Categories
Updates

USCIS Is Centralizing Filing and Adjudication Locations for Waivers of Inadmissibility

Share this:

Beginning June 4, 2012, people who have applied for particular visas
abroad and have been found ineligible by a U.S. Consular officer will be
able to mail a request to waive certain grounds of inadmissibility
directly to a USCIS Lockbox facility. This new process will directly
affect where these waiver applications must be sent.

With the current process, processing times for waivers of grounds of
inadmissibility range from one month to over a year, depending upon the
filing location. This new centralization of this process will give
enable more efficient processing and more consistent adjudication for
such waivers. In addition, people filing such waivers with a USCIS
Lockbox facility will be able to track the status of their cases online.

This process change will affect the filing locations of the following immigrant and nonimmigrant forms:

Form I-601, Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility
Form I-212, Application for Permission to Reapply for Admission into the United States After Deportation or Removal
Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, (if filed after a denial of a Form I-601 or Form I-212).

Any applicant who is mailing his or her waiver request form is advised
to use the address included in the revised form instructions on the
USCIS website.

Please note that during a limited six-month transition period, immigrant
visa waiver applicants in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, will be given the
option to mail their application to the USCIS Lockbox facility in the
U.S. or to file their waiver application in person at the USCIS office
in Ciudad Juarez.

Categories
Updates

Department of State Corrects Minor Errors in Exchange Visitor Program Summer Work Travel Interim Final Rule

Share this:

An updated final rule was recently published by the U.S. Department of
State regarding the Exchange Visitor Program – Summer Work Travel
interim final rule published in the Federal Register on May 11, 2012. In
this update, certain errors were fixed. These errors include an
incorrect fax number listed under the contact section, a citation to an
exemption to the category of prohibited jobs and the date by which
public comments should be received.

The correct fax number for further information should be (202) 632-2701.
Written comments from the public will be accepted by the Department of
State for up to 60 days from May 11, 2012. This update took effect on
May 30, 2012.

Categories
Updates

Customs and Border Protection Provides International Travel Tips

Share this:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has submitted a reminder for
tourists and travelers of important tips for international travel this
holiday season. With increasing travel and tourism over the past year,
CBP suggests that returning U.S. citizens or residents and international
visitors can do certain things to speed their processing through U.S.
borders.

Ensure you have an approved travel document. Remember that the
Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative requires U.S. and Canadian citizens
age 16 and older to present a valid and acceptable travel document
(e.g., passport, U.S. passport card, trusted traveler card, permanent
resident card, or an enhanced driver’s license).

If you are a national or citizen of a participating Visa Waiver
Program country, ensure you have an approved Electronic System for
Travel Authorization (ESTA) before boarding an air or sea vessel
traveling to the U.S.

Read more tips online at www.cbp.gov.

Categories
Global Pinoy

Contesting Abandonment of Green Card Status

Share this:

Jeremiah was granted U.S. lawful permanent resident status in 2005.  In 2009, he went back to Manila to visit his parents. While there, his 90-year old mother passed away. He spent a significant time in Manila caring for his father who was also in failing health and trying to get her mother’s estate in order. After almost two years in Manila, he finally returned to the United States in 2011.

Upon his arrival at the port of entry in LA California, he was issued a Notice to Appear. The Customs and Border Protection inspector charged him with abandonment of his permanent residence status and paroled him in to attend his hearing.

Jeremiah must now convince the immigration judge that he never intended to abandon his status. If he is not able to effectively contest the charge of abandonment, his green card will be revoked and he will be sent back to the Philippines. How will Jeremiah proceed with his case?

Failure to Return in One Year

If a green card holder remains outside the United States for more than one year, he is presumed to have “abandoned” his resident status and his green card could be invalidated/terminated by the Department of Homeland Security.  Unlike other travelers, however, the immigrant or green card holder is not subject to an expedited removal (or what is commonly known as “airport to airport”). He has the right to a hearing before a judge to contest the findings of abandonment by the Department of Homeland Security. Whether or not an individual green card holder will be brought to an immigration judge for a hearing will depend on the circumstances of the case. If there are valid reasons to show that there was no intent to abandon, then the individual will not be removed and will be allowed to retain his green card.

Contesting Abandonment

When there is absence of more than one year, a green card holder may either contest abandonment through the consular office of the U.S. Embassy or before the Immigration Court upon entry to the United States.

To avoid the trouble of prolonged interviews or extensive questioning at the port of entry upon arrival in the United States, contesting abandonment before entry may be done before the consular officer at the U.S. Embassy. This means applying for and getting approval for an SB-1 visa or a returning resident visa. A returning resident visa application is filed directly with the U.S. Embassy by filling up form DS117 and DS230. There is a non-refundable fee of $380.

Returning residents must show the consular officer that when they departed from the United States, they had every intention of returning and have not abandoned their US residency. In addition, they should be able to show that their trip outside the United States was temporary; that their protracted stay was caused by reasons beyond the green card holders’ control for which they are not responsible.

Documents Showing Unrelinquished U.S. Residence

The Department of State’s guidelines on what constitutes proof of ‘abandonment’ include failure to pay U.S. taxes and strong ties in the Philippines. If the green card holder has family members, properties, businesses located outside the United States and there were frequent absences from the United States, there is greater likelihood that permanent residence status would be considered abandoned and the green card revoked.

It is important therefore that the application for returning resident visa must be supported by sufficient evidence in order to establish his clear intention to maintain his US residency despite a lengthy absence. Proof of this intention may include a valid driver’s license from the State where he is a resident, a showing that the extended visit was caused by unforeseen circumstances, payment of U.S. income taxes, among others.

Studying Outside the United States

Despite lengthy absences of green card holders who happen to be students getting their education outside the US, applications for returning resident visas for this class of permanent residents are likely to be approved. Temporary purpose is not necessarily determined by lapse of time. As long as there is a projected time of return, the green card holder will not be charged with abandonment.

For students studying outside the United States, proof that a degree will be obtained within a definitive time frame is important in obtaining the returning resident visa to establish intent to go back to the United States after completion of study. Consular officers will consider evidence of family still living in the United States and a showing that the green card holder student returns to United States at the end of each academic term to rebut a presumption of abandonment.

Jeremiah’s Case

Since Jeremiah traveled back to the United States without a re-entry permit or a returning resident visa, proof of non-abandonment of status must now be established before the immigration court.  Jeremiah would be covered by the same Department of State guidelines and required to take on the same evidentiary burdens that a returning resident would be required to do before the consular officer at the U.S. Embassy, only this time, he would have to do so before an immigration judge.

Remember that an immigrant’s residence status is not a right but simply a privilege. As such, it may be revoked if there is a failure to appropriately contest the issue of abandonment.

(Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 887 7177 or 721 1963)

Categories
Updates

Latest Updates on FY 2013 H-1B Visa Availability May 18

Share this:

On May 18, 2012, USCIS posted an update regarding the amount of
applications received for standard cap-subject and master’s exemption
H-1B visas for Fiscal Year 2013. According to USCIS, a total of 16,000
H-1B Master’s Exemption visas have been filed, and 42,000 standard cap
visas have been filed. Each fiscal year, a total of 20,000 master’s
exempt H-1B visas are available; up to 65,000 standard cap visas are
available. These numbers are remarkably higher than petitions received
by USCIS at the same time in recent years.

USCIS began accepting petitions for H-1B visas for Fiscal Year 2013
(starting on October 1, 2012) on April 2, 2012. Petitions may be filed
no more than six months in advance of the requested start date. Please
note that up to 6,800 visas from the 65,000 cap-subject visas are set
aside each fiscal year for the H-1B1 program.

Categories
Updates

Homeland Security Expands List of STEM Degree Programs

Share this:

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently announced it is
expanding the list of science, technology, engineering and math (STEM)
designated degree programs that will qualify graduates in the US on
student visas for optional practical training (OPT) extensions. Under
the OPT program, international students who graduate from U.S. colleges
and universities may remain in the country and receive training through
work experience for up to one year. Students who graduate from a
designated STEM degree program are able to remain in the U.S. for an
additional 17 months via an OPT STEM extension.

“Attracting the best and brightest international talent to our colleges
and universities and enabling them to contribute to their professional
growth is an important part of our nation’s economic, scientific and
technological competitiveness,” said Janet Napolitano, Secretary of
Homeland Security. “International students and exchange visitors bring
invaluable contributions to our nation, and this helps empower the next
generation of international entrepreneurs, right here in America.”

The list of designated STEM degree programs has been expanded to include
such fields as pharmaceutical sciences, econometrics and quantitative
economics to help the U.S. bring in and recruit the best international
students to the country.

Categories
Updates

New Interim Final Rule Further Clarifies Requirements of Summer Work Travel Visa Program

Share this:

On April 26, 2011, the Department of State (DOS) published an interim
final rule to amend the requirements of the Summer Work Travel category
of the Exchange Visitor visa program. DOS has now published a second
interim final rule, in which it expands upon and provides guidance on
additional changes, as well as strengthens parts of the regulations
aimed at protecting the health, safety and welfare of program
participants and to reinforce cultural exchange components of the visa
program.

This new rule, which took effect on May 11, 2012 but will be delayed
until November 1, 2012, further supports the cultural components of the
Summer Work Travel category. It describes types of job placements that
are appropriate and expands the list of jobs prohibited under the
program. Written comments will be accepted from the public for 60 day
from the date of the notice’s publication in the Federal Register.

Categories
Updates

Latest Updates on FY 2012 H-1B Visa Availability May 4

Share this:

On May 4, 2012, USCIS posted an update regarding the amount of applications received for standard cap-subject and master’s exemption H-1B visas for Fiscal Year 2013. According to USCIS, a total of 13,700 H-1B Master’s Exemption visas have been filed, and 32,500 standard cap visas have been filed. Each fiscal year, a total of 20,000 master’s exempt H-1B visas are available; up to 65,000 standard cap visas are available.

USCIS began accepting petitions for H-1B visas for Fiscal Year 2013 (starting on October 1, 2012) on April 2, 2012. Petitions may be filed no more than six months in advance of the requested start date. Please note that up to 6,800 visas from the 65,000 cap-subject visas are set aside each fiscal year for the H-1B1 program. 

Categories
Global Pinoy

Seeking Spousal Support from the U.S. Citizen Sponsor

Share this:

Financial support may be one of the crucial issues that arise when there is a breakdown of marital relationship between a U.S. citizen and a petitioned spouse. This is usually expected when the petitioned spouse is unemployed and has no other means of support. Consider the following case of Maria who sought spousal support from her sponsor.

Maria entered the United States on a fiancé visa. Her petitioner, Peter, married her upon her arrival in the United States and executed an I-864 or an Affidavit of Support as part of the application for green card of Maria. The spouses lived for one year and thereafter separated and filed for divorce.

Instead of seeking spousal support through the state family court, Maria was advised by her lawyer to file in federal court where she stands a better chance of being awarded spousal support. Maria’s legal counsel informed her that Peter owes her money under the affidavit of support he signed. Hence, he filed a civil lawsuit for enforcement of contract. The district court ruled in favor of Maria and considered the affidavit of support as a contract. Peter was ordered to pay spousal support as part of his obligation when he petitioned Maria for the green card. He was obligated to pay his spouse an amount equivalent to 125 percent of the ‘poverty income level’.

Enforceable Affidavits of Support

Those who are petitioning relatives for U.S. immigrant visas are required by law to execute affidavits of support before visas may be issued. These affidavits are submitted to assure the U.S. government that the petitioned relative will not be a public charge or that they do not apply for government assistance or welfare upon arrival in the United States.

While these documents are termed as “affidavits”, they are in fact enforceable contracts. The petitioner agreed by signing the affidavit to provide support to maintain the sponsored alien at an annual income not less than 125 percent of the Federal poverty line during the period in which the affidavit is enforceable. Aside from the government agencies, the sponsored immigrant may sue the U.S. citizen sponsor if he does not provide the support as required by law. This is what happened in the case of Stump v Stump, an Indiana Northern District court case where the U.S. citizen petitioner was ordered to pay spousal support based on the affidavit of support that he signed on behalf of his petitioned spouse.

Limits of Enforceability

The affidavit may only be enforced while it is in effect. The petitioner is no longer liable in the following cases: (1) when the sponsored spouse becomes a naturalized U.S. citizen; (2) sponsored spouse earned enough income in 40 qualifying quarters under the social security law; (3) either the sponsor or the sponsored spouse dies; or (4) sponsored spouse abandons her lawful permanent resident status and departs the United States.

Divorce or separation from the sponsored spouse does not terminate enforceability of the affidavit of support.

The civil case for enforcement is filed with the appropriate district court and the nature of the case may be breach of contract or specific performance of the contract.

Poverty Guidelines

In executing affidavits of support the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service provides information on what level of income must be maintained by the petitioner for purposes of petitioning a relative. This level of income is based on the poverty guidelines released yearly by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  

Generally, a spouse seeking financial support based on the Affidavit of Support is awarded an amount equivalent to one household. This may amount to approximately $11,170 per year. This is not an absolute figure and the court may modify the exact amount to be paid by the sponsor.

Avoiding Bitter Separations

There are not too many sponsored divorced spouses filing for enforcement of affidavits of support. Many still desist from taking this route, as they feel beholden to their petitioners who they recognize as their genuine sponsors and who provided them with the opportunity to immigrate to the United States. Yet there are disgruntled ex-spouses who opt to file for financial support.

For bitter separations or divorce and for those who decide to file a case against the sponsoring spouse, note that there are possible defenses that may be raised to win their case against the sponsored spouse. One of these is the proving fraud on the part of the sponsored spouse by showing that the marriage was used simply for immigration benefits.

To avoid these civil lawsuits, it would be best for separating spouses to enter into amicable settlement agreements in regards to the terms of separation and spousal support. Or to be proactive about it, to consider drafting agreements where the sponsored spouse waives any future claims against the petitioner similar to pre-nuptial agreements.

(Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 887 7177 or 721 1963)