Categories
SideBar

Can My Property Be Taken To Pay A Debt?

Share this:

Creditors can run after debtors’ properties to satisfy their unpaid debts. However, many debtors are under the mistaken impression that creditors can just go after their assets or garnish their wages the moment their credits are left unpaid. That is not so.  

In order to attach a property or garnish a debtor’s wages, Creditors must first file a lawsuit in court and win that lawsuit against the debtor. Only after so many months of failed collection efforts, do creditors normally file a collection action in court. You, as the debtor, will then have 30 days to file an Answer in court. Depending on which county the court action is filed, it will then take a few more months before a case can be set for hearing. A judgment, if any, will then have to be issued against the debtor.  Once judgment is issued against a debtor there is another 30 more days to appeal before the judgment becomes final.

Thus, at the very least, debtors will have 6 to 12 months of warning that a judgment against them is coming and their properties taken to pay that judgment. This gives the debtor a lot of time to do something before their property is attached or wages are garnished. As long as debtors do not ignore their problem at the early stages, there is really no reason for their properties to be attached or their wages to be garnished as there is more than enough time to prepare and prevent their properties from being taken.  For example, the debt can be disputed, or, payment arrangements can be made with the creditor, or, bankruptcy protection can be sought in cases where debtor can no longer afford to pay the debts.

There is an exception, however, in cases of secured debts. The vehicle in a car loan, for example, can be taken by the creditor immediately even without a court judgment if a debtor is delinquent. Thus the car can be repossessed by the lender even without going to court.

In cases where the court issues a judgment against the debtor, all may still not be lost as the law still allows a debtor to claim some properties as exempt from execution. When a debtor receives a notice that his property is being attached, the debtor has 10 days to deliver a Claim of Exemption to the Sheriff. The form describes the property and explains why the property cannot be attached. Among others, you can claim exemption for:

– up to $75000 in equity in your home if you are part of a family unit ($50,000 if you are single) and $150,000 if you are 65 or older, disabled or on a low income
– A $2,300 equity in one or more cars
– Up to $6,075 in tools and other items that you need for work
– 75 percent of your salary for the last 30 days of wages that have not yet been paid
– Up to $2,525 each in a bank account in which your social security payments have been directly deposited
– You and your spouse may also claim exemption for household furnishings and clothing that the family needs
– A cemetery plot
– All or part of retirement, disability and health insurance, workers compensation, welfare unemployment, union and other benefits that are needed to support your family.

Thus attachment and garnishment of their properties and wages is not something that needs to happen as long as debtors do not ignore the problem. Debtors in financial trouble just need to be aware of their rights and the available remedies that the law gives to them.

(DISCLAIMER: material presented above is intended for informational purposes only. It is not intended as professional advice and should not be construed as such. Rey Tancinco is a partner at Tancinco Law Offices, a professional corporation with offices in San Francisco, Vallejo, and Manila. The law office website is at: tancinco.weareph.com/old.  Rey Tancinco can be contacted at (800) 999-9096 or (415) 397-0808 or via email at: attyrey@tancinco.com

Categories
Updates

New DHS Rule Extends Employment Authorization for Dependents of Foreign Officials

Share this:

In the August 9 Federal Register, the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) amended regulations regarding employment authorization for
dependents of foreign officials (those classified as A-1, A-2, G-1, G-3
and G-4 nonimmigrants). The new final rule will expand the list of
dependents who are eligible to work in the U.S. from spouses, children
and qualifying sons and daughters of A & G foreign officials to
additional include any foreign family member who is categorized by the
Department of State as qualifying.

This change to regulations will give the Department of State more
flexibility when they are entering into agreements with other nations
and those agreements include provisions to extend employment
authorization to immediate family members of foreign officials.

This rule became effective on August 9, 2010

Categories
Updates

DOS Publishes Final Rule Related to Exchange Visitor Program

Share this:

In the August 11 Federal Register, the Department of State (DOS)
published a final rule related to the Exchange Visitor Program. In June
of 2007, DOS had published an interim final rule that would amend
portions of the Exchange Visitor Program that related to trainees and
interns. The interim rule would remove the distinction between
“non-specialty occupations” and “specialty occupations,” establish a
new internship program and amend the selection criteria for
participation in a training program.

This final rule includes some changes to the interim final rule,
including the permission to use telephone interviews to screen
potential participants for eligibility in a training program, removing
the requirement that sponsors obtain a Dun & Bradstreet report of
companies for whom participants would be placed. The final rule also
clarifies regulations related to verification of Worker’s Compensation
coverage for participants and the use of an Employer Identification
Number (EIN) to find out if a third-party training host organization is
a viable business entity. Additionally, the final rule clarifies that
trainees and interns may repeat training and internship programs, in
certain cases.

This final rule will be effective September 10, 2010

Categories
SideBar

Government Help For Unemployed Homeowners

Share this:

Last month, US congress passed the financial reform package which included a $1 billion emergency mortgage relief program for unemployed homeowners. The money in this program will be made available to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development on October 1.  Under this program, eligible homeowners who are at least 3 months delinquent on their mortgages can get help with up to 12 or 24 months of mortgage payments to a maximum of $50,000 in federal loans.  According to the bill, the assistance can be loans, advances of credit or emergency mortgage relief payments. As this program is rolled out in the next few weeks, our readers can get more details by visiting the website of the US Department of Housing and Urban Development.   

This latest program of the government follows two other federal programs already providing assistance to unemployed homeowners.

The first program started last August 1, where the US Treasury Department offered extra help for unemployed homeowners struggling with their monthly mortgage payments under their Home Affordable Unemployment Program (HAUP).  This unemployment program offers homeowners a forbearance period to temporarily reduce or suspend their monthly mortgage payments while they seek employment. This is a forbearance program, which means that the unpaid amount can be added to the balance or repaid in other ways. The minimum forbearance period is 3 months although the lender may extend it depending on the guidelines.  During the forbearance period, a homeowner’s monthly mortgage payment must be reduced to no more than 31 percent of their gross monthly income. The lender can also decide to temporarily suspend payments in full.  .
Servicers under this program may not initiate foreclosure proceedings while a homeowner is being evaluated for the unemployment program or in the forbearance period.  To qualify, homeowners must not be more than 3 months delinquent and must meet other requirements. To determine if you qualify for the unemployment program, you need to contact your mortgage servicer. You should learn your eligibility within ten days of submitting complete documentation to your servicer.

The second program also involves the US Treasury department providing $2.1 billion to struggling homeowners in the hardest hit states. $1.5 billion was awarded to 5 states in June and will award $600 million later. The California Housing Finance Agency got $700 million from the Hardest Hit fund and will start taking applications by November 1.   This CAL-HFA program involves the following:

(1) Unemployment Mortgage Assistance – CAL-HFA will provide mortgage payment subsidy to unemployed homeowners who are in imminent danger of foreclosure due to short-term financial problems.
(2) Mortgage Reinstatement Assistance Program – CAL-HFA will provide limited financial assistance in the form of funds to reinstate mortgage loans that are in arrears in order to prevent foreclosures.
(3) Principal Reduction Program – provides assistance to homeowners in who have severe negative equity. CAL-HFA will provide matching capital with financial institutions to reduce outstanding principal balances of qualifying homeowners with negative equity.
(4) Transition Assistance Program – provides homeowners with relocation assistance when it is determined that they can no longer afford their home.

With foreclosures and unemployment still a huge problem in the current economy, it is hoped that some of our readers will be made aware of and benefit from the government programs currently available.     
    
(DISCLAIMER: material presented above is intended for informational purposes only. It is not intended as professional advice and should not be construed as such. Rey Tancinco is a partner at Tancinco Law Offices, a professional corporation with offices in San Francisco, Vallejo, and Manila. The law office website is at: tancinco.weareph.com/old.  Rey Tancinco can be contacted at (800) 999-9096 or (415) 397-0808 or via email at: attyrey@tancinco.com
 

Categories
Global Pinoy

Arizona’s Show Me Your Papers Law Suspended

Share this:

A frantic phone call from a Filipino parent was received by our office seeking assistance on how her son may be released from police custody in Arizona. According to the caller, her son was expected to come home from work but was instead incarcerated by police authorities in Arizona. One can easily conclude that the arrest was part of Arizona’s enforcement of its controversial immigration law.  

One day before its actual date of effectivity, Judge Susan Bolton of the US District Court ordered the suspension of specific enforcement provisions of Arizona’s SB 1070 also termed by advocates as the “show me your papers” (SMYP)law.  This law allows Arizona law enforcers to arrest illegal immigrants by virtue of their “illegal” status and force their deportation. The statute provides that an officer may make a warrantless arrest if he or she has probable cause to believe that an individual has committed any public offense that makes the person removable from the United States. SB 1070 also provides that where reasonable suspicion exists that a person is an alien who is unlawfully present in the United States, a reasonable attempt shall be made to determine immigration status and detention is required until the immigration status of the persons is verified.

Challenges to SMYP
    
In response to this Arizona immigration law, several civil rights organizations and individual lawsuits were filed questioning its constitutionality. On July 6, 2010, three federal agencies filed similar lawsuits challenging SMYP in federal court. These agencies are the US Department of Homeland Security, the Department of State and the Department of Justice.

The brief filed by Department of Justice (DOJ) claims that the SMYP law unconstitutionally interferes with federal government’s authority to set and enforce immigration policy. The DOJ argues that the Constitution and federal law do not permit the development of a patchwork of state and local immigration policies throughout the country. This patchwork of policies would seriously disrupt federal immigration enforcement. The federal government is also concerned with the strong possibility of harassment and detention of foreign visitors, legal immigrants and US citizens who cannot readily prove their legal status.

Even certain law enforcement agencies in the State of Arizona, specifically in Tucson and Phoenix, admitted in their declarations that this SMYP law will hamper their ability to effectively police their communities. They are referring to victims or witnesses to crimes who would be less likely to cooperate with police during investigations. Law enforcers in Arizona will also be diverted from solving violent crimes, property crimes and home invasions to attend to immigration law violations which is the sole jurisdiction of the federal government.

Real Solutions

The premise behind the Arizona SMYP law is that the federal government is not taking action to curb illegal immigration. While this may be one of the reasons, the States may not legally pre-empt federal authority over immigration.  If States, like Arizona, are allowed to enact their own immigration laws, then a patchwork of immigration policies enacted by possibly 50 different states would certainly conflict with federal immigration enforcement authority.

The appropriate solution to curb illegal immigration is for the federal government to come up with a comprehensive immigration reform program. This program that must be enacted by US Congress should consist of a path to legalization for the undocumented and an improved legal visa system that meets the needs of business in a global economy and foster family unity.

Filipino TNTs

Filipino immigrants are also looking forward to this comprehensive reform that will fix the broken immigration system. Of the approximately 11 million undocumented immigrants, 270,000 are Filipino nationals. This is according to the study of the US Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics. Philippines is the number five (5) country with the most unauthorized immigrants next to Mexico, El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras. This figure was taken in January 2009. It is still unknown how much the statistics have changed in the last 18 months.

With restrictive immigration policies and a heightened enforcement of immigration laws, there is an increase in the number of Filipino immigrants wanting to return to their homeland and voluntarily departing the United States. The current economic realities facing the immigrants in the US has impacted Filipino workers.
There is an increase in unemployment rates affecting not only those in the health care industry but also in education. There are a number of Filipino registered nurses who are already lawful permanent residents yet find themselves unemployed and forced to accept jobs less than that of a registered nurse. In the East coast, there are Filipino teachers who came in on H1B or J1 visas whose contracts were no longer renewed for the coming school year. They are forced to return to the Philippines at the end of their contract. Despite these occurrences, many Filipino immigrants are still hoping for a comprehensive immigration reform law that will give them a pathway to legalization.

The SMYP law of Arizona was enacted as an anti-immigrant measure that is widely seen as harmful to the immigrant community. This law has, however, brought the immigration issue to the limelight. Hopefully, the Arizona law will be struck down as being unconstitutional. In the meantime, its enactment may be a blessing in disguise as the Obama administration will now be compelled to act on the issue and support immigration reform legislation.

(Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at (02)887 7177)
 

Categories
Updates

Senate Approves Increase to Certain H-1B Application Fees

Share this:

This week, the U.S. Senate approved a new increase to the cost to apply
for an H-1B visa. This increase will help the federal government
recover funds it lost due to a $600 million emergency package used to
improve security along the U.S.-Mexican border.

This fee increase will help pay for 1,000 new border patrol agents and
unmanned aircrafts along the border, and will assist in funding a range
of agencies and prisons. The new measure would increase the cost to
apply for an H-1B visa by $2,000 per applications for companies with
50% or more of their employees under this visa category. The fee
increase will also affect certain L-1 visas.

Categories
Updates

USCIS Transitions Filing Locations for a Number of Forms

Share this:

In order to more effectively and efficiently initially process
applications and fees, USCIS has changed the filing locations of a
number of forms from USCIS Service Centers to USCIS Lockbox facilities.
This centralization of the form intake process enables USCIS to use
technology in place at their Lockbox facilities to enter and process
initial applications.

Filling locations have changed for the following forms:

– I-129F, the Petition for Alien Fiance(e)
– I-130, the Petition for Alien Relative
– I-140, the Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker
– I-526, the Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur
– I-539, the Application To Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status
– I-817, the Application for Family Unity Benefits

Categories
SideBar

Do I Need A Will?

Share this:

A will is a document that gives instructions on how you want certain things to be carried out after your death. A will would name the beneficiaries (spouse, children, family member, friends, charitable organizations, etc.) who will receive your assets after your death. If a person dies without a will, the laws of succession where the decedent lived will govern how the property will be distributed. Dying without a will is known as dying “intestate”. You have no say over who receives your assets and may leave your heirs dealing with the court system to sort out who receives what.

In general though, the laws of succession will leave your property to your spouse and kids but the ratio of distribution may vary from State to State.  If you do not have spouse and children, then property may go to your nearest kin which also varies from State to State. Thus, if one wants to dictate how the property is to be divided among his survivors, then it is necessary to make a will.

A will may be important for some people with young children because a will is the best place to designate the guardian of your minor children.

A will also names an executor who will be tasked carrying out your final wishes. An executor would normally collect and manage the decedent’s assets, pay debts, and, with the court’s approval, distribute the assets to the beneficiaries named in the will. If you want a particular trusted person to carry out your final wishes, then making a will is necessary in order for you to name and designate that person as your executor.

In general, the will only covers assets that are titled in your name at the time of your death. However, not all assets are included. The assets that are not affected by a will includes the following: (1) Life insurance proceeds are paid directly to beneficiaries designated in the insurance policy; (2) retirement plans assets such as 401(K) and IRA are transferred to whomever you designate as beneficiary in the plan documents; (3) assets owned in joint tenancy will pass to the surviving joint tenant upon your death; (4) assets held in Living trusts are transferred to the named beneficiaries in the trust document; (5) Your spouse’s half of the community property still belongs to your spouse and is not affected by your will.

A will can be changed or revoked at any time. It should, in fact, be reviewed periodically as your estate may not be distributed according to your wish if it is not up to date when you die.  You may also establish a new will and, in doing so, revoke your old will. When there are changes in your family such as marriage, divorce, births, deaths then it may be time to review your previously made will to update the changes in your family life. Likewise, it is also necessary to periodically review your existing will when there are significant changes in the value of your assets, or when it is no longer appropriate for your proposed guardian or executor  to act in that capacity.  

For some people, a will may still be useful even if they already have a trust. A trust is a legal document that lets a person put conditions on how assets are distributed after death and it lets them minimize gift and estate taxes. Most trusts, however, deal only with specific assets such as a piece of property, but not necessarily all the assets of an individual. Hence, a will, may still be necessary for all other assets that are not included in the trust.

(DISCLAIMER: material presented above is intended for informational purposes only. It is not intended as professional advice and should not be construed as such. Rey Tancinco is a partner at Tancinco Law Offices, a professional corporation with offices in San Francisco, Vallejo, and Manila. The law office website is at: tancinco.weareph.com/old.  Rey Tancinco can be contacted at (800) 999-9096 or (415) 397-0808 or via email at: attyrey@tancinco.com