Categories
Global Pinoy

Discovery of a Parent’s Fake Name on One’s Birth Certificate

Share this:

Proving a parent-child relationship is key to approval of most family-based petitions. Proof of filiation is typically shown through the birth certificate of the child. This document not only establishes fact of birth but also identifies parentage. It is therefore generally accepted as sufficient proof of parental relationship. What happens in a situation where the child who is ready to petition her parent discovers that her parent has been using a “fake” name?  How will this complicate the petitioning process?

The Fake Parent’s Name

Agnes was born in the United States. Her mother, Annie has been living as an undocumented immigrant in the U.S. for many years when she gave birth to Agnes almost 21 years ago. Since Agnes was born in the United States, she is a U.S. Citizen by birth.Agnes was advised that when she turns 21 years old, she would be able to help Annie obtain lawful residence status and get her a green card.

Agnes will be turning 21 years old this June. She began to gather all pertinent documents she figured she would need in order to file a petition for her mother. Agnes found her birth certificate listing her birth mother, “Annie”. She asked her mother to produce her own birth certificate for submission and to Agnes’ great consternation, her mother’s birth certificate listed her as “Teresita”, not “Annie”. All her years growing up, she has only known her mother to be “Annie” and by no other name. When she asked her mother for a birth certificate showing her mother’s name as “Annie”, her mother could not produce one.

Her mother then revealed to Agnes that the name “Annie” is not her real name but a fictitious name she assumed and used to enter the United States. Her mother’s real name is Teresita and she also has a different birthday from that indicated in Agnes’ birth certificate.

After being told about the real name of her mother, Agnes raised more questions. Why will her mother list a different name in her own daughter’s birth certificate? Is it not illegal to use a fictitious name and list it on a recorded instrument like a birth certificate? Is there a real person with the name Annie? Did her mother steal Annie’s identity? More questions came to Agnes’ mind as she delved deeper into the reasons behind the fake name.

Teresita, a.k.a. Annie, related the whole story to Agnes. Many years back, before Agnes was even born, Teresita had a chance to go to the United States. She over-stayed and was eventually deported back to the Philippines. Her brief stay in America made her dream of going back and try to make a life for herself here in the U.S. She was advised by a consultant, erroneously, that the only way she could re-enter the United States is by adopting a different identity. Teresita foolishly followed this advice. She admitted that she paid an agency in Manila to obtain a Philippine passport with a different name and birth certificate. She paid a substantial amount of money to the agent to get a different identity. Teresita, now passing herself off as Annie, was granted a nonimmigrant visitor visa. She used this identity to enter the United States more than 21 years ago. Agnes is her daughter out of wedlock and her husband, the father of Agnes, abandoned them when Agnes was just 5 years old.

Agnes cannot live without her mother. As it stands, she is fearful that her mother might be deported if she even tries to file a petition for her. She is seriously contemplating whether or not it would be wise to assist her mother in getting her an immigrant visa. Does Agnes have a chance of obtaining a valid visa for her mother?

Use of False Documents

Unsuccessful visa applicants are oftentimes tempted to obtain visas through illegal means. The use of false documents to obtain a visa can have serious, sometimes irreversible consequences for the applicant. It is one of the many grounds used for the denial of many future immigration benefits. If the person is in the United States in unlawful status, it is also a ground for deportation.

Quite often, the use of falsified documents is intentional. There are times, however, when visa applicants who use falsified documents are themselves victims of unscrupulous travel consultants who prey on the innocence and vulnerability of the eager and the foolhardy. But whether intentional or not, the adverse consequences attach equally. All risk denials of future applications for visas.

The use of a false identity is nothing less than material misrepresentation. As such, Agnes’ mother will find it difficult to obtain a visa without an approved “waiver” of the misrepresentation. But unlike other grounds for denial, consequences for use of false documents may be waived by filing an application with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.  If this waiver application is approved, a visa may be issued to Agnes’ mother.

There are remedial measures that the mother has to do before Agnes may even file a petition for her.  The first step to take is to “correct” the false identity and have her mother’s real identity established by obtaining a validly issued identification or travel document. She can go to the nearest Philippine consulate and apply for a valid passport. Thereafter, legal steps must be taken to have Agnes’ birth certificate amended with the civil registry to reflect the mother’s real name and identity.  

No Valid Excuse

Cases of using false documents vary in many respects. Waiver applications, because they depend in large measure on the facts and circumstances of each individual situation, may or may not be granted. If the waiver is denied, the ensuing result could be dire to the visa applicant.   

Reasons vary as to why individuals opt to take such a risky route in order to obtain a visa. It is important to remember, nevertheless, that any reason or explanation given to why an individual misrepresents or uses falsified documents, while providing a possible basis for forgiveness, is never an excuse or justification for wrongdoing.

(Atty. Lourdes Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at (02)721 1963 or visit her website at tancinco.weareph.com/old)

Categories
Updates

Homeland Security Extends Temporary Protected Status for Haiti

Share this:

The Department of Homeland Security has extended the designation of
Haiti for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for 18 additional months.
This extension is granted for the periods from July 23, 2014 through
January 22, 2016. This extension will allow current TPS beneficiaries to
keep their status through January 22, 2016 as long as they otherwise
continue to meet the requirements for TOPS status.

This extension was granted because the conditions in Haiti that
originally prompted the designation of TPS continue to be met.
Substantial (yet temporary) conditions in Haiti continue to prevent
nationals of that country from safely returning home.

Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes Updated H-2B Visa Numbers February 28, 2014

Share this:

On February 28, 2014, USCIS provided an update of the amount of
cap-subject H-2B visas received and approved by the federal agency for
the first and second halves of fiscal year 2014. According to USCIS, a
total of 35,145 beneficiaries have been approved for the first half of
fiscal year 2014, with an additional 2,763 petitions pending. 6,609
beneficiaries have yet been approved for the second half of fiscal year
2014; 7,288 petitions are pending.

Congressionally-based legislation limits the amount of H-2B visas
provided per fiscal year to a total of 66,000, with 33,000 allocated for
employment for the first half of the fiscal year and 33,000 allocated
for employment for the second half of the fiscal year. Unused numbers
from the first half of the fiscal year are made available for use by
employers seeking H-2B workers during the second half of the year.

Categories
Immigration Round Table

Obtaining Drivers License May Delude a Non-Citizen to Vote Illegally

Share this:

A Filipina national married to a U.S. citizen is facing removal proceedings for voting illegally in a U.S. election in 2006.  Although she is married to a U.S. citizen and has U.S. citizen children, she is being charged with inadmissibility because she violated 18 U.S.C. Section 611, which penalizes an individual for illegal voting and for false claim to citizenship. What happened in her case and why should new immigrants be aware of what could occur when they obtaining State driver’s license?

Elizabeth was petitioned by her U.S. citizen spouse and entered the U.S. in 2003 with a K3 visa. Upon her arrival in Illinois, she took steps to obtain her social security card, State identification card and drivers license. These are the steps that a new immigrant usually takes upon arrival in the United States.

According to the facts of the case as related in her case before the Seventh District U.S. Court of Appeals (Keathley v. Holder 11-1594), the State official at the Department of Motor Vehicles asked Elizabeth whether she wants to be an organ donor. She answered affirmatively. According to her, she also was asked whether she wants to register to vote. Again, she answered yes.

A few days after her trip to the DMV, Elizabeth received her driver’s license and a voter registration card. She innocently claims that with the issuance of a voter registration card, she assumed that she was entitled to vote. Hence, in the 2006 election she voted in the U.S. election.

When Elizabeth applied for her U.S. citizenship with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the examiner discovered the “illegal voting”. Elizabeth was put in removal proceedings.  She is at risk of being deported for what seemed to be her ignorance of her inability to vote. At present, she is awaiting for the hearing on her case after the Court of Appeals remanded the case back to the Immigration Court.

The Motor Voter Act

The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) also known as The Motor Voter Act was signed into law on May 20, 1993. This legislation required state governments to allow for registration when a qualifying voter applied for or renewed their driver’s license or applied for social services.

In compliance with this law, every state developed their respective unique election registration forms.  Most states also afford election registration training to bureau of motor vehicle officials.  But despite the election registration training of state officials at the Department of Motor Vehicles, there are non-citizens who find themselves in a situation where they register for voters’ identification cards. The worse case scenario is that the noncitizen is misled to believing that she is qualified to vote upon receipt of the voter’s identification card from the DMV. Thus, rendering her inadmissible and removable for making a false claim to U.S. citizenship.

Will the DMV official be held responsible for registering a non-U.S. citizen after he was presented with the Philippine passport and the appropriate visa?  Does the new immigrant have the right to rely on the “official” action of the DMV State official in issuing the voter registration identification card? These are just some of the issues that will be threshed out in a hearing to be held soon for Elizabeth. Hopefully, she will prevail.

The case of Elizabeth is not a common case but may happen to new immigrants. One may claim ignorance of the consequences of an unlawful act. And, unfortunately, the adverse implications may result in possible family separation. It is important to know what the basic rights and limitations of a new immigrant. But it is also equally important for them to be able to rely on the authority of government officials task with registering voters.

(Atty. Lourdes Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at  1888 930 0808 or at 1 800 999 9096 or visit her website at tancinco.weareph.com/old)