Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes Updated H-2B Visa Numbers – August 1, 2014

Share this:

On August 1, 2014, USCIS provided an update of the amount of cap-subject H-2B visas received and approved by the federal agency for the second half of fiscal year 2014. According to USCIS, a total of 25,210 beneficiaries have been approved for the second half of fiscal year 2014, with an additional 1,135 petitions pending. USCIS has begun accepting applications for the first half of Fiscal Year 2015; 1,168 beneficiaries have been approved, and 633 petitions are currently pending.

Congressionally-based legislation limits the amount of H-2B visas provided per fiscal year to a total of 66,000, with 33,000 allocated for employment for the first half of the fiscal year and 33,000 allocated for employment for the second half of the fiscal year. Unused numbers from the first half of the fiscal year are made available for use by employers seeking H-2B workers during the second half of the year.

Categories
Updates

Denial Rate for Asylum Claims Continues to Rise

Share this:

According to data from the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), the odds that your asylum claim will be denied in Immigration Court has risen. In FY 2012, the rates of denial reached a historic low of just 44.5 percent. They started rising again immediately. In FY 2013 the rates rose to 47.2 percent and during the first 9 months of FY 2014 the rates average 50.2 percent. This number, while higher than seen since FY 2009, is still much lower than rates seen a decade ago when nearly 2 out of every 3 claims were rejected.

The number of asylum claims decided by Immigration Judges continues to drop. The highest point was in FY 2003, when more than 35,000 cases were revised. That number dropped by FY 2010 to just 19,445. In FY 2013 that number was 20,941.

Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes Informational Toolkit for DACA Community Partners

Share this:

USCIS has developed and published a new Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) resource toolkit for community partners. This toolkit provides partners with a breadth of information on the immigration program for international children in the United States. Resources include a how to guide, a tip sheet, a series of frequently asked questions, infographics and informational flyers and lists of resources for DACA candidates.

This toolkit is available online for download. Additional resources include a PowerPoint presentation available for use at outreach events. This presentation can be requested by sending an email to the USCIS Public Engagement Division at Public.Engagement@uscis.dhs.gov. Download the toolkit online.

Categories
Updates

Department of State to Issue All SIVs for Afghan Nationals by August 2014

Share this:

The Department of State noted that it has a total of 3,000 Special Immigrant Visas (SIV) available for Afghan nationals for Fiscal Year 2014. It is expected that all of these visas will be issued by the end of August 2014. The Department of State welcomes an action to extend this program by Congress and will quickly make arrangements to release additional SIVs to Afghan applicants in need.

The Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 authorized the issuance of SIVs to Afghan nationals employed by or on behalf of the U.S. government in Afghanistan who met certain other requirements. Eligible Afghan nationals who were employed by or on behalf of the U.S. government in Afghanistan for a period of one year or longer between October 7, 2001 and December 31, 2014 are eligible for this program.

Categories
Global Pinoy

The Fate of Green Card Holders Facing Deportation Charges

Share this:

Permanent resident visas are in reality not “permanent” in nature. A ‘green card’ is still subject to revocation by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security if there are grounds to rescind its issuance. In fact, in certain cases, green card holders risk facing deportation charges. What steps may be taken should this happen?

Agnes has a U.S. citizen daughter who petitioned her 10 years ago. Since receiving her green card, Agnes has been in the United States a total of less than a year. She has been visiting the United States for less than one month a year. However, her US stays are not accurately reflected in her travel documents. Agnes regularly pays an “agent” who backdates the arrival and departure stamp on her passport with fake dates to make it appear that she had shorter stays in the Philippines and longer stays in the United States.

Early this year, Agnes underwent secondary inspection as she was entering the United States through thru LAX airport. She admitted before the CBP (Customs and Border Protection) inspector that the date stamps on her passport were fake. The CBP officer prepared a sworn statement and Agnes was asked to sign the document.

After admitting the wrong doing, Agnes was expecting to be allowed to enter the United States without any further problems. She did not realize that the CBP inspector would take her green card away from her. In addition, Agnes was subsequently issued a Notice to Appear before an immigration judge for her removal/deportation proceedings. Though she was allowed to enter the United States she was merely paroled on a temporary visa in order to face her removal/deportation proceedings.

Agnes would now like to abandon her green card and return to the Philippines right away. What are the consequences should she decide to simply depart from the United States? Will she be able to return to the United States again if her daughter re-petitions her?

USE IT OR LOSE IT

A permanent resident is issued a green card in order that one will be permitted to live and work in the United States. Hundreds of thousands of petitions are filed by Filipino nationals on behalf of their children or siblings and it a decade or more for some petitions before the visas are available. The usual situation is for green card holders to reside and work in the United States. Eventually, a green card holder may apply for U.S. citizenship after meeting the residency requirement. There are also a significant number of green card holders who are not staying in the United States. Some may have valid reasons for staying outside the United States like individuals who are continuing their studies abroad, or, have temporary job assignments outside the US. Some individuals, however, simply do not want to give up their green card despite the fact that they really do not have a good reason to keep it. If the latter happens, it would be best to abandon the green card and obtain the appropriate visitors visa.

Misrepresenting a material fact before an immigration officer in seeking admission to the United States is a valid basis to rescind the immigrant visa. The “fake” stamps representing the travel dates of a green card holder is considered fraud and will subject the individual to suffer serious consequences of removal.

In the case of Agnes, she will have to appear before the immigration court and face her removal charges. If she wants to maintain her status as a green card holder, she will have to explore the different waivers that may be available and appropriate for her specific case. She needs to seek professional legal assistance to avail and present the waivers that may be available to her. Only if the immigration judge exercises his favorable discretion in ruling on the waiver may Agnes be able to keep her green card.

On the other hand, if Agnes wants to give up her green card, she can file the abandonment of status application. The Customs and Border Protection may grant this abandonment application and is considered a voluntary relinquishment of Agnes’ green card status. But worse than simply getting an abandonment application approved, the U.S. government counsel may also argue in court to obtain a removal order against Agnes. This means that if the immigration judge issues a removal order, Agnes will not be able to return to the United States for at least 10 years. This is the serious consequence of a removal order.

In either case of filing waiver applications or abandonment applications, the individual in removal proceedings will have to put up with immigration court backlogs. In most jurisdictions, the backlog of cases in immigration court ranges from1 to 3 years. This means that unless the individual accepts a removal order without contesting it, the individual in proceedings may have to wait a couple of years before the removal case is resolved. During the pendency of the case, the individual in proceedings will have to stay in the United States.

As mentioned, there is a 10-year bar in returning to the United States after a removal order is issued against an individual. After the 10-year period has passed, a former green card holder (like Agnes in this case) will still need a waiver of the fraud she committed in presenting fake travel stamps on her passport. Whether or not she will be allowed to enter the United States again will depend on how her waiver application will be adjudicated.

Much like a driver’s license, a green card is merely a privilege that may be revoked. Using the green card according to the purpose it was issued is critical to maintaining it. One should avoid committing unlawful acts and fraud as this could definitely have serious consequences on one’s ability to return to the United States.

(Atty. Lourdes Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com, facebook/tancincolaw, tancinco.weareph.com/old or at (02)721 1963)

Categories
Global Pinoy

The “Accompanied by Stranger” Filipino Child

Share this:

“I was introduced to a ‘man’ I’ve never seen. He held my hand, as I boarded an airplane for the first time!”. This is how Jose Antonio Vargas (Jose), the celebrated Pulitzer prize-winning Filipino journalist, described his departure for the United States. It was 1993 and he was 12 years old at the time. Fast-forward to 2011 and Jose revealed publicly that he is an undocumented immigrant.

Ordinarily, Filipinos travel by plane to go to the United States and young Filipino travelers are typically accompanied by their parents or guardians. This is not, however, always the case. What happens when young immigrants enter fraudulently, unaccompanied by their ‘real’ parent and left in America for many years without documentation?

Paul was 15 years old when his mother told him that he was going to the United States for a vacation. He was a junior in high school and could not contain his excitement. Unknown to him, his mother paid a ‘consultant/agent’ a significant sum of money to obtain a U.S. visa for Paul.

Just like Jose Vargas, Paul was met at the airport by the ‘consultant/agent’ and was introduced to a couple. His mother exhorted Paul to follow instructions from this couple who would accompany him to the United States. Paul trusted his mother and obediently accepted whatever ‘guidance’ the couple gave him.

A few minutes prior to landing in U.S. soil, Paul was told that he should now answer to the name “Rob”. He was shown a passport for “Rob” but with Paul’s photo in it. Paul, while he found it strange, did not question the change. After all, he was very much excited and looking forward to meeting his cousins who were to take him to different tourist places in California. Upon his arrival in the United States, Paul and the couple who accompanied him presented their travel documents with their visas to the immigration officer. They were admitted. As expected, Paul was met by his cousins at the airport and took him to their Los Angeles home. Paul has no knowledge of what happened to the “Rod” passport that he used to enter the US. He last saw it in the possession of the couple who accompanied him.

After a few weeks in the United States, Paul began to realize that he was not going home. He was not averse to staying as he preferred to continue his studies in the United States with his cousins. After several years have passed, Paul realized that he is an undocumented youth. He could not apply to certain colleges because he realized he did not have the proper legal documents they were requiring for enrollment. Nevertheless, he finished his studies at a City College. After graduation, he could not get a job because he lacked the necessary employment authorization to work. What happens to Paul now? Will he be deported back to the Philippines? Why are some parents sending their children abroad without ensuring that their children’s immigration statuses are in place?

Liability of Minors for Fraud

After many years of residing in the United States, those who arrived as minors with fraudulent travel documents and visas find it difficult to adjust to a lawful permanent resident status. Current US immigration laws provide only limited ways to gain legal status. In June 2012, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (commonly called the “DACA”) allowed undocumented youths who arrived before 2007 and who are between the ages 15 to 31 to obtain permission to work and travel under the DACA policy of President Obama.

Others who are not eligible to avail of the benefits of DACA will have to find other options to legalize their stay. But the bigger issue is whether children like Paul, who entered with an assumed name, may be prevented from obtaining legal status because of the fraud that was committed in gaining entry into the US. Generally, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services impute the parent’s fraud on the minor children. There are precedent cases that USCIS use as basis to deny visas because of the fraud. In 2008, the case of Malik v. Mukasey (7th Cir) imputed the fraud of a parent to a 17 year old child depriving the latter of the ability to obtain legal status. There are, however, cases from other federal circuit courts that hold a contrary ruling. This means that the issue is still open to argument, depending on the circumstances of each case.

Surge of Undocumented Children at the Border

Unlike Mexico and the Central American countries, the Philippines is halfway across the world. While different in circumstances as Filipino children who were transported unlawfully to the United States, the surge of undocumented children at the border currently in the news share one thing in common: the actions of these children’s parents are fueled, in large part, by a desire to do what they believe is in their children’s best interest. As in the case of Jose Antonio Vargas, he recounted that his mother wanted to give him a ‘better’ life. Regardless of the reason behind such actions, however, it is clear that the minor children do not have the capacity to make these life-altering decisions for themselves.

Many of the minors arriving at the US-Mexican border come here based on erroneous information that they will be given legal status to stay once they set foot on US soil. They have been instructed to turn themselves in to the first border patrol officer they see. The hope, of course, is that once they turn themselves in, they will be processed and be allowed to stay. They may or may not be allowed to stay depending on the circumstances of their individual situations. Unfortunately, many will not qualify for residency and many will be deported.

There could be a distinction among the unaccompanied alien children at the U.S.-Mexican border and the innocent ‘accompanied by strangers’ children of Filipinos who were transported here. Many of those coming from Central America are escaping from “life or death” situations in their homeland. The young Filipinos are oftentimes victims of unscrupulous agents/consultants who prey on innocent children aspiring to have better futures. Unfortunately, both are suffering the unintended consequences of decisions made by their parents. Both are vulnerable to being deported back to their homeland.

(Atty. Lourdes S. Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com, (02)721 1963, tancinco.weareph.com/old or find her at facebook.com/tancincolaw)

Categories
Updates

New iCERT Password Security Requirement Takes Effect

Share this:

On Friday, July 18, a new password requirement was enacted for all iCERT users to enhance the program’s online security measures. Within 90 calendar days, iCERT users are required to create new passwords that meet certain requirements. These requirements include:

  • Passwords must be between 8 and 16 characters in length
  • Passwords must contain upper case letters, lower case letters, at least one number, and at least one special (non-alphanumeric) character
  • Passwords cannot match any of the previous 12 passwords used
  • Passwords must be changed at least once every 90 days
  • Passwords cannot be changed again within the first 15 days of use
Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes Updated H-2B Visa Numbers – July 18, 2014

Share this:

On July 18, 2014, USCIS provided an update of the amount of cap-subject H-2B visas received and approved by the federal agency for the second half of fiscal year 2014. According to USCIS, a total of 24,769 beneficiaries have been approved for the second half of fiscal year 2014, with an additional 1,246 petitions pending. USCIS has begun accepting applications for the first half of Fiscal Year 2015. No beneficiaries have yet been approved, but 437 petitions are currently pending.

Congressionally-based legislation limits the amount of H-2B visas provided per fiscal year to a total of 66,000, with 33,000 allocated for employment for the first half of the fiscal year and 33,000 allocated for employment for the second half of the fiscal year. Unused numbers from the first half of the fiscal year are made available for use by employers seeking H-2B workers during the second half of the year.

Categories
Updates

Proposed HUMANE Act Would Protect Unaccompanied Migrant Children at Border Crossings

Share this:

On July 16, 2014, Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) and Representative Henry Cuellar (D-TX) introduced the Helping Unaccompanied Minors and Alleviating National Emergency (HUMANE) Act. This legislation, if passed, would reform current law to help protect and support better treatment of unaccompanied children at the U.S./Mexico border.

“Today Congressman Cuellar and I are proposing a solution to the current crisis on our border,” said Sen. Cornyn. “Our proposal would improve the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2008, treating all unaccompanied minors equally and ensuring Due Process under the law in a timely, fair manner.” ??

“The border region in Texas has been overwhelmed over the past few months by a deluge of undocumented immigrants from Central America,” said Congressman Cuellar. “Today’s legislation strengthens current law protecting unaccompanied children and responds to the crisis while supporting the men and women of Border Patrol. I would like to thank Senator John Cornyn for partnering with me on this legislation and I ask my colleagues in the House and Senate to act quickly on this bill.”