Categories
Updates

Department of State to Issue All SIVs for Afghan Nationals by August 2014

Share this:

The Department of State noted that it has a total of 3,000 Special Immigrant Visas (SIV) available for Afghan nationals for Fiscal Year 2014. It is expected that all of these visas will be issued by the end of August 2014. The Department of State welcomes an action to extend this program by Congress and will quickly make arrangements to release additional SIVs to Afghan applicants in need.

The Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 authorized the issuance of SIVs to Afghan nationals employed by or on behalf of the U.S. government in Afghanistan who met certain other requirements. Eligible Afghan nationals who were employed by or on behalf of the U.S. government in Afghanistan for a period of one year or longer between October 7, 2001 and December 31, 2014 are eligible for this program.

Categories
Global Pinoy

The Fate of Green Card Holders Facing Deportation Charges

Share this:

Permanent resident visas are in reality not “permanent” in nature. A ‘green card’ is still subject to revocation by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security if there are grounds to rescind its issuance. In fact, in certain cases, green card holders risk facing deportation charges. What steps may be taken should this happen?

Agnes has a U.S. citizen daughter who petitioned her 10 years ago. Since receiving her green card, Agnes has been in the United States a total of less than a year. She has been visiting the United States for less than one month a year. However, her US stays are not accurately reflected in her travel documents. Agnes regularly pays an “agent” who backdates the arrival and departure stamp on her passport with fake dates to make it appear that she had shorter stays in the Philippines and longer stays in the United States.

Early this year, Agnes underwent secondary inspection as she was entering the United States through thru LAX airport. She admitted before the CBP (Customs and Border Protection) inspector that the date stamps on her passport were fake. The CBP officer prepared a sworn statement and Agnes was asked to sign the document.

After admitting the wrong doing, Agnes was expecting to be allowed to enter the United States without any further problems. She did not realize that the CBP inspector would take her green card away from her. In addition, Agnes was subsequently issued a Notice to Appear before an immigration judge for her removal/deportation proceedings. Though she was allowed to enter the United States she was merely paroled on a temporary visa in order to face her removal/deportation proceedings.

Agnes would now like to abandon her green card and return to the Philippines right away. What are the consequences should she decide to simply depart from the United States? Will she be able to return to the United States again if her daughter re-petitions her?

USE IT OR LOSE IT

A permanent resident is issued a green card in order that one will be permitted to live and work in the United States. Hundreds of thousands of petitions are filed by Filipino nationals on behalf of their children or siblings and it a decade or more for some petitions before the visas are available. The usual situation is for green card holders to reside and work in the United States. Eventually, a green card holder may apply for U.S. citizenship after meeting the residency requirement. There are also a significant number of green card holders who are not staying in the United States. Some may have valid reasons for staying outside the United States like individuals who are continuing their studies abroad, or, have temporary job assignments outside the US. Some individuals, however, simply do not want to give up their green card despite the fact that they really do not have a good reason to keep it. If the latter happens, it would be best to abandon the green card and obtain the appropriate visitors visa.

Misrepresenting a material fact before an immigration officer in seeking admission to the United States is a valid basis to rescind the immigrant visa. The “fake” stamps representing the travel dates of a green card holder is considered fraud and will subject the individual to suffer serious consequences of removal.

In the case of Agnes, she will have to appear before the immigration court and face her removal charges. If she wants to maintain her status as a green card holder, she will have to explore the different waivers that may be available and appropriate for her specific case. She needs to seek professional legal assistance to avail and present the waivers that may be available to her. Only if the immigration judge exercises his favorable discretion in ruling on the waiver may Agnes be able to keep her green card.

On the other hand, if Agnes wants to give up her green card, she can file the abandonment of status application. The Customs and Border Protection may grant this abandonment application and is considered a voluntary relinquishment of Agnes’ green card status. But worse than simply getting an abandonment application approved, the U.S. government counsel may also argue in court to obtain a removal order against Agnes. This means that if the immigration judge issues a removal order, Agnes will not be able to return to the United States for at least 10 years. This is the serious consequence of a removal order.

In either case of filing waiver applications or abandonment applications, the individual in removal proceedings will have to put up with immigration court backlogs. In most jurisdictions, the backlog of cases in immigration court ranges from1 to 3 years. This means that unless the individual accepts a removal order without contesting it, the individual in proceedings may have to wait a couple of years before the removal case is resolved. During the pendency of the case, the individual in proceedings will have to stay in the United States.

As mentioned, there is a 10-year bar in returning to the United States after a removal order is issued against an individual. After the 10-year period has passed, a former green card holder (like Agnes in this case) will still need a waiver of the fraud she committed in presenting fake travel stamps on her passport. Whether or not she will be allowed to enter the United States again will depend on how her waiver application will be adjudicated.

Much like a driver’s license, a green card is merely a privilege that may be revoked. Using the green card according to the purpose it was issued is critical to maintaining it. One should avoid committing unlawful acts and fraud as this could definitely have serious consequences on one’s ability to return to the United States.

(Atty. Lourdes Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com, facebook/tancincolaw, tancinco.weareph.com/old or at (02)721 1963)

Categories
Global Pinoy

The “Accompanied by Stranger” Filipino Child

Share this:

“I was introduced to a ‘man’ I’ve never seen. He held my hand, as I boarded an airplane for the first time!”. This is how Jose Antonio Vargas (Jose), the celebrated Pulitzer prize-winning Filipino journalist, described his departure for the United States. It was 1993 and he was 12 years old at the time. Fast-forward to 2011 and Jose revealed publicly that he is an undocumented immigrant.

Ordinarily, Filipinos travel by plane to go to the United States and young Filipino travelers are typically accompanied by their parents or guardians. This is not, however, always the case. What happens when young immigrants enter fraudulently, unaccompanied by their ‘real’ parent and left in America for many years without documentation?

Paul was 15 years old when his mother told him that he was going to the United States for a vacation. He was a junior in high school and could not contain his excitement. Unknown to him, his mother paid a ‘consultant/agent’ a significant sum of money to obtain a U.S. visa for Paul.

Just like Jose Vargas, Paul was met at the airport by the ‘consultant/agent’ and was introduced to a couple. His mother exhorted Paul to follow instructions from this couple who would accompany him to the United States. Paul trusted his mother and obediently accepted whatever ‘guidance’ the couple gave him.

A few minutes prior to landing in U.S. soil, Paul was told that he should now answer to the name “Rob”. He was shown a passport for “Rob” but with Paul’s photo in it. Paul, while he found it strange, did not question the change. After all, he was very much excited and looking forward to meeting his cousins who were to take him to different tourist places in California. Upon his arrival in the United States, Paul and the couple who accompanied him presented their travel documents with their visas to the immigration officer. They were admitted. As expected, Paul was met by his cousins at the airport and took him to their Los Angeles home. Paul has no knowledge of what happened to the “Rod” passport that he used to enter the US. He last saw it in the possession of the couple who accompanied him.

After a few weeks in the United States, Paul began to realize that he was not going home. He was not averse to staying as he preferred to continue his studies in the United States with his cousins. After several years have passed, Paul realized that he is an undocumented youth. He could not apply to certain colleges because he realized he did not have the proper legal documents they were requiring for enrollment. Nevertheless, he finished his studies at a City College. After graduation, he could not get a job because he lacked the necessary employment authorization to work. What happens to Paul now? Will he be deported back to the Philippines? Why are some parents sending their children abroad without ensuring that their children’s immigration statuses are in place?

Liability of Minors for Fraud

After many years of residing in the United States, those who arrived as minors with fraudulent travel documents and visas find it difficult to adjust to a lawful permanent resident status. Current US immigration laws provide only limited ways to gain legal status. In June 2012, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (commonly called the “DACA”) allowed undocumented youths who arrived before 2007 and who are between the ages 15 to 31 to obtain permission to work and travel under the DACA policy of President Obama.

Others who are not eligible to avail of the benefits of DACA will have to find other options to legalize their stay. But the bigger issue is whether children like Paul, who entered with an assumed name, may be prevented from obtaining legal status because of the fraud that was committed in gaining entry into the US. Generally, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services impute the parent’s fraud on the minor children. There are precedent cases that USCIS use as basis to deny visas because of the fraud. In 2008, the case of Malik v. Mukasey (7th Cir) imputed the fraud of a parent to a 17 year old child depriving the latter of the ability to obtain legal status. There are, however, cases from other federal circuit courts that hold a contrary ruling. This means that the issue is still open to argument, depending on the circumstances of each case.

Surge of Undocumented Children at the Border

Unlike Mexico and the Central American countries, the Philippines is halfway across the world. While different in circumstances as Filipino children who were transported unlawfully to the United States, the surge of undocumented children at the border currently in the news share one thing in common: the actions of these children’s parents are fueled, in large part, by a desire to do what they believe is in their children’s best interest. As in the case of Jose Antonio Vargas, he recounted that his mother wanted to give him a ‘better’ life. Regardless of the reason behind such actions, however, it is clear that the minor children do not have the capacity to make these life-altering decisions for themselves.

Many of the minors arriving at the US-Mexican border come here based on erroneous information that they will be given legal status to stay once they set foot on US soil. They have been instructed to turn themselves in to the first border patrol officer they see. The hope, of course, is that once they turn themselves in, they will be processed and be allowed to stay. They may or may not be allowed to stay depending on the circumstances of their individual situations. Unfortunately, many will not qualify for residency and many will be deported.

There could be a distinction among the unaccompanied alien children at the U.S.-Mexican border and the innocent ‘accompanied by strangers’ children of Filipinos who were transported here. Many of those coming from Central America are escaping from “life or death” situations in their homeland. The young Filipinos are oftentimes victims of unscrupulous agents/consultants who prey on innocent children aspiring to have better futures. Unfortunately, both are suffering the unintended consequences of decisions made by their parents. Both are vulnerable to being deported back to their homeland.

(Atty. Lourdes S. Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com, (02)721 1963, tancinco.weareph.com/old or find her at facebook.com/tancincolaw)

Categories
Updates

New iCERT Password Security Requirement Takes Effect

Share this:

On Friday, July 18, a new password requirement was enacted for all iCERT users to enhance the program’s online security measures. Within 90 calendar days, iCERT users are required to create new passwords that meet certain requirements. These requirements include:

  • Passwords must be between 8 and 16 characters in length
  • Passwords must contain upper case letters, lower case letters, at least one number, and at least one special (non-alphanumeric) character
  • Passwords cannot match any of the previous 12 passwords used
  • Passwords must be changed at least once every 90 days
  • Passwords cannot be changed again within the first 15 days of use
Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes Updated H-2B Visa Numbers – July 18, 2014

Share this:

On July 18, 2014, USCIS provided an update of the amount of cap-subject H-2B visas received and approved by the federal agency for the second half of fiscal year 2014. According to USCIS, a total of 24,769 beneficiaries have been approved for the second half of fiscal year 2014, with an additional 1,246 petitions pending. USCIS has begun accepting applications for the first half of Fiscal Year 2015. No beneficiaries have yet been approved, but 437 petitions are currently pending.

Congressionally-based legislation limits the amount of H-2B visas provided per fiscal year to a total of 66,000, with 33,000 allocated for employment for the first half of the fiscal year and 33,000 allocated for employment for the second half of the fiscal year. Unused numbers from the first half of the fiscal year are made available for use by employers seeking H-2B workers during the second half of the year.

Categories
Updates

Proposed HUMANE Act Would Protect Unaccompanied Migrant Children at Border Crossings

Share this:

On July 16, 2014, Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) and Representative Henry Cuellar (D-TX) introduced the Helping Unaccompanied Minors and Alleviating National Emergency (HUMANE) Act. This legislation, if passed, would reform current law to help protect and support better treatment of unaccompanied children at the U.S./Mexico border.

“Today Congressman Cuellar and I are proposing a solution to the current crisis on our border,” said Sen. Cornyn. “Our proposal would improve the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2008, treating all unaccompanied minors equally and ensuring Due Process under the law in a timely, fair manner.” ??

“The border region in Texas has been overwhelmed over the past few months by a deluge of undocumented immigrants from Central America,” said Congressman Cuellar. “Today’s legislation strengthens current law protecting unaccompanied children and responds to the crisis while supporting the men and women of Border Patrol. I would like to thank Senator John Cornyn for partnering with me on this legislation and I ask my colleagues in the House and Senate to act quickly on this bill.”

Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes Updated H-2B Visa Numbers – July 14, 2014

Share this:

On July 14, 2014, USCIS provided an update of the amount of cap-subject H-2B visas received and approved by the federal agency for the second half of fiscal year 2014. According to USCIS, a total of 24,638 beneficiaries have been approved for the second half of fiscal year 2014, with an additional 929 petitions pending. USCIS has begun accepting applications for the first half of Fiscal Year 2015. No beneficiaries have yet been approved, but 245 petitions are currently pending.

Congressionally-based legislation limits the amount of H-2B visas provided per fiscal year to a total of 66,000, with 33,000 allocated for employment for the first half of the fiscal year and 33,000 allocated for employment for the second half of the fiscal year. Unused numbers from the first half of the fiscal year are made available for use by employers seeking H-2B workers during the second half of the year.

Categories
Immigration Round Table

Positive Development on Petitions by U.S. Citizen Parents

Share this:

The recently released August 2014 Visa Bulletin of the U.S. Department of State reveals an unusual movement in the priority dates of certain petitions of U.S. citizens. For the first time in many years, the priority dates for the first preference category (F1) petitions by U.S. citizens on behalf of their adult single children are advancing faster than petitions by green card holders under the F2B category. What could have generated the acceleration of priority dates under the F1 category? Is this really good news to those who had chosen to stay as green card petitioners?

Carlos was petitioned by his U.S. citizen brother and arrived in the United States six years ago. It took 24 years before his brother’s petition under the fourth preference category (F4) became current. As a result of the lengthy process before the visa was actually issued, Carlos’ two children, Jed and Jon aged out or turned more than 21 years old.

Upon arrival in the United States, Carlos lost no time in filing a petition for his two adult sons. One of his adult sons, Jed, is a special child and Jon acts as his guardian. Carlos wishes to see Jed and Jon join him in the United States. Unfortunately, he was told that the waiting period for petitions on behalf of adult children takes at least 10 years.

Carlos filed for naturalization to U.S. citizenship after residing in the United States for more than 5 years. He sent a copy of his naturalization to the National Visa Center with the hope that Jed’s and Jon’s petition will be processed faster. Unfortunately, Carlos was told that U.S. citizen’s petitions for their adult children automatically converted to first preference category (F1B). Under this F1B category, it takes longer to petition adult children compared to petitions by green card holders under the F2B category.

When he realized his decision to be a U.S. citizen resulted in longer waiting time on the petitions of his children, he sought legal advice. He was informed that his sons can opt out of the automatic conversion and the petitions will remain under the F2B. He followed instructions on opting out and the request was approved. The priority date of petitions is 2004 under the second preference. For many years, the priority dates on the F2B category are moving faster. This month of July, Carlos noticed that the F1 category is moving faster than the F2B. He now wants to his petitions to be classified back to the F1 visa category. Can he revoked his approved request for opt out to F2B in order that his sons petitions may be processed under the F1 category?

Filipino Beneficiaries of Petitions

Philippines is one of the four countries that have severe backlogs in terms of processing of visa petitions. The other three countries are China, Mexico and India. But from amongst the four countries, only the Philippines suffer backlog of the visa petitions under the F1 category compared to the F2B category.

Under present immigration system, an individual who is a U.S. citizen enjoys greater benefits in terms of petitioning for their minor children, spouses and parents. But if the person being petitioned is a single adult child, the green card holders petitioning parents are better off in terms of waiting time.

To address this dilemma, a petitioning parent may avail of the specific provision of the Child Status and Protection Act (CSPA). Generally, the petition of a green card holder parent is automatically converted to FB1 when the parent naturalizes. With the opt out provision, under Section 6 of the CSPA, the son/daughter being petitioned may opt out of the automatic transfer to F1 and remain in F2B status. The petition will retain the original priority date as long as the petition was properly filed. With the approval of the opt out request, the petition is converted but will retain the original priority date. In essence, the U.S. citizen parent may still avail of the benefit of a green card petitioner despite having naturalized as a U.S. citizen if the adult child who is being petitioned decides to “opt out” of the automatic conversion.

August 2014 Visa Bulletin

The CSPA has been enacted in 2002 and long before that the peculiar backlog under the F1 category existed for many years. Very recently, after approximately 20 years, this situation has changed. A significant movement of priority dates for the month of August 2014 now indicates that the first preference moves faster than the second preference. While the current F1 priority date for August is June 1, 2004 the priority dates are moving at a pace of 6 months every month. This is good news to many U.S. citizen petitioners as their priority dates may be reached sooner.

With this positive development, comes a major concern that must be addressed. Like in the case of Carlos, petitioning U.S. citizen parents prefer to have their petitions in a category that processes their children’s visas faster. What will happen to those who decided to opt out of the first preference category? There may or may not be an opportunity to terminate the “opt out” approved request pursuant to the CSPA since this option is simply a remedial measure. But as of this writing, there is no guidance yet released by the Department of State regarding this matter. Considering the fluctuating movement of priority dates, it is best to wait, if this positive development will remain consistent in the coming months before making any major decision about filing revocation of their approved “opt out” requests.

(Atty. Lourdes Santos Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at (02)721 1963 or visit her website at tancinco.weareph.com/old)

Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes Updated H-2B Visa Numbers – July 7, 2014

Share this:

On July 7, 2014, USCIS provided an update of the amount of cap-subject H-2B visas received and approved by the federal agency for the second half of fiscal year 2014. According to USCIS, a total of 24,490 beneficiaries have been approved for the second half of fiscal year 2014, with an additional 1,056 petitions pending. USCIS has begun accepting applications for the first half of Fiscal Year 2015. No beneficiaries have yet been approved, but 188 petitions are currently pending.

Congressionally-based legislation limits the amount of H-2B visas provided per fiscal year to a total of 66,000, with 33,000 allocated for employment for the first half of the fiscal year and 33,000 allocated for employment for the second half of the fiscal year. Unused numbers from the first half of the fiscal year are made available for use by employers seeking H-2B workers during the second half of the year.