Categories
Updates

New Phone Scam Targets USCIS Applicants and Petitioners

Share this:

USCIS is warning the public of a new telephone scam targeting USCIS
applicants and petitioners. In this new scam, a scammer spoofs the
Caller ID data of USCIS, presenting a misleading or inaccurate phone
number in the recipient’s Caller ID. The scammer, posing as a USCIS
official, requests personal information from the applicant/petitioner,
including Social Security Number, passport number or A-number. The
scammer then states there are issues in the applicant/petitioner’s
records and asks for payment to correct those issues.

USCIS is guiding applicants and petitioners to immediately hang up if
they receive such a call. USCIS does not ever ask for payment or
personal information over the phone. USCIS further urges applicants and
petitioners to report the telephone scam to the Federal Trade Commission
at https://ftccomplaintasisstant.gov.

Categories
Updates

New Process to Establish Designation as Civil Surgeon

Share this:

Beginning March 11, 2014, USCIS will implement a new process by which it
receives and adjudicates applications for civil surgeon designation.
This new process change will require doctors seeking designation as
civil surgeons to file a formal application at a USCIS Lockbox location.
Physicians seeking this designation will need to complete Form I-910,
the Application for Civil Surgeon Designation, and pay the related $615
application fee.

This new application process will not affect current civil surgeons.
Prospective civil surgeons are guided to not file the form and fee prior
to the March 11 start date.

Categories
Immigration Round Table

Using a Green Card that Was Obtained Fraudulently

Share this:

An individual who is a green card holder and who committed prior fraud may apply for the necessary waivers to be able to continue to stay in lawful status. What happens if the green card holder was put in removal/deporation proceedings after the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services discovers the fraud? Can he still maintain the green card status and travel without any problem of returning back to the United States. An anonymous reader sent this letter to me:

Dear Atty. Lou,

I immigrated to the United States on June 1, 1988 as a single adult child of a U.S. citizen. The truth is when I was petitioned I was already secretly married in November 5, 1980. In 1995, I applied for U.S. naturalization in order that I may become a U.S. citizen. Unfortunately, the legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) found out about my prior marriage. I was on vacation in the Philippines when the INS sent me the “Order to Show Cause” and a “Notice of Hearing”. It was stated in the Order to Show Cause that I committed fraud and they will be deporting me. I failed to appear for scheduled hearing which was scheduled on December 1996. I, then, received another letter saying that the Immigration Judge terminated the proceedings in March 1997. Sometime in 1998, the INS re-opened my case but the Immigration Judge terminated the proceedings for the second time. Since 1998, I have not heard from the INS. Can I go home to the Philippines and return without any problem? Will I be eligible to apply for U.S. citizenship again?

Anonymous

Dear Anonymous,

When your U.S. citizen parent petitioned you in 1988, you were granted a resident status because you were “single”.  The fact that you lied about your marital status means that your green card was obtained fraudulently. The U.S. immigration service would not have issued you the green card had they known that you were married. But unlike a green card holder petitioner, your parent is a U.S. citizen and so your petition may have just been downgraded from first preference to third preference or married children of U.S. citizens.  If you wish to apply again for naturalization, this issue is going to come up and there is a possibility that your removal proceedings will be reinstated. But as I mentioned to you while you may have lied on your application, you are going to be allowed to file an application for waiver of the inadmissibility and be able to clear the defect on your green card. Once, this matter has been cleared with the immigration judge and you are granted a waiver, you will be allowed to maintain your green card status and then apply for naturalization. Of course, there is always a possibility that your waiver may not be approved depending on the circumstances of your case. If it is denied, you will be ordered removed.

In regards to your desire to travel temporarily to the Philippines using your present green card, you may still travel and be allowed to use your green card to return to the United States. But just like your application for naturalization, the matter regarding your fraud and misrepresentation may arise again when you try to enter the United States after your trip abroad. If the U.S. Customs and Border Protection inspector looks at your record it will be discovered that you had a prior removal proceedings that has been terminated.

You did not mention the reason for the termination in your letter. If the reason for termination is lack of notice, then the CBP inspector will have the opportunity to serve you with another Notice to Appear upon your arrival. On the other hand, if the reason for termination is based on the merits of your case meaning that there is no ground for removal, you should not have any problem returning with your current green card. It will be best for you to have your documents examined by an experienced immigration attorney before you take any action regarding your naturalization or before you travel outside of the United States.

Good luck.
Atty. Lou

Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq is a partner at the Tancinco Law Offices, a Professional Law Corp. Her principal office is located at One Hallidie Plaza, Ste 818, San Francisco CA 94102 and may be reached at 415.397.0808 or 1888 930 0808; email at law@tancinco.com or check their website at tancinco.weareph.com/old. The content provided in this column is solely for informational purpose only and do not create a lawyer-client relationship. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. This column does not disclose any confidential or classified information acquired in her capacity as legal counsel. Consult with an attorney before deciding on a course of action. You can submit questions to law@tancinco.com)

Categories
Global Pinoy

Consular Officer’s Discretion to Waive Interviews

Share this:

For many years, all applicants for nonimmigrant visas are required to make a personal appearance and be interviewed by a consular officer at the U.S. Embassy.  A visitor visa holder whose visa expired in the last 12 months may also be eligible under the ‘visa reissuance program’.

Recently, the U.S. Department of State finalized regulations allowing waiver of interviews of other categories of visa applicants.  

Michelle resides in the Philippines and is the mother of two minor children. Michelle has a US citizen mom whom she has visited every so often in the past. This year, Michelle wants to take her son who is aged 13; and, her daughter who is aged 15 to visit their grandmother in California and enjoy Disneyland during the kids’ summer vacation.

Michelle already has a B-2 nonimmigrant tourist visa but her visa has already expired a year and a half ago. For both her minor son and daughter, it is their first time applying for a B-2 visa.

What are the procedures in applying for renewal of Michelle’s B-2 visa? Is it different for the new applications of her son and daughter?

 The Interview Waiver Program (IWP)

The procedures in applying for a tourist visa will vary for Michelle and her two children. While they each need to meet the general requirements for a tourist visa, Michelle and her son are eligible to have their B-2 visa application in-person interview be waived.

In January 2012, the Department of State introduced a two-year pilot program, known as the Interview Waiver Program (IWP). Under this IWP the in-person interview requirement for certain nonimmigrant visas (NIV) may be waived.  This pilot program was one of the cornerstones of President Obama’s initiative to improve and speed up the visa process for certain categories of travelers to the United States. On January 14, 2014, the IWP was made permanent.

Several countries participated in the two-year pilot program, which included India, China, and Mexico among many other countries. The U.S. Embassy in the Philippines did not participate in the pilot program.

Under the IWP, nonimmigrant visa applicants may have their in-person interview waived if certain conditions are met. The in-person interview may be waived based on age. Thus, NIV applicants who are under the age of 14 or over 79 may have their interview waived for first-time as well as visa renewal applications if they are applying in the consular district of their normal residence.

In addition, IWP permits non-immigrant applicants, whose visa has expired within one year, to be eligible for in-person interview waivers if they (1) are seeking renewal of the visa in the same classification; (2) are applying in the consular district of their normal residence; and (3) have completed biometrics.

With the exception of visas in the categories of E, H, L, P or R, the in-person interview waivers are also available to NIV applicants whose visas have expired between 12 – 48 months ago. However, these applicants are subject to random interviews. Under the IWP, consulates must randomly interview a minimum of one percent of NIV applicants who are seeking visa renewal after expiration of 12 -48 months.
Consular Officer’s Discretion
While IWP has made the nonimmigrant visa renewal application process faster and more efficient, it is important to remember that eligibility for the in-person interview waiver does not automatically entitle any non-immigrant visa applicant to a waiver of personal appearance. Consular officers still have substantial discretion in deciding to waive the in-person interview requirement. Consular officers must interview any NIV applicant whom they find is a person of concern, regardless of age, who poses a high threat to US security or is from a high-fraud area.  
The Philippines is considered a high fraud post, but, hopefully, consular discretion to waive interview will be applied according to guidelines provided under this program. After all, there are countries that are also designated high fraud post but are currently participating in this program. If the U.S. Embassy in Manila decides to apply the guidelines as described in the visa interview waiver program, Michelle will be eligible for the in-person interview waiver because she is seeking renewal of her B-2 visa expired which expired within the 12 to 48 month period.  Her son will also be eligible for the in-person interview waiver because he is under the age of 14, even though it is his first application.  However, the daughter is not eligible for waiver and will need to be interviewed because she is over the age of 14 and this is her first time applying for a nonimmigrant visa.
In the event that waiver of the in person interview is granted, it does not change the requirements and standards of existing regulations with regard to security checks, visa classification, number of entries and validity of visas.
(Atty. Lourdes S. Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 721 1963 or visit her website at tancinco.weareph.com/old)

Categories
Updates

E-Verify Use Tops Half a Million

Share this:

USCIS reports this week that more than 500,000 companies now use the
E-Verify system, the federally run free online tool to confirm new
employees’ eligibility to work. In Fiscal Year 2013, companies used
E-Verify 25 million times, USCIS states.

“Since it was established, E-Verify has experienced exponential growth,
increased accuracy and high customer-satisfaction ratings,” said Lori
Scialabba, Acting Director, USCIS. “Participation in E-Verify is largely
voluntary, so the fact that half a million companies have signed up
demonstrates significant confidence in the program. Employers using
E-Verify find it helps them maintain a legal workforce in a quick,
secure and accurate way.”

E-Verify enables employers to get clarification about an employee’s work
authorization status in just moments. It is common for nearly 99
percent of work-authorized employees to be automatically confirmed by
the online tool either instantly or within 24 hours; no further action
in these cases is required by the employer or employee.

Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes Updated H-2B Visa Numbers January 17, 2014

Share this:

On January 17, 2014, USCIS provided an update of the amount of
cap-subject H-2B visas received and approved by the federal agency for
the first and second halves of Fiscal Year 2014. According to USCIS, a
total of 17,590 beneficiaries have been approved for the first half of
Fiscal Year 2014, with an additional 6,035 petitions pending. 505
beneficiaries have yet been approved for the second half of Fiscal Year
2014; 3,617 petitions are pending.

Congressionally-based legislation limits the amount of H-2B visas
provided per fiscal year to a total of 66,000, with 33,000 allocated for
employment for the first half of the fiscal year and 33,000 allocated
for employment for the second half of the fiscal year. Unused numbers
from the first half of the fiscal year are made available for use by
employers seeking H-2B workers during the second half of the year.

Categories
Updates

Secretaries of Homeland Security and State Designate Eligible Countries for FY 2014 H-2A and H-2B Programs

Share this:

Each year, federal regulations require that the Secretaries of Homeland
Security and State designate by notice in the Federal Register the
countries whose nationals are eligible to participate in the H-2A and
H-2B nonimmigrant visa programs for the coming year. This year, a total
of 63 countries have been identified. This notice goes into effect on
January 18, 2014.

Identification of these countries is based on four key factors: the
country’s cooperation in the issuance of travel documents for nationals,
citizens, subjects and residents of that country who are subject to a
final order of removal, and the number of final and unexecuted orders of
removal against nationals, citizens, subjects and residents of that
country; the number of orders of removal executed against nationals,
citizens, subjects and residents of that country; and other factors that
might serve the best interest of the United States.

Categories
Updates

More than 50 Groups Write Letter to Oppose Changes to Child Tax Credit Eligibility Requirements

Share this:

On January 15, 2014, over fifty organizations submitted a letter to the
U.S. Senate strongly urging that legislative house to oppose proposals
to change eligibility requirements for the Child Tax Credit (CTC) as a
condition of extending Unemployment Insurance coverage. As stated in the
letter, extending unemployment insurance benefits helps keep Americans
seeking work in a tough labor market from falling over an “economic
cliff”. Restricting CTC eligibility – specifically by requiring
taxpayers to have a Social Security number in order to claim the
refundable portion of the CTC – would drastically affect millions of
low-income families.

By requiring taxpayers to have a Social Security number, over two
million low-wage working families who pay income and payroll taxes would
not be able to claim the CTC credit. This would additionally impact
more than four million U.S. citizen children, many of whom are Latino,
states the letter.

Signatories to the letter include the American Immigration Lawyers
Association, AFL-CIO, Children’s Defense Fund and Southern Poverty Law
Center.

Categories
Global Pinoy

Overcoming the Bar to Re-entering the United States

Share this:

The issuance of an immigrant or temporary visa by the U.S. Embassy is a privilege and may be revoked for any valid reason. A visitor’s visa holder who uses and violates the terms of the visa by overstaying beyond the authorized period may face long-term bars to re-entering the United States. If this happens, will an individual be able to overcome these bars and re-enter the United States again?

Jenny entered the United States on a B2 visa to visit her aunt in California. She had just graduated from college and her trip to the United States was a graduation gift from her mother. She was permitted to stay in the United States for 6 months. After a few months, Jenny’s aunt told her to look for a U. S. employer who will sponsor her for an H-1B visa. Unfortunately, she could not find an employer before her B-2 visa expired. At the urging of her aunt, Jenny decided to remain in the United States and overstayed her visa. For the next year and a half, Jenny worked as a caregiver. It was difficult for her to find steady employment and she bounced around several different care home facilities. Jenny was stressed from having to look for work and not being paid well because she did not have any employment authorization. She finally decided to return to the Philippines and live with her mother.

After a few years, Jenny met Tom, a US citizen. He was visiting his relatives in Manila for the summer. Jenny and Tom fell in love. After Tom returned to the United States, Jenny and Tom continued their relationship long distance. After a short period, Tom and Jenny got engaged. Tom wants to petition Jenny for a fiancé visa.

Will Jenny encounter problems from her one and a half year of overstay during her last trip to the United States?

3/10 Year Bars

Jenny will face problems when she applies for a fiancé visa at the US Embassy because she overstayed on her last trip. Once Jenny’s B-2 visa expired, she became out-of-status and began accruing “unlawful presence”. In other words, she was considered undocumented. Under U.S. immigration laws, the period of unlawful presence in the United States accrued after April 1, 1997 will trigger the 3/10-year bar. This means that if an individual has a period of unlawful presence of more than six (6) months but less than one (1) year, and voluntarily departs the United States before removal proceedings commence, that individual will be inadmissible or be barred from entering the United States for three (3) years. On the other hand, if the period of unlawful presence is more than one (1) year, the individual will be inadmissible to the United States for ten (10) years. This is  often referred to as the 3/10 year bars. The periods of unlawful presence are not counted in the aggregate, but is accrued during a single continuous overstay.  

Filing A “Waiver”
 
Fortunately, there is a way to overcome these bars to re-entry.  Waivers are available to re-enter the United States again. If the individual who is subject to the bar is applying for a temporary nonimmigrant visa such as a tourist visa again or a student, H-1B or L visa, the individual may seek a 212(d)(3) waiver of the unlawful presence so long as there is other ground to bar this individual from re-entering. The waiver is discretionary. The three criteria for granting a waiver under § 212(d)(3) are set forth in the Matter of Hranka: (1) The risks of harm in admitting the applicant; (2) The seriousness of the acts that caused the inadmissibility; and (3) The importance of the applicant’s reason for seeking entry. If the waiver is granted, it will be valid for up to five (5) years maximum.

In cases where the individual is seeking an immigrant visa or a green card, the individual will need to apply for an I-601 waiver. This waiver is only available if the individual has a “qualifying relative” who will suffer extreme hardship if the individual is not admitted to the United States. Qualifying relatives are limited to US citizen or lawful permanent resident spouses or parents. Unfortunately, US citizen or lawful permanent resident children are not considered qualifying relatives.

How the Waiver Applies to Jenny

In Jenny’s situation she was unlawfully present in the United States for a year and a half and is therefore subject to the 10-year bar and may not be allowed to enter the United States. Even though the fiancé visa is a temporary or a nonimmigrant visa, a 212(d)(3) waiver is not appropriate for this type of visa. The fiancé visa is a hybrid type of visa where the fiancé visa holder will eventually be seeking a green card once in the United States. Jenny will therefore need to apply for an I-601 waiver.

Jenny does not have any “qualifying relatives” because she is not yet married to Tom and her parents are neither US citizens nor lawful permanent residents. However, under the regulations, non-citizen fiancés are permitted to use their US citizen fiancé as a qualifying relative if it is determined that the inadmissibility can be waived after marriage to the US citizen.  Jenny will only be granted a waiver if she can prove that Tom will suffer extreme hardship if she is not permitted to enter the United States. If the waiver is granted, it will be conditional.

Gaining approval on a waiver will require submission of substantial evidence that will show extreme hardship to the US citizen qualifying relative. When a relationship is still new, hardship may oftentimes be difficult to prove. Although there are indeed waivers available for “unlawful presence”, it is still easier for one to not undergo the need for a waiver by not violating any of the terms of their visa.

(Atty. Lourdes Santos Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 721 1963 or visit her website at tancinco.weareph.com/old)