Categories
Updates

Department of Labor Proposes to Move Up Effective Date for New H-2B Prevailing Wage Rule

Share this:

In the latest issue of the Federal Register, the Department of Labor
(DOL) is proposing to amend the effective date of Wage Methodology for
the H-2B visa program. The Wage Rule (a final rule, published in January
of this year), revises the methodology by which DOL calculates
prevailing wages to be paid to H-2B visa holders and US workers
recruited for positions related to the H-2B program. The effective date
of the original final rule was January 1, 2012.

After a court case in which plaintiffs argued that the 2012 date
was an arbitrary date, DOL revised the implementation date of the Wage
Rule to take effect 60 days from the publication of a final rule; this
anticipated publication date is now on or about August 1, 2011, with the
effective date being on or about October 1, 2011. Comments are
currently being accepted regarding this implementation date change.

Categories
Global Pinoy

Should the Filipino Pulitzer Prize Winner Be Deported?

Share this:

“I’m done running. I’m exhausted. I don’t want that life (of an undocumented) anymore.” This is the outburst of Jose Antonio Vargas in his lengthy confession entitled ‘Life as an Undocumented Immigrant” published with the New York Times on June 22, 2011.

Pulitzer prize winner Jose Vargas admitted in his article that he is an undocumented immigrant since he was 12 years old.  After 18 years, he courageously admitted not only his real status as an undocumented but also how he entered the US and engaged in varying fraudulent schemes.

Jose committed the following fraud and misrepresentations. First, a “cayote” smuggled him into the United States using a passport and a visa, which did not belong to him. His mother introduced him to a man who he addressed as “uncle” and who accompanied him to the United States.  Upon arrival in the United States, his uncle disappeared with his passport. His grandparents who are both US citizens took physical custody of him.

Second, as Jose was growing up he used a fraudulent “green card” as proof of his immigration status.

Third, Jose used a fake student visa stamped on his Philippine passport, which he used to obtain a genuine social security number.

Fourth, Jose claimed US citizenship on his applications for employment.

Not an Ordinary Undocumented Youth

While varying schemes were used, Jose should not be held accountable for the errors of judgment of his mother and grandfather. As a child, he was an innocent victim of the fraud. He never had any participation in the decision to come to the U.S. as an undocumented.  What happened to Jose remains true to tens of thousands of minors who are taken to the U.S. by parents who decide to stay in the U.S. even after their authorized stay expires. These are parents who either never bother to take steps to legalize the status of their children or simply have no legal options to legalize.

To provide for a better future for the children is oftentimes the parents’ reason for their decision to take their children to the U.S. and allow their visas to expire.  But the reverse happens to most of these children when they finish their education.

Usually, the harsh reality of being a “TNT” (Tago ng Tago, undocumented) manifests before they graduate from high school. When they begin their path to independence, they usually obtain driver licenses. This is what happened to Jose. At age 16, he went to the Department of Motor Vehicles to obtain a license just to be told that he possesses a fake green card. As an intelligent child, Jose initially was concerned but did not stop him from achieving his dream.

With his strong determination to succeed coupled with the support of his family and network of friends, he was able to finish college at the San Francisco State University.  He was able to intern and be employed as a reporter for major news publications like the San Francisco Chronicle, Washington Post and Harrington Post. And to top it all, he was also part of the team that received a Pulitzer Prize making him the second Filipino next to Carlos P. Romulo to receive this prestigious award.

After four years in the US, Jose became cognizant of his undocumented status and his subsequent misrepresentations.  But Jose was never himself. He was conflicted as he revealed in his confession – “I knew what I was doing now. I knew it wasn’t right. But what was I supposed to do?”

Jose expresses clearly what he wanted to impart, “ I learned that no amount of professional success would solve my problems or ease the sense of loss and displacement I felt.” Jose and the thousands of undocumented students whose decision to come to the United States was not their own are facing personal dilemmas. They try hard to be part of the mainstream U.S., acting like they are true Americans, devoting their time and energy to education and their professions. In the end, they are still going to be sent back to their true homeland after a removal or the court renders a deportation order.

Should Jose Be Deported?

The facts are clear that Jose is in violation of immigration law and probably criminal law. If his what he said in his confession are true, there is no question that he is deportable under the law. However, he is entitled to due process and has a right to a hearing. He shall be provided an opportunity to present waivers and other relief that may be available to prevent him from being deported.

While there are approximately 11 million undocumented immigrants most of these individuals are not all detrimental to the United States. In fact, the undocumented youth and the generation of Jose are mostly brilliant and hardworking. They represent the educated workforce needed for the US to compete in a global economy. They are pursuing the American dream immersing themselves into a nation that unfortunately undervalues their worth.

Instead of penalizing individuals like Jose, the Obama Administration should make good his promise of a comprehensive immigration reform law which includes the DREAM Act (Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors) that shall provide a pathway to citizenship to undocumented youth .

Jose Vargas is a courageous man. It did not matter anymore to him that he is a Pulitzer Prize winner and a very successful journalist. He is remorseful and ready for the consequences of his actions. Having publicly revealed his story, he did not wish solely to attain legalization for himself. Jose in his confession gave a human story and a voice to tens of thousands of undocumented youth who all deserve a second chance. He should not be deported.

(Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 02 887 7177 or 02 721 1962)

Categories
Updates

Georgia Anti-immigrant Law Faces Scrutiny

Share this:

In a recent hearing led by U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Thrash,
Georgia state attorney Devon Orland was pushed hard to defend the
state’s restrictive and controversial immigration enforcement
regulations. In the hearing, parts of which were published by the
Atlanta Journal Constitution, Thrash questioned the validity and
complexity of the legislation, and was concerned that each district
would translate and implement its own version of the enforcement law.
Below is part of the transcript of Judge Thrash’s comments and
perception of the state’s laws:

“You may have one county that says, okay, we don’t like all these
Hispanic children in our schools so we are going to make it really tough
on anybody that we suspect could be in this country illegally, and we
are going to arrest them and detain them until they leave our county –
except they can come here for two months to pick our Vidalia onions, and
we are not going to bother them then.”

And then we like the people down at the Mexican restaurant, like the
food there, so we are not going to bother the cook. And we are not going
to bother the guy that does the mayor’s yard work. They’re a nice
family, and we are going to leave them alone. But we are going to make
life so difficult for everybody else that they are going to leave –
except the ones we need to pick our crops or do yard work or wash the
dishes in the restaurant.

“I mean, you are not going to have 50 systems of immigration regulation.
In Georgia, you are going to have 159. Every county, every municipality
is going to decide what its immigration policy is going to be under
this law.”

Categories
Updates

New Gallup Poll Shows Americans Slightly Prefer Lower Immigration Rates

Share this:

According to data from a new Gallup poll, Americans continue to show a
slight preference for lower immigration rates. Gallup states that these
perceptions are similar to what was seen last year and remain in line
with poll data on the topic since 2002. Eighteen percent of polled
Americans, however, favored increased immigration, the highest amount of
Americans to state such an opinion since the question was first asked
by pollsters in 1965.

Gallup data also show that Democrats and Independents are divided fairly
equally between favoring decreased rates of immigration and maintaining
the current immigration levels. Republicans presented with a higher
preference for decreased immigration rates, but at a rate less than seen
in recent years.

View more results at: http://bit.ly/k0BsPe.

Categories
Updates

SC Legislature Approves New Immigration Enforcement Bill

Share this:

A new bill that would add two new processes to immigration enforcement
received final approval by the state’s legislative body. The bill would
require all of South Carolina’s police officers to check the immigration
status of their suspects and all South Carolina businesses to check the
immigration status of new hires through the E-Verify online employment
eligibility verification system. The state’s House approved the bill
Tuesday in a 69-43 vote. The bill has now been sent to Governor Nikki
Haley; her sources state that she will sign the bill.

“If Washington refuses to effectively support our law enforcement
officers by enforcing immigration laws, it is left up to the states to
stand up and do what is right,” said State Senator Bobby Harrell (R.,
Charleston). “That is exactly what South Carolina did today by making
sure our officers have the enforcement tools they need during this time
of federal indecision.”

This new bill expands on already existing legislation which, at the
time, was considered one of the country’s toughest immigration laws. The
original bill required all police officers to contact federal
immigration officials if they suspected someone was in the U.S.
illegally.

Categories
Updates

Proposed Bill Would Make E-Verify Mandatory

Share this:

This week, a new bill was introduced in the House of Representatives
that would require all employers to use E-Verify to electronically
verify the immigration status of potential new hires. The new bill, the
Legal Workforce Act (HR 2164) would remove the use of the current
paper-based process, gradually replacing it with the use of E-Verify’s
online technology for employment verification.

“E-Verify is a successful program to help ensure that jobs are reserved
for citizens and legal workers,” said Rep. Lamer Smith (R-TX), the
sponsor of the bill. “Despite record unemployment, seven million people
work in the U.S. illegally. These jobs should go to legal workers.”

While Smith and others do support the proposed bill, it will assuredly
receive criticism from many, including the advocacy group, the Coalition
for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA), who are already
speaking against the bill. Chirla notes a report by the Government
Accountability Office that stated E-Verify has multiple system errors
and is prohibitive to small businesses due to increased costs of use.

Categories
Global Pinoy

Fraud Victim or a Conspirator?

Share this:

There are many Filipinos who are in deportation proceedings before US immigration courts for having committed immigration fraud.  What is astonishing is that many do not even realize the severe consequences of their fraudulent actions.

When faced with a question about the use of a fraudulent or assumed name to enter the United States, there are those who respond in a manner that indicates no remorse in their actions. In these circumstances, one would think twice whether this individual in proceedings is a victim or a conspirator to the fraud.

Tammy recently graduated from college with a degree in Bachelors of Arts in Business Administration. As part of her graduation gift, her auntie introduced her to a travel agent who would be able to assist her in obtaining a visa to visit the US. Tammy’s auntie paid almost 200,000 pesos to this travel agent.  After a few weeks, Tammy was called by the travel agent and was informed to prepare to leave for the US. She was surprised because she did not have her passport yet and neither had she been to the US Embassy to apply for her visa. Still the travel agent, gave the time and date of Tammy’s departure.  She was told that her passport and visa would be given to her at the airport.

Tammy was advised by the Auntie to follow the instructions of the travel agent. At a designated place at the airport, she met the travel agent. Tammy was handed a Philippine passport with a US visa stamp. When Tammy looked closely, she discovered that the passport was not in her name but had her picture. The travel agent said that it was okay for Tammy to travel with that passport even if it is not her name.

Faced with the predicament of whether to proceed with her travel using the fake passport or just abandoning her plan to visit the US, Tammy decided to proceed with using the fake passport. She was able to enter the US and was given six months to stay as a tourist. At the end of the authorized six months, she decided to remain for good in the United States.

Tammy worked as a caregiver and was not questioned about her immigration status by her employer. After working for three years, she met Joel, a U.S. citizen, at her place of work.  Joel and Tammy dated for five months before they finally got married. Tammy gave birth to two wonderful children who are now ages 7 & 9.

A petition for an immigrant visa was filed by Joel for Tammy.  This petition was approved. However, Tammy’s application for the adjustment of her status to become a lawful permanent resident was denied. She was found inadmissible, or not eligible for an immigrant status because she entered the US with a fraudulent visa. An application for waiver was filed so that despite the fraud, she would still be allowed to obtain her immigrant status. The waiver was also denied and now Tammy is facing deportation proceedings.

During her hearing, Tammy related to the judge how she obtained her fraudulent passport. Tammy explained every detail of how she acquired her passport. She said that the travel agent “manufactured” the visa and that she was just a “victim” of fraud. Unfortunately, her response lacked credibility.

At the next hearing, Tammy had a completely different tone when asked about her fraudulent entry to the US. This time she cried and admitted her mistake. She begged for a second chance to have her waiver be considered favorably as her US citizen children and her spouse were everything in the world to her. Fortunately this time, the judge was swayed by her emotional grief and finally granted her a waiver of the fraud that she committed upon entering the US. Judgment was rendered giving her legal permanent resident status.

Extreme Hardship Waiver

An application for waiver of fraud may be filed when an individual has qualifying US relatives who will suffer “extreme” hardship. Qualifying relatives refer to a spouse or parents who are US citizens or green card holders. The court will take into account various factors in determining whether there are favorable factors to grant the waiver.

Considering the high standard imposed in meeting the elements of an approvable waiver, there is an increasing high rate of denial on these waiver applications. While the decision in the illustrated case of Tammy was granted favorably, there are many others similarly situated who are denied because of efforts by the US Department of Homeland Security to curb the use of fraudulent documents.

Not A “Normal” Course

The motivations for going to the United States vary. Unfortunately, there are some who skip the normal process of obtaining visas to the extent of engaging in misrepresentation. Whether one’s reason is to seek better economic opportunities or family unification or just plain avoidance of visa delays, the use of fraudulent documents to enter the United States is never an excuse and is obviously illegal. What is becoming a serious concern is that an applicant for visa may find this scheme a “normal” process without realizing the severity of the consequences of fraud.

False assurances that some unscrupulous “travel agents” give to travel applicants that it is okay to use assumed names and fraudulent travel documents is a cruel deception. One should avoid falling into these types of deceptions lest they be charged as conspirators and face severe consequences.

(Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 887 7177 or 721 1963)

Categories
Updates

ICE to Limit Work Restrictions for Eligible F-1 Students from Libya

Share this:

U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has announced that it
will offer special relief to some F-1 students from Libya who have
experienced severe economic hardships because of the current civil
unrest in Libya. ICE states that this relief will only apply to students
who were lawfully present in the U.S. under F-1 status on February 1,
2011 (when the civil unrest began), and who are enrolled in an
educational institution that his certified by the Student and Exchange
Visitor Program.

Eligible students will be able to obtain employment authorization to
work in the U.S., work an increased number of hours during the school
term and, if needed, reduce their course load while still maintaining
F-1 status.

“We want to ensure that students from Libya, who were here when civil
unrest began, are able to continue their studies without the worry of
financial burdens due to the armed conflict,” said Louis Farrell, SEVIS
director. “The changes announced in this notice will allow eligible
students from Libya to obtain employment authorization so that they can
meet their basic living expenses while continuing to pursue their
education in the United States.”

Categories
Updates

Massachusetts Will be Required to Participate in Secure Communities Program, Federal Officials Say

Share this:

The federal government is going to force the state of Massachusetts to
participate in the Secure Communities program. The Secure Communities
program is a controversial program that tracks the names and
fingerprints of any arrested person through federal criminal and
immigration databases to check their citizenship status. Massachusetts
Governor Patrick Deval had sent a letter to USCIS on June 3 stating the
state would not participate in the program, because only one in four
people deported had been convicted of a serious crime.

Governor Deval’s rejection of Secure Communities follows in the
footsteps of New York and Illinois, who had also chosen not to
participate in the program. However, according to a USCIS
representative, Deval’s rejection of the program will do little to delay
the implementation of Secure Communities in Massachusetts.