Categories
Global Pinoy

Co-habiting Partners of Long Time Nonimmigrants May Be Eligible for B2 Visas

Share this:

Spouses of nonimmigrant visa holder are usually granted derivative status and are afforded derivative visas to be with their spouse abroad. A legal relationship must be established to be able to show eligibility for a derivative visa. For those who have been living together without the benefit of marriage, there is still an existing regulation that will allow them to be with their partners during a temporary trip abroad.

Ruel and Maria have been living together for 10 years. They are not married but they have 2 children from their relationship: a 5-year-old son and a 7-year old daughter. For the past seven years, Ruel has been working as a Product Manager for a manufacturing company that is a subsidiary of a large multinational US-based company.

As a result of his exemplary work as Product Manager, he is being promoted to manage a small team in the U.S.  He would like to bring Maria and their two children with him.

The US company files a petition for Ruel as an intracompany manager. Ruel applies for his L1A visa at the US Embassy in Manila and his two minor children are allowed to accompany him as his dependents with their own L2 nonimmigrant visas. But what about Maria?

Common Law Spouses

For those living together without the benefit of marriage and who can document their lengthy relationship, the B2 classification will be an appropriate visa to temporarily accompany their partners abroad. Note that this rule applies only to those who are traveling as temporary workers, investors, students and diplomats posted in the United States.  It does not apply to common law spouses of lawful permanent residents and U.S. citizens.

Derivative status is generally for those partners who are married. It is legally impossible to apply for H4, L2, E2 and F2 for those who are common law partners. Considering that there is no derivative status, the B2 visa is an available visa as long as eligibility requirements are met.

Because Maria is not his spouse, she cannot qualify for an L2 nonimmigrant visa as his dependent. However, because she has been cohabiting with Ruel and she is the mother of their two children, she may qualify for a B2 nonimmigrant visa as Ruel’s domestic partner.
Temporarariness

The principal non-immigrant visa holder must still prove the temporary nature of the activity in the United States. For instance, in the case of Ruel, he should show that he would return to Manila after a brief stay abroad. The same with other nonimmigrants such as the H1B visa holders, E2 investors, L1 intracompany transferee or the F1 student visa holders.

The fact that the nonimmigrant visa holder will stay in the United States for more than one year is not the point of reference. It is proving the temporary nature of the visa of the principal that really matters.

Extensions of Stay

Usually, nonimmigrant workers or students are granted more than a year of visa availability. For the cohabiting partner, he will usually be granted an initial one year of B2 visa stay in the United States and then he can apply for extensions in increments of six months until such time that her partner returns to the Philippines after accomplishing the intended activity.

Same Sex Partners

Cohabiting partners include both the opposite as well as same sex partners. This was the interpretation made more than a decade ago by then former Secretary of State Colin Powell in his July 1, 2001 Cable to posts. Referring to the cohabiting partners’ B2 visa, he emphasized long-term relationships and is true for both opposite and same sex partners.

Although petitioning spouses in same-sex marriages are not recognized, this existing policy of allowing B2 visas for same sex partners of nonimmigrant visa holders appears to be an exemption.

Viable Relationship

Those who are granted the B2 visas to accompany their domestic partners must prove that the relationship is genuine and has existed for a long time. There should be proof of the viability of the relationship such as statements of joint finances, lease or deed of sale of their home, partnership agreements, if available, etc.

Since the visa that will be made available is the B2 visa, the cohabiting partner seeking this classification must still show that he has strong ties to the Philippines. This means that he/she should show that he/she has a home to return to after a brief stay abroad. A long-term relationship will be a critical factor.

If, however, the principal applicant has existing relationship with a legal spouse but maintains a live-in partner, the latter may not be eligible for the B2 visa. Just like an applicant for a visitor’s visa, the standards for eligibility of a domestic partner are high.

(Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 721 1963 or 887 7177)

Categories
Updates

New Ombudsman Program to Help H-2A Applicants and Advocacy Groups

Share this:

The Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) has established a new
Ombudsman Program to help strengthen the H-2A Temporary Agricultural
program. This new Ombudsman Program aims to support fair resolutions to
concerns that show up in the H-2A program community. The Ombudsman
Program will conduct independent, impartial inquiries into issues
connected to the program. The Ombudsman Program will identify areas
where agricultural workers and advocacy organizations are concerned with
how the OFLC functions and will provide recommendations for continual
improvement of the program.

The Ombudsman Program is a free service and may be of help to people
facing issues caused by mistakes, errors or delays in the processing of
their H-2A application. The program does not provide legal services and
is not a way to obtain assistance with completing your H-2A application.

Categories
Updates

Global Entry Program Expands to Four Additional Airports

Share this:

Customs and Border Protection has announced the expansion of their
Global Entry program. The program will be expanded to include four
additional airports throughout the month of March: Minneapolis – St.
Paul International Airport, Minneapolis, Minn. (03/5); Charlotte Douglas
International Airport, Charlotte, N. C. (03/12); Denver International
Airport, Denver, Colo. (03/19); and Phoenix Sky Harbor International
Airport, Phoenix, Ariz. (03/26). This expansion is connected to recent
initiatives to increase travel and tourism in the U.S., as well as
encourage job creation. Part of President Obama’s initiative,
established through Executive Order, included making the Global Entry
pilot program a permanent program.

Global Entry is now available in 24 airports in the U.S. and gives
pre-approved members access to a streamlined and automated way to avoid
the tedious nature of regular passport processing lines. Wait times for
people utilizing the program are reduced by over 70 percent; more than ¾
of travelers that use the Global Entry program are processed in under
five minutes.

Categories
Immigration Round Table

DUI Conviction In Itself Is Not a Crime of Moral Turpitude

Share this:

Dear Atty. Lou,

I petitioned my husband for a green card last year. Two months ago, he was charged with Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol. He has a hearing soon and I am afraid that he will be deported if gets convicted. I am pregnant right now and I cannot afford to lose him.

Josephine

Dear Josephine,

Under current law, an individual who is charged with a crime of moral turpitude within five years from the time of his admission to the United States may be removed or subject to deportation. In determining whether the offense charged is a crime of moral turpitude, the specific statute defining the crime is analyzed whether or not it has the element of “knowledge”.

In one case decided by the Board of Immigration Appeals, the conviction was for an aggravated DUI, and reviewing the statute in the State where it was committed, it was determined that the statute required a showing that the defendant drove under the influence, knowing that his driver’s license has been suspended, cancelled, revoked or refused. Here, the DUI is a ground for removal. But note in another case that was also decided by the Board, it also found simple DUI as not morally reprehensible because it was a regulatory offense that required no knowledge or culpable mental state, hence, may not be a ground for deportation.

It is difficult to determine whether your spouse’s case will result in deportation. If it is a case of simple DUI, then it should not be a serious concern for you. There is one controversial bill pending in Congress now and which was introduced in January 2012 that might adversely affect individuals who are without lawful status or non-U.S. citizens charged with Driving Under the Influence. This is called the Scott Gardner Act or the H.R. 3808 where the local police may be authorized to detain non-immigrants who are unlawfully residing in the United States and are caught driving under the influence of alcohol. The state or local enforcement officer may verify the individual’s status and take into custody for federal transfer an individual who is unlawfully in the United States.

This bill is currently being considered and hopefully it will not be passed into law. Just like the “secure communities” the states and localities will be forced to engage in immigration enforcement. The police officers enforcing this law will foster abuse and racial profiling which will result in the distrust of local law enforcement.

Since your husband was admitted as a green card for two years, it will be better that he should be more careful next time and avoid trouble with the law to avoid harsh immigration consequences.

I hope this information is helpful.

Atty. Lou

(Lourdes Santos Tancinco Esq .is a partner at the Tancinco Law Offices, a Professional Law Corp. Her office is located at One Hallidie Plaza, Suite 818, San Francisco CA 94102 and may be reached at 415 397 0808 or at 1 888 930 0808, email at law@tancinco.com. The content provided in this column is solely for informational purposes only and do not create a lawyer-client relationship. It should not be relied as legal advice. This column does not disclose any confidential or classified information acquired in her capacity as legal counsel. Consult with an attorney before deciding on a course of action. You may submit questions to law@tancinco.com).

Categories
Updates

DOL Amends H-2B Regulations; Schedules Informational Webinars to Explain

Share this:

On February 21, 2012, the Department of Labor published a final rule
that amends certain H-2B regulations. The rule changes the process by
which certification of temporary employment of non-agricultural
nonimmigrant workers. This rule additionally creates regulations that
provide enhanced enforcement of employers that fail to meet their
obligations. Finally, changes have been made to Form ETA 9142, the
Application for Temporary Employment Certification. This final rule will
become effective on April 23, 2012.

In order to ensure public understanding of these substantial changes to
the H-2B nonimmigrant program, the Department of Labor is holding a
series of webinars and a public briefing, in which they will educate
stakeholders, program users and others of the changes to the H-2B
program. The sessions will take place in March and early April. More
information can be found at the Department of Labor website.