Categories
Updates

Arizona Passes Highly Restrictive Immigration Enforcement Bill

Share this:

This Tuesday, Arizona passed a new, highly restrictive immigration
enforcement bill. The new law, SB 1070, has made the lack of correct
immigration paperwork a misdemeanor in the state. It also directs
police officers to determine a person’s immigration status if they
reasonably suspect the person is an illegal immigrant.

SB 1070 passed 35 to 21 in the State House of Representatives, but has
nevertheless been the cause of much division throughout the state.
Police associations were torn about the bill; police unions backed it,
but the state police chief’s association opposed it and believed it
could harm levels of trust the police have with immigrant communities
in the state. Immigration groups, as expected, were horrified by the
passing of the bill, with many stating it, in effect, mandates racial
profiling and creates a police state.

Categories
Global Pinoy

Unlawful Voting Prevents Naturalization of Non Citizen

Share this:

Dear Atty. Lou,

I have a problem in regards to my husband’s situation. We are both residing in the East Coast. I am a US citizen now and my husband is still a permanent resident or a green card holder. He made a major mistake by voting in one of the local elections. He was not supposed to vote because he is not a citizen yet.

He now wants to become a US citizen but his lawyer said that he could no longer become one because his name will show that he voted and will be subject to deportation. My question to you is if there is any possibility that he will be able to apply for citizenship and he will not be caught that he voted. If he applies for citizenship, will he really be deported?

I wrote a letter to the Board of Elections where he registered to vote asking them if he can clear his name from the voters’ list because he did not know that he cannot vote just yet. I did not get a response since I sent the letter one year ago. Please help!

ND

Dear ND,

Generally, unlawful voting by a US citizen is a ground for inadmissibility and for removal/deportation. This particular provision of the law was put in place in 1996 by the enactment of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act. The prohibition refers to voting after September 1996.

The provision against unlawful voting refers to any federal, state or local elections. There is no express requirement that the non citizen actually knew of the violation of the voting requirement. However, the Department of State issued guidance, stating that the non citizen may not be held inadmissible if the alien demonstrates to the satisfaction of the consular officer that he did not “knowingly vote in violation of the rule.”

Another exception to the unlawful voting is that if the non citizen resided in the US before age 16, each parent was a US citizen and the non citizen reasonable believed he was a US citizen.

There are also limited municipalities in states such as those municipalities in Maryland and Massachusetts that actually allows non citizen to vote.

In the case of your husband, you mentioned that he voted in a local election. You may want to determine whether the municipality where he voted allows non citizens to vote so he will not be guilty of unlawful voting. Also, you did not mention when your husband received his green card status. If he was living in the US before age 16 and each of his parent are US citizens, he must show proof that he “reasonably believed” that he was a US citizen.

If none of the above exceptions apply to him and he engaged in unlawful voting, then he will risk being put in removal proceedings if he tries to apply for his citizenship. He may also be potentially liable for a criminal offense in addition to his removal charges before the immigration court.

I hope this information is helpful.

Atty. Lou

(Lourdes Santos Tancinco Esq .is a partner at the Tancinco Law Offices, a Professional Law Corp. Her office is located at One Hallidie Plaza, Suite 818, San Francisco CA 94102 and may be reached at 415 397 0808, email at law@tancinco.com. The content provided in this column is solely for informational purposes only and do not create a lawyer-client relationship. It should not be relied as legal advice. This column does not disclose any confidential or classified information acquired in her capacity as legal counsel. Consult with an attorney before deciding on a course of action. You may submit questions to law@tancinco.com)

Categories
Global Pinoy

New Generation Must Learn from WWII Veterans

Share this:

Edgardo comes from a Filipino family with military background. Most of his relatives served in the military forces of the United States either in the air force or in the navy.  He applied to join the US Navy in 1989 through the Philippine Enlistment Program at Subic Bay. When he was accepted, he felt that the door of opportunity opened for him and immediately left the Philippines in 1990 to go to the Recruit Training Center in San Diego.

It did not take long for Edgardo to be in active duty. In 1991, he was deployed to the Persian Gulf War. He returned safe after a few months and was assigned to different US bases until March 2003. During the Bush administration, Edgardo was deployed in Iraq. His war experience in Iraq was very challenging. He witnessed many of his colleagues suffered the atrocities of war and there were casualties in his unit. Edgardo survived and returned to San Diego after six months to be reunited with his spouse and child.

During Edgardo’s deployment in the Persian Gulf and Iraq, he was not in possession of a green card. All he had was his US military identification card. Realizing that there were a significant number of noncitizens serving the US military, the rules on citizenship were amended by then President Bush to give priority to members of the military.

Edgardo finally applied for US citizenship without first becoming a green card holder. He was recently naturalized to become a US citizen and was again deployed abroad. This time he is fighting the war in Afghanistan.

Filipinos As Second Largest Group

According to a study conducted by the Migration Policy Institute, there are about 87,000 immigrants from the Philippines who have served in the armed forces of the United States. The study shows that about 12,000 Filipino immigrants were in active duty in 2008; and, that there are about 75,000 veterans of the US Armed Forces. The Filipinos were determined to be the second largest group among the 650,000 foreign born veterans next to the Mexican nationals.

The history of the enlistment of Filipinos to the US military goes back to 1901 when more than 500 Filipinos registered to be part of the US Navy. Recruitment of Filipino men during World War I and II increased their numbers.

From 1947 to 1989, the US Philippine Military Bases Agreement included a provision allowing for the enlistment of Filipinos through the US Navy Philippine Enlistment Program. Thousands of Filipinos were able to migrate as US soldiers and most of the second and third generation Filipino-Americans are related to someone who was a veteran. There are currently still about 25,000 Filipino immigrants in active military service since 2001.

Naturalization of Non Citizens in the Military

Section 329 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides an opportunity for naturalization to those who have served in the US Armed Forces.  Unlike veterans of other US wars, the Filipino World War II veterans were not allowed to be naturalized until 1990.

Generally, enlistment in the US military is limited to US nationals and green card holders. The exception is if the government determines that enlistment of non-citizens or non-green cardholders is vital to the national interest or is based on a treaty like the US-RP Military Bases Agreement.

Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest (MAVNI)

On February 2, 2009 the US Army implemented a Department of Defense enlistment pilot program called the Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest (MAVNI).

Under MAVNI, non green card holders or non citizens may enlist if they are legally present in the United States in E,F,H,I,J,K,L,M,O,P,Q,R,S,T,TC,TD,TN, U or V status, or are in the US as refugee or asylee.

Persons who enlist under MAVNI can obtain US citizenship without first applying for green card.

Learning from WWII Veterans

There are now varying incentives for immigrants to enlist in the US Army. Joining the US military now for immigrants may be by choice. But during World War II, most of the Filipino men were conscripted to the US military by order of then President Roosevelt. The Filipino World War II veterans remained loyal soldiers courageously fighting and sacrificing in the name of freedom and democracy. Unfortunately, their sacrifices and heroic deed were left unacknowledged for a long time and there are still thousands of war veterans who are denied their just recognition. The new generation of Filipino war veterans should learn from the experience of World War II veterans and advocate for better treatment by the US government based on what they justly deserve. Remember Bataan.

(Tancinco may be reached at law@tancinco.com or at 887 7177)

Categories
Updates

USCIS Continues to Accept FY 2011 H-1B Petitions

Share this:

USCIS announced earlier this week that it will continue to accept
petitions for H-1B visas that are subject to the Fiscal Year 2011 H-1B
Annual Cap. USCIS will accept enough petitions to ensure it is able to
reach the 65,000 general H-1B cap and the 20,000 cap reserved for
individuals with U.S. master’s degrees or higher.

As of this
week, USCIS has received roughly 13,500 petitions counting toward the
general cap and about 5,600 petitions for individuals with U.S.
master’s degrees or above.

Please note that for cases that were filed during the first five-day
window of this year’s filing period (April 1-7), the 15-day premium
processing period began on April 7, 2010. The premium processing period
for cases filed after that date will begin on the date that the
petitions is received at the correct USCIS Service Center for
processing.

Categories
Updates

A New USCIS Naturalization Video Offers Detailed Information for Immigrants

Share this:

USCIS has developed a new informational video to share information
about the naturalization process. This video, called “The USCIS
Naturalization Interview and Test,” is 16 minutes long and offers an
overview of the entire naturalization process, including eligibility
requirements, how to apply for naturalization, steps to achieve
naturalization, an overview of the naturalization interview, details
about the English tests and details about the civics test. In addition,
the video provides two simulated interviews to give you examples of
what your interview may be like.

The video is an exceptional reference tool for those seeking an
overview of the naturalization process. It is available online at the
following URL: http://bit.ly/cwq71a

Categories
SideBar

Can I File For Bankruptcy And Keep My Home?

Share this:

A major concern for homeowners who are contemplating the filing of a bankruptcy petition is the question of whether or not they can keep their home in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing.

Debtors who consider the filing of a bankruptcy petition do so as they can no longer afford to continue paying all their debts. The major components of a typical debtor’s obligation would consist of the home mortgage, the car loan and the credit card bills.  In the past, the debtor may have been able to afford the monthly carrying cost of these obligations. However, with the economic downturn, many debtors have lost their jobs, suffered reduction in working hours, or, just have been unable to pay off their credit card balances monthly such that the balances have steadily increased and are now at levels that are unaffordable.

In many cases that I have encountered with financially troubled clients, the typical homeowner owns a home with has a negative or zero equity. The client would also have a car loan which is still unpaid; and, have credit card bills in the 5 or 6-figure range which has kept on increasing monthly due to interest and penalties accruing.  In these cases, the debtor may be able to afford paying for one or two of these debts (the home mortgage and the car loan, for example) but would not have enough earnings to be able to afford paying for the third obligation (credit card debts, for example).  Would the filing of a chapter 7 bankruptcy petition be a solution to this debtor’s problem?  

Many debtors are hesitant to consider bankruptcy as an alternative due to the concern that they will loose their home in a bankruptcy filing. This is not so. In a bankruptcy filing, the homeowner would have the option to keep the home. Hence, in a Chapter 7 filing as long as the homeowner has no equity (or the equity in the house is exempt) and the homeowner continues to keep making the monthly mortgage payments, the homeowner does not have to loose the home. In bankruptcy court, the homeowner can “affirm” the home loan obligation; and, as long he continues to make the monthly mortgage payments, the homeowner gets to keep the home.    

This is also the same with a debtor’s cars. Almost all of us need a vehicle to get to and from work. If a debtor decides to keep the car, he/she may likewise do so in a bankruptcy filing. Same as the home loan, the debtor may also “affirm” the car loan and continue making monthly payments and keep the car.

The credit card obligations, on the other hand, are a different matter. Debtor normally would not want to “affirm” these credit card obligations. Financially troubled debtors would normally want these credit card bills wiped out. Credit card obligations being an unsecured obligation, the debtor can have these debts discharged in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing. In fact, in the many clients I have encountered, most of them would have immediate financial relief as they are now able to continue paying their home mortgage and car loan obligations without the additional burden of also paying their credit card bills.  

Thus, a bankruptcy petition should be considered as a viable option for some homeowners who want to keep their homes.  A Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition gives them the flexibility to wipe out their unsecured obligations but still gives them the option to keep their homes.
 
(DISCLAIMER: material presented above is intended for informational purposes only. It is not intended as professional advice and should not be construed as such. Rey Tancinco is a partner at Tancinco Law Offices, a professional corporation with offices in San Francisco, Vallejo, and Manila. The law office website is at: tancinco.weareph.com/old.  Rey Tancinco can be contacted at (800) 999-9096 or (415) 397-0808 or via email at: attyrey@tancinco.com
 

Categories
Updates

USCIS Updates Two Adoption – Related Immigration Forms

Share this:

Earlier this week, USCIS announced that it had published new versions
of two immigration forms: Form I-600, the Petition to Classify Orphan
as an Immediate Relative and Form I-600A, the Application for Advance
Processing of Orphan Petition. The new date at the bottom of both of
these forms is 12/30/09; after 60 days, previous versions of the forms
will not be accepted.

From April 1, 2010 to June 2, 2010, USCIS will continue to accept
previous forms. However, after June 2, 2010, USCIS will only accept the
current versions of the forms. Petitions using older forms will be
rejected by USCIS. The rejected form, supporting evidence and filing
fees will be returned to the petitioner, along with a copy of the
current version of the form.

U.S. residents wishing to adopt a child from an international location
should continue to submit Forms I-600 and I-600A, along with all
supporting documentation and filing fees to the USCIS Dallas Lockbox
for initial processing.

U.S. residents living abroad may also submit their forms and
documentation to the USCIS Dallas Lockbox. Alternatively, they may file
their Form I-600A at the overseas USCIS office that has jurisdiction
over their overseas location of residence. They may file their Form
I-600 at the overseas U.S. Embassy, consulate or office with
jurisdiction to accept the petition; however, they must already have an
approved and valid Form I-600A and must be physically present at the
time of filing in the country of the adoptive child.