Categories
Updates

Consequences of False Claim to Citizenship

Share this:

A “false claim” to U.S. citizenship is one of the grounds used to deny an immigrant visa application. This misrepresentation has severe consequences that may also adversely affect one’s ability to seek immigration relief in removal proceedings. What actually is a false claim to citizenship? What are its severe consequences?

Period of Time Misrepresentation Made

Before September 30, 1996, misrepresenting one’s citizenship and pretending to be a U.S. citizen to obtain immigration benefits is considered a ground for inadmissibility. This means that a foreign national who falsely claims to be a US citizen will not generally be able to obtain a green card based on an approved petition. The misrepresentation must be willful and material. To trigger the inadmissibility ground the false claim must be made to either a United States consular or immigration officer. It did not apply to a false claim made to a private employer.

Although it was a ground to deny an application for immigrant visa, there are waivers that may be available. This waiver application under Section 212(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act may be approved if there is extreme hardship to qualifying relatives of the applicant.

After September 30, 1996, with the enactment of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRAIRA), the consequences of this provision became severe. It had become a ground for deportation in addition to it being a ground for denial of admission. This means that even if one is valid nonimmigrant or immigrant status, if a claim to U.S. citizenship is made the foreign national may still be held liable and risk being deported. Unlike the prior law, the 212(i) waiver is no longer available for misrepresentations made after September 30. 1996.

Misrepresenting on Form I-9

An individual who has no legal status to stay in the United States is usually without legal authority to work. But instead of remaining unemployed, the common unlawful scenario is to apply for any available U.S. job. Once accepted, they are asked to prove their status by accomplishing a USCIS Form I-9. This is the Employment Eligibility Verification which documents whether the new employee is authorized to work in the United States.

While representation to any employer will trigger the consequences of false claim, the prior I-9 form has a box which states “U.S. national or citizen”. If this box was checked, the undocumented immigrant may not face the permanent bar because the provision of law does not include false claim to U.S. nationality.

In 2009, the I-9 form was amended and the boxes of U.S. citizens and noncitizen national of the United States were separated. Hence, the undocumented who checked United States citizen to prove eligibility to work will suffer the consequences of the false claim to citizenship.

Possible Defenses

Various defenses may be raised. It depends on when the claim was made. Careful analysis of each case is crucial and that not all those who made the false claims will suffer the consequences. In fact the Department of Foreign Affairs Manual provides that “timely retraction” of false claim is one good possible defense.

Despite existence of possible defenses, it is still important to understand that to avoid serious consequences one should avoid making false claims as much as possible. While it may seem that in I-9 forms, checking the box of “lawful permanent resident” may be complicated as it will require more documents, falsely checking the box of U.S. citizen on the I-9 form carries irreversible errors and may bar receiving future immigration benefit.

(Atty. Lourdes S. Tancinco is a San Francisco based immigration lawyer and immigrant’s right advocate. She may be reached at law@tancinco.comfacebook.com/tancincolaw, or 1 888 930 0808)

Categories
Updates

Why the Immigration Innovation (I-Squared) Act Must Be Passed Into Law

Share this:

One of the controversial immigration proposals released last week by the Trump Administration is the reduction of the family based immigration and the proposal for a merit based system of immigration instead of the current employment based immigration preferences. Most of the proposals contained in the legal framework are contained in the RAISE Act and SECURE Act which are bills introduced by Republican lawmakers. But there is also a new bill, Immigration Innovation Act, that requires the support of majority of our legislators and that if passed into law will benefit the U.S. economy without having to reduce family immigration.

RAISE Act: Merit Based System

Trump proposes a broader shift away from current immigration system focusing mainly on issuance of immigrant visas only to foreign nationals on the basis of merits. If passed into law, the existing employment based categories based on U.S. employer needs will be changed to a rigid point system prioritizing foreign nationals in a series of categories including professionals, researchers, those holding advance degrees and those with extraordinary ability in a particular field.

The proposal for a merit based system does not only fail to take into account the needs of U.S. businesses. It also comes with a proposal that fails to recognize the importance of family unity by limiting family petitions to spouses and minor children eliminating parents, adult children and sibling categories. If passed into law, there will be a reduction of 500,000 or 44% of total immigrants each year.

I-Squared: Immigration Innovation Act

Interestingly, at about the same time the White House released its immigration proposals, a new bill was introduced by Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Jeff Flake (R-AZ) on January 25, 2018. This is the Immigration Innovation Act or the “I-Squared” which also addresses the gaps on the H1B visa program at the same time amends the employment based system of immigration in a manner that directly improves on the current system.

On the H1B provisions, the I-Squared raises the current cap from 65,000 to 85,000. There is a method used to determine adjustment of the cap on a market escalator of up to 195,000 and de-escalator based on prior fiscal year. It also addresses the way of choosing H1B visa petitions when the cap is reached within 5 years of the filing period. There will be a priority to (1) Individuals who have earned a U.S. master’s or higher, who are subject to the numerical limitations; (2) Individuals who have earned a doctoral degree outside the U.S.; (3) Individuals who have earned a U.S. bachelors or higher in a STEM field; (4) Other petitions

On the employment based petitions, I-Squared has provisions that will (1) Eliminate per country limits for employment-based visas and increases per country limit for family-based visas to 15%; (2) Require recapture of unused visas from FY 1993 to FY 2013; (3) Exempt from numerical limitations: dependents of EB immigrants, individuals with a U.S. STEM master’s or higher degree, individuals with an approved EB-1 petition for extraordinary ability or outstanding professor/researcher.

Other than proposing to eliminate the per country limits, it also creates a new employment-based conditional immigrant visa (35,000 per year) for individuals who (1) have a university degree; (2) have received an offer of employment from a qualifying U.S. employer; and (3) will satisfy the requirements of 3 employment based preferences (EB1, EB2 & EB3).

Between the RAISE Act/Merit Based System and the I-Squared Act, the latter is a better bill that deals with a real reform of our immigration system without having to cut family legal immigration. Let us contact our representatives in Congress and urge them to support this Immigration Innovation (I-Squared) Act or S. 2344.

(Atty. Lourdes S. Tancinco is a San Francisco based immigration lawyer and immigrant’s right advocate. She may be reached at law@tancinco.com, facebook.com/tancincolaw, or 1 888 930 0808)