Categories
Updates

New Report Details Reasons Why Unauthorized Immigrants Stay in U.S. Despite Restrictive State and Local Laws

Share this:

According to a new report, state- and local-based immigration
enforcement laws are not leading to unauthorized immigrants leaving the
United States. Instead, the report notes, the laws are simply driving
such immigrants from one area to another, rather than from the United
States. The report goes on to report that these regulations additionally
lead to isolate unauthorized immigrants from the communities in which
they live and from local law enforcement, due to fear of retribution or
punishment for their immigrant status.

The report, which was published by the Center for American Progress,
delineates the main reasons that undocumented immigrants remain in the
United States. According to the report authors, most undocumented
immigrants have been in the U.S. for ten years or more and live in
family units with children. They are well settled in the U.S.; this,
they believe, is where they are making their lives. Additionally, the
cost to return home is too expensive and the reasons for initially
immigrating to the U.S. – a lack of economic opportunity in their home
country – further strengthen these undocumented immigrants’ resolve to
remain in the U .S., even in the face of ever-restrictive immigration
regulations.

Categories
Updates

USCIS Provides Updated Number of Cap-subject H-2B Visas Approved for Fiscal Year 2012

Share this:

USCIS has published an update of the number of cap-subject H-2B visas approved for the first and second half of Fiscal Year 2012. According to USCIS, a total of 29,779 beneficiaries have been approved for the first half of Fiscal year 2012, with 6,416 beneficiaries pending. 7,030 beneficiaries have been approved for the second half of Fiscal Year 2012, with 2,007 beneficiaries pending. These numbers were last updated on February 17, 2012.

Congressionally-based legislation limits the amount of H-2B visas provided per fiscal year to a total of 66,000, with 33,000 allocated for employment for the first half of the fiscal year and 33,000 allocated for employment for the second half of the fiscal year. Unused numbers from the first half of the fiscal year are made available for use by employers seeking H-2B workers during the second half of the year. These numbers do not, however, carry over from one fiscal year to another. 

Categories
Updates

USCIS Reminds Applicants that the I-601 Provisional Waiver Is Not in Effect

Share this:

USCIS is currently investigating the potential of making changes that would allow some immediate relatives of U.S. citizens to receive a provisional waiver of the unlawful presence bars before leaving the U.S. This procedural change would apply to spouses, children or parents of U.S. citizens who are able to demonstrate extreme hardship.

USCIS reminds applicants that these procedures are not yet in effect; they will not be available to potential applicants until a final rule is published in the Federal Register that specifies the specific effective date. USCIS is currently planning to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking sometime in the next few months. An open comment period will then be activated, in which the public can comment on the proposed rulemaking. Please note that any applications requesting this new process will be rejected and the application package and related fees will be returned to the applicant.

Categories
Global Pinoy

Inter-Country Adoption: Giving Permanent Homes Abroad for Abandoned Children

Share this:

Many immigrants have indicated their desire to adopt either a child who is a relative or an orphan. If the adoptee is a relative he may be classified as an immediate relative child. For this type of relative child adoption, immigration law requires two years of legal and physical custody requirement from the adoptive parent before an immigrant visa is issued to the child. Prospective adoptive parents who are not able to meet the two years physical presence requirement may want to consider adopting a child under the inter-country adoption if they meet the eligibility requirements.

Inter-Country Adoption

Both the Philippines and the United States are signatories to the May 29, 1993 Hague Adoption Convention on the Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect to Inter-Country Adoption (Hague Adoption Convention). While the United States signed this treaty in 1994, it took effect for the United States only on April 1, 2008.
    
Central authorities are created for each country signatory to the Hague Adoption Convention. The United States Department of State and the Philippines Inter-Country Adoption Board (ICAB) serve as central authorities for inter-country adoptions.

Different Rules Apply

Prior to 2008, identification and adoption of the orphan child are the first steps toward obtaining an immigrant visa for the orphan or abandoned child. With the Hague Convention or post April 2008, the rules changed. Adopting the child or obtaining legal custody is now the last step. If for any reason the adoption was done first prior to filing the immigration petition, the adoption must be rescinded and the petitioning adoptive parent must begin the process of inter-country adoption again. Orphan adoptions prior to 2008 are not covered by the Hague Adoption Convention and are not to be rescinded.

The Department of State emphasizes that the convention procedures “front load” the immigration process.  The eligibility of the child or that of the adoptive parent must be determined first before an immigrant visa is issued and adoption petition is filed and the decree of adoption obtained. This is only done through a Hague accredited agency.

Caveats

Except for relative adoptions, the adoptive parent may not initially choose the child to be adopted and there is a strict prohibition not to contact the child.

When a prospective adoptive parent makes a decision to adopt, they should be warned not to go directly to ICAB-Philippines. Neither should the prospective parent contact an orphanage or adoption agency in the Philippines.

The Process

The sequence of steps to be taken is critical in the adoption and immigration process. A prospective adoptive parent should first contact a Hague accredited agency in the United States, which is also a recognized agency of ICAB-Philippines. The prospective adoptive parent from this recognized agency must obtain a home study report. Thereafter a USCIS Form I-800A is filed with the USCIS Chicago Lockbox address.

As soon as the I-800A is approved, a copy of the approval notice is sent to the ICAB who will then refer an eligible child for adoption. The prospective parent will decide from there whether to accept the child. Another form I-800 is filed if the prospective parent accepts the ICAB referral. If approved, the U.S. Consular officer notifies the ICAB with an Article 5 Letter that the prospective adoptive parent may proceed to obtain an adoption or custody decree. As soon as the Article 5 letter is released, ICAB will issue a temporary legal custody in accordance with the Hague Adoption Convention. This legal custody document and all other supporting documents will be the basis for the issuance of an IH-3 or IH-4 immigrant visa. When the child is issued the visa, the adoption can be completed in the United States.

Number of Visas Issued to Adopted Children

In 2011, the U.S. Department of State reported that there were 9,300 immigrant visas issued to children adopted by U.S. citizen parents. Of these numbers, 2,700 were processed under the Hague Convention. Only 230 adopted children from the Philippines were issued visas compared to 2,589 from China and 1,727 from Ethiopia.

Despite the number of children available for adoption and the fact that there are a significant number of Filipino American prospective parents interested in adopting children of their own identity and culture, only a few Filipino adoptees are issued visas yearly. The seemingly complex process is usually what bars them from initiating the process. The complication of obtaining a U.S. immigrant visa after much expense in undergoing the adoption process may be softened by being aware of the “front loaded” process under the Hague Adoption Convention.

Atty Bernadette Abejo, Executive Director of ICAB, in a message recently sent through GMA Pinoy TV program’s Pusong Pinoy Sa Amerika, encourages prospective adoptive parents who are Filipino Americans to do it the right and legal way. The adoption process under the Hague Adoption Convention establishes a way of providing much-needed permanent homes abroad for many of our orphan or abandoned children.

(Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 721 1963 or 887 7177 )
 

Categories
Updates

Self Check Program for Employment Eligibility Verification Now Available Nationwide

Share this:

USCIS announced this month that its Self Check service will now be
available nationwide. Self Check, a free online service of E-Verify,
allows workers to check their own employment eligibility status. The
service is now available in all 50 states as well as Washington, DC,
Guam, Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands and the Commonwealth of
Northern Mariana Islands.

“We are pleased to complete, ahead of schedule, our expansion of this
important tool for employees,” said Alejandro Mayorkas, Director, USCIS.
“Since our initial launch in March, approximately 67,000 people have
used Self Check and we anticipate that participation will dramatically
increase with service now available to individuals across the country.”

Self Check was developed by the Department of Homeland Security, in
partnership with the Social Security Administration. Individuals can
check their own employment eligibility status online at
http://www.uscis.gov/selfcheck and can obtain guidance on how to correct
their records, if mistaken. The service is offered directly to workers
and is available in both English and Spanish.

Categories
Updates

US Embassy in London Urges Applicants to Apply for Visas Now for Summer Travel

Share this:

The US Embassy in London, UK, has commented that visa services at that
location will be limited during July and August 2012 for all
nonimmigrant visa categories. This is due to the Olympics taking place
in London during that time. Applicants are encouraged to apply for visas
during the spring and early summer for a stronger possibility of an
appointment; availability of appointments cannot be guaranteed during
July and August. The Embassy has opened up its appointment calendar
through the end of June to facilitate this.

Please note that travelers who plan on entering the United States
without a visa under the Visa Waiver Program (by air or sea) who do not
have travel authorization approval under the Electronic System for
Travel Authorization are urged to register now to travel during the
summer. If registration is denied, these travelers will be required to
obtain visas.

Categories
Updates

Department of Labor to Publish Final Rule Regarding H-2B Worker Program

Share this:

The Department of Labor (DOL) will publish its final rule regarding the
non-agricultural employment of H-2B nonimmigrants on February 22, 2012.
In this final rule, DOL will amend its regulations regarding the
certification of employment of nonimmigrants working in temporary or
seasonal non-agricultural positions in the United States, as well as the
enforcement of the obligations of employers of these nonimmigrant
workers.

The final rule amends the process by which employers obtain temporary
labor certifications from DOL for use in petitioning the Department of
Homeland Security for nonimmigrant H-2B workers. In addition, it
improves the levels of protections for both U.S. and nonimmigrant
workers under the H-2B program. This rule will be effective 60 days
after its publication in the Federal Register.

Categories
Updates

DHS and TSA to Expand Pre-Screening Program for Airline Travelers

Share this:

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) today announced that they will be expanding the TSA Prev™ program, a pres-screening program, to additional airports across the U.S. The program has initially been piloted in seven locations. To date, over 336,000 passengers have been screened through TSA Prev™ lanes, enabling TSA to focus on passengers the agency knows less about, while enabling a more expedited screening process for travelers who provide information about themselves prior to flying.

“TSA Prev™ moves us closer to our goal of delivering the most effective and efficient screening by recognizing that most passengers do not pose a threat to security,” said John S. Pistole, TSA Administrator. “We are pleased to expand this important effort, in collaboration with our airline and airport partners, as we move away from a one-size-fits-all approach to a more intelligence-driven, risk-based transportation security system.”

The program currently operates with American Airlines at airports in Dallas, Miami, Las Vegas, Minneapolis and Los Angeles, and with Delta Air Lines at airports in Atlanta, Detroit, Las Vegas, and Minneapolis. US Airways, United Airlines and Alaska Airlines will all begin participating in the program later this year.

Through 2012, the program will be expanded to include the following airport locations:

  • Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport (BWI)
  • Boston Logan International Airport (BOS)
  • Charlotte Douglas International Airport (CLT)
  • Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport (CVG)
  • Denver International Airport (DEN)
  • Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport (FLL)
  • George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH)
  • Honolulu International Airport (HNL)
  • Indianapolis International Airport (IND)
  • John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK)
  • LaGuardia Airport (LGA)
  • Lambert-St. Louis International Airport (STL)
  • Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport (MSY)
  • Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport (SJU)
  • Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR)
  • O’Hare International Airport (ORD)
  • Orlando International Airport (MCO)
  • Philadelphia International Airport (PHL)
  • Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX)
  • Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT)
  • Portland International Airport (PDX)
  • Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA)
  • Salt Lake City International Airport (SLC)
  • San Francisco International Airport (SFO)
  • Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA)
  • Tampa International Airport (TPA)
  • Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport (ANC) 
Categories
Global Pinoy

Travelers Legal Obligation to Declare Currency is Simply a Reporting Requirement

Share this:

The filing of a federal criminal case against Marissa Lapid, the spouse of Senator Lito Lapid, is not an isolated case. There are quite a few Filipino travelers leaving or entering the United States who found themselves subjected to penalties of forfeiture for failure to report monetary negotiable instruments or currencies. Not all were criminally prosecuted. Most of them were able to have their money returned after paying minimal penalties.

Travelers may avoid the severe penalties imposed by federal law by being aware of this reporting requirement and complying accordingly. There are also innocent traveling immigrants like the case of the Filipino senior citizens who had to experience the consequence of failure to report the currencies during their travel to the United States.

Abigail, a U.S. citizen, petitioned her parents, Rosa and Francisco, for an immigrant visa. Both of them are now in their senior years, Rosa is 67 years old while Francisco is 75 years old.

When the couple received their immigrant visas, they were excited to travel and live the rest of their lives in the United States. They withdrew money from their bank account in the amount of $25,000 to bring with them during their trip. Last year, they traveled to the United States and entered through the Los Angeles International Airport. In their customs declaration Form 4790 they failed to write that they were in possession of more than $10,000. Upon being questioned extensively by the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) inspector, Rosa initially denied carrying $25,000. At that moment, their luggage and hand carry bags were searched and the $25,000 was found. The CBP inspector forfeited all their money. Rosa was crying and insisted the return of their money, as she was not aware of the need to declare the money. Francisco was likewise upset and was arguing with the CBP inspector. He asserted the importance of having the money returned to them as they will start a new life in the United States with her daughter.

A few weeks after the incident, Abigail communicated with the CBP and sought to have the money returned to her parents. She argued that her parents were not aware of the requirement, had difficulty communicating in the English language and asked for compassion considering that the money were her parents’ life savings. Abigail filled up a Petition for the return of the money after her parents received their seizure notice letter. After going through the process, Abigail was able to get most of the money back with minimal penalty paid to the government. No criminal charges were filed.

Reporting Requirement

The U.S. law requires declaration of monetary instruments of more than $10,000 when traveling to and from the United States. This includes traveler’s checks, cash, gold coins, negotiable checks, money order, promissory notes and securities or stocks. Negotiable checks include those that may be cashed by the bearer including those that are payable to someone other than the bearer and are endorsed without restrictions. Credit cards with credit lines of over $10,000 are not subject reporting requirements.

For those entering the United States, a declaration form is distributed to all passengers on board the aircraft where the traveler must declare items they are required to report. For negotiable instruments meaning currency or endorsed checks valued at $10,000 or more, a declaration form FinCEN 105 or Currency and Monetary Instrument Report must be filled up and submitted also to the Customs and Border Protection. This may be accomplished during the secondary inspection. This form may be downloaded from the Internet or a CBP officer may provide it to the traveler if requested.

No money is going to be paid to the CBP after declaration. Information on the FinCEN 105 is then forwarded by the CBP to the Internal Revenue Service for determination on whether the money is subject to taxation.

Return of the Forfeited Currencies

In order for the money to be seized, there has to be evidence that the person had knowledge of the reporting requirement and knowingly failed to report it. There are legal ways to get the forfeited money back from the CBP . This will require proof of legitimate source of the money and the proof of the legitimate intended use of the money. A petition may be filed as soon as a formal seizure notice letter is issued by the CBP.

If the legitimate source and legitimate intended use may not be proven, then penalties may be imposed on the traveler. A criminal case may be filed under federal law that prohibits bulk cash smuggling under 31 U.S. Code Section 5332. Once the criminal case is filed, the government must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the traveler ‘knowingly’ violated the reporting requirement. If the government prevails, penalties of imprisonment or civil penalties may be imposed.

Other Options

It is indeed an expensive mistake not to declare currencies of over $10,000 to the CBP and definitely more serious to hide the undeclared monies inside the luggage. To avoid the trouble of having to face forfeiture or criminal charges, one should not hesitate to declare currencies of over $10,000 especially if the money is from a legitimate source. In the alternative, it may be best that a traveling immigrant or visitor wire the money to a reputable bank or a trustee. If there is legitimate forfeiture, the traveler must take diligent step to follow through with the case instead of waiting for a criminal complaint to be served at the unexpected moment.

(Tancinco may be reached at  law@tancinco.com or at 8877177 or 721 1963)