Categories
Immigration Round Table

K4 Stepchildren and Their Options for Adjustment

Share this:

On the basis of the marriage of the biological parent and the stepparent, a child may be considered a stepchild and may be avail of certain immigration benefits. Either the stepchild may be classified as a derivative beneficiary or a direct beneficiary depending on the petitioner and the age of the stepchild. In certain cases, the stepchild may also avail of the non-immigrant K4 visa status. But there are limits on the process for adjustment for K4 visa holders. These limitations are addressed in the case below.

Dear Atty. Lou,

I entered the United States with my mother on a K4 visa when I was 19 years old. My mother married a US citizen after I turned 18 years old. When her US citizen husband filed a petition I-130 for her, a nonimmigrant visa K3 was also filed. The consular officer issued my Mom a K3 visa and I was also issued a K4 visa as derivative child of my mother.

My mom was able to get her green card through my stepfather. I was not issued a green card through my stepfather because of my age. Hence, my mother filed a second preference petition for me as a minor child of a green card holder parent. The petition was approved but I was not able to adjust my status because USCIS denied my application for adjustment. It was stated in the denial that as K4, I could only apply to for my green card through the petition of my stepfather. However, I cannot be considered as a stepchild because my stepfather and my mom married after I turned 18 years old. What should I do? I do not want to go back to the Philippines to get my visa.  

Anthony

Dear Anthony,

You are correct in saying that the step-parent relationship is formed only before the child reaches 18 years old. Once the step-parent relationship is formed, a petition I-130 may be filed by the step-parent on behalf of the stepchild. The petition will generally be approved if the marriage of the stepfather and the biological parent is real and entered into in good faith.

Generally, K4 visas are issued to minor children of K3 visa holders. Upon arrival in the United States of the K3 and the K4s, the US citizen spouse or step-parent usually has 1-130 petitions for the K3 and K4 (below 18 years old) visa holders.  When the I-130s are approved, both the K3 and the K4 visa holders are able to adjust and get their green cards. The K3 and the K4s cannot adjust status except on the basis of the marriage to the same US citizen petitioner.

In your particular case Anthony, you were past 18 years old when your biological mother and your step-father were married.  This means, that for immigration purposes, you have not formed the legal relationship to allow you receive the benefits of a “child”.  You may be wondering why you were issued a visa to enter the United States if there is no step-parent/child relationship.  The issuance of your K4 visa was on the basis of the fact that you are a minor child(below 21 years old) of the principal beneficiary of the K3 visa petition. It was not issued to you on the basis of the petition by the U.S. citizen step-parent.  

Since your mother is now a green card holder, she rightfully filed a petition for you under the second preference or the F2A visa category.  Considering that the priority dates under the F2A  are current for the month of August, you may file for an adjustment of status. Unfortunately, your adjustment was denied because K4 may only adjust through petitions filed by the original petitioner, which in your case is your step-father. What you can do is file a request of a reconsideration of your adjustment denial.

In a similar case recently decided in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Akram v. Holder (No.12-3008-July 9, 2013), the court held that the restriction to adjust for K4 visa holders finds no support in existing law. Under 8 U.S.C. §1255(d) the “ K3’s marriage”, not the “K4’s relationship” to the petitioning citizen is what matters. According to the decision in the case of Akram v. Holder, Congress did not intend for a relationship with a citizen stepparent to be the only way for a K4 visa to adjust status. You may seek a reconsideration of the denial of your adjustment application based on the ruling in the case of Akram v. Holder.

I hope this information is helpful.

Atty. Lou

(Lourdes Santos Tancinco, Esq is a partner at the Tancinco Law Offices, a Professional Law Corp. Her office is located at One Hallidie Plaza, Ste 818, San Francisco CA 94102 and may be reached at 1 888 930 0808; email at law@tancinco.com or check their website at tancinco.weareph.com/old. The content provided in this column is solely for informational purpose only and do not create a lawyer-client relationship. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. This column does not disclose any confidential or classified information acquired in her capacity as legal counsel. Consult with an attorney before deciding on a course of action. You can submit questions to law@tancinco.com)

Categories
Updates

Global Entry Program Expands to Include Four New Countries

Share this:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection is expanding the Global Entry trusted
traveler program to include certain citizens from a series of new
countries. The Global Entry international trusted traveler program is
active at most major U.S. airports. It allows pre-approved, low-risk
participants to expedite their entry into the U.S. using Global Entry
kiosks. Currently, only U.S. citizens, U.S. nationals, U.S. lawful
permanent residents, Mexican nationals and some eligible citizens of the
Netherlands may participate in this program.

On August 9, 2013, the program will expand to also allow for
participation citizens of the Republic of Korea who participate in that
country’s Smart Entry System (SES) program; certain citizens of Germany
who participate in that country’s Automated and Biometrics-Supported
Border Controls (ABG) Plus program; a limited amount of citizens of
Qatar; and a limited amount of citizens from the United Kingdom who
frequently travel to the U.S.

Categories
Global Pinoy

Is U.S. Immigration Reform Bill Dead or Alive?

Share this:

There is no exact number on how many of the estimated 11 million are undocumented Filipinos.  Perhaps, we will never know; not until a legalization law is enacted. There are positive factors that will justify the passage of an immigration reform. A recent poll shows that 74 percent of registered voters favor legalization and eventual U.S. citizenship. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released it findings that the Senate bill, S. 744, will grow the United States economy and reduce the federal deficit by $158 billion over the next 10 years and $685 billion more over the following decade.

The members of the U.S. House of Representatives will go on leave for the Congressional summer recess beginning this month of August. While the Senate passed their version of the comprehensive immigration reform bill (Senate Bill S.744) during the last week of June, the immigrant community may be wondering whether this bill was dead on arrival at the House of Representatives. A companion bill to S.744 is yet to be introduced. Will the 11 million undocumented waiting for an opportunity to obtain proper legal status be given a chance?  

Undocumented Immigrants In Limbo

“Lucia” is one of the undocumented Filipinos who, most probably, will benefit from the legalization program of an immigration reform law. She arrived in the United States when she was 8years old and was educated in U.S. schools. Lucia now works as a special education teacher at her local district school. She has been teaching as a special education teacher to children with disabilities. Lucia has no legal documents. She has an expired employment authorization.

After several years of working without proper legal documents, Lucia applied for immigrant visas elsewhere where she will be able to use her skills without fear of being deported or removed. She was accepted for immigration in Australia and will begin her journey “Down Under” before end of this year if no immigration reform will be passed. Her family still resides in the United States and she still prefers to live and work in the United States except that lack of legal status makes her vulnerable to removal anytime. Just like the rest of the millions undocumented immigrants, Lucia doubts whether a comprehensive immigration reform will ever be passed into law before the U.S. 113th Congress.

Status Update

It may be recalled that after President Obama was elected as President, the advocacy for the passage of a comprehensive immigration reform gained strong momentum. The U.S. Senate passed a bi-partisan comprehensive immigration bill in June 2013 with the hope that the House of Representatives would come up with its own version of the immigration reform.

After the passage of the Senate Bill, most of those who would prospectively benefit from the immigration reform were elated. There was a legalization component contained in this bill together with some restrictions. Among the provisions in proposed bill are stringent eligibility criteria for someone to qualify for Registered Provisional Immigrant status. Those who register will have to wait at least ten years before being able to apply for green cards and cannot do so before everyone in the current visa backlogs receives their green cards. Among the toughest legalization plans ever proposed, the Senate bill would exclude anyone who poses a threat to our communities or to national security.

So far no comparative immigration reform bill with a legalization component ever came out of the House. Majority Leader Eric Cantor and Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte have announced intentions of introducing a bill similar to the DREAM Act for the undocumented young immigrants but not broad legalization for all undocumented groups.

Another House bill that came out short of a comprehensive immigration reform is the H.R.1417 or the Border Security Results Act. This is one of the piecemeal legislation that the House Republicans passed out of the Homeland Security Committee. The proposal is to commit more resources on border security but did not address the concerns along the border. The Border security provisions are “triggers” which means making border security measures as conditions prior to granting legal status.

Partisan Politics

Contrary to the Democrats version of an overhaul of the immigration system, many Republicans expressed their strong position that only piecemeal immigration bills will be enacted beginning with the DREAM Act. Not only are there differences between the parties. There is also an increasing division among members of the Republican party. A derogatory statement against young immigrants made by Republican Steve King was denounced by his colleagues in the Republican party.  House Speaker John Boehner made it clear that only if majority of the Republicans will support a comprehensive approach to the immigration reform will he work for its passage. All these indicates that the immigration reform bill is obviously facing an uphill battle and may die at anytime, unless the anti immigration reform legislators change their perspective of why it is important for the nation that an immigration reform law must pass.

Despite the odds, the Democrats and the pro-immigration reform remains optimistic, as they are not merely taking a recess break. Many are organizing various town hall meetings with their constituents when they go back to their districts and are inviting Republican legislators to attend. The bill is not yet dead and there is still the strong opportunity that the direction of the wind will change in favor of its passage.

(Atty. Lourdes Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 887 7177 or 721 1963 or visit her website at tancinco.weareph.com/old)

Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes Revised Application for Family Unity Benefits Form

Share this:

USCIS has published a notice letting the public know that a revised Form
I-817, the Application for Family Unity Benefits, is now available for
access and use. Form I-817 was changed in this revision to clarify
language in certain areas and convert the form layout from a one-column
to two-column layout. Applicants can now begin using the revised Form
I-817, with a published date of June 26, 2013.

Previous versions of Form I-817 may continue to be used until September
23, 2013. On that date, only the current version, revised on June 26,
2013, will be accepted.

Other forms revised, with deadline for use of previous forms, include:

Form I-131, The Application for Travel Document
Deadline to use previous versions: August 29, 2013

Form I-129S, The Nonimmigrant Petition Based on Blanket L Petition
Deadline to use previous versions: September 9, 2013

Form I-129F, The Petition for Alien Fiancé(e)
Deadline to use previous versions: September 16, 2013

Form I-140, The Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker
Deadline to use previous versions has passed

Form I-360, The Petition for Amerasian, Widow(er), or Special Immigrant
Deadline to use previous versions has passed

Form I-751, The Petition to Remove the Conditions of Residence
Deadline to use previous versions has passed

Categories
Updates

Department of State Provides Guidance for Immigration Benefits after DOMA Ruled Unconstitutional

Share this:

On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court ruled section 3 of the Defense of
Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional. That court decision has had a
number of effects on federal policies for same sex couples, including
policies related to immigration-related benefits. According to the
Department of State, beginning immediately, consular officers are guided
to review visa applications filed by a same-sex spouse in the same
manner as they would an application filed by an opposite-sex spouse,
except in a situation where a specific federal immigration law requires a
different approach.

The federal government’s Visa Office has deleted a key component of
immigration regulations, which formerly limited the word “marriage” for
immigration purposes to mean “only a legal union between one man and one
woman as husband and wife” as well as the word “spouse” to mean only “a
person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife. Same-sex
marriages are valid for immigration purposes as long as they are
recognized in, according to the Department of State, the “place of
celebration.” Same-sex marriages are valid for immigration purposes even
if the same-sex couple intends to live in a state that does not
recognize same-sex marriages or comes form a country in which same-sex
marriages are not legal.