS Secretary (13-11270Eleventh Circuit 2013), the Court ruled that the “remarriage bar” does not apply to widows whose cases are re-opened under the 2009 survivors law or section 204(l) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Applying the ruling of this case to Lucy, she will be able to obtain her immigrant visa despite her remarriage to John.

The case of Williams v. DHS refers only to re-opened cases under section 204(l) of the INA where the U.S. Congress attempted to remedy the harsh effect of requiring a two year marriage for purposes of filing widow petitions. For the general petitioning process, it is important to emphasize that the widow should still not be remarried if they wish to get their green card through the deceased spouse.

There should be no penalty for remarrying especially during the latter part of life where one seeks companionship during one’s senior years. But like any life changing decisions, it is important that the widow(er) take time to analyze the legal consequences of the marriage on any rights, benefits, privileges they currently enjoy as widows, whether it be in the context of social security pensions, taxes, or in this case, immigration.

(Atty. Lourdes Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 721 1963 or visit her website at tancinco.weareph.com/old)

Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes Updated H-2B Visa Numbers February 21, 2014

Share this:

On February 21, 2014, USCIS provided an update of the amount of
cap-subject H-2B visas received and approved by the federal agency for
the first and second halves of fiscal year 2014. According to USCIS, a
total of 33,337 beneficiaries have been approved for the first half of
fiscal year 2014, with an additional 3,751 petitions pending. 5,100
beneficiaries have yet been approved for the second half of fiscal year
2014; 7,108 petitions are pending.

Congressionally-based legislation limits the amount of H-2B visas
provided per fiscal year to a total of 66,000, with 33,000 allocated for
employment for the first half of the fiscal year and 33,000 allocated
for employment for the second half of the fiscal year. Unused numbers
from the first half of the fiscal year are made available for use by
employers seeking H-2B workers during the second half of the year.

Categories
Immigration Round Table

Reminder to DACA Recipients: Renew Early and Avoid Losing Your Authorization to Work

Share this:

On June 15, 2012, the Obama administration announced its “deferred action” program to young immigrants who were brought to the United States as children. Deferred action for young immigrants was referred to as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (or DACA).

An individual granted DACA status does not provide any permanent resident status but has the effect of deferring removal action against an individual for two years. This means that if the DACA status was granted on June 30, 2012, it will be valid only until June 20, 2014.  With the expiration of DACA status coming up, what steps must be taken to renew one’s status as a DACA recipient? What will happen if the DACA recipient does not receive a renewal of his status?

DACA Granted by ICE

Roger was born in the Philippines and arrived in the United States when he was 8 years old. His father paid a travel agent in the Philippines for a passport with a visitor visa. This was handed to Roger to be used in his travel to the United States. Roger has been using an “assumed” name while in the United States.

In 2011, Roger was arrested for a minor traffic violation. He was convicted for a misdemeanor offense. He is now 26 years old and he was brought to the immigration court for his removal proceedings. While his case was pending, his lawyer applied for a DACA status. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (or ICE) granted his DACA request and his case was administrative closed. Roger now has an employment authorization document which will expire on June 30, 2014. What should he do to avoid being placed back in removal proceedings?

One of the many requirements of DACA is that the individual must not have been convicted of a felony, a significant misdemeanor, three or more other misdemeanors and are not a threat to national security or public safety. In the case of Roger, he was convicted only for a minor traffic violation which is not considered a significant misdemeanor. He met all the requirements for DACA status and was granted employment authorization card. If he is working right now, it is important for Roger to start applying for the renewal of his DACA status to avoid losing his authorization to work and incurring unlawful presence.

On February 19, 2014, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued guidelines for renewal of deferred action by DACA recipients. It must be noted that the guidelines are only for those granted DACA by ICE. It does not apply to those who were granted DACA status by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Those granted deferred action by ICE are usually those who were in removal proceedings or have prior orders of removal.

Period to File

According to the USCIS guidelines, DACA recipients may request renewal of their deferred action 120 days prior to the expiration of their original 2 year period of deferred action. For example in the case of Roger, he was granted DACA on June 30, 2012. He can apply for renewal now since it is within the 120 days period for applying for renewal.

Individuals who received DACA through ICE—most of whom received DACA between June 15, 2012 and August 15, 2012, the period before USCIS began accepting I-821D applications—will be required to apply for DACA as if for the first time, providing proof that they meet all of the relevant guidelines. The form must be completed, properly signed and accompanied by supporting documentation to establish eligibility as if it was an initial application, a Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, filing fees totaling $465 ($380 fee for Form I-765 and $85 biometric services fee), and Form I-765WS.

The USCIS notice emphasized that those individuals who do not receive a renewal before the expiration of their original DACA grant will accumulate unlawful presence and loses work authorization. It is advisable to submit the DACA renewal applications early at least within the 120 period for filing.

Atty. Lourdes Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 1 888 930 0808 or visit her website at tancinco.weareph.com/old)

Categories
Updates

Renewal Guidelines for Individuals Granted DACA Status from ICE Now Posted

Share this:

According to USCIS, some DACA recipients may request renewal of their
deferred action 120 days prior to the expiration of their original
two-year period of deferred action. This renewal request capability is
limited to a small group of DACA recipients, individuals who received
such status from Immigration and Customs Enforcement between June 15,
2012 and August 15, 2012.

The majority of DACA recipients received DACA through USCIS after August
15, 2012. However, individuals who received this status through ICE
during the period before USCIS began accepting Form I-821D will be
required to apply for DACA as if for the first time, including providing
proof they meet all the required guidelines for DACA status.