Categories
Updates

Department of State Announces DV-2014 Online Registration Start Date

Share this:

The Department of State has published the start date for online
registration for the DV-2014 program. Online registration will begin on
Tuesday, October 2, 2012 at 12 noon EST, and will end on Saturday,
November 3, 2012, at 12 noon EST. The Department of State also notes
that instructions for the 2014 program are not yet available.

Each year under the Diversity Visa program, 55,000 diversity visas are
made available to eligible petitioners from countries with low rates of
immigration to the United States. Applicants who are selected by the
random lottery are offered a permanent resident diversity visa.

Categories
Global Pinoy

Petitioning a Child Despite Lack of Blood Relationship

Share this:

A child of a United States citizen (USC) or lawful permanent resident (LPR) may derive immigration benefit as long as the legal relationship between the child and the USC/LPR parent exists. What if there is no relationship with the child? How does one establish relationship that will allow a USC/LPR to petition a child who is not related to him by blood?

To address this issue, we examine the case of one of our readers who emailed the following interesting inquiry:

“I met a wonderful woman while I was on vacation in the Philippines. In the few months that we were together, I fell in love with her. Upon my return to the States, she informed me that she is pregnant and that I was the father of the child. I returned to the Philippines after the birth of the child and acknowledged the child as my own in his birth certificate. I proceeded to the U.S. Embassy in Manila to register my child as a U.S. citizen. I was told to take the DNA test, which I did. Unfortunately, the DNA tests showed negative results meaning that I am not the biological father of the child. I left for the United States and returned after a few years to the Philippines to visit the child. I felt bad for the child because he seemed to be neglected by his mother. I want to petition the child even if he is not my own child. What should I do to be able to give this child a better future? Thank you very much and God bless your heart. – Anonymous”   

Proving Parent Child Relationship

Generally, the birth certificate is the sole document that proves the relationship between the parent and the child. In filing immigration petitions, a parent submits proof of his citizenship or resident status and the birth certificate of the child. To prove the legitimate status of the child, a marriage certificate of the parents is usually submitted.

Since the birth certificate is a strong proof of the relationship between the parent and the child, there are some instances where an individual, not the real parent, would simply have his name recorded as the “parent” on the birth certificate, in the erroneous belief that this action creates the parent-child relationship. This often happens in adopted children cases where a child’s birth certificate is made out to show the name of the adopting individual as the “parent” (instead of the natural/birth parent) so that such individual could “adopt” the child without necessity of securing a judicial decree of adoption. This is what is commonly known as a “simulated” birth certificate, the adoptive parent is declared to be the parent on the birth certificate despite the lack of judicial authority to do so.

It must be clear that in immigration petitions, “simulated birth certificates” are not acceptable proof of parent-child relationship. As soon as an immigration examiner or consular officer is put on notice about facts showing that the reported parents are not the biological parents, the petition is denied for lack of legal relationship.

Despite the strong evidentiary nature of birth certificates to show parental relationship, therefore, its submission is not enough and other factors are taken into account before immigration petitions for children are approved.

To illustrate, a grandparent who obtained a birth certificate naming him/her as a “parent” on behalf of a grandchild, would circumvent the immigration process meant for petitioning direct issues/children and would not be allowed. Factors that raise red flags on the simulated nature of the birth certificate could be the age of the grandparent at the time of the birth of the child, the age gap between the siblings and the child claimed to be the grandparent’s own child, the age difference between the grandparent and the child, as well as other similar circumstances.

DNA Tests

There is nothing in the regulations that require mandatory DNA testing to prove a parent-child relationship. The consular officers and the immigration examiners exercise their discretion in cases where there are doubts on the parent-child relationship. Most high fraud posts, which include the U.S. Embassy in Manila, often require DNA testing especially in illegitimate cases or children born out of wedlock.

This is what happened in the case of our letter writer. He was required to take the DNA test, which he did willingly and confidently. To his dismay, the child was found not to be his biological issue. Despite proof of the past romantic relationship he had with the mother of the child, the DNA test yielded negative results. These results are conclusive as far as the U.S. Embassy is concerned and is determinative of the absence of the parent-child relationship.

Petitioning A Non-Biological Child

One expects the reaction of an individual, made to believe he was the biological father of a child when in fact he was not, would be that of outrage. Here, our letter writer decided to be magnanimous and instead opted to try to petition this child.

There are two ways to petition a non-biological child. One way is through the adoption process. After 2008, adoption of orphans is governed by the Hague Convention on Adoption and generally, the child is not supposed to be “pre-identified”, meaning the child to be adopted may not be identified by the adoptive parents. Instead, the Inter Country Adoption Board will take on this role of identifying who will be adopted. If inter-country adoption is not applicable, the child must be domestically petitioned as a “relative” child, in which case, the adoptive parent must show at lease two years of physical presence in the Philippines and at lease two years of legal custody over the adopted child before the immigration petition could be processed.

The other way to petition a non-biological child is through the stepchild petitioning process. This is not applicable to all non-biological children.  A U.S. citizen may petition a stepchild only if the biological mother and the U.S. citizen enters into a valid and good faith marriage before the stepchild turns 18 years old. In this case, the U.S. citizen may petition the child as long as there is proof of the marital relationship with the mother.

(Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 887 7177 or 721 1963)

Categories
Updates

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Implementation Date Set for August 15

Share this:

Earlier today, the Department of Homeland Security posted a release
reinstating that USCIS will be ready to implement the deferred action
for childhood arrivals process on August 15. On June 15, Janet
Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security, announced that certain young
people who came to the U.S. as children and meet key guidelines may be
eligible to receive deferred action. The process by which such
candidates can request consideration for deferred action is currently
being finalized by USCIS.

USCIS states that it intends to make
all forms, instructions and other relevant information and tools related
to deferred action for childhood arrivals ready for the public on
August 15, 2012. The federal agency will then immediately begin
accepting requests for consideration.

Categories
Updates

USCIS Reminder Centralized Filing for Waivers of Inadmissibility

Share this:

USCIS has commented that, since June 4, 2012, individuals outside the
United States who have been found inadmissible for certain visas by a
U.S. consular officer who wish to waive the inadmissibility ground
should no longer apply for waivers at their foreign location. USISC
comments that such individuals should file requests directly to USCIS by
mailing their application to a USCIS Lockbox facility in the U.S. This
change, it should be noted, only affects cases in which the individual
is outside the U.S., is found inadmissible for an immigrant visa (or
nonimmigrant K or V visa) and only affects the filing location.

These waiver applications are adjudicated at the USCIS Nebraska Service
Center. These changes, which took place on June 4, affect filings for
Form I-601, the Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility;
Form I-212, the Application for Permission to Reapply for Admission into
the United States After Deportation or Removal (if filed together with a
Form I-601); and Form I-290B, the Notice of Appeal or Motion (if filed
after a denial of a Form I-601 or Form I-212.

Please note that waiver applicants located in Mexico have the option of
filing with the local USCIS Field Office in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, in
addition to the USCIS Lockbox facility, until December 4, 2012.