Categories
Updates

USCIS Introduces E-Notification of Application Acceptance

Share this:

On June 25, 2009, President Obama announced that in the next 9 days,
USCIS intended to launch an improved USCIS website (at www.uscis.gov)
that would better assist customers in managing their immigration needs
and maintaining up-to-date information on the status of their cases.

As part of this larger initiative, USCIS has now launched an online,
E-Notification initiative for immigration applications/petitions filed
at one of three Lockbox locations (Chicago, Phoenix and Lewisville
[TX]). Individuals that file their applications/petitions at one of
these locations will now have the option of receiving an email and/or
text message providing verification that the application or petition
has been accepted by USCIS.

Individuals wishing to receive E-Notification should complete Form
G-1145, the E-Notification of Application/Petition Acceptance form, and
attach it to the top of their application or petition. Information you
share in this form will be used by USCIS to contact you via email
and/or text message.

Categories
Immigration Round Table

Admission of Drug Use Resulted in Denial of Visa

Share this:

Dear Atty. Lou,

I am a Canadian citizen, with an American husband, who admitted past drug use (marijuana, which although technically illegal in Canada, use of which is very rarely prosecuted) on my medical interview, thinking that my use of it was so insignificant it would not be considered a threat (up until my interview, January 21st 2009 I used it maybe 2-3 times a year, and by ‘use’ I mean took a puff of a joint passed at a party). I’m sure you know what happened next.

I was denied and told I have to show three years of sobriety before I can apply again. The worst part of this so far (other than the fact that they made me wait four months and pay $300 to find out I’m inadmissible instead of telling me up front at the medical) is that NO ONE will tell me what I have to do next, only that I have until January 21st, 2010 to do it. The deadline is approaching now, and I still haven’t a clue how I’m supposed to prove to them I’m sober. Can you give me any information on the rest of this process? I’ve sent three emails to the consulate but have only received form letters from them stating basically that “it’s not personal”, without giving any of the information I’ve requested.

Confused User

Dear Confused User:

Section 212(a)(1)(A)(iv) of the Immigration and Nationality Act clearly bars a person who is determined to be a drug abuser or addict from receiving an immigrant or non-immigrant visa. The implementing regulations define “drug abuse” as the non-medical use of a substance listed in section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act.

One may be found to be an abuser based on the medical findings of the recognized physicians. Most of the time without the admission, the physician would not know whether the applicant had taken controlled substance in the past. Believing that honesty has its rewards, applicants admits to past use of drugs not knowing that their admission may mean the end of their dream to come to the US. This is the harsh reality on how this ground for inadmissibility is being applied to future immigrants in the US.

There is just one minor exception based on relevant regulation. A person is not inadmissible as a drug addict or drug abuser if he has not used a psychoactive substance within the last three years. (9 FAM 40.11 N.9.5)

In your case, you mentioned that you have not been prosecuted or convicted for a drug offense, hence, the ground for your inadmissibility is based on “health related ground” instead of a criminal ground of conviction for controlled substance or marijuana.

For health related grounds, you must be informed that there is no waiver for drug abusers or drug addicts. What you need to show is that you have not used the “psychoactive substance” abuse for the last three years as per regulations of the Department of State. To be able to prove that you are sober, you may want to get a medical certificate from a recognized physician of the US Embassy consular section to attest to the fact that you have not taken any more marijuana. The physician will issue such favorable findings after your interview or undergoing another medical examination.

Based on your letter, you stated that you had used marijuana two or three times a year prior to your interview on January 21, 2009. It is not indicated whether you admitted this fact to the interviewing officer. If you did admit to use of marijuana three times a year, this means that you were not sober yet for the last three years. You may want to wait until you have proven that you are sober for at least three years before having your immigrant visa filed again by your US citizen spouse. The one year deadline is a period of time given to you by the consular officer to provide evidence of sobriety. If you are not able to provide evidence within that time, your US citizen spouse may re-file a petition for immigrant visa again at the appropriate time when you are able to prove that you are no longer considered a “user”. I hope this information is helpful.

Atty. Lou

(Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq is a partner at the Tancinco Law Offices, a Professional Law Corp. Her office is located at One Hallidie Plaza, Ste 818, San Francisco CA 94102 and may be reached at 415.397.0808; email at law@tancinco.com or check their website at tancinco.weareph.com/old. The content provided in this column is solely for informational purpose only and do not create a lawyer-client relationship. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. This column does not disclose any confidential or classified information acquired in her capacity as legal counsel. Consult with an attorney before deciding on a course of action. You can submit questions to law@tancinco.com)

Categories
Updates

Nebraska Now Requires Public Employers to Use E-Verify to Determine Employee Eligibility

Share this:

Earlier this year, Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman signed into law a
bill that would require public employers, including state agencies, and
contractors working for public employers to use the federal
government’s E-Verify program to determine the employment eligibility
of all new hires. This law went into effect October 1. As of October 1,
all public employers must include in their contract with a contractor
the provision that the contractor use the E-Verify system to determine
all new hires’ employment eligibility. Additionally, for two years,
Nebraska’s Department of Labor will have available information about
E-Verify for private employers and will encourage the use of the
program by private employers.

Nebraska is the latest state to require the use of the E-Verify system
for public employers and their contractors. E-Verify is also required
in some form in Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Minnesota,
Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South
Carolina and Utah.

Categories
SideBar

Can I Abandon A House I Can No Longer Afford To Pay?

Share this:

Our office received the following email:  

“What is the best action to take with an upside-down house? My wife and I bought a house in Vegas and plan on retiring there early. We are in our mid 50s. It is a second home or vacation house for us. We own a house in the Southern California area. We are seriously considering letting go of our second house in Vegas due to our low interest only payment will expire in June of 1010 and the house is almost 60% less than the original price.

What if we decide to stop payment on the house and just let it go? What will be the consequences for this action? Can we be sued by the lender? What other options do we have?     

If the homeowner abandons the house and the lender then sells the property in a foreclosure sale for less than the loan amount, there arises the possibility of a “deficiency” judgment against the homeowner. Rules regarding deficiency judgments differ from State to State; hence, individuals in the same situation may have different options or consequences depending on which State their property is located. In.  For the State of Nevada, however, lenders do have the right to a deficiency judgment. Thus, abandoning you house may not necessarily clear you of all liability.

The good news for this homeowner, however, is that not all lenders may decide to sue the homeowner for a deficiency judgment. Some lenders do. Some lenders don’t.  Some lenders may decide not to come after you with a deficiency judgment as they may decide that additional expense of collecting the deficiency from a homeowner would not be justified by what, if any, they would be able to collect from the homeowner.

The bad news, however, is that even when the lender decides not to enforce a deficiency judgment the homeowner may still not be completely free from liability. In these deficiency cases, the lender may instead issue the homeowner an IRS form 1099 for the deficiency.  This means that the deficiency was considered as a “loss” by the lender but is to be considered as an “income” to the homeowner. The net result is that you will now have a taxable income that you will owe Uncle Sam. This may not sound fair as you got nothing out of the transaction, but that is indeed a taxable income under IRS rules.    

To be completely relieved of liability, the filing of a bankruptcy petition may or may not be an option depending on the equity the homeowner has on his primary home in Southern California, the homeowner’s family income, his other assets (if any) and other financial factors.  Other than that, the homeowner may be stuck with a deficiency judgment or a tax bill. Neither one sounds like a nice result.  

Readers should, however, be aware that deficiency judgment rules differ from State to State. In California, for example, extra judicial foreclosure of properties (which is the faster and preferred way to foreclose by most lenders) does not give rise to a deficiency judgment.  Likewise, the facts given by our homeowner refers to a second home (and, not a primary home).  Taxation rules may differ when a primary home is involved as the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act (valid until 2012) makes foreclosure deficiency non-taxable as regards purchase money loans on primary homes.  

(DISCLAIMER: material presented above is intended for informational purposes only. It is not intended as professional advice and should not be construed as such. Rey Tancinco is a partner at Tancinco Law Offices, a professional corporation with offices in San Francisco, Vallejo, and Manila. The law office website is at: tancinco.weareph.com/old.  Rey Tancinco can be contacted at (800) 999-9096 or (415) 397-0808 or via email at: attyrey@tancinco.com.)

Categories
Updates

USCIS Posts Update of the Amount of H-1B Petitions Received

Share this:

USCIS has posted an update of the amount of H-1B petitions the federal
agency has received. As of September 25, 2009, roughly 46,700 H-1B
cap-subject petitions and 20,000 H-1B petitions that qualify for the
advanced degree cap exemption have been received by USCIS. A total of
65,000 H-1B visas are available for this fiscal year.

In previous years, USCIS received large amounts of H-1B petitions. In
many cases the agency stopped accepting these petitions days or weeks
after the initial acceptance date. This year, however, due to the
economic recession, the amount of filed petitions is much lower. On
April 17, 2009, in their first public notification about this year’s
H-1B program, USCIS announced they had received roughly 43,000 H-1B
petitions and 20,000 that qualified for the advanced degree cap
exemption.

Categories
Updates

DV-2011 Registration Period Begins October 2

Share this:

The online registration period for entering the 2011 Diversity Visa
lottery begins at noon, Eastern Daylight Time, Friday, October 2 and
ends at noon, Eastern Standard Time, Monday, November 30. Individuals
interested in applying for the DV-2011 program and being considered for
permanent residency in the U.S. through the program should apply for
the lottery on Form DS-5501, the Electronic Diversity Visa Entry Form,
during this open registration period. The form can be accessed online
at www.dvlottery.state.gov. Paper entries will not be allowed.

The Diversity Visa program makes available visas to people that meet
the program’s simple requirements for eligibility, including being a
native of a country whose natives qualify for the program and meeting
either the education or work experience requirement of the lottery
program (a high school education or its equivalent OR two years of work
experience within the past five years in an occupation that requires at
least two years of training or experience to perform).

A maximum of 55,000 visas will be distributed among six geographic
regions, with more visas going to regions with lower rates of
immigration. Visas are not available to nationals of any country that
has sent more than 50,000 immigrants to the U.S. over the last five
years. Further, within each geographic region, no one country can
receive more than seven percent of the available visas in any one year.

For the 2011 Diversity Visa lottery program, natives of the following countries are not eligible to apply:

Brazil, Canada, China (Mainland-Born), Colombia, Dominican Republic,
Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, India, Jamaica, Mexico,
Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Poland, South Korea, United Kingdom
(Except Northern Ireland) and its Dependent Territories, and Vietnam.

Please note that people born in Hong Kong Sar, Macau Sar ad Taiwan are eligible for this year’s program.

Categories
SideBar

Can Debt Settlement Firms Help Me?

Share this:

You have probably come across ads by companies offering to settle your credit card bills for pennies on the dollar claiming that their services will cut your bills and save you thousands of dollars. If you have already maxed out your credit card balances and are already drowning in credit card debts, these offers would sound like the very solution you need. Do these offers sound like a scam? Or, can debt settlement firms really help you reduce your debts?

How does a debt settlement firm work? The debt settlement firms operate by collecting money from you every month. In the meantime, they do not pay your creditors. They merely put the money they collect from you in a trust fund. When you have already built up enough funds, they then negotiate with the creditors for a reduced payment and pay-off your bills in full. In theory, this is the way it is supposed to work 

The reality, however, may be different.

Before you sign up, you need to consider a few things. First, you need to consider the fees being charged. The fees charged differ for each company. There is no industry standard. Typically, however, there is an initial set-up fee and a monthly fee that a client is supposed to pay month after month.  This being an unregulated business, it is not unusual for clients to learn later on, that these firms together with the client’s money have vanished.

Clients make monthly payments to these firms thinking that these firms are already taking care of their debts. This is not so.  You need to know that during all the months that the debt-settlement company is collecting from you and trying to build up enough funds to pay off the creditors, it does not settle anything at the beginning. In the meantime, all your credit card obligations remain unpaid, the unpaid bills are still affecting your credit scores and you may still continue to get collection calls from your creditors.   

There are also usually high dropout rates from clients before the company reaches a settlement with their creditors. Let’s say, for example: that a client owes $20,000 in credit card debts. Assuming that a debt settlement firm intends to settle that  $20,000 debt at 50% off or at $10,000; and, assuming also that a debtor pays $500 a month into the trust fund of the debt settlement firm, it will take 20 months for that $500 monthly contribution to reach $10,000.  During those 20 months when the firm is not doing anything on your debt, the debtor still pays a monthly fee to the firm in addition to the $500 a month payment accumulated in the trust fund.  Note that while your fund is accumulating for the next 20 months the debt settlement firm does nothing to reduce or cancel your debt. After 20 months, the firm may indeed be able to settle the debt for $10,000 but chances are the lender will not even wait for 20 months without doing anything. Chances are, the lender will initiate a collection suit in court long before 20 months. At this time, the debt settlement firms cannot do anything, as they are not authorized to practice law in a collection lawsuit. Thus, clients end up in exactly the same place they were before …… with unpaid debts and a collection lawsuit to boot.

You should also consider that debt-settlement has tax consequences. The amount forgiven by a creditor may be a taxable income. This is money that you now owe to the IRS. The problem with this is that if a client ultimately has to file for bankruptcy, it may put some clients in a worse situation. This is because tax debts may not be dischargeable in bankruptcy while the credit card debt was a dischargeable debt.

So, when is debt-settlement right for you?  
 
Debt settlement would probably be a good solution for only a small portion of the population.  You would probably be a good candidate for debt-settlement if you are ready to file for bankruptcy but do not qualify for a Chapter 7 filing (If a client qualifies for Chapter 7, most people would just file Chapter 7 and get a discharge on all the debts instead of only a portion of it in a debt-settlement).  On the other hand, in a Chapter 13 filing a client will be obligated to schedule a payment of debts with creditors over a 3 to 5 year period. Hence, in these kinds of cases, debt-settlement may be a viable alternative instead of filing for Chapter 13. 

Debt settlement companies do provide a service. However, it is in your interest to do the legwork first and find out if it is the right solution for you for the specific situation that you are in.    

(DISCLAIMER: material presented above is intended for informational purposes only. It is not intended as professional advice and should not be construed as such. Rey Tancinco is a partner at Tancinco Law Offices, a professional corporation with offices in San Francisco, Vallejo, and Manila. The law office website is at: tancinco.weareph.com/old.  Rey Tancinco can be contacted at (800) 999-9096 or (415) 397-0808 or via email at: attyrey@tancinco.com.)

Categories
Updates

USCIS May Increase Fees for Immigration Services

Share this:

Earlier this week, on a visit to Los Angeles, Alejandro Mayorkas, the
new Director of USCIS, stated that the federal agency may have to raise
fees and cut the budget for immigration services next year. According
to Mayorkas, financial challenges have led to the agency considering to
raise fees for immigration services. Currently, USCIS is looking at
generating $118 million less in revenue this year, due to a smaller
amount of individuals and employers applying for citizenship and visas.

The number of individuals applying for citizenship declined greatly
last year; many believe that decrease was due, in large part, to a 2007
increase in fees for citizenship applications. Advocates of immigrants
believe that any further fee increases will lead to even more drastic
reductions in citizenship applications in the years to come.

According to Mayorkas, USCIS is required to be a self-supporting
agency. While USCIS is seeking an increase in federal funding –
recently, they requested just over $206 million in funds from Congress
– it is possible, Mayorkas says, that immigration services fees will
increase again in the near future.

Categories
Updates

U.S. Government Launches New Web-Based Immigration Alert System for Applicants

Share this:

Yesterday, the U.S. government started a new web-based program that
lets immigration applicants check the status of their cases through
text messages and emails. This new program is another way to minimize
red tape through technological innovation, according to administration
officials. The government is also currently developing a new way for
individuals in the U.S. to receive emergency info from the government,
along with consumer product recalls and other important alerts, through
electronic means. The new immigration tracking method and the proposed
emergency alert system are both part of a method to fundamentally
change the way the government communicates with those residing in the
U.S.

These efforts are “fundamentally changing the default of the public
sector,” said Vivek Kundra, the government’s Chief Information Officer.
“You’re seeing a result of a transparent and open government the
president talked about.”

The new immigration alert system will, among other things, remind
applicants if portions of their application are not complete (e.g.,
digital fingerprints not recorded successfully). Instead of applicants
having to contact the government for information, this information will
now be outbound through the new e-alert system.