Categories
Updates

USCIS Extends Temporary Protected Status Registration Period for Haitian Nationals

Share this:

This week, USCIS announced that they will extend the registration
period for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for all eligible Haitian
nationals. The initial period for TPS registration for Haitian
nationals was from January 21, 2010 through July 20, 2010. This period
has now been extended through January 18, 2011.

The Department of Homeland Security had previously published a notice
in January 2010 that announced TPS designation for Haiti for an 18
month period. This TPS designation only applies to Haitian nationals
who have continually resided in the U.S. since January 12, 2010 and not
to those who first entered the U.S. after that date.

Categories
Updates

USCIS Posts Notice Clarifying Three-Day Rule for Employee Eligibility Verification for New Hires

Share this:

USCIS recently reminded U.S. employers that they have just three days
after their new employees’ dates of hire to open a case in E-Verify. In
addition, this rule also applies to the completion of essential
portions of the I-9 form. Section 2 of the I-9 form should also be
completed within this time period. It should be noted, for
clarification, that the three-day period is, in fact, four total days,
as stated in a USCIS posting. For example, if an employee is hired on a
Monday, these deadlines must be reached by the Thursday of that same
week. The date of hire (in this case, Monday) is not counted in the
three-day period.

However, there has been some question as to whether ICE will interpret
the three-day rule in the same way that USCIS has stated. While ICE has
informed the public that they will honor the USCIS interpretation of
the three-day rule (the fourth day after a hire), ICE has not published
any official notice stating this understanding and has, instead, only
forwarded the USCIS posting to their field agents.

Categories
Immigration Round Table

Victim of Illegal Recruitment Charged with Misrepresentation

Share this:

Dear Atty. Lou,

On April 29, 
2009, my brother and I were granted
  H2B visas to work for a US company somewhere in Missouri. After receiving our approvals and our interview at the US Embassy, I purchased a non-refundable plane tickets. Unfortunately, we were called 
back to the embassy a few days prior to leaving. We were 
questioned by the fraud department at the US Embassy. We did not know
 anything, but apparently the US employer was not honest, and not
 treating workers properly.

We did not know why we were being questioned and were told by our
 agencies in the Philippines and USA that it was a minor problem with a
 contract. We were told that the US employer had just submitted 
the wrong contracts and their lawyers would be contacting the US 
Embassy to straighten out the problem. We were sent new contracts to
 present at the US Embassy fraud office in Manila. We then had our visas revoked and lost out on the chance to work in 
the USA, and lost on the money we had spent on the agencies, US 
Embassy fees and plane tickets. I think the US government took care of
 the Filipino workers that were already in the US and assigned them to legitimate employers. However, my brother and I were about to
 leave to the US, and were unfairly punished. Not only did I lose the visa, job, 
and money, but it appears that I was also accused of misrepresenting

When I went before the US Embassy at a later date with a job offer from a
 real employer I was denied as misrepresenting.
 I am a hard-working young lady only 22 years old now and I just want a chance to
 work for an honest hotel in the US. It is not our fault that the US employer was corrupt. Please help us to clear our names at the US Embassy and get the H2B visas. I know of an honest agency and employer now that would treat me properly. Thank you for
 your help.


MB

Dear MB,

I understand that you were not responsible for the unfortunate incident regarding the revocation of your visas. From the point of view of the US Embassy, they have no basis to determine whether you were aware of the misrepresentations that the US employer/petitioner made in regards to your application for H2B working visas.

Section 212 (a)(6)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act provides that an alien who by fraud or willfully misrepresenting a material fact, seeks to procure or has sought to procure or has procured a visa, other documentation or entry into the US or other benefit provided under that Act is inadmissible or barred from receiving a visa.

The information you have provided indicates that the eight owners of the US petitioner’s company were indicted on RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) related to labor racketeering, forced labor trafficking and other immigration violations.

Misrepresentation as a ground for the denial of the visa must be material and must be made willingly and knowingly. The consular officer may not assume that you are not a conspirator to the misrepresentation. The fact that they have seriously indicted the owners of the US company of federal law violations does not automatically mean that you are not a party to the illegal scheme. Hence, if you are found to have “misrepresented” a material fact to the US Embassy, it is your burden to overcome this finding by showing that you are innocent of this misrepresentation.

You may prove your innocence to the consular officer when you have a subsequent opportunity to apply for another working visa through a new employer. If this petition is approved and you re-apply for the working visa at the US Embassy, you should bring proof that you did not participate in the misrepresentation of your prior petitioner and that you are a victim of this unlawful recruitment. Your proof must be satisfactory which must include not just your written testimony but also objective evidence. If you are able to convince the consular officer that you were a victim of illegal recruitment and innocent of the misrepresentation charges, then you may be issued nonimmigrant visas as long as you prove other eligibility requirements. Good luck!

Atty. Lou

(Lourdes Santos Tancinco Esq .is a partner at the Tancinco Law Offices, a Professional Law Corp. Her office is located at One Hallidie Plaza, Suite 818, San Francisco CA 94102 and may be reached at 415 397 0808, email at law@tancinco.com. The content provided in this column is solely for informational purposes only and do not create a lawyer-client relationship. It should not be relied as legal advice. This column does not disclose any confidential or classified information acquired in her capacity as legal counsel. Consult with an attorney before deciding on a course of action. You may submit questions to law@tancinco.com

Categories
Updates

New Fee Schedule for U.S. Passports

Share this:

Fees for the U.S. Passport Book, the U.S. Passport Card and other
passport services will soon change. These fees, which are used to cover
the costs of producing passports and providing emergency services for
U.S. citizens overseas in crisis situations, will be amended starting
July 13, 2010. The new fee schedule will be:

U.S. Passport Book

Adults (First-Time Applicants): Passport Fee – $110; Acceptance Fee – $25
Adults (Renewal): Passport Fee – $110; Acceptance Fee – $0
Minors: Passport Fee – $80; Acceptance Fee – $25

U.S. Passport Card

Adults (First-Time Applicants): Passport Fee – $30; Acceptance Fee – $25
Adults (Renewal): Passport Fee – $30; Acceptance Fee – $0
Minors: Passport Fee – $15; Acceptance Fee – $25

Other Fees

Additional Visa Pages: $82
File Search Fee: $150
Expedited Processing: $60

Categories
Global Pinoy

Maintaining Green Card Status While Outside the US

Share this:

After more than 15 years of waiting for the priority date to become current, Luis was finally issued an immigrant visa with his spouse and minor children. Upon issuance of the visa, Luis traveled to the United States and stayed with his brother while he settles to find his own residence. In the meantime, Luis’ children are all in high school and want to return to Manila to finish their education.  After serious consideration, Luis allowed his spouse and his minor children to return to Manila. He initially stayed in the US to find work to support his family.

After several months Luis realized that it was not easy to find a job. In fact, he personally knows relatives and friends who lost their jobs and their homes. Frustrated with his situation and missing his family, he decided to obtain a “reentry permit” and departed for Manila to resume his employment and attend to their businesses

Luis has no plans to return to the US in the next two years. His spouse, Rhea, is very apprehensive about the status of their green cards if they do not return to the US.

Time Spent Outside the US

Entering the United States for a few weeks and returning to Manila thereafter gives rise to an issue of abandonment of residence. Some green card holders are under the impression that they will be able to maintain their lawful permanent resident status as long as they enter the US “at least once per year”. This may be too simplistic and may carry mistaken beliefs of what actually constitutes abandonment.

A returning resident is one who is returning to the United States from a temporary visit abroad and it the stay abroad was protracted, this is caused by reasons beyond the control of the individual and of which he is not responsible.

What constitutes a temporary stay abroad will actually depend on the circumstances of each case and not necessarily the length of stay spent outside of the United States. The periods of stay abroad are initially points of reference for the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) inspector at the airport but these inspectors are not prevented from inquiring further into the “intention of the green card holder” for purposes of abandonment.

Generally a lawful permanent resident returning to the United States after an absence of six months or less will be treated as if he or she never left the United States. This is the “less than six months” rule.

If returning to the US after six months but less than one year, the green card holder bears the burden of the presumption that he never intended to abandon his residence. He is deemed to be seeking admission.

If the stay abroad has been for more than one year, a re-entry permit or a returning resident immigrant visa is expected to be presented to the CBP inspector at the airport.

No Abandoning Acts

The fact that the “less than six months” rule is generally applies does not necessarily mean that a green card holder should return every six months and leave again to return before the sixth month. If this is the situation, while there will be no admission issues if the absence is less than six months, the pattern of entry and departure becomes a critical factor during the inspection process.  If the CBP inspector, through the database available to him, determines that more time is spent in Manila than in the US, then the question turns into identifying his principal place of abode to validate whether the individual is maintaining his US residency.

Most abandonment findings are a result of green card holder’s committing the “abandoning acts.” Subjective intent to maintain green card status must be supported by objective evidence such as the (1) purpose of trip outside the US; (2) nature of the employment whether it is temporary or indefinite; (3) filing of US taxes as a resident; (4) ties in the US to include house, bank accounts, credit cards state identification card or driver’s license; (5) residence of immediate family members.

If an individual has a protracted stay outside the US and still wants to maintain his green card status, the burden is on him to show that his principal place of abode and his unrelinquished residence is in the US. A re-entry permit may be applied from the USCIS. Preparing documents to prove ties in the US and carrying them during their return to the US is likewise advisable.

Should there be a finding of abandonment at the airport, the CBP inspector may issue a Notice to Appear and put the individual into removal proceedings before an immigration judge. Or in the alternative this individual may be asked by the CBP inspector to sign a Form I-407 abandonment of permanent residency status. If there is no intention to abandon, the individual should not sign this 407 form.

Considering the difficulty of obtaining green cards or US resident status, those who are now afforded the opportunity to live and work in the US should maintain their status as long as possible. While circumstances differ for each individual case, it is important to realize that nothing is permanent in character including the green card. It is either you “use it or lose it.”

(Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at (02)887 7177)

Categories
Updates

New H-2A Job Registry: Online Tool Will Help the Public Search Active Agricultural Jobs

Share this:

Starting July 8, U.S. workers and organizations that represent
farmworkers will have a new way to learn about temporary agricultural
positions accepted by the Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC)
through a single online location. The new H-2A Job Registry will
display all active agricultural jobs until half the period of
employment has passed; some positions for certified agricultural jobs
will remain archived for up to 5 years.

The new web tool will provide a single, easily searchable point of
entry for the public to find information about agricultural jobs filed
under the H-2A visa program. The new tool was developed to fully comply
with new H-2A regulations (implemented in March 2010) and is integrated
into the OFLC’s iCERT Visa Portal System, available online at
http://icert.doleta.gov.