Categories
Updates

DHS Publishes Notice to Rescind 2007 No-Match Rule

Share this:

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has just published a notice
in the Federal Record in which it rescind previous amendments related
to how employers should respond when they receive no match letters.
This recent notice calls for rescinding the August 2007 No-Match Rule
and the 2008 Supplemental Final Rule.

The original 2007 rule described the obligations employers had when
they received no-match letters from the Social Security Administration
(SSA) or a letter regarding employment verification from DHS. These
letters are sent when an employee’s stated Social Security number does
not match the numbers in the SSA’s existing database. In addition the
2007 rule provided ‘Safe Harbors,’ rules employers could follow that
would establish that the employer did not have knowledge that the
employee in question was an unauthorized alien. If an employer is shown
to have knowledge of an employee’s unauthorized status, that employer
can be subject to civil and criminal penalties.

The current notice comes as DHS now believes they have created
substantial improvements in E-Verify program (the electronic employment
verification system) and other federal programs to provide the
resources employers need to reduce instances of unauthorized
employment. DHS believes that a better use of resources would be to
focus efforts on enforcement and community outreach to “increase
compliance through improved verification, including increased
participation in the USCIS’s E-Verify employment eligibility
verification system, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s ICE
Mutual Agreement Between Government and Employers (IMAGE), and other
programs.”

Categories
Immigration Round Table

Stateless Person Desires US Citizenship

Share this:

Dear Atty. Lou,

I was born in 1943 of a Filipina mother and a US citizen father who is an American soldier and escaped from the Death March. I am now 65 years old (as old as World War 2) and my father found me when I was already 19.

My problem is: the Department of Foreign Affairs would not issue me a regular Philippine passport since according to them I should have made a choice before I got to be 18. So I was declared stateless and had to get a card from the Bureau of Immigration here as a “NATIVE RESIDENT” with a stateless identity. When that was done, the DFA gave me a travel document, which was accepted by the US Embassy and the second time I had to go the US, the Embassy gave me a 10-year visa.)

I found my half-sister and half-brother in the USA and the TV show Probe team even featured us when I finally was able to fulfill my father’s request that his ashes be spread all over Bataan. Anyway, to make a long (epic) story short, the consul I last talked to said I should apply for US Citizenship derivative through one US CITIZEN parent. I have the complete military records of my father, sent to me by NARA. I even have his birth certificate from Melrose, Massachusetts. I also have letters from my American siblings and relatives acknowledging me as their blood relative.

If I were to choose Filipino citizenship, I just found out that I cannot afford the monetary aspects of this long and arduous process. Perhaps, as my half sister said it was my father’s desire that I choose US citizenship.

I am writing to you with the hope that you may give me some advice on how to go about this. I have no wish to gain this citizenship for the benefits that may come with it, but I would like to be able to live the remaining years of my life as a US citizen. HELP!
                                                                  
Stateless Amerasian

Dear Stateless Amerasian,

It is disheartening to know that you are still confronted with your nationality issue. While it is not your fault that you are “stateless”, there were legal steps that needed to take place in order to relieve you of becoming stateless.

Birth in the Philippines does not confer automatic Filipino citizenship unlike in the US where birth in the US results in the child being a US citizen. In the Philippines, citizenship is actually conferred based on descent or parents cititizenship. The  1935 Philippine constitution was in effect at the time of your birth. Under the constitutional provision, if a person was born of a foreign citizen parent and a Filipino mother, you were mandated to elect Philippine citizenship before the age of majority or before you reached 21 years old. Taking this affirmative step would have afforded you Philippine citizenship. This actually requires registration of your birth in the civil registrar before your turned 21 years old. Since this act was not performed, you lost the opportunity to be a Philippine citizen. The only way then to obtain Philippine citizenship is to be a “resident” of the Philippines and later on maybe obtain naturalization as a Filipino citizen. As mentioned in your letter, you decided not to proceed with this route because of monetary constraints.

You now want to derive US citizenship because you were able to locate your father when you were 19 years old. Unfortunately, since you were born between 1941 and 1952, pertinent US nationality law under the old Section 309 of the Immigration and Nationality Act requires children born out of wedlock to be legitimated before they turn 18 years old. This is a requirement to acquire citizenship through your father. Legitimation by your US citizen father should have occurred before your 18th birthday. The legitimation laws of the state where your US citizen father was a resident or domicile will govern whether he had taken steps to legally “legitimized” or acknowledged you as his child.

For out of wedlock children claiming through a father, the claim may be based on the legitimation laws of any jurisdiction where the father or the child resided or was domiciled between the date of the child’s birth to his or her 18th birthday. Acquisition of citizenship for a child born out of wedlock is also provided for under INA Section 309, 8 USC Section 1409. Unfortunately, under Massachussetts law of which your US citizen was a resident prior to his death recognizes legitimation only by intermarriage of the natural parents. In this case, there is no indication in your letter which shows that “legitimation” or marriage of your parents took place.

Different states have different sets of rules on what “legitimation” of out of wedlock children is considered legal. Some states may be more liberal while others are truly restrictive like the Massachusetts law.

It is too late to derive citizenship through your father absent evidence to show that your parents married as proof of your legitimation and as required by Massachussetts law. You may want to explore other options of obtaining a resident visa (green card) either through family petition (through your siblings petition) or employment petition. As soon as you obtain a resident card, you may then apply for naturalization to US citizenship after five years of becoming a resident.

Atty. Lou

(Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq is a partner at the Tancinco Law Offices, a Professional Law Corp. Her office is located at One Hallidie Plaza, Ste 818, San Francisco CA 94102 and may be reached at 415.397.0808; email at law@tancinco.com or check their website at tancinco.weareph.com/old. The content provided in this column is solely for informational purpose only and do not create a lawyer-client relationship. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. This column does not disclose any confidential or classified information acquired in her capacity as legal counsel. Consult with an attorney before deciding on a course of action. You can submit questions to law@tancinco.com)

Categories
Updates

Department of Labor Comments on Errors in Certifying Employer Federal Employer Identification Numbers

Share this:

It has been noted that multiple U.S. employers have been having
problems receiving approvals for Labor Condition Applications (LCAs),
that are required to request H-1B petitions as part of the iCert
program. These problems occur in cases where the Department of Labor is
unable to verify the requesting employer’s Federal Employer
Identification Number (FEIN), and, in some cases, occurs even when
employers correctly enter in this information.

The Department of Labor has recently amended the error
notice that is created in instances where there is an error related to
an employer’s FEIN. The new error notification provides detailed
instructions on how the employer can provide and submit documentation
to the Department of Labor. Please note that this additional process
may extend the time it takes the Department of Labor to process the
request.

The iCert program, according to the Department of Labor, is
a “one-stop to improve access to employment-based visa application
services and USDOL immigration news and information.” It is available
online at http://icert.doleta.gov/ and can be accessed 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Categories
Updates

USCIS Now Accepting H-2B Visa Applications for FY 2009

Share this:

After receiving less H-2B visa applications than expected from
employers this year, USCIS has again begun accepting applications for
this visa category. The H-2B visa, which provides temporary entry into
the U.S. for semi-skilled workers, has an annual cap of 66,000. So far,
USCIS has only issued just over 40,000 of these visas for this fiscal
year (ending September 30). “Because of the low visa issuance rate,
(U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, USCIS) is reopening the
filing period to allow employers to file additional petitions for
qualified H-2B temporary foreign non-agricultural workers,” reported
USCIS.

The H-2B program enables employers to bring in temporary foreign
workers to fill non-agricultural positions for which there is a
shortage of U.S. workers. These positions are typically in areas such
as health care, food service, landscaping and construction. In previous
years, there was a high demand for these workers and, typically, the
amount of applications received were much more than the 66,000 annual
cap. However, this year, as we’ve seen with the H-1B program, the
global recession has greatly affected employer needs for H-2B workers.

Categories
SideBar

Can I be Sent to Jail for Not Paying my Bills?

Share this:

I sometimes get questions from our readers with questions and answers that seem to be so obvious. However, I get these same questions over and over again that apparently many people are not sure about it. The email I received from a reader illustrates this point:

“I was a gambler and a year ago I had personal problem in my life. I got so depressed that I almost committed suicide. Just because gambling helped to ease my depression I got hooked.  I ended up with bills on my credit card for cash advances of $150,000 … and because the economy is so bad they cut our hours of work from full time I only work as a part time now… I was still paying for my bills until I cannot afford anymore because of working part time. I was thinking about filing for bankruptcy but I don’t want to get in trouble. I’d like to pay my bills but I cannot afford it anymore. Because of what I owe can I go to jail for that? I used to take home $4000 mo now I am lucky if I take home $2000 now. Sometimes it’s just enough or sometimes I’m still short. … Can I go to jail for that? …. If they garnish my paycheck, me and my son will be living in the street but I’m scared that they might put me in jail and who is gonna take care of my son. That’s why I’m scared to file bankruptcy. Please tell me more… “ 

This question is not very unusual as credit collectors oftentimes perpetuate this myth. Credit collectors do make calls to debtor’s place of employment or home numbers and leave threatening message. They try to intimidate debtors to pay up or threaten them with arrest or imprisonment.

Fortunately for debtors there are no debtor prisons in the US. There have been no debtor prisons in the US for the past 150 years.  Some countries may still place a debtor in prison for failing to pay a debt.  However, debt is not criminalized in the US. In order to go to prison you must be convicted of a criminal behavior.  Failing to pay a debt is not a criminal behavior.

What will most likely happen with credit card debts is that the creditor will sue you in court to collect the obligation. Through this judgment the creditor can then garnish your wages or get liens on your properties.  However, getting to this point is a very time-consuming and costly affair for the creditor. Hence, unless you owe a huge amount and/or you have assets they can run after, it is usually very costly for creditors to go to court to collect from debtors who have no assets. Specially, considering that debtors with no assets can easily file for bankruptcy and get rid of these debts anyway.

In case of secured obligations, such as a home mortgage or car loans, the creditor’s remedy is to foreclose on the home or repossess car. Creditors cannot put you to jail for failing to pay their secured obligations.

Many people have lost their jobs, have had unexpected medical problems, or just had financial investments gone bad. A debtor in such a situation who can no longer make the minimum payment is not a criminal and cannot go to jail for these reasons.  Collection agencies, however, will do anything they can to compel payment from the debtor.  You cannot go to jail if you cannot pay your financial obligations. That is precisely the reason why we have remedies available such as bankruptcy and debt settlements. If a debtor does nothing about it, the worse that will happen to the debtor is a ruined credit score!

Categories
Updates

USCIS Updates a Series of Immigration-Related Medical Forms

Share this:

USCIS has updated a number of immigration-related medical forms, all of
which are now available for use and download. According to USCIS, all
consular posts should now start using the new forms DS-2053, DS-3024,
DS-3026 and DS-3025 and discontinue the use of older versions of these
forms. Forms DS-3054 and DS-3030 include changes and updates that were
made to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Technical
Insrtuctions. CDC is currently in the process of updating the 2007
Tuberculosis Technical Instruction to all consular posts.

The updated medical forms include the following:

DS-2053 – Medical Examination for Immigrant or Refugee Applicant

DS-2054 – Medical Examination for Immigrant or Refugee Applicant

DS-3024 – Chest X-Ray and Classification Worksheet

DS-3030 – Chest X-Ray and Classification Worksheet

DS-3026 – Medical History of Physical Examination Worksheet

DS-3025 – Vaccination Documentation Worksheet

Categories
SideBar

Can I Run Up my Credit Cards Before Filing Bankruptcy?

Share this:

A client came to me this week with a not so typical financial question.  This case involves a single mother who is gainfully employed and has a good credit record. She has a couple of department store credit cards as well as the usual Visa and MasterCards.  She carries minimal balances on her credit cards that she pays off every month.

A few months ago she had a medical issue. She went to the emergency room and had some medical and lab tests performed on her.  She was in and out of the hospital for about a few days.  Fortunately, the medical tests found nothing wrong with her. She turned out okay and her medical issue was resolved.  However, unfortunately for her, the medical and lab tests done on her were so expensive that she ended up with medical bills of more than a hundred thousand dollars. After so many weeks of trying to collect from her the hospital gave her a final demand letter to pay the bill or face a collection lawsuit.

There is just no way that she can afford to pay the medical bill as her income is just enough for her family to survive on.  This client has already decided that filing for bankruptcy is her only option. However, she did ask around and among the many “advice” she got from friends was that she should just use up all the available balance on her credit card before filing for bankruptcy.  Should she do so?

“Charging up” your credit card before filing for bankruptcy may seem like an inviting proposition.  After all, it does not matter whether your obligation is $100,000 or $200,000. These credit card bills (and other unsecured obligations) will be wiped out in a Chapter 7 filing anyway.  So why not go on a vacation courtesy of your credit card? Why not buy the newest and biggest flat screen TVs that your credit card will allow? And, while at it why not just go ahead and make cash advances and send some of it to your family or relatives in the Philippines?  Indeed, why not?

The reason why it is not such a good idea to run up credit card obligations in anticipation of filing for bankruptcy   is that those credit card obligations may possibly turn out to be nondischargeable on the ground of fraud. The bankruptcy trustee can review your purchases prior to filing for bankruptcy and may make these debts nondischargeable.  The banks themselves may also file for Adversary proceedings in bankruptcy court to contest the dischargeability of these debts. Hence, you may still end up being liable on these fraudulent debts despite the bankruptcy filing; and, worse, may also result in having your bankruptcy case dismissed.

Under the Bankruptcy Code there are presumptions that can be inferred from certain actions of a debtor.  For example, the Bankruptcy Code presumes it to be fraudulent and therefore nondischargeable: if: (a) a consumer incurs a debt to any single creditor totaling $500 for luxury goods or services incurred within 90 days before the filing; and, (b) cash advances on credit card obtained within 70 days before the filing are also presumed to be nondischargeable.        

It does not look good if you run up your credit card obligations in the months prior to filing for bankruptcy. It looks even worse if you take out cash advances, purchased luxury items or simply run up a lot of debts or exhaust your credit limits.  These actions raise the presumption of fraud and may adversely affect your bankruptcy filing.

Advice and concern you receive from friends may indeed be genuine and, on the surface, may also seem to be reasonable. However, outdated or wrong information that you receive may have severe consequences on your financial life.

(DISCLAIMER: material presented above is intended for informational purposes only. It is not intended as professional advice and should not be construed as such. Rey Tancinco is a partner at Tancinco Law Offices, a professional corporation with offices in San Francisco, Vallejo, and Manila. The law office website is at: tancinco.weareph.com/old.  Rey Tancinco can be contacted at (800) 999-9096 or (415) 397-0808 or via email at: attyrey@tancinco.com.)

Categories
Updates

USCIS Increases Amount of Worksite Audits

Share this:

Current feedback has revealed that USCIS has greatly increased the
amounts of surprise visits to the worksites of U.S. employers of H-1B
and L-1 visa beneficiaries. According to anecdotal information, agents
of USCIS have been coming to worksites with a list of questions they
are asking all employers, regardless of company size. The goal of these
visits is to ensure the identity of the petitioner and beneficiary, and
to make sure that the beneficiary is working within the terms of the
visa they have received.

It should be noted that, so far, these agents are arriving at employer
locations without the authority to enter the worksite and request entry
and employer consent. Legally, employers have the right to deny these
agents entry into their worksites at that time.

It is essential that employers prepare for these potential audits ahead
of time by collecting and having ready all necessary materials and
proof of compliance for these agent representatives. Please contact us
for more information and guidance regarding this increase in worksite
audits.

Categories
Updates

Napolitano Discusses Immigration Policy and the Recent Increase in Raids and Policy Implementation

Share this:

Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security led
a closed-door meeting this week in Seattle, Washington with
representatives from a number of industries and advocacy groups
affected by immigration legislation. On Monday, Napolitano met with
members of immigration advocacy groups, labor unions, local officials,
police officers, representatives of farmworkers’ associations and other
interested parties. In the meeting, Napolitano and the attendees
discussed current and proposed changes to immigration legislation and
enforcement.

Earlier this year, the Obama Administration called for the auditing of
the workforces of more than 650 businesses throughout the country,
leading to major concerns voiced by businesses and relevant
organizations that want to understand the impact of these changes in
the implementation of policy at the national level.

“Secretary Napolitano believes it’s important to speak directly to the
many individuals and groups that are impacted by our work,” said Matt
Chandler, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security.

In the meeting, attendees voiced their concerns about recent ICE
practices, including programs looking to utilize local law enforcement
officials in the tasks of tracking illegal immigrants and due process
rights for immigrants that have been incarcerated by federal officials.

While there had been earlier talk about comprehensive immigration
reform entering the national agenda as a major news item this year,
currently the issue has been substantially shadowed by current interest
in healthcare reform. It is expected, however, that the Obama
Administration, with Napolitano as its primary decision-maker, will
push forward with shifts to changes in policy and implementation in the
coming months.