Categories
Updates

New Immigration Reform Act Introduced in U.S. Senate

Share this:

A new act supporting high-skilled immigration professionals was recently
introduced in the U.S. Senate by Senators Hatch (R-UT), Klobuchar
(D-MN), Rubio (R-FL) and Coons (D-DE). The Immigration Innovation Act of
2013, also known as the “I-Squared” Act proposes to make critical
changes in the area of high-skilled immigration.

The act would affect multiple issues faced by businesses that need
highly skilled workers and foreign students graduating from U.S.
universities in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM). The
Act also would allow for additional employment-based green cards by
using green cards from other immigration categories. Finally, the Act
would create a fund through fees paid by businesses seeking
highly-skilled workers to improve STEM education programs in states
throughout the U.S.

Categories
Global Pinoy

The Consequences of Lying

Share this:

Last week, world-renowned cyclist, Lance Armstrong admitted in his interview with Oprah that he used banned drugs to score victories on his Tour de France competitions. According to Armstrong, he feels “disgraced, humbled and ashamed by his actions”.  Telling the truth may have liberated him from living a lie for seventeen years, but this revelation comes with consequences.

In an immigration context, lying to an immigration examiner or on the immigration application also comes with serious consequences. There are lies that may be forgiven through waivers and lies that result not only in a denial of one’s current application but in permanent bars to receiving future visas.

Isabel entered the United States using the passport with a U.S. visa under the name of “Maricel”. She did not have to appear before the consular officer in 2000 to get the visa. A phony travel agent claimed that she looked like the picture on the passport and that she would be allowed to use the visa. Since Isabel always wanted to travel to the United States, she paid a significant amount of money to the agency and was able to enter the United States. After more than five years in the U.S., she met her partner in life. A petition was filed on her behalf but the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service denied the petition and her waiver application. Isabel was brought to the immigration court for removal/deportation.

In court, she renewed her application for her green card and her request for waiver. She admitted before the immigration judge that she used an “assumed name” when she entered the United States. The immigration judge was observing Isabel while she was testifying and noticed that there was lack of remorse on her part in admitting to the fraud. It was at that point that the judge asked her a moral question: “do you know what is right from wrong?”. Isabel answered ‘yes’ to the question. The Judge then continued to question her in this fashion until Isabel broke down in tears and admitted the reasons why she actually lied to the immigration officer about her identity.  Still in tears, Isabel asked for forgiveness and pled for compassion from the judge to allow her to stay in the United States so she continue to live with her ailing U.S. citizen husband. She said she regretted getting herself in this mess, she regretted being part of such a scheme assuming someone else’s identity.  She said she was never at peace during the years that she was using someone else’s identity but that she had hoped to be given a second chance so she could stay and take care of her ailing husband. The immigration judge granted her waiver and she was spared from deportation. She was granted a chance to right the wrong she committed.

Not all who engaged in fraud in immigration petitions are successful in obtaining waivers. The circumstances of each case are taken into account in determining whether an individual merits a grant of waiver. Those who are not granted waivers will not be issued visas and risk being deported or removed from the United States.

When Lying is Fraud

Not all lies will constitute fraud for purposes of denial of visa applications. Lies turn to fraud when it is a serious and material lie or misrepresentation. The most common types of serious “lies” in immigration are those involving (1) actual marital status; (2) good faith marriages; (3) traveling with different or assumed name and (4) political asylum applications.

There are those who are able to get away with the fraud and travel, like in the case of Isabel.  But once the fraud is discovered, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will take steps to make sure that the individual who engaged in fraud is either prosecuted or put in deportation proceedings. Those found to have engaged in fraud in obtaining visas are specifically excluded from receiving benefits from recent immigration pronouncements such as prosecutorial discretion, deferred action, or provisional waivers. This indicates that fraud is as high a priority in the denial of visas as those who have been convicted of crimes or deemed to be national security threats.

Waivers of Fraud

Since ‘fraud’ in visa applications is specifically mentioned as a ground for denial of visas, it has been difficult to obtain waivers of fraud.

Prior to 1997, filing a waiver for the inadmissibility ground of fraud simply requires the filing of an accomplished I-601 form and filing fee. But after the enactment of the Illegal Immigration Reform Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRAIRA), the law requires proof of extreme hardship to U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident spouses or parents. Extreme hardship must be supported by strong evidence. Again, each case is different and the immigration examiner has discretion to adjudicate the waiver applications.

The Courage Not To Lie

It is not easy to admit a lie. Watching Armstrong admit his biggest lie is like watching an individual admitting his mistakes and lies before an immigration judge. Armstrong is a public figure, a legendary sports hero. His admission resulted not only in great loss to him monetarily but forever damaged his iconic place in the world of sports and philanthropy. While a person in removal proceedings is not under the same level of scrutiny, he certainly faces the same predicament. Like Armstrong, a person enjoying immigration benefits acquired through lying may get away with the lie, even for a long time, but it does not mean that the wrong is somehow righted, or that at some point, the lie would not be revealed. And if the reckoning comes, one has to deal with the lie, admit to it, and accept its consequences. This is difficult and it is disgraceful. So instead of going through the ordeal, one should deliberate seriously on the possible consequences before choosing to engage in fraud or lie in immigration applications. The courage is not in one’s ability to admit to a lie, greater courage is required not to commit one.

(Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 887 71 77 or visit her website at tancinco.weareph.com/old)

Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes Updated H-2B Visa Numbers Jan. 25, 2013

Share this:

On January 25, 2013, USCIS provided an update of the amount of
cap-subject H-2B visas received and approved by the federal agency for
the first and second halves of Fiscal Year 2013. According to USCIS, a
total of 29,227 beneficiaries have been approved for the first half of
Fiscal Year 2013, with an additional 3,047 petitions pending. A total of
2,264 beneficiaries have been approved for the second half of Fiscal
Year 2013, with an additional 2,395 petitions pending.

Congressionally-based legislation limits the amount of H-2B visas
provided per fiscal year to a total of 66,000, with 33,000 allocated for
employment for the first half of the fiscal year and 33,000 allocated
for employment for the second half of the fiscal year. Unused numbers
from the first half of the fiscal year are made available for use by
employers seeking H-2B workers during the second half of the year. These
numbers do not, however, carry over from one fiscal year to another.

Categories
Updates

Iowa Department of Transportation to Issue Drivers Licenses and Nonoperator IDs to People Granted DACA Status

Share this:

The Iowa Department of Transportation has changed its perspective and
will now issue driver’s licenses or nonoperator ID cards to people who
have been approved for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
status after a change in guidance by USCIS and the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).

On Friday, January 18, 2013, USCIS changed the definition of persons
granted DACA status to being “authorized granted Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrival status are “authorized by the Department of Homeland
Security to be present in the United States and considered to be
lawfully present during their deferred action [time period].”

Under Iowa legislation, driver’s licenses and nonoperator IDs can only
be issued to foreign nationals authorized to be present in the U.S.
Because of this change in definition by USCIS, Iowa’s Department of
Transportation can now legally issue these IDs to people granted DACA
status.

Categories
Updates

Press Release: Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver

Share this:

WHO CAN BENEFIT FROM THIS NEWLY MINTED REGULATION

What a blessing to have received two pieces of good news related to
immigration within a span of one year.  Since August 15, 2012, when DACA
– Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals – took effect, thousands of
hopeful youngsters have received their employment authorization
documents and social security numbers. They are now gainfully employed,
contributing ot he family coffers or saving up for college.  By March 4,
2013, the new provisional unlawful presence waiver, alternatively
referred to as 601A waiver, will take effect. On the state level, there
is also good news because immigrants without status will eventually
become eligible to apply for driver’s licenses under the temporary
visitor driver’s license (TVDL) program.  The program will take effect
ten months after Governor Quinn signs the approved bill into law. 

Who can avail of the 601A Unlawful Presence Provisional Waiver?

A
limited set of individuals will benefit from this recent announcement. 
Only individuals who are immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, who are
physically present in the U.S. but cannot adjust status here, despite
being married to U.S. citizens, with U.S. citizen children and having
lived here for a long time, may avail of this unlawful presence
provisional waiver. 

“Immediate Relative” is defined as the (i)
spouse of a U.S. citizen; (ii) parent of a U.S. citizen who is at least
21 years of age; (iii) child below 21 of a U.S. citizen parent. 
Examples of those may benefit from this waiver include: spouses, parents
and children of U.S. citizens who crossed the border or jumped ship or
entered without inspection by an immigration officer.   

How does the 601A waiver work?

This
new process applies only to immediate relatives of U.S. citizens who
have no violation other than being unlawfully present in the U.S.  This
new process will not apply if there are other issues such as entering
with a false passport or name, previous removal/deportation, criminal
conviction, engaging in any form of fraud or misrepresentation, or
unauthorized claim of U.S. citizenship.

A very important
requirement for a successful waiver application is a showing of extreme
hardship on the part of a qualifying relative – a U.S. citizen spouse or
parent.  There is no clear definition of extreme hardship and it can
only be inferred from successful case law.  This emphasizes the
importance of seeking legal counsel who can thoroughly assess a specific
situation and help the applicant evaluate whether it is wise to apply
for this waiver.   

By March 4, 2013, and only after the approval
of an immediate relative immigrant petition or a self-petition,
applicants may file the 601A waiver at a designated lockbox within the
United States.  This new procedure alleviates the anxiety among family
members because they can continue to be together during the waiver
application process.  In order to perfect the waiver process, the
applicant must still leave the U.S. and have the immigrant visa
interview at a U.S. consulate abroad.  Approval of the unlawful presence
waiver does not a guarantee issuance of the immigrant visa but as long
as there is no issue other than unlawful presence, the applicant can
expect to rejoin his or her family in the U.S. immediately after visa
issuance.  If, at the interview process, other undisclosed or not
immediately discoverable issues surface, the applicant will be required
to go through the regular 601 waiver process described below.     

The
existing 601 waiver procedure still applies to those who cannot avail
of the 601A waiver. This existing process requires the applicant to go
for the immigrant visa interview first before being allowed to file the
601 waiver, consequently causing months, if not more than a year, of
waiting for the outcome of the waiver application.  In an effort to
streamline the waiver process, all waiver applications – the new 601A or
the existing 601 process – are now filed in designated locations. 
Hopefully, this will make the adjudication process consistent compared
to the past when waiver applications were adjudicated at the various
consulates around the world.           

Applicants scheduled by the NVC ON or AFTER January 3, 2013 for an upcoming interview are eligible to apply for a 601A waiver.

Who qualifies for a 601A Unlawful Presence Provisional Waiver?

An individual qualifies for this waiver if ALL of the six requirements below can be met:

  1. The applicant is at least 17 years of age;
  2. The applicant is physically present in the United States;
  3. The applicant has accrued unlawful presence in the U.S. for a
    period greater than 180 days or the applicant entered the U.S. without
    inspction  
  4. An immediate relative immigrant petition on behalf of the applicant has been approved;
  5.    The immigrant visa processing fee has been paid;  
  6.    Extreme hardship will be caused upon qualifying relatives
    (U.S. citizen spouse or parent) if the waiver is not granted an
    immigrant visa

Who are ineligible to apply for a 601A Waiver?

  1. Anyone who does meet any one of the qualifying factors above will be ineligible to apply for a 601A waiver.
  2. The applicant has a pending application for adjustment of status.
  3. Applicants with notices of visa interview prior to January 3, 2013

Example 1 – Spouses and Children of U.S. Citizens who Entered Without inspection (EWI)

In 2005, Alex traveled to Canada.  Although Alex did not have a U.S.
visa, he was able to enter by land.  He fell in love with Cathy and got
married three years later.  They have two U.S. citizen children.  Cathy
filed an immigrant petition for Alex as soon as they got married but
because he was not inspected by an immigration officer when he entered
the U.S., he could not proceed with his immigrant visa process within
the U.S.  He needed to leave and process his immigrant visa abroad. 
However, the length of his unauthorized stay in the U.S. would have
prevented him from returning for at least 10 years.  For Alex and Cathy,
leaving to pursue the visa application abroad was an impossible
solution in light of the fact that Cathy needed to work and no one would
be available to take care of their two young U.S. citizen children. 
Alex’s lengthy absence would subject Cathy to extreme hardship.

Pursuant
to a 601A waiver application, Alex can file an application for
provisional waiver in the U.S. after Cathy’s immigrant petition has been
approved and the requisite visa fee paid. The waiver application must
prove that Cathy (Alex’ qualifying relative) will suffer extreme
hardship if the waiver is not granted. He can wait for the outcome of
the application in the U.S., thus, enabling him to spend more time with
his family.  Once the waiver is approved, he can travel to a consulate
abroad to continue the immigrant visa process and reenter the U.S. as a
lawful permanent resident once he receives an immigrant visa.     
          

Example 2 – Crewmembers (C1 and D1 Visa Holders) who Married a U.S. Citizens

Cesar,
a widower, had a low-paying job in a cruise ship. While the ship was
docked in Florida in 2002, he learned about opportunities for a higher
income in the U.S.  This was very enticing to him because he wanted his
children to go to school and eventually earn their professional
degrees.  One of the children, Dan, was focused on becoming a licensed
physical therapist in the U.S.  Dan succeeded in becoming a green card
holder through employment-based immigration.  Dan, who is now a U.S.
citizen, could have easily petitioned for his father Cesar but having
“jumped ship”, he was unable to apply for adjustment of status in the
U.S. His situation is similar to someone who entered without inspection.

Cesar eventually met Liza, a U.S. citizen widow and a strong
cancer survivor.  Cesar and Liza gave each other hope, treasured being
together and decided to get married.  They longed to travel to places
around the world but Cesar had to work out his immigration status. 
Cesar would need to apply for a waiver and the new provisional waiver
would allow him to await its approval in the U.S.  This would enable
Cesar and Liza to spend more time together, before Cesar proceeds abroad
to continue his application for the issuance of his immigrant visa.

Example 3 – Children Who Crossed the Border at a Tender Age

There
are thousands of infants and unsuspecting children who were brought to
the U.S. through the borders by their relatives.  Many of these children
cannot proceed to college because they cannot avail of student loans
for lack of social security numbers.

Miguel, an agricultural
worker, gained residency through employment.  This process took so
long.  He finally received his green card and was reunited with his
childhood sweetheart, Celina. They got married and were blessed with a
child, Mario.  As a green card holder, Miguel was capable of filing a
petition for his family but, back then, it would have taken at least 5
years for his wife and child to immigrate. The family could not bear
being separated much longer. Celina and Mario were denied visitor’s
visas many times so Miguel’s wife, Celina, and their 3-year old son
risked it and crossed the border. 

Life got in the way and it
took some time for Miguel to become a U.S. citizen.  He can now file an
immigrant petition on behalf of Celina and Mario (who is now 18) but
because they entered without inspection, they would need to exit in
order to apply for their immigrant visas at the U.S. Consulate back
home. The recently announced provisional waiver enables them to file
their applications for provisional waiver in the U.S. prior to attending
the visa interview at the U.S. consulate abroad.  Once the visas are
issued, they can return as permanent residents.       

No Appeal, Motion to Reconsider or Motion to Reopen

The
waiver application process is complex.  While it may sound
self-serving, I strongly advise seeking legal counsel before filing an
application for provisional waiver.  It is also important to note that
grating of a waiver is discretionary and there is no appeal or motion to
reconsider or motion to reopen if the application is denied.

Categories
Immigration Round Table

Taking Steps to Realize a Mothers Dying Wish

Share this:

Dear Atty. Lou,
 
My 98-year-old mother has not seen my sister, who resides in the Philippines, for a total of 38 years. Now my mother is very ill and has been in out of the hospital. Many times, she was on the verge of dying but survived after treatment. She has multiple medical problems including dementia. Most recently during the holidays, she suffered a mild stroke. She told me that her only wish is for her to see my sister before she dies. 

In our Filipino culture, I believe, there is a saying that when someone is suffering a serious ailment and is on the verged of death, this person may be waiting for wish to become a reality. Probably the reason why my mother is still alive despite her serious medical conditions is that she is still waiting to see my sister. My question Atty. Lou is how can my sister apply for a visitor’s visa?  For sure, she does not have proof of employment neither does she own properties. However, I can shoulder all her costs for travel including her round trip ticket and her expenses during her temporary stay here. I am willing to execute an Affidavit of Support. Please guide us on what we can do. I want our mother’s wish to come true before the inevitable happens. May this be considered a humanitarian request for a visa? Please help us.

Maria

Dear Maria,

I totally understand how you feel about your mom and her ardent desire to see your only sibling left in the Philippines. You did not mention whether your mother petitioned your sister. If your mother and your sister have not seen each other for 38 years, I would assume that no relative petition was filed on her behalf.

There are two ways for your sister to obtain a visa to enter the United States for a visit. The first one is through a B2 visitors visa. This type of visa is the most appropriate for your sister. A visitors visa is granted to those who wish to enter the United States temporarily for pleasure. It is expected that the visa applicant must show proof that she will only stay in the United States for a short period of time or holds a non-immigrant intent. This means she should be able to convince the consular officer that she will not stay permanently in the United States. Under Section 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, a legal presumption exists that every applicant for a visitors visa is an intending immigrant until he or she establishes to the satisfaction of the consul that he or she is eligible for a nonimmigrant status as a visitors visa holder. Once the presumption is overcome, the applicant will be able to obtain a nonimmigrant visa and subsequent admission to the United States. In overcoming this presumption, the applicant must show sufficient ties to the Philippines and that her ties will not be abandoned during her temporary stay in the United States.

It is a challenge that your sister has no properties or sufficient income. But her ties to the Philippines may be established by other means like the residence of her own family and long time employment. The health condition and advance age of your mother may be strong reasons to prove the urgency of the visit and the temporary nature of your sister’s stay in the United States.

If after exerting all efforts to apply for a visitors visa and your sister is still denied one, she may try to apply for the humanitarian parole visa, which is the visa of last resort for those who urgently need to travel for humanitarian reasons with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

I hope this information is helpful. Good luck.

Atty. Lou

(Lourdes Santos Tancinco Esq .is a partner at the Tancinco Law Offices, a Professional Law Corp. Her principal office is located at One Hallidie Plaza, Suite 818, San Francisco CA 94102 and may be reached at 1 888 930 0808, email at law@tancinco.com. The content provided in this column is solely for informational purposes only and do not create a lawyer-client relationship. It should not be relied as legal advice. This column does not disclose any confidential or classified information acquired in her capacity as legal counsel. Consult with an attorney before deciding on a course of action. You may submit questions to law@tancinco.com)
 

Categories
Global Pinoy

Finding Courage to Prosecute Traffickers

Share this:

Pablo arrived in the United States using an H2B visa. Having paid his recruiter a substantial amount of money, he was told that he will work for a hotel in Nevada. Upon his arrival, he found out that there was no employment for him in a hotel. Instead, he was forced against his will to work in various households as a housekeeper for a minimal pay. His recruiter kept his passport with the visa that eventually expired. After one year without legal status, he left his housekeeping job without his recruiter’s knowledge. He finally found a job as a live-in caregiver and worked 24/7 without leave. This time he was paid a reasonable salary for his services.

Since he is undocumented, Pablo would like to legalize his stay by applying for a working visa. He found out that obtaining a visa as a caregiver could take several years. He also learned that being in unlawful status will make it legally impossible for him to change status to a nonimmigrant working visa. Pablo heard about the case of a Filipina getting a “T” visa as a victim of human trafficking. He wants to apply for the same visa. Pablo was told that he fits the profile of a trafficking victim. But when he was informed that part of the requirement is that he assists law enforcement agencies in prosecuting his recruiter and employer, he had second thoughts about his decision to file the T visa. According to Pablo, he could not in conscience assist in persecuting the person who helped him in coming to the United States. He said that despite paying the recruiter money, he still feels that he owes this person a debt of gratitude.

The story of Pablo is a story of many of our “kababayans” who are victims of human trafficking but are afraid to pursue their cases against their recruiters. Very few find the strength to fight for their rights and liberate themselves from the traffickers with law enforcement authorities’ support.  In an effort to reach out and assist victims of human trafficking, the Obama administration proclaimed the month of January as the National Slavery and Human Trafficking Prevention Month.

Human Trafficking

Human trafficking is a serious offense. It is a form of modern-day slavery in which traffickers lure individuals with false promises of employment and a better life. Traffickers often take advantage of the vulnerable population, the poor, unemployed individuals, the undocumented who lack access to social safety nets.

Not all failed recruitment or labor contracts may be classified as trafficking. To consider a case as ‘trafficking’ depends on the type of work, the use of force, fraud, or coercion to obtain or maintain work.

A trafficking survivor may avail of the protection of the law anytime he can show that he was a victim of a “severe form of trafficking in persons”. The severity may be proven by showing that the victim was brought to the US either for: (1) the purpose of a commercial sex act by force, fraud or coercion, or was under age 18, or (2) labor or services induced by force, fraud or coercion and for the purpose of subjecting the victim to slavery, debt bondage or involuntary service

The “T” Visa

In October 2000, Congress created the “T” nonimmigrant status by passing the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act (VTVPA). The legislation strengthens the ability of law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute human trafficking, and most importantly, offers protection to victims.

For those who are trafficking victims and are undocumented, the “T” visa may be availed of. The T Visa allows victims to remain in the United States and obtain permanent immigrant visa status.

Prosecuting the Trafficker

The T visa has a dual purpose. It primarily assist the victims of trafficking and secondarily  assist law enforcement authorities in the investigation or prosecution of human trafficking cases. Under the secondary purpose, the applicant for the T visa is expected to comply with reasonable request by authorities to assist in the investigation and prosecution of trafficking. If the victim is not willing to cooperate, the T visa will not be approved. This part of the application process is where some victims are afraid to pursue their applications for T visas. To help the victims gather courage to assist in prosecution, the family and community must be supportive of the efforts undertaken by the trafficking victim. The prevention of human trafficking requires a team effort not just from the government but also from public.

Filipino Trafficking Victims in the U.S.

There is no exact number on how many Filipinos are victims of human trafficking in the United States. In the media and even in the blog of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, many Filipinos relate how they became victim of unscrupulous individuals who forced them into labor and debt bondage. While we often hear of domestic workers as victims, recently, teachers on H1B visas are also claiming to be victims of trafficking. In the recent federal case of Nunag Tanedo v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board there were 350 Filipino teachers who scored a victory when after trial the jury awarded them $4.5 million in damages. These cases and the other human trafficking cases where the employers were investigated, charged and convicted manifest the increasing awareness of individual against human trafficking. We each play a role in curbing extreme exploitation and abuses of workers and innocent kababayans.

(To report trafficking in persons call the following U.S numbers: 1-888-428-7581 or 1-888-3737-888.  Author Atty.Lourdes Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 887 7177 or 721 1963)

Categories
Updates

USCIS Publishes 2013 H-2A and H-2B Eligibility List

Share this:

Federal regulations state that USCIS may only approve petitions for H-2A
and H-2B nonimmigrant status from nationals of countries that have been
designated for such status, as published in the Federal Register. The
notice of countries must be renewed each year. This year’s notice has
just been published and identifies 59 countries whose nationals are
eligible to participate in the H-2A and H-2B nonimmigrant programs in
the coming year. The list is the same as the previous year, but includes
one new country: Grenada. The notice takes effect January 18, 2013.

Eligible countries include:

  • Argentina
  • Australia,
  • Barbados,
  • Belize,
  • Brazil,
  • Bulgaria,
  • Canada,
  • Chile,
  • Costa Rica,
  • Croatia,
  • Dominican
    Republic,
  • Ecuador,
  • El Salvador,
  • Estonia,
  • Ethiopia,
  • Fiji,
  • Grenada,
  • Guatemala,
  • Haiti,
  • Honduras,
  • Hungary,
  • Iceland, Ireland,
  • Israel,
  • Jamaica,
  • Japan,
  • Kiribati,
  • Latvia,
  • Lithuania,
  • Macedonia,
  • Mexico,
  • Moldova,
  • Montenegro,
  • Nauru,
  • The Netherlands,
  • Nicaragua,
  • New
    Zealand,
  • Norway,
  • Papua New Guinea,
  • Peru,
  • The Philippines,
  • Poland,
  • Romania,
  • Samoa,
  • Serbia,
  • Slovakia,
  • Slovenia,
  • Solomon Islands,
  • South Africa,
  • South Korea,
  • Spain,
  • Switzerland,
  • Tonga,
  • Turkey,
  • Tuvalu,
  • Ukraine,
  • United Kingdom,
  • Uruguay,
  • Vanuatu.
Categories
Updates

USCIS Provides DACA Updates and Revises FAQs

Share this:

This week, USCIS updated the amount of Deferred Action for Childhood
Arrivals (DACA) cases it has received and accepted for processing.
According to USCIS, since August 2012, a total of nearly 400,000
requests have been accepted, 13,366 have been rejected and 407,899
received. The majority of requests have been submitted for people
originating from Mexico (290,019) and currently residing in California
(110,230).

USCIS also recently published an update
of its FAQ on consideration of DACA on its website. This FAQ covers
background information on DACA, guidelines for requesting consideration,
eligibility criteria and other details about the DACA process.