Categories
Updates

USCIS Is Conducting 25,000 Site Inspections of H-1B Employers

Share this:

In response to a study conducted last year that found cases of fraud
and other infringements in one out of every five H-1B applications,
USCIS is stepping up its enforcement of the skilled worker program.
This fiscal year, federal inspectors plan to conduct 25,000 on-site
inspections of U.S. companies that have hired foreign workers under the
H-1B program. This is five times as many inspections as there were last
fiscal year.

In a letter to Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa),
USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas commented that the inspections of
companies began in July of this year. The program, according to
Mayorkas, determines “whether the location of employment actually
exists and if a beneficiary is employed at the location specified,
performing the duties as described, and paid the salary as identified
in the petition.”

This new enforcement initiative has been implemented in tandem with an
increase in demands for detailed documentation for foreign worker
applications from USCIS.

Categories
SideBar

Should I Stop Paying Mortgage And Abandon My House?

Share this:

Millions of Americans are wishing for some form of financial relief through loan modification from lenders. Unfortunately, however, the reality is that only a small portion of loan modification applicants are benefiting from the loan modification program being encouraged by the government while millions are still hoping for relief.

A couple that was already in bankruptcy proceedings came to see me last week. The situation of this couple is not unlike the situation of many other American couples today.  Prior to the housing bust, this couple had previously owned 4 houses. The last few years, they had invested their life savings on the down payment of these real estate investments. As should already be obvious by now, the values declined and this couple last all their equity (hence, their life savings) on these investments turned bad.

Three of their real estate properties have already been foreclosed while only their primary home remains.  Though the spouses are already in their mid 60’s and already receiving retirement income, both are forced to continue employment as they need the additional income to pay for the mortgage on their primary home.  The situation, however, went from bad to worse when they also informed me that they were already 10 months delinquent on the mortgage payments of their primary home. In addition, the property value of their home is already way below the mortgage obligation.   

Prior to coming to see me, this very sweet couple had already been to various loan modification seminars sponsored by certain individuals. They found one whom they liked and proceeded to give their trust to these individuals who then promised that their loan modification would be approved. No approval came, hence, the foreclosures of their 3 properties. The only reason their primary home has not yet been foreclosed is because they are in a bankruptcy proceeding that has temporarily halted the foreclosure of their home.  Eventually, however, this Stay of foreclosure by the bankruptcy court will be lifted and the lender will be able to foreclosure on the home if they continue to remain delinquent.    

This very sweet couple has pleaded with me to help them save their home.  They do not have a place to go should their house be foreclosed. They want me to do everything possible to save their primary home. They have already exhausted their savings with their bad investments. They have also expended many more thousands of dollars the past year on loan modification services, which went nowhere. Now, they have practically exhausted all their financial reserves.

Just by looking at the income that they are currently receiving and comparing it with the mortgage payments (not to mention the real property taxes and insurance they have to pay on the home), it is clear that they do not have the financial capacity to continue with their mortgage payments. More than half of their monthly income needs to be allocated to mortgage payments just to be current, not to mention the 10 months of delinquent mortgage payments that they will need to update if they want to keep their house. The hardest thing for me to do was to make this couple realize, that with their financial situation, they could not afford to continue paying for their primary home. They had to realize that they would eventually loose their home. It’s not a question of “if” but a question of “when” that will happen.

In this particular case, it does make sense for this couple to stop paying the mortgage. Instead of paying the mortgage my advise to this couple is to just stop paying their monthly mortgage payments and save whatever monthly mortgage payment they are supposed to make.

They, however, do not need to abandon the house now. Instead of going out to rent an apartment, my advise to them is to stay put in the house. Why go rent an apartment when you can stay in the house (for now) rent-free. In California, for example, it would take around 4 months for a lender to extra-judicially foreclose a property from the time it gives a delinquent notice. Assuming the couple still does not leave the home even after foreclosure, an eviction action will have to be instituted which may take probably another 2 to 4 months. At the very least, therefore, the couple would be able to stay in the house a few more months rent-free even if they continue not to pay the mortgage now.  Thus, if they were paying mortgage of $3,500 a month and they save this mortgage for the next 8 months before they are forced to leave the house that would give them $28,000 at the end of 8 months. This is money that they can use as deposit and payment for their apartment plus whatever other personal expenses they may need. In this situation, though they may eventually loose their home, they will at least have some savings to tide them over the difficult times.

Homeowners who are struggling to make mortgage payments should be aware of what their financial end game is. Some homeowners keep on dipping from their savings or keep on borrowing money just to make the monthly mortgage payments on a house they can hardly afford to keep. Eventually when credit is exhausted or savings are gone, that house will go into foreclosure. Not only will the homeowner loose the house, the homeowner will also have lost all his savings too.  For some homeowners, it may just make more sense to accept the inevitable and accept loosing a house but retain whatever savings the homeowner still has. Homeowners who do not plan ahead may have no choice and end up loosing BOTH the house and whatever savings the homeowner may still have left.

It may be important for us homeowners to realize that in these difficult economic times, we may just need to return to the basics. After all, a house should just be a shelter for us.  There is no need to be emotionally attached to a particular house. Though the home we reside in now may be the house that gave us so many happy memories, we have to also realize that those happy memories reside in our hearts and minds; and, not in any physical abode.

(DISCLAIMER: material presented above is intended for informational purposes only. It is not intended as professional advice and should not be construed as such. Rey Tancinco is a partner at Tancinco Law Offices, a professional corporation with offices in San Francisco, Vallejo, and Manila. The law office website is at: tancinco.weareph.com/old.  Rey Tancinco can be contacted at (800) 999-9096 or (415) 397-0808 or via email at: attyrey@tancinco.com  

Categories
Updates

USCIS Will Accept Uncertified LCAs with H-1B Applications for the Next 120 Days

Share this:

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced last week
that they are implementing a 120-day period in which they will accept
H-1B petitions filed without Labor Condition Applications (LCAs)
certified by the Department of Labor (DOL).

USCIS has made this amendment to their regulations after receiving
requests from members of the public asking them to allow acceptance of
H-1B petition filings that include LCAs that have been filed with, but
not yet certified by DOL. DOL’s implementation of the iCERT system has
resulted in an increase in processing delays for certain LCA
certifications. Certain employers and beneficiaries have been
negatively affected by these increased processing times, limiting their
ability to file H-1B petitions with USCIS in a timely fashion.

In order to accommodate those affected by processing delays of LCAs,
USCIS began accepting H-1B petitions with uncertified LCAs on November
5, 2009 and will continue to accept these until March 4, 2010. However,
USCIS will only accept such H-1B petitions if they are filed at least
seven calendar days after the LCAs were filed with DOL and only if the
petitioner provides evidence of this filing.

Categories
Immigration Round Table

New Law Allows Survivors of Deceased Petitioners to Receive Visa

Share this:

Dear Atty. Lou,

I have a single sister who was petitioned by my father.  Her priority date is February 1995.  My father died in May 2002.  He was an immigrant when he petitioned my sister and then became a citizen after the petition.  My sister lived here in the United States since 1985.  She is now 72 years old.  I just read in the newspaper that a new law has been passed that if a petitioner died then the petition can be pursued as long as the one being petitioned is here in the United States.

Can my sister get her green card? I hope you can respond this as soon as possible for my sister is sick and she needs to get medical benefits. Hopefully you can give priority to this letter for my sister needed it badly. Thank you very much.
 
 FLC

Dear FLC,

It is true that on October 28, 2009, President Obama signed into law the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Bill Conference Report that contained a provision to end the widow penalty and provide relief for beneficiaries of deceased petitioners.

Primarily, one of the immigration provisions benefit the widow(er)s of American citizens and their children. These widows may now self petition for an immigrant visa even if s/he married for less than two years at the time of the citizen spouse’s death. They may file an I-360 self petition from within two years of the law’s passage.

Aside from the widow provision, the law adds a new section of law that also benefits survivors of approved petitions filed be US citizens who die before their petition’s priority date became current or while their petition is pending at the time of the petitioner’s death. The requirement is that (1) petition must have been filed by the US citizen and this was pending or approved that the time of death; (2) beneficiary or derivative beneficiary resided in the United States at the time of the death and (3) beneficiary continues to reside in the United States.

The survivors that are covered by the law are follows: (1)immediate relatives including spouse, parent, minor child of a US citizen; (2)family preference relatives including unmarried son or daughter of a citizen, married son or daughter of a citizen, spouse or child of a permanent resident, brother or sister of a citizen; (3) employment based dependents (derivative beneficiaries); (4) refugee/asylee relative petition beneficiaries; (5)nonimmigrants in “T”(victims of trafficking) or “U”(victims of crime) status and (6)asylees.

In the case of your sister, she is a family preference relative and seemed to qualify as a surviving relative of an approved petition by your deceased US citizen father. She was in the United States at the time of the death of your father and continues to reside here. Unfortunately, much as we want to suggest that she take immediate action to file a self petition, we should wait until the Department of Homeland Security through the Citizenship and Immigration Service releases its regulations on how this new law is going to be implemented. I understand the urgency relating to the medication condition of your sister but let us just wait on how we shall be directed by regulations to obtain benefits based on this new law. There will be public information on this as soon as the regulations are released.

Atty. Lou

Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq is a partner at the Tancinco Law Offices, a Professional Law Corp. Her office is located at One Hallidie Plaza, Ste 818, San Francisco CA 94102 and may be reached at 415.397.0808; email at law@tancinco.com or check their website at tancinco.weareph.com/old. The content provided in this column is solely for informational purpose only and do not create a lawyer-client relationship. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. This column does not disclose any confidential or classified information acquired in her capacity as legal counsel. Consult with an attorney before deciding on a course of action. You can submit questions to law@tancinco.com)
 

Categories
Updates

Department of Homeland Security Finalizing Plan to Collect Fingerprints or Eye Scans from International Travelers Exiting the U.S.

Share this:

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is finishing up its
proposal to collect either fingerprints or eye scans from all
international travelers at U.S. airports as the travelers leave the
U.S. This new plan, which would be in effect in two years, would enable
the U.S. government to track the 35 million international visitors that
leave the country each year, including visitors who may have overstayed
their visas. DHS expects the proposal will be submitted to the White
House for review and approval by next month.

The proposal has caused concern, especially from those in the airline
industry. Originally, the program would have required airlines to pay
for the majority of the costs of the program; however, DHS now says it
may remove that requirement. The program is expected to cost between $1
and $2 billion over a ten year period; a large portion of the costs
will most likely now be paid by taxpayers and international travelers.
Additionally, the program would not track international visitors
leaving the U.S. at land borders, because of additional costs and
associated delays in commerce and transactions. Eighty percent of
international travelers depart the U.S. from land borders.

Categories
Updates

USCIS Posts Update of the Amount of H-1B Petitions Received

Share this:

USCIS recently posted an update of the amount of H-1B petitions the
federal agency has received. As of October 25, 2009, roughly 52,800
H-1B cap-subject petitions and 20,000 H-1B petitions that qualify for
the advanced degree cap exemption have been filed with USCIS. A total
of 65,000 H-1B visas are available for this fiscal year under the
current annual cap limitations. USCIS comments that it will continue to
accept cap-subject and advanced degree petitions until it has received
enough H-1B petitions to fulfill the limits posed by regulations.

In previous years, USCIS received large amounts of H-1B petitions. In
many cases the agency stopped accepting these petitions days or weeks
after the initial acceptance date. This year, however, due to the
economic recession, the amount of filed petitions is much lower. On
April 17, 2009, in their first public notification about this year’s
H-1B program, USCIS announced they had received roughly 43,000 H-1B
petitions and 20,000 that qualified for the advanced degree cap
exemption.

Categories
Updates

USCIS Posts Video to Explain Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) Program

Share this:

USCIS launched a new video on its Web site this week that provides a
review of the federal agency’s Systematic Alien Verification for
Entitlements (SAVE) program. The new video, available online at
www.uscis.gov/SAVE, describes the process of immigration status
verification and, additionally, provides information about how federal,
state and local agencies (that provide benefits) can apply for
participation in the SAVE program.

SAVE is a program that helps benefit-granting agencies determine an
applicant’s immigration status. SAVE ensures that only applicants with
a verifiable immigration status receive federal, state, or local public
benefits and licenses. SAVE checks applicants’ immigration status
against millions of recorded federal database records. Over 300
agencies have enrolled in the SAVE program, to date.

Categories
Updates

USCIS Extends Grace Period for Previous Versions of Form G-28

Share this:

The USCIS form G-28, the Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or
Accredited Representative, was updated by USCIS on April 22, 2009. At
that time, the form contained an ‘N’ designation; this means that no
previous editions of the form will be accepted. However, USCIS has
decided to extend the grace period for accepting previous versions of
Form G-28, while it continues to refine the current version of the
form.

USCIS expects to complete the revision of its current form shortly.
Until that time, the federal agency will not reject filings submitted
with older versions of the form.

The April 22 version of Form G-28 is available for download at the following URL:

http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/New%20Structure/2nd%20Level%20(Left%20Nav%20Parents)/Forms%20-%202nd%20Level/Forms%20Static%20Files/g-28.pdf

Categories
Updates

New Final Rule: HIV Infection No Longer Sole Grounds for Inadmissibility to U.S.

Share this:

In the Federal Register, dated Monday, November 2, 2009, the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will officially remove HIV
infection from the definition of “communicable disease of public health
significance” and will additionally remove any reference to HIV from
the scope of examinations for aliens wishing to enter the U.S.

Prior to this final rule, HIV infection was considered a communicable
disease of public health significance by CDC; individuals that tested
positive for the infection during the required medical examination for
U.S. immigration were inadmissible to the United States. However,
effective January 4, 2010, as stated in this final rule, such
individuals will no longer be inadmissible to the United States solely
on the ground that they are infected.