Categories
Immigration Round Table

True Love or Romantic Opportunist? Defining Love in Immigration Marriage Cases

Share this:

Many believe that the fastest way to obtain a green card is through marriage to a US citizen. While it may indeed be the “fastest” way to become an immigrant, it is not necessarily the “easiest” route. There are serious legal consequences that result from a finding of marriage fraud.

George entered the US as a nonimmigrant L1 intra-company employee of a multinational company. When the company decided to end its US operation, George found himself in unlawful status. He did not depart the US but worked “under the table”. With his earnings, he continued to have support money sent to his spouse and minor children in the Philippines.

His relationship with his first wife ended when he discovered that an annulment case has been filed against him. His ex-wife decided to live with her lover and left their minor children. The children are now in the custody of George’s parents. George continued to provide financial support to his minor children.

In a school reunion that was held in Los Angeles CA, George met Jennifer who was his sweetheart back in high school. Jennifer was still married at the time they met. George claimed that his feelings for his high school sweetheart were rekindled and courted her again. After some time, Jennifer divorced her husband and married George. Jennifer, who is a US citizen, then filed a petition for George who eventually got his green card.  Jennifer also petitioned for one of George’s children to come to the US. George and Jennifer appeared to be a happy couple until George finally obtained his US citizenship.

As soon as George got his US citizenship, he disappeared and never returned to their home. Jennifer did not have an idea what caused George’s sudden disappearance. George sent an email to Jennifer telling her that he is no longer in love with her and that he decided to go back to the Philippines. Jennifer was shocked with the turn of events and in retrospect realized that he was merely used by George to get his immigration status. Jennifer sought legal advice and was told that it may be difficult and too late to revoke the immigration status of George.

Jennifer presents a very sympathetic case. But what actually transpired in this case that George was able to get away with his seemingly malevolent and opportunist motivations? What standards are used to determine true love from deceitful relationships entered into for purposes of obtaining the green card?

Motivation for the Marriage

A marriage that did not last for a long time does not mean that the marriage is a fraud. There are many factors that immigration officers take into account in deciding validity of these marriages. The standard is based on the intention of the parties at the time of marriage. The subjective intent or desire to marry must be clearly expressed through statements during the interview coupled with objective evidence of joint documents.

The Immigration and Nationality Act and its regulations contain provisions that assist in determining whether the marriage is fraudulent or a sham. A marriage is considered fraudulent when one or both parties enter into the marriage primarily for the purpose of obtaining resident status for the foreign spouse. This means that this immigration benefit should not be the primary motivation for entering into the marriage. The immigration officer will determine whether at the time of marriage, the parties intended to establish a life together.

The parties must be able to show that the purpose of marrying is to live a life together as a couple. Despite expressing this intention, the immigration examiner may be quick to deny a petition if the parties are unable to overcome certain doubts that may arise in their relationship. Most of the time, red flags are raised in nontraditional marriages. USCIS Adjudicators Field Manual enumerates instances of possible marriage sham if the following exist: (1) separate cohabitation; (2) disparity in age; (3) marriage between relatives; (4) no common language; (5) multiple prior marriages and (6) marriages arranged by third parties. When some of these circumstances arise, more substantiating evidence of the validity of the marriage is required.

There is no hard and fast rule in determining what and how much evidence is necessary to prove a valid marriage. Each case has its own circumstance and proving one’s true “love” as a basis for the marriage should come naturally if the marriage is real.

Citizen Accomplice

The penalties for marriage fraud are severe. For the alien spouse, Section 204(c) of the INA bars the approval of any subsequent petition filed on behalf of the immigrant. This bar applies even if subsequent petitions are already valid and real marriages. The US citizen accomplice who knowingly enters into fraud is equally liable under Section 1325(c) of 8 United States Code for imprisonment of 5 years or fine of not more than $250,000.

Opportunist Spouse

When a green card marriage is short lived, it is not unusual to come to the quick conclusion that it was probably a marriage of convenience for the opportunist spouse. In the case of Jennifer above, it is her suspicion and her side of the story that we have heard. We should, however, not be so quick to jump to a conclusion as there are always 2 sides to a separated couple’s story. Jennifer and George cohabited as a couple for 4 years. They both went through the immigration process and were found to have met the standards. If there is indeed proof that would categorically point to fraud, then there are ways of re-opening a case. But certainly not if based merely on an allegation from an abandoned spouse who would naturally be bitter from a failed relationship.

(Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or @ 1800 999 9096)

Categories
Updates

USCIS to Close Ho Chi Minh City Field Office

Share this:

USCIS has announced that it will permanently close its field office in
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam on March 31, 2011. Starting March 25, all
applications and petitions that were previously accepted by the field
office in Ho Chi Minh City may be filed with the US Department of State
consular section in that city. In cases in which it has such
authorization, that consular section will take responsibility for
processing certain cases. The Consular Section will send all other
applications and petitions to the USCIS Field Office in Bangkok,
Thailand for processing.

Learn more about the Ho Chi Minh Field office at
http://hochiminh.usconsulate.gov. Contact the USCIS Bangkok Field
Office by phone at 02-205-5352 (Thailand) or 011-662-205-5352
(International) or email at bkkcis.inquiries@dhs.gov.

Contact the Bangkok Field Office by mail:

Regular Mail
DHS/USCIS Bangkok
c/o American Embassy
Box 12
APO AP 96546

Express Mail
DHS/USCIS
Sindhorn, Tower 2, 15th Floor
130-133 Wireless Rd.
Lumpini Pathumwan
Bangkok Thailand 10330

Categories
Updates

USCIS Proposes New Rule for Management of Cap-Subject H-1B Visas

Share this:

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has proposed to change
regulations regarding the governance of H-1B petitions subject to
annual caps, as well as those for people with U.S. master’s or higher
degrees. The proposed rule would require employers who wish to petition
for H-1B workers that are subject to the annual cap to first file an
electronic registration with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS) during a designated registration period.

Under the
proposed rule, if USCIS believes that the H-1B cap will not be reached
by the first day that such petitions may be filed, USCIS will let all
registered employers know that they may petition for H-1B workers on
behalf of beneficiaries named in the selected registrations. In such an
instance, USCIS will continue to accept and select registrations until
the annual cap is reached. However, if USCIS believes that the H-1B cap
will be reached by the first day that petitions may be filed, USCIS
proposes to close the registration before that date and to, instead,
randomly select a sufficient number of registrations to meet the visas
that are available for that fiscal year.

It is USCIS’s goal,
through this proposed rule, to reduce the administrative burdens and
costs associated with employer submissions of petitions.